{"id":7931,"date":"2008-09-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-22T02:00:40","modified_gmt":"2017-01-21T20:30:40","slug":"madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
\u00e9’
\n:<\/p>\n
o
\nu
\n:\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
\n:\n<\/p>\n
E
\nz:\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
\nII-\n<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
\nI-\n<\/p>\n
3″\n<\/p>\n
c:\n<\/p>\n
1:\n<\/p>\n
E?\n<\/p>\n
::\n<\/p>\n
E
\nZ
\n5<\/span>
\nII-\n<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
\nSE
\n3<\/span>
\nu
\nr
\n2<\/span>
\n:\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
\nE<\/p>\n
I
\nI
\nI<\/p>\n
THE HDN’BLE MR.JusTIczV\u00a7u3Hns3W\ufb01”#\ufb01I.” f.’<\/p>\n
R.s.A.no.351\/zdqezansi
\nBETWEEN: V ‘<\/p>\n
nanazan
\nSEUTHARISHETTY _ A,m_=.<\/p>\n
55 ms, am p.r..n.1cp.r-r:e’m:_\u00bbrp;v.Lz;_ ‘- ”<\/p>\n
saxasun naxana *-~ .”. at<\/p>\n
B G PURE HUBLI -V f V
\nMALAVRLLI TALUK, _~”-g- ‘.g, IA,’
\nnannra DI3T-5?1\u00a33Q ; ;.;.;-PETITIGNER<\/p>\n
my 3:1: J\ufb01ymms, Amrs)<\/p>\n
AND :\n<\/p>\n
1 Purm\ufb01sw\ufb01nv “_
\n310 HARISHETY5<\/p>\n
s\u00e9nnc\ufb02a nnx\ufb01h\ufb01 ***** ”\n<\/p>\n
‘ ‘.V\ufb01’Gi\u00a7UR\ufb01”HDBbI<\/p>\n
12’: HAL\ufb02\u00a5KLLIxV.\n<\/p>\n
*. .aanaxa,p:sra57143o<\/p>\n
‘”‘v. 2 AEJDHAMME}A<\/p>\n
Aszn’aaour 65 YEARS
\n‘, wwo”;gws HARISHETTY
\n*, ~HaJoR , RIO ALAKATTE KDPRALU
\n.”,sARmsun nnxnnn
\n‘,3 G PURE HUBLI
\nMALKWALLI<\/p>\n
.__ %E *-~MANnvn nxsr-571430
\n‘\u00bb-,\u00e9 npc\ufb01nmn<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT 49<\/p>\n
DID LLPLTE PIARISHETTY
\nEHO MADAIAH<\/p>\n
‘I unnu u..n.._… ..\n<\/p>\n
swan ‘I-u\ufb01llllll ‘Jr R\ufb02\ufb02,<\/p>\n
NAN-‘HUI ni\ufb01ii Qf\ufb02ii-‘ET OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT 0?’ KARNATAKA I-HG!-I COURT OF K\ufb01RNA’FAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAE(& WGH C’<\/p>\n
Kg’ 5} Ii”J$R.FzI”\u00a7’\u00a3.}\u00a7$DI VIBELAEE
\n}’.!R\u20acJ3G.\u00a5’\ufb01xLLI TALUK
\n1″\u00a3A\u00a3\u00a7B’\u00a3’3i\u00a7 I315′?-571436<\/p>\n
4 \u00a3HIKK\ufb01?\ufb02RY\ufb01MMA<\/p>\n
ASEE PLEOUT 35 Y <\/p>\n
EED LR?E MARISHETTY<\/p>\n
\ufb01f\ufb01 F\ufb01TTAE3EA _.m._
\nZs’\u00e9.;’C? \u00a7’\u00a7L?*aEzLE3R ‘KILLAC-EB I<\/p>\n
? manaazvuaa<\/p>\n
}\u00a7”\u20ac’39RE–\u00a7?1124!<\/p>\n
5 azanxnnx
\nA633 A\u00a3OUT 33 YEARS
\n\u00a333 anwz nnnxsaawr
\n$39 SIEERIAH ‘_’
\nRf\ufb01? ?H1GAnAHnLLI”, -_>;
\nE g yaaa, E&&B\u00a53&\u00a71 Ta _ , –=,’eg=
\nHAHEEE 21a?+\u00a7?1430 “-9 _=g;, RE$?GNDENTS<\/p>\n
i\ufb01y 2:: : 3 \u00e9 x\u00a7\u00e9;mm3yH;,A\u00a3v tan R1-4
\n\u00a35 $\u00a3Hvs3,AmB.3\ufb01a2PK\u00a3sEN?EB)
\n23x_ $zL\u00e9\ufb011g\ufb01ksgv iQg–foF cvc \ufb01EAINST THE
\nJansgnzar-V’&% ‘3\ufb01cgzs”, mw;7.11.2aas rasssn IN
\nR.\ufb01a\ufb01%.3%f2\u00a7\ufb012’vQNg TH\ufb01*u?1LE QF THE CIVIL 3U\ufb02GE<\/p>\n
_:aR.aa\u00a7;%\u00bbMA9\u00e9vagv 3333153255 was 3&PEhh BN3
\n\u00e9’g@n;?vt\u00a7@” ?H$_ auusmaaw .AND nacngz DT.1T.4.2092
\n‘eg$s2a z% \u00a2;E5\u00a7\u00a7.ac4fa9 QM wax FILE or mus czvxa<\/p>\n
3$\ufb01$\u00a7\u00bb\u00a7a\u00a7;\ufb013;g\ufb01xaaayannx.<\/p>\n
w3:\u00e93asa caazua an ran ADMISSION THIS nay,<\/p>\n
H  TE\u00a3=E\u00a2UE?”\u00a7ELIVERE\ufb02 THE ynnaowxms:<\/p>\n
JFDGIIN!<\/p>\n
Zizia is aaasnd defendant’s appeal against<\/p>\n
the jzzdqmant and: decree in iD.8.}\u00a5.4\u00a3}-\u00a311989<\/p>\n
.. ……….. ‘Fl nantvuvuiu\ufb02\ufb02u\ufb02s mutt \u00a3..:\u00a7;8l’;3,_:R’l’ OF KARNATAKA i-HGH COURT OF KARNNFAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAXA HIGH COURT OF XARMATAKA H569-\u00a7 C<\/p>\n
3. ?ha Trial Court, based an tha pledings<\/p>\n
fzame\ufb01 isaues; which ara aa un\ufb02er:<\/p>\n
ii}<\/p>\n
\ufb01ii}<\/p>\n
‘Whether the plaintiff .p:\u00e9\u00a7esff ‘
\ntha geneaiogy atetad’in”\u00a7\ufb01\u00a3a? ‘__
\n2 of the ;p1ain\ufb01_ a\ufb01d }fu\u00a3th\u00a7\ufb01’ ‘_ _
\nthat he i$>,the4Ws\u00a7m off in: \ufb01t”<\/p>\n
aafendant \ufb01ari\u00a7\u00a7atty?\u00bb.*u”<\/p>\n
WhatherF\u00a7he5@la$h:iff_p:ovea
\nthat the’,  $\ufb01\u00a7t*g W$;h&dule<\/p>\n
g;@\u00a7$:ti\u00a7s }ax\u00e95f;th\u00a2’ jaint<\/p>\n
: fam\u00a3iy_piQ\u00a7a;tie@?V <\/p>\n
‘wggthgi  V\u00a7hm_.w\u00a71aintiff is<\/p>\n
:_ahti\u00a7lad, f\u00a7$ partitian and<\/p>\n
‘ say\u00e9:a\u00a3$” \u00a7355essian cf tha<\/p>\n
\u00e9ui\ufb01”\ufb01c$a\ufb01uie pxapertias. If<\/p>\n
“$0 Q\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01 is his share?\n<\/p>\n
*\ufb02\u00a7iV\u00a7’ T<\/p>\n
wng\u00e9hex chm plaintiff ia<\/p>\n
‘\u00bb%ntitlad ta amsne profita as<\/p>\n
 :\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n
\ufb01dditienal Iaaua Nb.l:<\/p>\n
ef the I\ufb02afandantz Ha.1 axe antitled. for<\/p>\n
grayed?\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01hat erd\ufb01z DI dacr$&?\n<\/p>\n
Whether the L.Rs<\/p>\n
.. — –.- –c-. “urn \u00abum ‘nIl”IiIeiT’RW”I\u00a5\\l’\\<\/p>\n
mun vying: cur mmaNA:AK.A HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 9? KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARMATAKA HIGH Ci<\/p>\n
tag share at their share over tha gait<\/p>\n
azhedule prmgertiea?\n<\/p>\n
4. % agpxwmiatian of thaw evi\ufb02\u00a3n\u00a2\u00a7; fthewu”<\/p>\n
Tria; Ceurt held that \ufb01he _\u00a71\u00a7i\ufb01tiff”f$a$ <\/p>\n
antitisd ta Sfil zhara, the d\u00e9f\u00e9\ufb01dan\u00a7 3h,2His <\/p>\n
entitl\ufb01\u00e9 far 8321 ahara, %ife is e\ufb01\ufb01iti\u00e9d to
\n1X21 ahare ma daugbia:3_a\u00a7\u00e9”aq\ufb01s;ly entitled
\nfar 1321 sha\u00a3e,each,~~ :w’ . V.<\/p>\n
5. he d\u00a7f\u00a2\ufb01\ufb01aptu\u00a7n%\u00a7Tfiiadfan appeal before
\nthe 3′.”-::s=&:er__ \u00ab.V t’~.’.::q_12–x:?; . In the appeal,<\/p>\n
thaugh tha appeal i\ufb01gdismiaaed, hawaver, as<\/p>\n
ragam\ufb01s”_.the’u;$\ufb01ar\u00a7, tha Aypallata Court<\/p>\n
 ,\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01ifi$\u00a7 _\u00a7\u00a7aV judgment and hald that th$<\/p>\n
pi’.;;i.;-;\u00bb;js;,i\u00a7\u00a3-f\u20ac”‘~~_., _3,5-“‘ entitled far 10%;?” share;<\/p>\n
:V  \ufb01afa\ufb01&&n\u00a3 -\u00a7\u00a7;2 is entitled. far 1\/23″” shara
\nu”  $\u00a7\ufb01;V\u00a7a\u20ac\u00a7\u00a3te:a are entitled. fur 1!2?”‘ ahara
\n g$\u00a7\ufb01;  The judgment and decree of the Lawar
\n._\u00a3yp%l1ata Geuzt is called in qneatien in this<\/p>\n
n”\u00a7pp\u00e9a1 by dgrsndanr Na.2.<\/p>\n
awn WJJIJKI Ur ms-smmm mm cg-mg? 0F KARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA Ham: COURI or KARNATAXA HIGH COURT or xAmA’ma<A HIGH 0<\/p>\n
5. Laarnad emunsal aypaaxing far defendant<\/p>\n
\u00a7a.2 mainiy canten\ufb01ed that Siddamma 15 not t\ufb01g<\/p>\n
wife mi Hariahatty and the plaintiff \u00e9\u00a7\u00e9$ja\u00a7f  <\/p>\n
gm: &ny share in the suit scha$ulewp\u00a3p\u00a7&\u00a3ty.;u
\nH9 aise submitted that a\ufb01gn:m\u00e95s\ufb01@i\ufb01g thgtg <\/p>\n
\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01ama _is tha wifa,’gf Eg\u00a3i3hetfy;_:3\ufb01\u00e9 <\/p>\n
becamea the aecnnd wife #\u00a7\ufb01 aye \ufb01ii; n\ufb01t get
\nany shara in th\u00a3t\ufb02p;\u00a2fe\u00a7fie\u00a7 V\u00a7;d H\ufb01\ufb01rthar
\nantmitte\u00e9 that,  a1i:\u00bb %\u00a7@ H\u00a7%@\u00a7\u00a7ters of
\nIv\u00a3a.ri3hettjg’    ta the
\npzwce&\ufb01ing$. &%\u00a7M.$i;g#\ufb01\u00a5i\u00a7h jaf share is not
\nQarzemtiyJ\u00a7\u00e9\ufb01Q h% h\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01 th$Wcaurts halaw. In<\/p>\n
thia re\u00a7\u00a2;\ufb01\u00a2 he’=:3ii\u00a7\ufb01” an tha evidence of<\/p>\n
};%.w.s;;fa::\u00a7 gzib-mi_Vt’t”:=.x=:1v’that defendant E-30.2 in 115.5<\/p>\n
 \u00e9%i\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2\u00e9 A?h\u00a73 aateg\u00e9xicaliy atated that
\n\u00a7i\u00a5&\u00a7m\u00a7a w\u00a7s:\u00a2\u00a3tried ta ans Chikkananjaiah. He _
\n _fi1rt\u00a7a2r ..__;\u00e9:%;.\u00a73;\u00a3f\u00a73′.tt\u00abaa:i that sidaama has dascmihed<\/p>\n
” 3 h%:a\u00a7:f’a\u00e9 tha daughtez at \ufb01hikkamadamma and<\/p>\n
 ;\u00e93i\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01: af Iynarahundi Hulikapya and mat
\n._\u00a7iv\u00e9a the addrema cf hgr husband Harishatty.<\/p>\n
 “Ralyimg an the avi\ufb01ence cf D.W.4 and Exa.D2<\/p>\n
an\ufb01 E3, the learned caasel for defendant No.2<\/p>\n
C<\/p>\n
L\/2:7<\/p>\n
.. ._.—…… awn<\/p>\n
W-wmm.m vwwn Mwswsi V3” mxmmm mm mun or a<AaNAmcA 1-mm count OFKARNATAKA mm-2 awn cw mmAwm H56}-E o<\/p>\n
snbmiztad that marriage bets-man Harishatty and<\/p>\n
Sziszix\u00e9asma is not prmred and further <\/p>\n
that aftar the: tiaath of Kaxishetty, <\/p>\n
m.=a-m:L~:ea an all his legal heirs.%..,V1"\u00a7gV:;;qg\u00e9\u00a7;e;,J'V%'%< <\/p>\n
bath the courts helm-av have—   3a;;vd,c2.\u00a7\u00a2:1..,vV:i1\u00a7_ :'<\/p>\n
sai\u00e9 .:\u00a2b.a:a armangst the c1:\u00ab'.:i.lc:i,r\u00e9r3."c"3f  V<\/p>\n
Ha aim: submitted that a.l'3;L.?\u00a5.4 in his cxzosaw<\/p>\n
3  \u00e9xanzinati an. Apart tram this, he alas<\/p>\n
submitted that tinting the pzzaceedings in Civil<\/p>\n
in tha<\/p>\n
 . ‘ . . 2
\nS Q W…\n<\/p>\n
9 III.\n<\/p>\n
m dd
\n3 u
\nT I
\nan t
\n.3
\nr
\na
\nw
\nW
\n3<\/span>
\nx
\nQ
\nt
\nh .\n<\/p>\n
G… C 1..\n<\/p>\n
m m M
\n.3 Q m<\/p>\n
$5<\/p>\n
.0 :63 \u00a7$.<2g5_ no .5559 $0.3 \u00a7$.<\u00a7\u00a7 me .\u00a73OU 30:." S_<Ez\u00a2$_ mo M3300 zen: \u00a7\u00a2h<Zu\u00a7 ".0  $62,. \u00a7_5\u00a2zm,\u00a7 ma wxa\ufb01u :3"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi \u00e9’ : o u : 9 : E z: 5 II- 0 I- 3″ c: 1: E? :: E Z 5 II- 0 SE 3 u r 2 : 5 E I I I THE HDN’BLE MR.JusTIczV\u00a7u3Hns3W\ufb01”#\ufb01I.” f.’ R.s.A.no.351\/zdqezansi BETWEEN: V ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMadaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-21T20:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-21T20:30:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1094,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-21T20:30:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-21T20:30:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-21T20:30:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008"},"wordCount":1094,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008","name":"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-21T20:30:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-puttaswamy-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madaiah vs Puttaswamy on 2 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}