{"id":79593,"date":"2009-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-28T02:13:41","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T20:43:41","slug":"sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n<pre>\u00a36\n\n1\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 23% DAY OF OCTOBER 2009 \nBEFORE  '\nTHE HOEWBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERIYVII V'  \n\nWRIT PETITION NQ19939 OF 3;(}09'(\u00abr\u00ab}'1\\\/i%.jCI_?\u00ab('fI'A]\":~   \nAND V * -   \n\nWRIT PE'FI'I'ION NO21573 OF 20Q9'Y{G'M--OI\ufb02.O1 . \u00ab. \"  \n\nBETWEEN\n\nSR1 N.NANJAPPA  \nS\/O.LATE SRI.NANJUNDAPP\"A__  \nAGED ABOUT 70 YEARS \" 'I\nR\/A.1\\Io.9,3RD MAIN I   V\nBAHUBALI NAGARA, JALAHALLI ' ' -\n\nEANGALOREI3      PE'I'ITIONER\n\n{BY  B\"  \"Am\/. ,)\n\nSR1 GYANCHANI) Q , . \nS\/O LATE SRI\".I)_CHENGA1\u00a7\u00a5LAL\n 56 YI*3ARS~  _\n \"B!\/AINO.TKZNEIFLOOR \"\" I'\n SRRCROSS, SQRSTREET,\n'Al\\\u00a7'CHEI3_ET; EANG;ALORE--53\n\nya\n\nSRI*.N}'RAMAG?I+:ANORA RAJU\n_ AGEE 43..YEARS\n\n .  vs\/O SMNARAYANA RAJU\n\n  '~ISIIITIMBHAGYAIIAKSHMI\n\n-_A;'GED'39 YEARS\n\n .f\"w;\u00a7O SRI.RAMACHANDRA RAJU\n\n\" BOTH ARE R\/A.No.2o, 2ND MAIN\n\" BAHUBALI NAGARA, JALAHALLi\nBANGALORE--13  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>{BY SR1 MANJUNATH G.K. ADV., FOR<br \/>\nEVLSJ. ASSOCEATES, FOR R-1<br \/>\nSR1 H.HANUNLANTPLARAYAPPA, HCGP FOR STATE<br \/>\nR&#8211;2 8: R-3 SERVED]<\/p>\n<p>THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER   _<br \/>\nAND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYINO__TOIQUASeHj<br \/>\nTHE IMPUONEO ORDER DT. 17.12.2008 PASSED &#8211;SYf-THE CITY \u00ab. &#8216;<br \/>\nCIVIL COURT, BANGALORE ON 1.A.3 II\\T'&#8221;OSI 1143\/_2&#8243;oo_5 VIDE;<br \/>\nANX~E AND ALSO BE PLEASED TO QUASHA FIHE .IMPUGNED.<br \/>\nORDER DT. 20.6.09 PASSED BY THE CITY C&#8217;iV1};;,CC)L\u00a7RT,&#8217;~._<\/p>\n<p>BANGALORE ON I.A.4 IN OS 1143\/2006 VIDE P;NX&#8211;H&#8217;A\ufb01I)_v  &#8221;<br \/>\nTHESE PETITIONS cOM1NG&#8221;&#8216;d&#8217;e&#8217;u.O&#8217;N_ FC)R&#8211; 1\u00ab&#8221;IeRE1&#8217;;:MINARY<\/p>\n<p>HEARING IN &#8216;E&#8217; GROUP THIS DAY;&#8212; TE-\u00abIE&#8221;~-.COUP'{&#8216;fvv&#8211;3\\\/IADE THE<br \/>\nFOLLOWING: x  5 _  .\n<\/p>\n<p>As the issue perfains   of eourt fee, I have<\/p>\n<p>put Sri    learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Pleader on notice.\n<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner has  question the orders, dated<br \/>\n17.12.2005 &#8216;{I&#8217;mneXure\u00a5E)) a\u00b0nd.&#8221;20.e.2009 {AnneXure&#8211;H] passed<\/p>\n<p>Tithe Prineipal City Civil and Sessions Judge.<\/p>\n<p> EangaIor&#8217;r;,o:I&#8217; in O.S.No.}.143\/2006.<\/p>\n<p>2.  The &#8220;first respondent filed the suit against the<\/p>\n<p> the respondent Nos.2 and 3 seeking the relief<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A.V..of..d_eO1aration, permanent injunction, etc. In the said suit<\/p>\n<p>dud&#8217;~.__proOeedings, the petitioner \ufb01led I.A.No.3 invoking Order 7<\/p>\n<p>33%<\/p>\n<p>Ruie i1(c) of C.P.C. and sought rejection of the piaint on the<\/p>\n<p>ground of the payment of insufficient court fee. The  <\/p>\n<p>Court dismissed the same holding that it is  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>decide the issue of court fee w&#8217;ithout&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;the  .of4:jthe-.g<\/p>\n<p>parties. Not content with this dismissal  tithe <\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led I.A.No.4 invoking Section 15i&#8217;&#8211;oi&#8217;*~C.P.C.~.for&#8211;..tav3xing&#8221;up&#8217;V&#8217;the &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>issue No.7 as a preliminary&#8217; .issue;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;TheVissue i\\To;&#8217;7&#8217;*reads as<br \/>\nfo11ows:~<br \/>\n&#8220;7. Vifhethef.  suit 1: utiluaitiorji. .V  by the<br \/>\nplaintiff and.coLtrt:fee.._gpeiit:i&#8217;V_&#8217;byVhim, is proper<br \/>\nThe said I.A.:&#8221;&#8216;a1so_ met&#8217;  fate that was met by the<br \/>\nI.A.No.3. Thesexipetitiotns areiiied raising the chalienge to the<\/p>\n<p>orders on.&#8217;:g_:\u00a5&#8217;:A{t_Nost_. 3 and  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>  ..VSri&#8221;R;E\u00a7\u00a7Sadasivappa, the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>I-&#8216;V,petition&#8217;er'&#8221;sulornitsthat the Court is obliged to take up issue<\/p>\n<p>_j:&#8217;No.7._as the fjreliminary issue. He further submits that the<\/p>\n<p>5.provisions&#8217;-contained in Order 7 Rule 1 MC) and the provisions<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;cogitiajned in Section 11(2) of the Karnataka Court&#8211;Fees and<\/p>\n<p> Valuation Act, 1958. operate in two different spheres.<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01\ufb01if,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the dismissal of l.A.l\\&#8217;5&#8217;o.3 is no ground for the<br \/>\ndismissal of I.A.No.4 also. He also relied on the <\/p>\n<p>decisions:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) 2002 (4) KCCR 2987<br \/>\nCompany and Another Vf.  ;Maha1it&#8217;*.Q.Qlttoul:&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Company and Others. To<\/p>\n<p>1:) ILR 1999 KAR 3660 W Tl1immaiah&#8211; x_f_.&#8217;S1;eeiiitrlaHsa<\/p>\n<p>4. Sri G.K.Manjuna-th, the&#8212;learnedA_cou\ufb01svel aiipearing<\/p>\n<p>for M\/s.M.S.J. Associates  submits<\/p>\n<p>that the matter .for_the respondents (plaintiffs)<br \/>\nevidence. He&#8217;   Court has formed the<br \/>\nView that;tiie,evider1,c&#8217;e&#8217; of the parties is required for deciding<\/p>\n<p>  and therefore the Trial Court has rightly<\/p>\n<p>  4.<\/p>\n<p>5.  Sri&#8217;  AH.Hanumantharayppa, the learned<\/p>\n<p>Cit&#8221;&#8216;:Co:rer:imer;.t&#8221;~&#8211;i5leader submits that the Court has no option,<\/p>\n<p>issue No.7 as a preliminary issue before it starts<\/p>\n<p> lrecording of evidence on other issues. He further submits<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9i<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\nthat, it is necessary to refer to the provisions Contained in<br \/>\nSection 1 1(2) of the Karnataka Courtwfees and Suits <\/p>\n<p>Act, 1958, which is extracted hereinbelow:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;1 1. Decision as to proper fee in,Vcourt$:&#8221;&#8216;{&#8216;} &#8221; _  <\/p>\n<p>{2} Any defendant may, by <\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led before the frst hearing..___of the &#8216;suit   H<br \/>\nevidence is recorded on the  of<br \/>\nsubject to the next succeeding&#8221;&#8216;su_b not tater,<br \/>\nplead that the subject&#8211;rr1dtter&#8217;0f not been<br \/>\nproperly valued or that&#8221;-the:fee&#8211; ;no&#8221;t&#8217;Jsu_f\ufb01.cient.<\/p>\n<p>All questions?__&#8217;Vari;;\u20ac;ingt:n 33s.uch.4_&#8221;pledsv&#8211;shall be heard<\/p>\n<p>and decided: euizience&#8217;*vw\u00a3vfrecorded affecting<br \/>\nsuch  of the claim If the<br \/>\ncourt decides that  matter of the suit has<br \/>\nnot been properly. or that the fee paid is not<br \/>\n  the cour*t-s.'&#8221;Lall fix a date before which the<br \/>\n plaint .,&lt;A;vfLall.}be_ amended in accordance with the<br \/>\nand the deficit fee shall be paid. If<br \/>\nthe&#039;&#8211;plai__nt  not amended or if the de\ufb01cit fee be not<\/p>\n<p> uqititin the ttrne ailowed, the plaint shall be<\/p>\n<p>&#039;A lv~:frejei:ted and the court shall pass such order as it<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  just regarding costs of the suit. &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01\ufb01tt<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of<\/p>\n<p>VEERAGOUDA AND OTHERS v.\n<\/p>\n<p>SHANTAPPAGOWDA, reported in ILR 2009  _<\/p>\n<p>held that if an issue regarding court fee is   V <\/p>\n<p>issue shall be decided before record&#8217;ing:1&#8243;eVide:1ce&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>issues. Therefore, the mandate of law\ufb02is very:   No &#8211;. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>discretion is left to the Court fo_r__Rpos&#8217;i:p_onirig\u00ab.the_t1ecision<br \/>\nregarding issue of court fee is taken in the<br \/>\nwritten statement or _before:&#8217;the&#8217;eyi.den\u00bbce  \u00abrecorded. In this<\/p>\n<p>case, it is not  that__;&#8217;the&#8217;-Treeording of the evidence<\/p>\n<p>has not yet   in paragraph 4 of<br \/>\nthe written ignsuf\ufb01ciency of the court fee.<br \/>\nFurther, the issue No;7.v&#8217;isdaiso: framed regarding the payment<\/p>\n<p>of. Vcou-rt fee.   I<\/p>\n<p>.   the&#8221;se circumstances, the order passed on<\/p>\n<p> isset aside. The Trial Court is directed to take<\/p>\n<p>Di1p4&#8243;issuec__NoV;&#8217;7 as a preliminary issue before it proceeds to<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8216; &#8211; . V_rec_o_rd&#8217; the&#8221; evidence on other issues.<\/p>\n<p>R\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>8. In View of this direction, there is no need tospass<\/p>\n<p>any orders on the Trial Courts order an I.A.No.3.<\/p>\n<p>9. These petitions are ailowed in part. as  ~<\/p>\n<p>costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>VGR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri \u00a36 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23% DAY OF OCTOBER 2009 BEFORE &#8216; THE HOEWBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERIYVII V&#8217; WRIT PETITION NQ19939 OF 3;(}09&#8242;(\u00abr\u00ab}&#8217;1\\\/i%.jCI_?\u00ab(&#8216;fI&#8217;A]&#8221;:~ AND V * &#8211; WRIT PE&#8217;FI&#8217;I&#8217;ION [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-27T20:43:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-27T20:43:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":916,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-27T20:43:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-27T20:43:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-27T20:43:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009"},"wordCount":916,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009","name":"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-27T20:43:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-nanjappa-vs-sri-gyanchand-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri N Nanjappa vs Sri Gyanchand on 23 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79593\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}