{"id":7795,"date":"2008-07-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008"},"modified":"2017-04-21T23:26:11","modified_gmt":"2017-04-21T17:56:11","slug":"ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n
in 'mm HIGH C0831' ca\" mnmrmm, \nnmnzzs mm mm 23\" DAY aa .::rr.15.5.o3, vmz\nmm-1-:.  x A =    \n\nTHIS  ivssfiwic\u00e9n'  cm FOR mama\nmums  s 'm:x*v,VVv' mm cotmr mssan '1'HE\n\nWEA.'L.=\u00a7J 9'5:-'::.?i.:'t*.\u00a3';i.i.fV:vx1 by a pets-:>n who is is; xrmxket\n\n'\"-\u00abiE1;';1\u00a73?.=\u00a7:on\u00a2a:'yV__A&:within the notified men of that\n ., ' V . _ H  xreapondani: Agricul tuxal Pzoduca\n Committee {'APM('.\" in shcaxt),\n\n \u00ab:..'Vf\u00a3e%'V:1wanthpur. Bangalare, whoae action in\n\ntiec1:\u20ac.m'.ng the ranawaj. of 1:119 Trading Licensa\n\n .  \n<\/pre>\n
5-noun: 5 u_nn.:nu.:nI\\nu_nn nan manna;-5-n. I \u00a2…znu…::u_an 11:11.11: :45 nu-54;;<\/p>\n
challanged by the petitioner in an <\/p>\n
under Eectimz 74 of the Act, be2o,\u00ab;-;\u20ac~}
\nraapsndent Bixector of
\nNa.2Ei’2CtG5 but the appeai’1\u00abAVa\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7af’a*i$
\ndiamiaaed in tum\u00bb   <\/p>\n
16 . 5 . 2868 czapy pgzq-ducgad.  42:3′ ‘\u00bb_._J!n.::11’ei:4\u00a3LtV,A1faa’:-ii, the<\/p>\n
yr-went Writ Pm;it; i\u00ab:;;1A 35.23:.’ quashing of
\nboth the arszi\ufb01ga  \ufb02igf\u00e9\ufb01tion to the<\/p>\n
Iviarkat  ‘t.\u00a7g._t;_:\u00a7a;1aw  .i:i.can3a ate”<\/p>\n
 H\u00a7\u00a5c\u00a2\u00a7;Lc;\u20ac.4\u00a7ta\u00a7”\u00ab~.:i,aaun\u00a7i’ to the zeapcndanta.<\/p>\n
 ‘.5 2:1 8- . AI}-.,  .\n<\/p>\n
The first V ;zta;ais4’p\u00ab:i:~x:ciV\u00a7.:i:;.V;-:fjtV:V. \u00a7;\u00a7”‘4’.*5epra3ante<i by the
\nHigh Gen;-mt LA V\ufb01iaader. The alwand
\n   .. """ 'ia zaspreaentard by Sri
\n zraapondant mason is by<\/p>\n
market committee<\/p>\n
tfile\ufb02 .'$1__f&temant at csbjections.<\/p>\n
:4; bI.IaLA|..dh. . can.-. –\n<\/p>\n
g-,.    I have heard Sxnt. Shalini Eatil,
\n V. ‘–._l&’&iVZi.\u00a7. \u00e9d counsel \u00abapps:-aring for the petitionaxr,<\/p>\n
‘Agni \ufb01ximregawda, learned czzmns-al for the APMC,<\/p>\n
II\\1\\nI\\ I gnu : I_n|.II_tII_I|n|.In.:|l -A uuaAn – -4-. . I..J|\u00a2I..J\u00a2I..1n nun…-<\/p>\n
Learned High Court Government Pleader.ntf\ufb01or<\/p>\n
is a formal party and Sri at Erakash;\u00b0learned
\ncounsel appearing for the \u00a7”[responeent}:F\n<\/p>\n
5. With the consent of \ufb02theh3counsei
\nappearing for the tartiegg ghg matter is taken
\nup for disposal. “W A L 9v >A\n<\/p>\n
6. Taa\ufb01g5_ the tiearneah*eoonsel appearing<\/p>\n
for thee I-\u00a3{t_a;:ke215.’  as well as the<\/p>\n
learned eg\ufb01nsel for the 3′ respondent lessor,
\nhave tried to defend the orders passed by the<\/p>\n
Market Com\ufb01titee and the Appellate Authority’s<\/p>\n
\u00b0 order passed b\u00a7 the Director, I find that the<\/p>\n
kIX\u00a2raeraasqr:\u00a2r from a basic defect namely that<\/p>\n
the market committee which has a right to<\/p>\n
h”xregniate the trade in the market yard at
\nh,Yeshwanthpur, cannot at the same time totally<\/p>\n
_\ufb01eny a right to trade in the market yand by<\/p>\n
refusing to grant or renew a license, as that<\/p>\n
could amount to denial of a right to trade<\/p>\n
Va,<\/p>\n
dent Pppellate AutheritQ”wLiChn”<\/p>\n
#*f\\\u00a79im’W| amen: m\ufb01xamnenuresmn ndsntma-ca mmeamm m…….. ……….-\ufb02,…,–_ _<\/p>\n
decline renewal \u00abof a trading license jwithin<\/p>\n
the nerket area. I am of the vieWathat_the_’<\/p>\n
objection raised by the lessor for renewal ie<\/p>\n
an irrelevant consideration},in the matter cf’.<\/p>\n
renewal of a trading lieense in favour of a
\nmarket funetionargf by? then Qarket i\ufb01enmittee.
\nWhilw it ieV open _te ithe'”35hjreependent to
\nindependentlfeeorh opt its rights and remedies
\nas aqainst\ufb01 the ‘petitioner: the proceeding” of
\nthe {na\u00a7ke\u00a3;%g\u00a7\ufb01m:\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7eeii$V the context of a
\nrenewal of a,tredihd licence cannot be used as<\/p>\n
a devise te come in the way of the petitioner<\/p>\n
i”earrying on its fundamental right of trade or<\/p>\n
rvthe Vnarket, committee taking note of such<\/p>\n
objection to deny renewal of license which can<\/p>\n
d’aifect7the fundamental right of the petitioner<\/p>\n
d,to_Carry on trade of her choice.<\/p>\n
d. One another reason as to why the
\nimpugned orders require to be quashed is that<\/p>\n
the petitioner if independently enjoys any<\/p>\n
g\ufb01\/\/WW<\/p>\n
    f’!\u00a7\u00a7I\u00a7? fig %’\u00a7.\u00a7Qq\u00a7\ufb02’!\ufb02\u00a7\u00e9”& ij\ufb01\ufb02m \ufb01\ufb02zenw mew E\u00e9wavasanaznsi. Mm xcsnaasa-= ……… mm.” .._<\/p>\n
protection under any existing rents \u00a2@\ufb01\ufb01;\u00a21<\/p>\n
iaws operating in the area, an_or\u00a7erE\u00a7y_rne_’<\/p>\n
market committee to ioenyrj renewals- van<\/p>\n
indirectiy deprive a tenant of the”\u00a7roteotion\u00b0;<\/p>\n
extended to the tenant \ufb01h\u00e9@F \ufb01ne ren\ufb01scontroi
\nprovisions. The fma\ufb01tet ioo\ufb01mittee ioeing a
\npubiic authority snonid not aot is a manner so
\nas to ae:e\u00e9$\u00a7 ta. \u20acos\u00a7eet iofw:any protective<\/p>\n
enactmen\ufb01.5e<\/p>\n
9. It is for tnesekreasons the impugned
\norders Annesqres–J 45\u00a2 N are quashed by issue
\nof a writx of [oertiorari and the market
\n  to consider the<\/p>\n
application k\u00a7orf,renewai independent of the<\/p>\n
s,objeetions raised by the E” respondent and to
\n“oass orders on the same within two weeks from<\/p>\n
W the date of receipt of a copy of this order.<\/p>\n
“* Rule issued and made absolute.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/–\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
W\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01gs,’ \u00a7._\u00e9”&$ai\u00abEa$P:a axvm ks-‘ammo: M nO–. n-1-11r1.–<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar in ‘mm HIGH C0831′ ca” mnmrmm, nmnzzs mm mm 23″ DAY aa .::rr.15.5.o3, vmz mm-1-:. x A = THIS ivssfiwic\u00e9n’ cm FOR mama mums s ‘m:x*v,VVv’ mm cotmr mssan ‘1’HE WEA.’L.=\u00a7J 9’5:-‘::.?i.:’t*.\u00a3’;i.i.fV:vx1 by a pets-:>n who […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce ... on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce ... on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-21T17:56:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-21T17:56:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":730,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce ... on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-21T17:56:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce ... on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce ... on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-21T17:56:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-21T17:56:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008"},"wordCount":730,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008","name":"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce ... on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-21T17:56:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-madeena-traders-vs-director-of-agricultural-produce-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Madeena Traders vs Director Of Agricultural Produce … on 28 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}