{"id":78996,"date":"2001-10-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2001-10-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001"},"modified":"2014-02-03T01:23:00","modified_gmt":"2014-02-02T19:53:00","slug":"association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001","title":{"rendered":"Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B Srikrishna<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: B Srikrishna, M Ramachandran<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>  B.N. Srikrishna, C.J.  <\/p>\n<p> 1. O.P. No. 16272 of 2000 was brought as a public interest litigation by the petitioner<br \/>\nwhich is an association interested in protection of the environmental ecology of the<br \/>\ncountry, and of the State of Kerala, in particular. The basic grievance made in the<br \/>\npetition pertains to indiscriminate depredation of natural resources in that the sand<br \/>\nfrom Periyar river bed and the river banks were being indiscriminately mined, causing<br \/>\ntremendous ecological disturbances and depletion of natural resources. It is the case<br \/>\nof the petitioners that there is no system of control over the excavation of sand from<br \/>\nthe river banks and the river beds. It is also the case of the petitioners that, despite<br \/>\nrepeated appeals made to the District Collector and the State Government, no action<br \/>\nwas being taken, resulting in a serious situation as the authorities of the State Government<br \/>\nwere not properly implementing their own directives and orders issued by Circulars<br \/>\npreviously issued.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. These petitions were with regard to Panchayats and their depredatory activities<br \/>\nalong the banks of the river Periyar. The story with regard to other Panchayats<br \/>\nsituated on the banks of other rivers is not much different. This State, popularly called<br \/>\n&#8220;God&#8217;s own country&#8221;, has been endowed bountifully by nature; that men shall not<br \/>\ncause wasteful depletion thereof, should be the objective of every right thinking citizen,<br \/>\nand this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. Certain chronology of events is necessary to be noticed in order to appreciate<br \/>\nthe final order we propose to pass for disposal of these petitions.\n<\/p>\n<p> 29.6.1998 &#8211; State Government took control of nine rivers from the Panchayats<br \/>\nunder Sub-section 82(1) of the Kerala Panchayat Act, 1960.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5.1.1998 &#8211; Circular No. 66221\/P1\/97\/Revenue, making restrictions on the basis<br \/>\nof the export committee report on sand mining in Bharatha Puzha (18 conditions were<br \/>\nimposed, which was subsequently made applicable to all other rivers) <\/p>\n<p> 4.4.1998 &#8211; District Collector has constituted an expert committee including 21<br \/>\nPanchayat Presidents, instead of experts (P4) <\/p>\n<p> 8.11.1998 &#8211; Reports in newspapers stating that Bridges are in dangerous condition<br \/>\ndue to excessive sand mining and water pups. (Exhibits. P8 &amp; 9) <\/p>\n<p> 4.12.1998 &#8211; Writ Petition challenging the said constitution was disposed of with<br \/>\na direction including experts. (Ext. P5) <\/p>\n<p> 21.4.1999 &#8211; As directed in CCC. 117 of 2001 against that District Collector,<br \/>\nErnakulam has taken a decision to ban poll scoop and to take strict action against<br \/>\nviolators.\n<\/p>\n<p> 25.10.2000 &#8211; Ordered that if it is found that sand mining has been done<br \/>\nunauthorisedly, the sand thus mined will be taken back to the place from where it is<br \/>\nunauthorisedly mined and put back into the river.\n<\/p>\n<p> 20.12.2000 &#8211; Direction issued to District Collector, Ernakulam to file a report<br \/>\nstating the quantity of the sand mined during the previous year. Till such time sand<br \/>\nmining from Periyar River is banned.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9.1.2001 &#8211; Report by District Collector, Ernakulam stating that Rs. 5,52,05,309\/- is<br \/>\ndue by the Panchayats on the banks of Periyar River towards River Management Fund.\n<\/p>\n<p> 29.1.2001 &#8211; Report by District Collector, Ernakulam stating that Rs. 2,04,54,164\/- is<br \/>\ndue towards River Management Fund and Rs. 6,78,78,462\/- towards Royalty.\n<\/p>\n<p> 24.1.2001 &#8211; Direction to Kavalangad, Eloor and Varapuzha Grama Panchayat<br \/>\nSecretaries to be present in person on contempt.\n<\/p>\n<p> 24.1.2001 &#8211; Direction issued to District Collector not to use or divert River<br \/>\nManagement Fund.\n<\/p>\n<p> 16.2.2001 &#8211; Direction issued to the Centre for Earth Science Studies (CESS) to<br \/>\nmake an urgent inspection of the Periyar River and to give a report.\n<\/p>\n<p> March &#8211; 2001 &#8211; Interim report submitted by the CESS stated that bridges are in<br \/>\ndangerous condition, and indiscriminate scooping of sands from river channel is not<br \/>\nonly a threat to the stability of bridges, river banks and religiously\/culturally significant<br \/>\nsand bodies, but also aggravates the rate of lowering of river beds and also drastic<br \/>\nchanges in river bed configuration which in turn lead to salt water ingression farther<br \/>\ninland.\n<\/p>\n<p> 15.3.2001 &#8211; Interim order by the High Court directing the District Collector to<br \/>\nfile a statement showing the Kadavus that would come within the banned area of<br \/>\nPeriyar River namely 1 km (one) upstream and down stream of bridges, list of Kadavus<br \/>\nthat would not come within the prohibited distance, the quantity of sand permitted.\n<\/p>\n<p> 23.3.2001 &#8211; Statement by District Collector, Ernakulam stating the Kadavus<br \/>\nshowing the kadavus which comes within the above distance of 1 km.\n<\/p>\n<p> 23.3.2001 &#8211; Order by the High Court prohibiting ban on kadavus which falls<br \/>\nwithin the prohibited distance from the bridges.\n<\/p>\n<p> 26.3.2001 &#8211; Interim order by the High Court, imposing 11 conditions on the basis<br \/>\nof the report of the expert committee. The court further directed the State to impose<br \/>\nthese conditions on all rivers. The Court also directed the Government to file an<br \/>\naffidavit stating the quantity of sand taken outside the State.\n<\/p>\n<p> 20.5.2001 &#8211; Govt. issues Circular No. 40368\/C2\/2HOM\/LSGD, dated 25.5.2001<br \/>\nincorporating the above conditions imposed by the Court. But there is statement that<br \/>\nthis will be additional conditions.\n<\/p>\n<p> 15.6.2001 &#8211; Report filed by the District Collector stating that Karamasamithis&#8217;<br \/>\nhave convened in all Taluks and they will be made active.\n<\/p>\n<p> 21.6.2001 &#8211; Direction to the District Collector that before the sand mining ban is<br \/>\nremoved after 31st September, no sand mining shall be allowed unless and until the<br \/>\nDistrict Collector and the Karmasamithis are constituted and functional in each<br \/>\nPanchayat.\n<\/p>\n<p> 23.7.2001 &#8211; Affidavit as directed by the Court filed, stating that the quantity of<br \/>\nsand transported outside Kerala is 11,84,456.66 M. Tonne of sand per annum from<br \/>\nthree districts, Ernakulam, Malappuram and Palakkad Districts.\n<\/p>\n<p> 26.9.2001 &#8211; Last date for the filing of report by CESS.\n<\/p>\n<p> 1.10.2001 &#8211; Sand mining holiday is to be lifted, if conditions are to be satisfied.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. From the history of events narrated, it is apparent that, as early as in the year<br \/>\n1993, the State Government was aware and alive to the fact that removal of sand<br \/>\nfrom the rivers in the State and the licensing thereof, which were handled by the<br \/>\nPanchayats through which the rivers were handled by the Panchayats through which<br \/>\nthe rivers concerned flow, had deteriorated. There was indiscriminate and unregulated<br \/>\nremoval of sand from the major rivers causing large scale land sliding and loss of<br \/>\nproperty. There was also disturbance to the biophysical environment system of the<br \/>\nriver beds in different degrees. Several directions made by this Court in this regard on<br \/>\npublic interest litigation by the public spirited citizens were not taken into account by<br \/>\nthe State Government. Repeated directions of this Court resulted in the Government<br \/>\nin exercise of its powers under Section 82(1) of the Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 to exclude<br \/>\nthe nine rivers, namely Bharathapuzha, Periyar, Chaliyar, Pamba, Kallada,<br \/>\nVamanpuram, Chandragiri, Karamana and Meenachil from vesting in the Panchayats<br \/>\nand taking them over.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. It is unfortunate that despite, passing such an order in 1993, no further steps<br \/>\nwere promptly taken to deal with the issue which was a burning one even then. It is<br \/>\nonly on 5.1.1998 that the Government gave directions in its Circular prohibiting sand<br \/>\nmining to the following effect:\n<\/p>\n<p> 1) Pass is to be issued to the sand which is to be transported to other States. It should<br \/>\nnot be allowed to transport sand to other States without pass. Sales Tax is to be levied<br \/>\non inter state trade.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2) The District Collectors have to appoint an expert committee so as to fix the quantity<br \/>\nof the sand could be mind and the quantity of sand that could be mined from the<br \/>\n&#8220;Kadavus&#8221;, in each year, in advance. Only after the decision of the Collector on the<br \/>\nsaid recommendations that the Municipalities and Grama Panchayat would be allowed<br \/>\nto remove sand.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3) The above expert committee to evaluate the quantity of sand twice a year and to report<br \/>\non long term measures on this matter.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4) Check posts have to be set up in each &#8220;Kadavus&#8221; and a watchman is to be appointed<br \/>\nat the expense of the Panchayat. For this no additional post would be allowed. The<br \/>\nTahsildars should give identity cards.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5) To the existing workers indulging in sand mining in co-operation with the local<br \/>\nadministrations, identity cards shall be issued by the Tahsildars. The entry of new<br \/>\nworkers in this field should not be allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6) The practice of auctioning of sand should be completely stopped and the Panchayat\/Municipality<br \/>\nshould take steps to collect and sell sand evaluating load, vehicle and<br \/>\nquality of the sand.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7) The Collectors of Palakkad, Thrissur and Malappuram Districts should meet and<br \/>\ndecide the rate of price of the sand. This is to be done prior to the beginning of the<br \/>\nseason. The convenor of this meeting would be Collector of Palakkad District. The<br \/>\nremaining 50% amount after giving the wages of the employees from the price of sand<br \/>\nis to be credited to the Fund of the Local Administration. The other 50% of the amount<br \/>\nis to be deposited in the &#8220;River Management Fund&#8221; under the control of the Collector.<br \/>\nThe Fund is to be utilised for the protection of Bharathapuzha and other allied<br \/>\nactivities. Special and detailed orders have to be issued in this regard.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8) The Tahsildars should set up Task Force consisting of local voluntary associations<br \/>\nfor the purpose of making sure that sand is collected only in accordance with the<br \/>\nconditions and guidelines issued by the authorities. The Collectors should make sure<br \/>\nthat the Task force have been set up much before the opening of the season. The Grama<br \/>\nSabhas as should take part in these activities.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9) Sand mining prohibited from 1st July to 30th September every year.\n<\/p>\n<p> 10) CESS and CWRDMM should conduct a study on the quantity of sand in the region<br \/>\nbetween Chamravattom and Thirunavaya in Bharathapuzha and the quantity of sand<br \/>\nthat could be removed and the places where salt water is instructed, etc. and report<br \/>\nto the Government within 4 months.\n<\/p>\n<p> 11) Sand could be removed only at a distance of 500 meters from the bridges and irrigation<br \/>\nprojects. The sand mining should be done in accordance with the guidelines and<br \/>\nconditions issued by the Government. The Panchayat\/Revenue Authorities must<br \/>\nensure that no unauthorised mining is done.\n<\/p>\n<p> 12) Land filling should not be allowed using sand from the river. The Panchayats\/Grama<br \/>\nSabhas should conduct awareness programmes.\n<\/p>\n<p> 13) The wastes from the septic tanks shall not be allowed to be flown into the river. The<br \/>\nLocal Administrations should take measures to see that no wastes are dumped into<br \/>\nthe streams leading to the river.\n<\/p>\n<p> 14) All authorised possessions should be prohibited and all such persons in possession<br \/>\nshould be evicted.\n<\/p>\n<p> 15) The Collectors should appoint Survey Staff to demarcate the boundaries of the river<br \/>\nwithin a specified time.\n<\/p>\n<p> 16) The existing River Management Committee should work effectively. The District<br \/>\nCollectors should specially attend this matter.\n<\/p>\n<p> 17) As the availability of waste in the river is very important, the Forest Department should<br \/>\nattend to the afforestation programme at the originating place of the river.\n<\/p>\n<p> 18) The irrigation department should as part of Panchayat development make programme<br \/>\nprojects for making small dams that would prevent the wastage of excessive flow of<br \/>\nwater into the sea.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. These directives came about, not because of any serious application of mind<br \/>\non the part of the State Government, but because of the interim orders made by this<br \/>\nCourt in O.P. No. 15971\/1997 on 12.9.1997 and 24.10.1997.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. When it was found that the above directions, though salutary, were not being<br \/>\nstrictly implemented the petitioner approached this Court by O.P. No. 16272 of 2000,<br \/>\ncomplaining that the administration and the Panchayats had failed in enforcing the<br \/>\nrestrictions imposed by the Circular dated 5.1.1998. At this stage, after hearing several<br \/>\ndefaulters who were affected, and after appointing and getting reports of expert<br \/>\ncommittees known as Centre for Earth&#8217;s Science Studies (CESS) and Centre for Water<br \/>\nResources Development and Management (CWRDM), this Court made a detailed<br \/>\norder on 26.3.2001, some of which pertained to the maximum quantity of sand permitted<br \/>\nto be excavated from different kadavus situated in different Panchayats. Paragraph 2<br \/>\ngave a detailed plan of action to be followed and also noticed that there were a number<br \/>\nof Panchayats which were defaulters in making contributions to the River Management<br \/>\nFund constituted for regeneration of natural resources along riparian beds. In paragraph<br \/>\n7 of this order, this Court directed the State Government to impose conditions mentioned<br \/>\nin this order in respect of sand mining in all the rivers in Kerala in addition to the<br \/>\nspecific directions given by the Court in the specific orders.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. On 25.5.2001 the Government of Kerala issued a circular containing the<br \/>\nfollowing directions:\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;1) The Panchayats shall directly carry on the sand mining. It shall not auction that right<br \/>\nin favour of contractors.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2) No people scooping or any mechanised method is permitted at any of the Kadavus.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3) The sand mining operation shall be done only during day time that too between 8 A.M.<br \/>\nto 4 P.M.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4) No vehicle shall be brought to the river bed for the purpose of loading sand.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5) Vehicles shall be parked at a minimum distance of 25 meters from the river bank. In order<br \/>\nto ensure that no vehicle is brought to the Kadavus\/river bank the Panchayats shall<br \/>\nerect concrete pillars at the Kadavus on the banks of the river so that no vehicle can<br \/>\nbe taken to the bank of the river except two wheelers.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6) No sand mining shall be done within 10 meters from the river bank.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7) The passes shall be issued by the Geology Department through an authorised officer.\n<\/p>\n<p> These printed passes could be obtained by the Panchayats on payment of royalty in<br \/>\nadvance for a period of one month. The passes shall contain signature of the<br \/>\nauthorised officer of the Geology Department and also its seal and shall be countersigned<br \/>\nby the Secretary of the Panchayat concerned.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8) The Panchayat shall also pay in advance 20% of the value of the sand covered by the<br \/>\npass issued for one month towards River Management Fund, in advance, to the<br \/>\nDistrict Collector. On receipt of the cheque for the above amount, the District Collector<br \/>\nor an officer authorised by him shall countersign the passes. Before the 10th of every<br \/>\nsucceeding month, the accounts shall be settled by the Panchayats with the District<br \/>\nCollector and the balance amount towards River Management Fund shall be paid. No<br \/>\npasses without undergoing the formalities referred above shall be permitted to be used<br \/>\nfor mining or transporting sand.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9) The Secretary of the Panchayats shall see that all the columns in the passes are filled<br \/>\nup properly.\n<\/p>\n<p> 10) The Panchayats shall post an employee at each Kadavus who will make an endorsement<br \/>\nas to the time at which the vehicle leaves the Kadavus with a load of sand and the time<br \/>\nrequired for the vehicle to reach its destination. To have a watch over this arrangement<br \/>\nand to see that the representative of the Panchayats is meticulously following the<br \/>\nabove direction, after the journey is over, the used form shall be immediately returned<br \/>\nto the Panchayats. In any case, the same vehicle shall not be given a fresh pass without<br \/>\nsurrendering the pass used by it for the prior trip. All the other conditions imposed<br \/>\nby the Government from time to time shall be binding on the Panchayat in the matter<br \/>\nof mining and transporting of sand.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. There is, however, a sting in the tail. Instead of complying with the directions<br \/>\nof this Court as contained in the order dated 26.3.2001, this circular ends by saying,<br \/>\n&#8220;these conditions should also be imposed in the case of rivers under the control of<br \/>\nMunicipalities\/Corporations of State&#8221;. What was directed by this Court was that<br \/>\nthe conditions imposed in its order shall be imposed in respect of sand mining in all the<br \/>\nrivers in Kerala. What has been done is something divergent. When the learned<br \/>\nAdditional Advocate General&#8217;s attention was specifically drawn to this lapse, he stated<br \/>\nthat, though not happily worded, the circular really means that and it imposes the<br \/>\nconditions suggested in the interim order of this Court to sand mining in all the rivers in<br \/>\nKerala.\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. At this stage, when these Original Petitions came up for final hearing, we<br \/>\nlearned from the learned Additional Advocate General that the State of Kerala is<br \/>\nconsidering bringing forward a comprehensive legislation to give ample powers to the<br \/>\nState Government to make detailed rules and regulations which would carry forward<br \/>\nthe object projected in the original petitions and the desire expressed by this court<br \/>\nthrough its interim orders from time to time. We are also of the view that in a matter<br \/>\nlike this a comprehensive legislation is the only remedy as the court cannot make<br \/>\ninterim orders continuously and supervise the situation, though for the lapse on the<br \/>\npart of the executive, the court has to step in from time to time to see that the situation<br \/>\ndid not go out of control. We are happy that the State Government is forward thinking<br \/>\nand desires to bring forward a comprehensive legislation on the subject.\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. In view of the fact that there is an impending legislation on the subject, we<br \/>\nare of the view that an order on the lines of the existing interim orders would be<br \/>\nsufficient to take care of the situation in the interregnum from today and the date on<br \/>\nwhich the legislation becomes effective. With this in view, we heard several of the<br \/>\ncounsel who appeared for the intervenor Panchayats, contractors, employees employed<br \/>\non sand mining and construction works. In our judgment, every restriction of<br \/>\ndevelopment is a reasonable restriction on somebody&#8217;s right to life, right to trade or<br \/>\nbusiness or occupation. As long as the restriction is not disproportionate and more<br \/>\nthan necessary, and within reasonable limits, such restriction is a price one has to pay<br \/>\nfor being a part of the civilised society. We must hasten to add that neither has the<br \/>\nCourt directed a total prohibition of sand mining in the State river beds and river banks,<br \/>\nnor is that what we intend to do. Sand mining is necessary; but it has to be done within<br \/>\nstrictly regulated limits defined for the purpose of sustaining development which is the<br \/>\nultimate objective.\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. With the aforesaid objective in mind, after hearing all objectors, we dispose<br \/>\nof the aforesaid Original Petitions and Contempt of Court Cases with the following<br \/>\ndirections, which shall be without prejudice to the right of the State Government to<br \/>\nbring forward a comprehensive legislation on the subject and which shall operate<br \/>\nduring the interregnum till such legislation comes into force:\n<\/p>\n<p> i) All the directions issued by the government dated 5.1.1998, 20.5.2001 and the interim<br \/>\norders of this Court, including the one dated 21.6.2001 regarding sand mining shall be<br \/>\nstrictly followed by all the authorities in respect of all the rivers in Kerala. No sand<br \/>\nmining shall be allowed, unless the conditions incorporated therein are followed,<br \/>\nincluding the obtaining of report from the experts.\n<\/p>\n<p> ii) The collection of sand within 1 km of bridges and irrigation projects is prohibited.<br \/>\nIllegally mined sand shall be directed to be put back in the river.\n<\/p>\n<p> iii) Export Committee as referred to in the G.O. dated 5.1.1998 shall be the Centre for Earth<br \/>\nScience Studies (CESS) or Centre for Water Resources Development and Management<br \/>\n(CWRDM). District Collector shall obtain the report of CESS or CWRDM and if there<br \/>\nis no report received, no sand mining shall be allowed unless and until such report is<br \/>\nobtained and all steps indicated therein are taken. While fixing the Kadavus, the<br \/>\nDistrict Collector shall not allow any Kadavus, where the conditions laid down cannot<br \/>\nbe complied with.\n<\/p>\n<p> iv) Constructions made within rivers (as pointed out by the experts), reported to be<br \/>\ncausing adverse effect on river ecology, shall be demolished immediately by the local<br \/>\nauthority, and the expenses incurred on this account shall be recovered from the<br \/>\nconcerned persons.\n<\/p>\n<p> v) Karmasamithis shall be constituted in all Panchayats and made functional before<br \/>\nallowing and mining they shall point out any violations of conditions. All reports<br \/>\nsubmitted by Karmasamithi members and the public shall be considered immediately<br \/>\nby the District Collector, or police officials and other authorities and immediate action<br \/>\ntaken to prevent such violation the Secretary, Local Self Government, for the family<br \/>\nfor paying the arrears in instalments. The Secretary, Local Self Government, shall after<br \/>\nconsidering each case make appropriate directions with regard to the instalment in<br \/>\nwhich the arrears have to be paid off. As long as there is no default in payment of such<br \/>\ninstalments, the Secretary may permit such Panchayats to extract sand as otherwise<br \/>\nallowed under this order.\n<\/p>\n<p> vii) The River Management Fund shall be utilised for protecting the river and the river banks.\n<\/p>\n<p> viii) River sand shall be allowed to be taken outside the State only if there is excess quantity<br \/>\navailable, as decided by the State Government.\n<\/p>\n<p> ix) Steps shall be taken to demarcate the river boundaries and to protect them.\n<\/p>\n<p> x) The State Government shall consider the constitution of a River Protection Force and<br \/>\na State River Management Authority for protecting all the rivers in the State from<br \/>\nexcessive sand mining.\n<\/p>\n<p> xi) On behalf of some of the Panchayats it is contended that they had no opportunity for<br \/>\ndealing with the expert committee report and some of them are aggrieved by that. If<br \/>\nany Panchayat has any objection to the report of CESS, which is already on record,<br \/>\nsuch panchayat may forward its objections to the State Government through the<br \/>\nconcerned District Collector. On receipt of such objections, the State Government<br \/>\nshall refer the objections to the Science, Technology and Environment Department<br \/>\nfor examination by an appropriately constituted expert body and implement the<br \/>\nremedial measures as may be suggested by such expert body.\n<\/p>\n<p> xii) The State Government shall also consider the feasibility of alternatives to river sand<br \/>\nin developmental activities. The petitioner in C.M.P. No. 48244 of 2001 in O.P. No. 16272<br \/>\nof 2000, a private company, has proposed dredging of offshore waters to collect sand<br \/>\nfrom the sea and suitably refining it for use in constructional activities. The feasibility<br \/>\nof its proposal shall be studied by the State Government by referring it to an appropriate<br \/>\nexpert body. The petitioner in CMP No. 48244 of 2001 has expressed its willingness<br \/>\nto defray the expenditure likely to be incurred in connection with such feasibility study.<br \/>\nThe State Government may call upon the petitioner in C.M.P. No. 48244 of 2001 to<br \/>\ndeposit such amounts as are necessary for defraying the expenditure for carrying out<br \/>\nthe feasibility study and, if the feasibility study shows that the proposal is feasible,<br \/>\ntake necessary steps to encourage alternative excavation of sand as may be suggested.\n<\/p>\n<p> It shall be the duty of the State Government through its administrative and police<br \/>\nofficers at sufficiently high levels to ensure that these directions are strictly complied<br \/>\nwith and there is no cause for grievance that sand mining is clandestinely and illegally<br \/>\ncarried out despite these directions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 Author: B Srikrishna Bench: B Srikrishna, M Ramachandran JUDGMENT B.N. Srikrishna, C.J. 1. O.P. No. 16272 of 2000 was brought as a public interest litigation by the petitioner which is an association interested in protection of the environmental ecology of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Association For Environment ... vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Association For Environment ... vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2001-10-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-02T19:53:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001\",\"datePublished\":\"2001-10-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-02T19:53:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\"},\"wordCount\":3777,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\",\"name\":\"Association For Environment ... vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2001-10-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-02T19:53:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Association For Environment ... vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Association For Environment ... vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2001-10-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-02T19:53:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001","datePublished":"2001-10-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-02T19:53:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001"},"wordCount":3777,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001","name":"Association For Environment ... vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2001-10-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-02T19:53:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/association-for-environment-vs-state-of-kerala-on-11-october-2001#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Association For Environment &#8230; vs State Of Kerala on 11 October, 2001"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78996"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78996\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}