{"id":78360,"date":"2009-02-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009"},"modified":"2014-02-17T09:48:48","modified_gmt":"2014-02-17T04:18:48","slug":"sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n
WW W  WW muum W mmmmm %~\u00a3\u00a5\ufb01\u00a5\u00b0\u00a7 mum W mmwmm MW?-% cu\n\nmnmzmacsamr GFKARB.?ATAI\u00a3& A?3;wGaz\u00a2\u00a2km%%\n\nmama arms :2?-m' 2518 9.4? 0FpEmUAR3\u00a72m;9 5':    \n\nBEFCERE\n\n \n\n1 SR! K crmwvaaagju      \nAGEE ABc::m\":*__4& &'Ea1\u00a2f$  \n\n2 K    \nAGEI}.a\u00a7E$3U*E7;5C' Y\ufb01suza  \n\n3 K        \n\nAeEm'a_3\u00ab:3rLr':*.\n\n~  %g;;EV;2%g_13;.wLrr 49 YEARS\n\n L 5  \n\nAGEI} ABGLVI' 30 YEARS\n\nL ~  ' %s.Rs crmmmzx 0?\n\n 'mm V rmzsmzaxapr Arm\n ALL ARE Rssmma AT\n\n$33.13}, 91'?' MARI\n\n RA EKIEESIGN\n\nwmacm GARDEK\n\nBazvsamma  mimmsm\n\n{By 313'. S V BEAT, AEIQCATE}\n\n\n\n,vV:.L\\5\"'%!lW|k'%*2tI1\"W40-\u00a3\u00a3!\"\"W!fIr4f#\"\"$ EW wwm an WWW\n\nInwluvuunn-3\n\nI \"I?-E:  E SEXY\nCC}-OPER\u00a3'iITVE BAKHK LTE,\nC \nB.A}i\"G!&LRm-569 \ufb01i\ufb01\nREPR'ES\u00bb%\"TED BY ITS\nGENE-RALE!I\u20ac':.N\ufb02GER\n\n2 *I'mAss.m*A1~zTREGzsTRAECrF \ncaammm  '  [_ \nBAHGALWE sI.IB~B1vii&z:3aI     \nBANGALmE   1  = \n\n3 THE JC}HTT;RE[;':ifI3TI?&H%3F   \nf.'.PE1?e'.2'=.'3FB__.4'i7:i._  .-\u00e9rvm\nARBI'FRATmi3I'.\u00a3EEI.\u00a2    \n\n L YES Famgmrxm L'm.,\nBwGA1;cs;2z;&       ...RE:sm1szr.:zm':~s.\n\n{By 'Sri A 2v*;5:3r\u00a7rs:3}u~\u00a7&aNA Ram 35 an B :5;\nmqs.\u00bbmra.a;?,ar;,xmATE3 miss: 9;\nSIZE 1;: HAN%i'&I\u00a7'i'rIA.\u00a7?AYAPPA\u00a7 HQGF' mm 22 a 23;\n\n % kikk'%?z-agwm-*mm imam mvxcms ma mm 22?\n\n9? TI-$2; zs\ufb01r\ufb01mfwa\ufb01mz ca? B\u00a7DIA mama as QUASH\nTHE ~aRDE;::\u00a2: PA$$EE? BY TI-m R3 DT.5.5.200\u00e9\n\n   'cozW'm1m;3\u00ab~m mvzsma xwmzgms on Tim gm\n  '}'}Eg_ KARHATAQKA AELLATIE TREUKAL\n[*k%%%gn*\u00a3*%\u00a29.A.4.2:sar7 vmvz 2%}\u00a5ZhIEXURES~F' RED :3 as Tm:\n%   Erma Paocsssmss IS A mm as-mrrro\n\nPR.QCE'EE}.'\u00a7GS ARE A RULLYIY A\ufb01\ufb01 IEERECT THE\n\n ?>-_ 'RE:3mRx3mITs Tm PM 'Item cosm me' Tim\n ~._FR't'.')CEEi3IRGrS TI*R%GHQ\u00a5}'I\" AHD GEAR'? SUCH\n   ,7D'I'i\"ER AND  E RELEF8 AS ARE MST.\n\nTi-I13 PE'I'I'\u00a7'\u00a7\u20ac.'.'3\u00a7 S\ufb02li\ufb02\ufb01 Q25!' FGR P%L\ufb02e'II\u00a7\ufb01RY\nEEAREIG -- 'B' G  '\ufb01'\ufb02S EAY, 'Fi\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01?' MADE\nTHE F'OLLQW\ufb01G;\n\n\n\n REBWHE Vuw\ufb02wmi Mr\" mamnmm mmm 1-..wWa\" W- mmmmm MBQM M\n\n2m  \n\nQQBER\n\nA Writ: Fatima by \u00a7%s_ $1523. Whcs am  _ \nx\ufb01xmndeum in a  \n\nRmpendait-Joirxt Rg\ufb01aar g;>f_ \n\nArbitratiann Cell, Bama1are:\"'v%%4zrmV\ufb01g3_1% \n\nragamenizatixw cf   who\n\n2.   92' am V\n   legality :3? the artim*\n\ndam 5;\u00a7.2s:;r:a5pag\u00a7[gd%y%'m%:rye Joint Rwnwu-ax af Co-\n\nas-'-.\n\napmatiw    in JRII)}I}\"BF['3'732[\ufb024-G5\n\n 'F' in the writ peti\u00e9on) and\n\n  M 'gm dated 9.4.2097 pmwi in Rwisien\n\n \n\n   an tk Eve of the Karnataka\n\n at Bmmom. M Rasriaien Petitnlon\nA 1 '   rim pcrmaat magnum came m be aimmmx.\n   oftm ordw 'm proeluoed as i\u00a7.I  'G' to thia\n\n:3. The1aga1g'sundasaughttab\u00a2urged\u00a3x:&1is\nwrit pe\ufb01\ufb01nn umm &X\"k:5 }:8 22'? of the Comt\ufb01zution of\n\n\n\n$ww\n\nVa t\u00ab\"\"nI:'mta'-\"m an\n\nIndia ea behalf ezf tm patitionm-3 and as\u00bb aubmitted \n\nSri S '.1' 311431, 1earz'n-ed Cstaunsel ?m tlmi the \n\npreeech\"g' befcxre 'tI'1\ufb01JOi1'1'f: Regswar \u00a7::;';V gt   u  \n\nrasaalution of the diwute umier  \n\nKamatalea Co-opera\ufb01im Scaei\u00a2'E:ie:\u00e9_'\u00a3!s;j:t 1$?a:a :a  \n\nthe eye sf law as whm1  \ntlzm pcmicners' fathm   and\ntlm prcnzeeding be;r;ga 1\u00a7u:;ii;Q;n% law, no\n\ufb01xrthar ord~r:::ra,:     of; mudiify the\ndaacrip\ufb01:n1_.  \ufb02ue pmmaings\nEm in the ieye\ufb01f the Reg-may and\n\ntm Trib1z;1gu\"\u00a7.._}1gmeV; '  an ermir in m  '\n\n  the fimt rmpondent-Eazzk to\n\n  \ufb01lad mam Ordcr 22 Rule 4 1:9\n   ~Bank*ht:: bring' anrwardtmmusmt\nC,,,,.4._'p-p\ufb01\ufb01smrs'  as m: hairs in pxaoe 92' the awn\" 1\n\n:4-.Af:a'w*'basi::fa:cm1ead?mtct}mab0ve\n\n  \"patina am: in ma samnd mum nfiitigatimtn befam this\n\nCmzrt are that the \ufb01rat 2-wpondmzt-Bank had mt\n\nmtaina.m\u00a7\u00a3nt\ufb01at1wfathm'ufthepe$:|hr1em. Cartam\n\n\n\n'\"\\U>'\u00a2\u00bb' w~m.wmmem \u00a3!kWE'& mwwarw wt\" mmmwwwo\ufb01\ufb01m warm LUUW aw rmwwymm Ewim\ufb01 W\n\nremymeztt of the ban amount. it was d:\u00a3.1e_  \n\n t 9f the berrowu\u00e9     \n\nraised a d\ufb01putae and the mattm   \nArbitramr. Tim claim petitizm'   gafad V%\n\nhad rauibad in an awmfd. It   was\naeught. is he axecutadg   havhzg\nrw.&ed the  of ma an\nappcal 't)e:ef:31::e.~~'   Tribunal and\n   2-aspandent. \nappeal   of the erdsr dmzea\n\n1e.5.19-99  Na.12Qf19'98 (Copy\n\njg; tn the ma-. mama) and the\n\n h.ag:i  mmaaa 25: the 91-Wm mum-iv.y\n\n    the ex-pa1'Be award rm\u00bb homzm 3. ma\n    \u00a35 deci\u00e9a the mattm a\ufb01mh.\n\nV' 1'31' The prw\ufb01nt Writ; Pe\ufb01\ufb01nmmn qzzwtimsmd, that\n\n k %% m\u00a2 m w_p.sa.ca59?12m2(cs-RES) \ufb01led befuzam tlxis\n\"cam-:, wmch mm as be diamssm: by arder dated\n\n29.2.2062 (mm? praduamd at \ufb01I}I  'D' is the: 'Writ\n This Caurt  %.a absmwread; that it was\n\nt\/'\n\n\n\nwnwwuwxmt \"9.wf5\"\u00a7 \ufb02u-m\"\"\u20acM\"*MM1m'\"*t1:EAF'\"\\7.l9\u00a3'\u20acv.lI9\"\u20acz i\ufb01\"i\u00a7$V3lF'l\u00a3 MM\n\nspam ta the Writ Pa  ta ralm a\ufb02 \nmm' by the swim mm' W  \normma aumorigv and $1 'chm 'w=ak e:M:\u00a7f  T  \n%.dj_,,g the mawgnmk\ufb01imy\ufb01 gm \n\nimtimma mam: me  j J\nbona\ufb01cie nzistakc am' the\n\nan :11    am an\na;apIim41:.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:i'VV  V   ' ~V\u00a7i_fstA '._.\u00a7E\u00a3\u00a7\ufb01andcn_t-Bank unstim-\nOrder    9 3f mar: ax\ufb01 Smtion 5\nof tha   ajkswed w the: arhitzmc-r\n\n    13.3.2001.\n\n*2'; 'V  in the or@3.a' ' I  ,\n\n   pr;-;a\u00a2e 'x 1\u00a7; ff\u00e9zit Petitimzers as is tizxaeir trait, wales up a\n\nA x %  an\u00e9 rm: presaz-M Ravisixm Pemn am.\n    hefam :21: Kamatalaa Amnam '\u00a7'r\u00a3bu.naI\nk A    that the ertiar as gamed witiwut awarding a\n\nproper' oppamniity m \ufb01xa pt-mam: petitimnnrs 129 $3 their\nobjerzrtioztm et;c., Em 'had in law. 31%  t \ufb01unzi\n\n\nV\n\n\n\nawwnewmamwmm aruwlm MWMWE WW \ufb01\ufb01\ufb02w\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb02uw WW3\"     \ufb02ag\n\nfavour with the Appellate Autim\ufb01tgr in mm emf \n\nmdm' dated 2?.8.2\ufb02(33 paased in \n\nHc.97j2002 (Copy pmduwd at    u \" ~ \n\nPetition; and the arxtier allcrwing the \n\nArkaiuatnr was set aa\ufb01e     \n\nto the cxrigiml autkzzritf to  \nfar brirl\ufb01ng the lgal  Tltzsc dccmed\nVjiriahzlaiah   as to\nthe   pmcn ia ab-\nizzitio-void.   Lixppurtlanity of being\nlmzd tgbozh %\/       \n\n&~ .. x  '\ufb01nch h\ufb01mry, th\ufb01 app\ufb01catian\n\n   1.\u00a31;'__ \"\" Err nrdmn cm 5,5.% and the\n\n to be ailowed as pear the order at\n\ni   'F urdar yet agahzt was qtws\ufb01szwd before\n'   But Witkmut sueawa on this aexasion as\nK \u00ab  dismiasad the Rev\u00e9aian P'e1*?J\ufb01o:1 as par its\n  datad 9.4.290? {Capy pmaums. at Amzre 'G' to\n  W1-3': Hetitinn} and it is quamonsng them orders of\n\nthus ori\ufb01mal autlmxity azxd the Tribunal vac Anmures\n'F' & 'Cr' rapectively, the pz-want writ petitian.\n\n\/\"\n\nx\n\nV\n\n\n\n'W 'QM\n\nas 'w\"w\n\ng. sum\ufb01mm of $1 3 V Bhat, \na  on behalfnf\ufb01w pea-_:mm is that   % \nimmma againm a ma. pm-mu; Ea:\n\n \n\nwhich ia a mzllity in Law,  .b\u00a7\n\nOrder 22 Rule 4, Gmdcr 221%  [ Swmn 5\nar the Limitmrzn 4%.-:'.:t__is anf\"z'1.:;c1a3maxt-\nBankwas. aim?)-5;'   mntizrrue the\n33191'!   whiz had already\ndied being\"   am mmdm, it is\n\n-V  the prez-mm ar\u00e9tzxa 9f the\n m\ufb01 as amhe mm are: aqua\ufb01y\n\n 1 k%m\".k%tI: 3 saw me aabmmm that deciavm a\nx \u00ab  cfthfm mmmmmgh an Lmhsch was \ufb01lm'; in\n  _ if1'w%gar'n of appslieatim, mm been allmm\ufb01 witkwut\n ,vir*t11a11ypriB\n\nt\u00a3s:pe't:\u00a3tfaoz1.ersr\u00a5ghtt:ad\u00a2fmd the  whbh wag\n@1'1ty of the  I\u00a7 wi\ufb01ch had been he-augktt\n\n\n\namrmawwwrwwrawwm uwwaw uwwma we\" mxnnmam\ufb01\ufb02 nmm LUUW U?\" K&\ufb01W\ufb01'\u00a5\"5M(& M\ufb01\ufb01gwi C\ufb01\n\nagmt the dead pemsn, '\ufb01mrefcra, aka the \n\nbadinlaw.\n\n:1. In supw-2 crf this submis\u00e9\ufb01bn,   A\n\nrein' nae on the 3%' ' ism. Bmch da>\u00a3$is\u00a3 mf\u00a7.'Tef\n\nCaurt in tin: me at cmmmv\num:-ts, mmm, xe\u00a7\u00a71;_ed  * \n293 and axmthm'    Caurt in\nthe ease of   aemct v.\nawmmm  in Am\n\n12.  the Divisinn Bmxch csf\n\n   vim that a suit imnzmea\n\n yeratzxn. ia. a Nullity in law and the:-mm\n\n  under Gx\ufb01w m Euk 4 ram: an\n\n  \ufb01m Order 5 Rule 1? am he ma-mm' ed in\n\nA    M and diamiasmg the suit. along with the\n\n_   far such puz-we was the prep&* warm: csf\n ta1nm1byt.hetriaICo1zrt..\n\n13, In tm dee$im:3. of the Suprme Cam': in\nMfs\ufb01shok 'Trmzsport Agerwy case, a 6% nbtairmd\n\n\n\n:1: ma xmwwwwwmwawmt K\"H%m'M\"&1 WM\n\n:16:\n\nagdm the dead person wlrml waa sought ts \n\nmmcttad warm the maxheim, 51-. was resimd f  \n\n4 readwith Rule 10 of me, while   \n\ntr:'IaIC;am't, it ha\ufb01 been    V\nRmzann Fatima under    \nwas agin %ed by th\u00e9 appeal at\ntheixmmrrxzeaf the   the\nSwim Ceurig    Grder\n30 Rue   respect of the\n\" not a  - 'p\ncc:nom\":1etc:uI,;\\\\\/._VM% _   .  \u00e9\n   Ran, ]aa.rz1sex1 Ceumal\n\n \ufb01r-at rwpomcnt-Bank weuld\n\n '    that the gresmt writ petitien is not arm\n   by the High Caurt in an Arfwle 22?\nA that 'Elm {Eda pawad is may an an IA in a\n  pmma\ufb01ing; that a. writ patition alacu\ufb01 mt be:\n   en'bax'mir:;ed for \ufb011t  at m sta.gIa\u00a7 Whm the main\n\nmaths-zr fa a\ufb01\ufb02 pemim before the arzig\ufb01tlal amfmrityh\n\n\n\nW W\" \"W\"-nwwwmwwm uwww H-uwwuu Mr nanmm\u00e9mt\ufb01a\ufb01u WKWW V-...UUi'H U?' \ufb01\ufb02t\ufb02w\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01 \"WWW $3\n\n:11:\n\n:5. It an aim aubmmaa that the \n\ntmugh was agairmt 11% dead pman wfhnm   _\n\ncaw ta know that trim pcrscsn wag  u  \n\nwmm\ufb01ve shew have hm;   \npi-swarm had} been   %\nthe Bank was amt havizg\ufb01he  of ms'\nthe pmon; that the   u of the\n4mm pasaan.   by the\npreamtit W1-it  tmir\n@al smug.  pamans and\nin such  gr  the legal hairs had been\nmugm  \ufb01f the dead persmtx, the\n\n   ths claini petitimi was cured\n\nthe eiaim pe\ufb01tisn against the pt-\u00abwent\n\n   withzn' 1% mm' him of law'; tmt the\n\n   tlrmwh wag mt twxablae #1 has iniua1ly\"\n\"    has mu cured, than anly legal\n\n applica\ufb01sn was \ufb01led am the lam}\n\n applicatinn  allnrwed, tha paramzt\n\npe\ufb01tismm ware subatimtsd in plaec 9f the 971-g'nal\n\nxmmndema\ufb01susmna\ufb02mth\ufb01maxnaofac\ufb01onm\n\n -\n<\/pre>\n
Wfi e\\wMwm.tt!n:r”vaH”\u00a7m\\m”& nmuwaw WW<\/p>\n
\u00abax wwwwuwx<\/p>\n
:i.2:\n<\/p>\n
term efthe impugmd exams are scught to be <\/p>\n
from the Judi nf the \ufb01upam\ufb01ourt in  ~12   <\/p>\n
\u00abpa-ua in Am mm ac 2&4,   <\/p>\n
has \ufb01rawn sw\ufb01c attc:-sntien \u00a36;     V<\/p>\n
we men we and in the  the
\nsuprm Court in um  #2:’  and
\ncums.  in. that
\nwas alse,    jprsrson and
\nthat  the  ‘ ‘ came
\nta m\u00ae%mu\u00a7 m\u00a7%af gm dcfmaan: as was
\nagi  xx”: the na\ufb01zze that had<\/p>\n
    and that had {wen<\/p>\n
  Paatal Shara “A&d1’me:’ci&* 22 Rub 4 of cm, om umcr<\/p>\n
Sw\ufb01mi\ufb01l az\ufb02 153 at? CPQ. The trial Cant’: u <\/p>\n
nmrwnmawwuur\ufb02in\ufb02\ufb02 \ufb02ih\ufb01\ufb02i\ufb01 VI-u\\’*&t9*M!’\ufb02’&% NJ?’ \ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01l\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02      <\/p>\n
:13:<\/span><\/p>\n
both the appncaciom bang cf the view <\/p>\n
applimtian Ear subs\u00e9ttxtitjg aesendmz $03.2 m;4  % f    _
\nml hm and tha \u00e9armiant  j  <\/p>\n
the tiw for  a suit an the  <\/p>\n
Thserafora was of the View
\nSecticn 151 carlnot be    the
\nmm all applicatiom  ‘rm
\nmam had been   \ufb01ling two
\nRmian Pe\u00a3:itia,:\u00a7s   Am; ‘clue Raxaiaim<\/p>\n
the “tlrxat the o@1a’ ‘ I suit<\/p>\n
wcau\ufb01 ham’ ,3   an the am gr \ufb01.l31g’ the<\/p>\n
   proper View for the mson, the<\/p>\n
 5 at \u00a31513 Lsmimion Ant. would
\n    afthis mmm that the appiication \u00a391′
\n ham. allowed, wank date back {:5<\/p>\n
_ A’   gr smssmntm af the  ‘ ms the suit
\n    bear; itia\ufb01tuta\u00e9 within the perm af zimitaaian fez’
\n ‘ ‘ miief an the pmmte, the trial mart was in<\/p>\n
diamisaing applim\ufb01sona and ages-rdir1glv_, allcrmmd ‘Elm
\nRwkivn Patitisns emci the app1?m’tis:3s. Ayirmt. such<\/p>\n
:14:<\/span><\/p>\n
erdara oftm High Cc-urt, \ufb02m ma\ufb01a: had beer: carried to <\/p>\n
um summe mm by \ufb01n dasamaant, the f  _<\/p>\n
Cxourt ep\ufb01xw that the addiwn of the     =<\/p>\n
aacmn {1} of Sectizzn 21 wh\ufb01ch was net 3:   ”
\nthe Limitatimn Act. was and had   <\/p>\n
1963 Act  no cure sugh a  <\/p>\n
arm the: Caaurt was aatia\ufb01ed
\npartiw m’t1:m~ as p ‘\ufb01\u00a7  to a
\nmiatalm made in    tr:\n<\/p>\n
correct witkmut,   af such<\/p>\n
mmaaxy  stage and thc<\/p>\n
prJ:*m1m’ him as?    K \ufb01cr\ufb01xzsn sf law exwhlazi<\/p>\n
    as :2: Btlit, which had been<\/p>\n
tht: mwly mm pa.-rufm as t.’r1a.1gh it<\/p>\n
  grow’ ‘zmI’2’I15t:i1:ut:ion am Ema}: is<\/p>\n
 v\ufb01aavi\ufb01nrx, tbs iriai Ccurt: was in max fa<\/p>\n
  the applbnankn an the graurs\u00e9 that the<\/p>\n
 mu\ufb01 have besen barmd by Lam’ .tat\u00a39n,<\/p>\n
 that the E-iighifatzmrt hasmlnmtime mzfracxtsriew<\/p>\n
  and acmrdingly afjsnmaa the appeal.<\/p>\n
\u00bbvsm’\u00ab’x\\ wwwmu mm ww”uaramawa”‘\u00a2na\ufb02”‘M\u20acV.\ufb02’\\ aunuafrl uwwnl WT WHKIWMEMKK WKWW MKFUK3 LN” Ki”-5%_%_\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\u00ab\u00a7,\u00a7\ufb01&%\ufb01&  <\/p>\n
:15:<\/span><\/p>\n
16. 1: is this amman which 1’3 1-aim apex’:
\nmm Ccmxmel gar the {amt zmpnndent-Bank    _<\/p>\n
that the app\ufb01c-a\ufb01on kmvkg hm  bfj’   u ” ~ <\/p>\n
autmrity as well as the
\nnot only by the Judwnt \u00absf   v%
\nam at   v.\n<\/p>\n
  so 2324, but
\naim by the 3tatj.;*i:a:_fy  11? :::f the
\nKarnataka   Aaentim
\nis amva   g%\u00a7zfar’ @ 1;+s\u00a7ectiarn (3; of Sec\ufb01ntt
\n11?, whigh   _’ 7
\n  is 3 my :9 the
\n    to mare than one reiief :31
\n ‘ . the  mime of amen’ mm; dam’
\n  k\u00abw\u00a2a5ga,fwm reIi9_,fs; hm rfhe amim m
\n ‘7cl:zim\ufb01\u00a7;f_\u00a3*;I1s1xc:v}z re\ufb01e\ufb01, Iwshail net\ufb01nvwd
\nV ‘#5; far mm reiiefsai \ufb01miwsci, wcmpt with
\n A. ,  \ufb01fths Rw\ufb01sbww er arm mhwpazwrz<\/p>\n
  whom a dispuha \u00a35’ mm\u00bb-w \ufb01r dwision
\n wxdermmbn ‘F11′<\/p>\n
  it is submzm’ that in ‘him mm’ sf such proviniena<\/p>\n
 the authozrity m pernzdt tm additinn efa new<\/p>\n
defmdant car when instituted in him mm at” wrong<\/p>\n
:16:<\/span><\/p>\n
pt\ufb01\ufb01cfi text ads! thc \ufb01ght pcrm at any ataga sf
\nhm:-zag cf the d\ufb01pl\ufb01e providad that it was   _
\nbona\ufb01de mistake and in ma pmmr,  A
\nmam bm% am as expbiruad
\nap\ufb01iaatlms are: W33 sustains-;:i_    3
\nwovm if mm um um  <\/p>\n
thwe\ufb01om submim :16  i$_  _<\/p>\n
1?.  comma:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a331′ the \ufb01rst  gubm am the<\/p>\n
addition ‘ as Raga}
\n  jus\ufb01.fie\u00e9 an gm; as
\nthe     positiabn af guatantars and
\n nt in famur af gm Bank,<\/p>\n
 Vfgfgaymmt and ware wimmaexs. to that<\/p>\n
   fatihm; that they are wmpwd \ufb01nm<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
 t9 the ecntrary and if 9: pemn ears. be<\/p>\n
 g ta’: 13:1 their awn mm as d t, it ma\ufb01am um<\/p>\n
VT  if they are dmcribeci as mal haim afa ciawmaad<\/p>\n
xwuorz. and \ufb01sh:-e subm\ufb01 that Im m  is<\/p>\n
mwmmmwr\ufb02ur\ufb01\ufb02f\ufb02 E”‘HlQn’?\ufb01”l Emhd\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01g ‘Jr       <\/p>\n
:17;\n<\/p>\n
18. liomally, 3% Ccsurt wauid mt
\nsuch wntenticxzm in a petition un\u00e9ar Ar\ufb01cie  <\/p>\n
Comtimtziem of India, wen   the  ” ‘V <\/p>\n
 prameclings b\ufb01ore the <\/p>\n
quwtion is tak\u00a21’1 up for  <\/p>\n
and 33 submitm by   the
\npe\ufb01tiarm that the  Vdaad parse};
\n:15 a Huzlity’ 53%’ ._1awj=”‘ gumiminn,
\nmadifmatie\ufb01,     mm: ha<\/p>\n
19.’   in law mt dehatabie<\/p>\n
any  ta “‘ixsf$;ki’v\u20acerith;ari::;:; that pramewrxg’ agmrxs’ t a<\/p>\n
 d\ufb01sad’   Kim   in Easy. Only \u20ac\u00a71Zi$\ufb01\u00a3.!1’i is in what<\/p>\n
   T3 ati\ufb01 Em mam’ ta.1z’mc1′ aad<\/p>\n
  _vaMa’ A   suixequem &s*\u00a5:iz::r:…<\/p>\n
_ V   L329. ‘I”1’w @103′ d1’&’W”.\u00a3’1 by Sri \ufb01.
\n_    Icame\u00e9 Gamma}, far the frat rwpx3nd\u00a2nt-Ba.r1k is
\nV  W1m1 once a party is ad% by way af 3.  t,<\/p>\n
subatitut\ufb01osn \u20ac131′ aafamwrka  term asf’ tbs provh\ufb01om af
\n\ufb02tisn 21(1)  much  date hack to the<\/p>\n
S?”\n<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
\/r<\/p>\n
x”‘\\auM”m ml: WM!\u00bb mwwwm WW3: mwmwnnwmamnm I”KiH\u00a3\u20acW\ufb02 WM<\/p>\n
:18:<\/span><\/p>\n
data: af tithe arky\u00e9ztlal ix\ufb01\ufb01aiimn $1″ 13%  .’ 3<\/p>\n
ther\ufb01are hwxm valid im an aut\ufb01\ufb01y wh\ufb01   _<\/p>\n
eitfm” aptiy agzrplicahia er \u00e9jmcw  =
\npr%t 3ituah?o\u00a5’1- Qlmtisn ia nut  ‘\u00ab
\npmeaurmg er the naturzz    5: u
\nrwponximzb\ufb01arak maid
\nmeurmeras iitbed ‘m   as fr:\n<\/p>\n
whether it had    .\n<\/p>\n
should belrm\ufb01 m:.\u00a7e=
\nammpm.m;,  had tlmemselvw
\nsoug}:r\u00a7’t:.~  hgal rcprmentativm :21′ the
\n appea: be\ufb01sre the Tribunal
\n a men alkwad and tha matfm’ had<\/p>\n
  tn the \ufb01rigizml autimrity \ufb01xr re—<\/p>\n
 \ufb01\u00e9isx an mazrzlrk If such is the mr\ufb01m<\/p>\n
 the lwl rewamntat\ufb02 an mm?’ awn.<\/p>\n
VT   , rwm’ im the: proceedum’ an bgal
\n:repa’we2″1ta\ufb01::\ufb01, The queatinn is um: {me sf <\/p>\n
mm aa l\ufb01al mprwmtat\ufb01m, but the qumfmz is as ta
\nwhet\ufb01 the cxriginal pmcmdirxg as irmtituted agairzat a<\/p>\n
%’<\/p>\n
…. ”\n<\/p>\n
ww”H “MW” wwwwm WM awmmmwamwww I'”ill’IW!”! muwsu VP” amamammm. %'”$\u00a7?\u00a3;$i'”\u00a7 QWUENM CW5′ \u00a7\u20act\u00a7aRN\ufb01:g’\ufb01@%& HWM \ufb02\u00e9<\/p>\n
 as its the va\ufb01\u00e9itf’ caf the <\/p>\n
:19:<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01cad peratm was a. xzzullity in law and if an <\/p>\n
has been gut aver by any ether   <\/p>\n
law.\n<\/p>\n
22. Even fer a 1%;\n<\/p>\n
canmd that the 0&1′ ‘
\nfherefam nathm   <\/p>\n
23. In   respcmdem:—<\/p>\n
Bank has mt  what was\u00bb
\nan    pemson by mung
\nthe ~2:2″RuLe; -1; Grdcr 22 Ru}: 9<\/p>\n
of ($93.,   Limita&n Act; as even.<\/p>\n
” ..~   r  an recar\u00e9 as
\n k cm mg matter having been
\n   W 1-  m*a1 % $5+:r;\u00a7%amnase T\ufb01bumi. The qumtinn 53, if
\n ‘_”_;__. a;zch  pesitian af tm proowdim befem the<\/p>\n
A 3 —  wimm tame was any rma say the m-imam:
\n  as mail as tam Tribuxaal E have egairzed on the<\/p>\n
3-_ wI:1i3e<\/p>\n
examming such whs\ufb01y uxmww\ufb01axy app\ufb01mhiona unda-<\/p>\n
:N2:\u00a2\u00a3WmW~\u00ab*”‘va anwwarzzh Wmwwmi WA MKRWNIWQWEJMFQJW lI’1\ufb01\\\u00a5N”E \ufb02aw’<\/p>\n
s:< 'Wwn<vwrwuv'wmw<\/p>\n
:31:<\/span><\/p>\n
order 22 Huh; 4 er Rm 9 and Sectinn 5 <\/p>\n
Linlitatinn Act.\n<\/p>\n
24″ ‘I”he mum: addIm&:f:\u00e9i5AA\u00bbV:\u00a7\u00a71.,bf’?-31\u00a7}f_ ,&
\nrwn\u00e9criis that the     <\/p>\n
not suppazrtu\ufb01 by the  .\n<\/p>\n
A.Madhuau\u20ac1hana   c;:\u00a7\u00a7i;,m1  em<\/p>\n
   autlmrity<\/p>\n
for the   far subs\ufb01m\ufb01nm.\n<\/p>\n
af 3    13.3., ea\ufb01dixg af 3.\n<\/p>\n
pleh\ufb01\ufb01  though such adding<\/p>\n
cafths p%a.;~:y%\u00a7gg:zsg1ga\u00a2r peai\ufb01iafuma, it ahcmld be team
\n    . . . . . .. ‘  1d’ A in law, wag mhm*’ warmmnd<\/p>\n
 iwaitian of law.\n<\/p>\n
  app\ufb01aatimn F21:-$3 an beha\ufb01’ cf the<\/p>\n
44    A’  A,t befare tfm Arbittamr  mt one ‘ea add the
\n ”  it: their awn mpacity as partm tag: the
\n i.e., by way at’ suhsiitzmbn but may ta<\/p>\n
class:-ibe ‘chm as lagal repmmtativm at’ a dead pm-sun,
\napmsonwhn haddisw e:\\am1attI*z.eix1itiai:iar1afthae<\/p>\n
1- mmwmmwmm Vamtrws ‘6’i\u00ab$””‘|b\u00a3W.LtV\ufb023f””&.F\ufb013″’65l\\aU’I aiswau WW<\/p>\n
:22:<\/span><\/p>\n
preaeadE@, the impmwd erdws cscmld mt have <\/p>\n
chma  as am s:a1&ti:t1g the arigizlal   <\/p>\n
It *3 ea d\ufb01wmt maaer if the Mp-\u00bb.f:1;:’.tz’;ar;~\u00a7’&’*a:;-i u  <\/p>\n
have been batsught an mm in   \u00e9a\u00a7pa\u00a7i;\u00a7”<\/p>\n
defmadanm am: as ta whemmjkzmzg
\nway mama to the bem\ufb01aaf  ml  the
\nclam: as agajmt than  what was
\nathamptad an the’  cf  an\ufb01
\nthat having ngni;    claim the
\nbmu; af    .i1’7[3}(d} of the Co-<\/p>\n
capezrative Sgo\u00e9g\ufb01mi\ufb01  ‘  V’ _ h ” ~ ‘<\/p>\n
:23.  ma  \u00a7r\u00a3\u00a7e abmae: diacuss\ufb01an, than Writ<\/p>\n
   authority! Ammrurw ‘F’ 85 ‘C? are<\/p>\n
  quashed   af a Writ :31’ Ca\ufb01orari. It in capm ta
\n its plzraue the matter agaimt; ti,-1:5 prmnt
\nVA  anly in the wdsting ummcity as lqal &i”rs,
\n  . w*%:3::::h atatua p\u00a2r.i:;s:onm-s \ufb02zmtmeivaw ma dmcribed in
\n mgommarrmumzmmmim raurzdand<\/p>\n
itisalsamada ckmrtmatitfmcpmtotlxcprwentwxit<\/p>\n
petit\u00a7mxIemmurgeaEEsu;:h1%s9z\ufb01mi::naa51:m.ybe<\/p>\n
\/\/<\/p>\n
23<\/span>
\nopw ‘ea mm in the faxrtkwr gmawci\ufb01ms bcfarc
\nArbh1’at:ar.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-5
\nItxdg\u00e9j ‘<\/p>\n
Ev      g\ufb01w\ufb01g\ufb01g ax; x\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7.\u00a7 $55.: \u00a7xu.\u00a7m#iI$\u00a2.:u.\u00a7&.\u00a2s\u00a3….%e.n 2119 ;..:..\u00a7_. …..Zi, …:?.\u00a7..,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar WW W WW muum W mmmmm %~\u00a3\u00a5\ufb01\u00a5\u00b0\u00a7 mum W mmwmm MW?-% cu mnmzmacsamr GFKARB.?ATAI\u00a3& A?3;wGaz\u00a2\u00a2km%% mama arms :2?-m’ 2518 9.4? 0FpEmUAR3\u00a72m;9 5′: BEFCERE 1 SR! K crmwvaaagju AGEE ABc::m”:*__4& &’Ea1\u00a2f$ 2 K AGEI}.a\u00a7E$3U*E7;5C’ Y\ufb01suza 3 K […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative ... on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative ... on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-17T04:18:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-17T04:18:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1488,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative ... on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-17T04:18:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative ... on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative ... on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-17T04:18:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-17T04:18:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009"},"wordCount":1488,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009","name":"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative ... on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-17T04:18:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-cheluvaraju-vs-the-bangalore-city-co-operative-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri K Cheluvaraju vs The Bangalore City Co-Operative … on 25 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78360\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}