{"id":78585,"date":"2008-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-04-22T16:28:19","modified_gmt":"2017-04-22T10:58:19","slug":"smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
WP2Gl66.0~4$\n\nIN mm area count or KARNATAKA \n\ncmcurr BENCH AT nmxwm  jk   V\n\nDATED mm mm 2219 may or 8EPTE\u00a7;l_I\u00a7$R,j =  K A' * \n\nTHE HON'3LE MKJUSTICE   \" \n\nWRIT I'E'I'ITION ad;\n\n   \n\nBetween:\n\nSmtshakt\ufb02a D;.\"Gu\"p;'a1,     _  \n\nAged about __43 \"   V\"    .\n\nW\/0 Ma:an'R.i3a:::di,  A .    '\n\nWor1{ing_.\u00a3a.$ --iE_1_1gi:;1 ee_:_r  Grade) ,\n\nAt Hubii~Dh\"am'2ad U'rba:n'iZ)'cvclepment Authority,\nNavanagar, iJ\u00a713.bVi}m:\"\u00a78G~--. ' '\n\nAnd residing at P101:  Park,\n\nVidyanagar, aH%ub1i:53o :32  ...Pl1'.'!'I'I'IOHER\n\n(By _sgi;J.s.shetzy; Ade;\n\n\n\nA    Urban Development Authority,\n\n' \"'Navan;a\u00a7;ga\ufb01r, I-Iubii-580 025,\n Regptm-seated by its Commissioner.\n\n   $ta&. ofKarnata' ka\n\nV V ~._By its Secretary to Government,\n' -- .sUrba11 Dcvciopment Department,\n\nM. S. Buildings,\nBanga1oI'e--S6O O9 1.  KSSPONDEHTS\n\n (By &-Lnuavatag Itniekki, Adv for R1,\n\n&'i.R.K.Hatti, GP for R2 1\n\nZ\n\n\n\nWP20l66.D4\n\n2\n\nThis petition is \ufb01ied under Article 226 of the Consgtittition\nof India praying to quash the order dt.6.5.2004 vkie \n\nG issued by the government anei order dt.6.5;\u00a72OD\u00a7}--...__vi:1e\nAnnexure-H issued by R1\/authority and-'...\"g1a1}t  \n\nconsequential bene\ufb01ts and etc.,\n\nThis petition coming on. for    \n\nCourt made the following:\n1. Heard the counsel for the   \"the_coti1nse1 for\nthe respondents. V  ' ' .. . <\/pre>\n
2. The facts a1e_asV_.foI1oW\u00a7:’.–  V_ . V .<\/p>\n
The  Civil Engineeritag.\n<\/p>\n
He joinedthe.   Ieepondent on 01.01.1982 as a<\/p>\n
Ju1:uo’ r Engitieert  ‘basis. Her services came to be<\/p>\n
   Engineer on 01.01.1992. It is stated that<\/p>\n
   V lations to regulate the servtce” conditions of<\/p>\n
t\ufb01e.ei\u00a3;pto”y’e’ee.\u00bbv_ 1″ respondent-authority. In the absence<\/p>\n
V Vt of the””ssuc}:i ieetwaunent xegulations made under Section 72 of<\/p>\n
H H ”   Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987, (for<\/p>\n
   Act’) it has been foilowing rules applicable to<\/p>\n
  ‘earzesponditlg ca\u00e9res in the Public Works {)epart1nent of the<\/p>\n
  ‘State Government. In exercise of powers conferred under<\/p>\n
Article 309 of the Constitution, the Governor of Karnataka has<\/p>\n
Q.\n<\/p>\n
WP20166.04<\/p>\n
made rules called the Karnataka Public Works  ‘<\/p>\n
Dcpartnxeznt Service (\ufb01ecnximtzcnt) Rulgjes, ,__1’988’.'””1n;: “‘<\/p>\n
Noti\ufb01cation dated 05.07.1939, the pest   <\/p>\n
(Special Grade) is xequired to   ffhe\u00e9
\ncadre of Junior Engineer and the    such
\npromotion is that a  {:1 service of not
\nless that: 8 years in theVA’eaei1fe   The
\nrespondent  V’ 911 01.12.2001.\n<\/p>\n
resolved to   Engineer (Special
\nGrade)   the State Government
\nseeking   petitioxaer. The authority<\/p>\n
has been   for creation of every post and<\/p>\n
 En’ itbatve-gest  absence of regulations as <\/p>\n
   per the Act, the pmposal to create a<\/p>\n
    \ufb01om the I” mspondent-authority by a<\/p>\n
  only thereafter the State Government can permit<\/p>\n
 ef the post In the instant case, the Stahe Government<\/p>\n
   eonsideling the proposal submitted by the I” respondent-<\/p>\n
‘V V   by an order dated 04.02.2002 permitted the authority<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
vo.r__r_>2o:6\u00e9.o4<\/p>\n
to pmrnotc the petitioner as Junior Enginccxj    <\/p>\n
subject to the following thme conditir\u00a7i:\u00bbi”s1:”” ‘<\/p>\n
i) her annual   ‘:”:i!.;*cn <\/p>\n
should not contai\ufb01\n<\/p>\n
ii) she should have
\nexaznm    V’\n<\/p>\n
iii) there     contemplated
\n A  jj; 2  before the
\n that; \u00e9uutho\ufb01ty and the approval of<\/p>\n
the Govcm\ufb01xe\ufb01t  21.02.2002 was passed by the<\/p>\n
1″ 1es1\u00a7bndcnt~atiih\u00a7:\u00a714ity ijpmmoting the petitioner as Junior<\/p>\n
  Grade) with e\ufb02bct from 11.02.2002. The<\/p>\n
 was \ufb01xed in the pay-scale applicable to<\/p>\n
  the   Engineer (Special Grade) by an order dated<\/p>\n
”  1 She has from the date of promotion since been<\/p>\n
 ~gf.6\u00a3tldn.g:’..\u00e9s Junior Engineccr (Special Grade). The order of the<\/p>\n
 “‘-E:\u00a7*\u00a5_’v;f\u00a2\u00a7sponc1cnt~autho1ity pmxno\ufb01ng the petitioner ci\ufb02 indicate<\/p>\n
WP20l66.04<\/p>\n
contemplated against the peti\ufb01pner and that   <\/p>\n
advezse remarks in the annual   the 2<\/p>\n
petitioner for the last \ufb01ve years. Howevl .& er; the Atlocl  <\/p>\n
in its audit of the I” :espondei;t\u00abea,nther\u00a7t3V:’ fo_1’\ufb022~’-tt<\/p>\n
2003 made an observation that
\nto promote the petitioner  of the petitioner
\nfor \ufb01ve years should be    wh\ufb02e ganting
\npmmotion thc1e;’we’f3e:t:’.9gx:n?taI  only for three
\nyears and  ‘fer two years had not
\nbeen  1  themnmmo\ufb01on given to the
\npetitioner  imposed by the State<\/p>\n
Government. \ufb02it   centention of the petitioner that these<\/p>\n
t eohscreataont Wexe inenmpetent and without jurisdiction.<\/p>\n
  well de\ufb01ned functions of the auditors, the<\/p>\n
— Vt   instiuetione bi’: State Government to the auditors contam’ ed<\/p>\n
 . in__Mysore  Fund Audit Manual would stipulam that it is<\/p>\n
  “*f1mc1:ion of the audit to pmscrible what such enters<\/p>\n
  be or tn interfere with their  application.<\/p>\n
  “Even in the actual audit of transactions an auditor must<\/p>\n
 Iecognxw the clear dis\ufb01nction between auditerial md<\/p>\n
\u00a3><\/p>\n
WPZOI 66.04<\/p>\n
administra\ufb01ve functions. Criticisms o\ufb02’emd v-v- <\/p>\n
Department must therefore be limited to   ‘V <\/p>\n
based on the actual accounts. It is 1?.=,ot  <\/p>\n
range over the \ufb01eld of administimjion \u00aboraof statis’;ii\u00a7;f:\u00a7 and’i’\u00a7o’i.*I’cr_ ‘ ;<\/p>\n
suggestions how a\ufb02laizs may   It ;jis further
\ncontended that noa~Writiag*~..of * reports
\nof an employee by the Rcpo:1_’\ufb01s:’.a.Ag_  hcid against
\nan employee. The’  of Cax\u00e9iom\ufb01on who is the
\ncompetent    con\ufb01dential report
\nnoticing    retired fnom service
\nwithout   zeport of almost evexy<\/p>\n
one of the oi12p1o3’coa._  Authority had prepared special<\/p>\n
-‘ in accordance with Rule 10 of the<\/p>\n
 (Con\ufb01dential Reports) Ruies and after<\/p>\n
   con\ufb01dential reports for \ufb01ve years, the<\/p>\n
  promoted. Accordingly, the 1″ mspondena<\/p>\n
‘.Tv:”‘auu,f;I:iq3I”ity Hy its letter dated 21.02.2004 had explained the<\/p>\n
  the Local Audit Cincle and on the basis of the<\/p>\n
T faaxi\ufb01caons given by the Authority, the Controller of State<\/p>\n
” “Accounts Department by its letter dated 12.04.2004 dircciacd<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
WP2Ul66.G4<\/p>\n
the Local Audit Circle to accept the explanatiog      <\/p>\n
mspondent-authority and drop tha\u00e9 Mmaiitiit\ufb02  <\/p>\n
Controller of State Accounts lI)epa1tm;\u00e9nt\u00bbLt:\u00abyz  <\/p>\n
invited the attention of the Local’  Ciiclc to.    6 of V’<\/p>\n
the Mysore Local Fund Auqjt Mg;nu;2\u00a5I:’a\ufb01ii1_\u00a7ii1~o\u00a7’:t\u00e9dA  Audit
\nCircle not to make such    is therefore the
\ncase of the “had been raised
\nby the audit   and became non-\n<\/p>\n
cxistcnt with   However, the State
\nGovemmfgnt   dated 06.05.2004 conveyed<\/p>\n
to the 1″  Withdrawing the pern;us’ sion<\/p>\n
V dated   by it \ufb01r pmmo\ufb01on of the petitioner<\/p>\n
   thc 1″ rcspondcnbauthority to relieve the<\/p>\n
  ‘ post and further oiicmd aboiition of the<\/p>\n
  ,1fxost.A  Planmng’ Member of the Authority styling<\/p>\n
”   sinner of the Authority has passed an order<\/p>\n
V’  relieving the petitioner from the post of<\/p>\n
  Engineer (Special Grade). It is the case of the petihloncr<\/p>\n
   as on the date of the petition, the ortier has not yet been<\/p>\n
given e\ufb01bct to since the oxder does not stipulate any charge<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
WPZOI 66.04<\/p>\n
axmngement in as much as it does not say the’ <\/p>\n
petitioner should hand over charge and to   slee” 2 <\/p>\n
should report alter handing over  jitlishi <\/p>\n
petitioners case that she wasV.{:o;1\ufb01ntii:_1vg” “as  a<\/p>\n
(Special Grade) even though thettvoztter is   tieve come
\ninto force. It is in this  presentuvpetition is<\/p>\n
\ufb01led seeking to quash   1 __ <\/p>\n
3. The  has \ufb01led
\nstatement of    years’ confidential
\nreports  the available in the o\ufb01ce and two
\nyears’ con\ufb01dential’  not been gven by the then<\/p>\n
Commissioner. ‘V Though the Commissioner can write a special<\/p>\n
  oixthe cntties made in the se1v1ce’ reg1s’ ter earhb 1′<\/p>\n
for  V  ” v;ng:.:~two years the State Government have)’ g<\/p>\n
t     granted earlier was withdrawn, the<\/p>\n
-. jveutho\ufb01ty”\\\u00a5ee le\ufb01 with no choice but to cancel the appointment<\/p>\n
   the promotion.\n<\/p>\n
t    The Government Advocate would sapptement the<\/p>\n
 “Statement by contending that the conditions dearly indicated<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
WP2{)i66.04<\/p>\n
that annual con\ufb01dential reports of \ufb01ve years  <\/p>\n
ava\ufb02abic as a condition precedent. In  ‘Q \ufb02ee”  <\/p>\n
annual con\ufb01dential report of only
\nthe withdxawal of the approvaigsin may as it is ‘A .<\/p>\n
the condition precedent.\n<\/p>\n
3. Having regard to    which we
\nnet in serious dispute,   reports for \ufb01ve
\nyears not being   of any fault
\nof the pe\ufb01\ufb01oxenj.    Cejnetnissioner acting under
\nRule :0    %rvices (Con\ufb01dential Reports)
\nRules annual con\ufb01dential report for<\/p>\n
two mojmgfeaxs ‘was  there was Mequate compiianoe. In<\/p>\n
 eifeet  S~te1te Geeemment seeking to proceed further on<\/p>\n
the ‘e1.1el’i’t  was contrary to paragraph 6 of the<\/p>\n
  Mysdi\ufb01l  Audit Manual. There is a patent error in<\/p>\n
~    the approval of the pe\ufb01\ufb01onefs promotion as<\/p>\n
  (Special Grade). Hence, there is substance in<\/p>\n
K  grounds urged in the writ pctitniozz. The objec\ufb01ons <\/p>\n
   the State Government are thcrefom irrelavant and have no<\/p>\n
bearing to deny promotion to the petitioner.<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
W\u00a7?29}6\u00e9.0#<\/p>\n
6. The writ petition is accordm   ‘Q<\/p>\n
and H are quashed. Appmpriate oIvi1A::1’$_ ‘  <\/p>\n
consequential bene\ufb01ts be ‘:9 th\u00e9  <\/p>\n
Jml –<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008 Author: Anand Byrareddy WP2Gl66.0~4$ IN mm area count or KARNATAKA cmcurr BENCH AT nmxwm jk V DATED mm mm 2219 may or 8EPTE\u00a7;l_I\u00a7$R,j = K A’ * THE HON’3LE MKJUSTICE ” WRIT I’E’I’ITION ad; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R ... vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development ... on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R ... vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development ... on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-22T10:58:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\\\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-22T10:58:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1215,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\\\/O Martin R ... vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development ... on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-22T10:58:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\\\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R ... vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development ... on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R ... vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development ... on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-22T10:58:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-22T10:58:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008"},"wordCount":1215,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008","name":"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R ... vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development ... on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-22T10:58:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shakila-d-gunjal-wo-martin-r-vs-hubli-dharwad-urban-development-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Shakila D Gunjal W\/O Martin R … vs Hubli Dharwad Urban Development … on 22 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78585\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}