{"id":80156,"date":"2009-03-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-28T00:40:06","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T19:10:06","slug":"smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath And Das<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN TFEE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT SHARWAD<\/p>\n
DATED THIS THE 17?” DAY OF MARCE, 2eo\u00a7f f%:.’<\/p>\n
PRESENT<\/p>\n
THE HoN’8:..E MKJUSTICVFE’K.\u00bbL\u00a2MA\u00a5Kf3′{}’4N:;\u00a7\u00a73f}\u00a7.VV’   <\/p>\n
AND
\nTag HOBFBLE MR. 3UST\u00a3\u20ac;:E-~.H.N. NA_GA_\u00a71’i3H)i\\f\\I”*S\ufb01$’:<\/p>\n
MESCELLANEQUS EQWST A.P.\u00a75EAL'”\u00a75\u00a3Q.\u00a7;1_;’1i\/2G(\u00a7?(MV)<\/p>\n
BETWEBQ:<\/p>\n
Sm’ 3A:~aA;<:'~v%_  m '   <\/p>\n
W\/C} LATE G 7RAMACHAN.\u00a7)RA  <\/p>\n
AGE 37 vEA;2s;c:<;c;seauTsx'r;ess<\/p>\n
Ric: T0aAP;AeA;_g  \u00bb    <\/p>\n
NGW R\/AT_.AGAb1KER}1.. ..*<\/p>\n
TQ AND DIST, :<ez–*=PAL. :APPELL\u00a3\\\u00a5xfT<\/p>\n
A Vf(2\u00bbYVs\u00a7f:;%%\u00a2;\u00a7;',a.;\\;%mAs++s:<;s.R P mm, ADV.)<\/p>\n
"mi-; Ds\u00e9\u00e9zsicrsm CGNTRQLLER APSRTC<\/p>\n
   ANAF3TA_5:PUR DIVISION
\n "AN4\u00a7\\NT}\ufb01PUR A P. :RESPONDE\u00a5'3T<\/p>\n
kfgav SRLSUNIL s. 955241 ma<\/p>\n
M\/Si. RAG ASSOCIATES, ADVS.)<\/p>\n
MFA FILED U\/5.173(1) 0? MV ACT AGAi:\u00a7I$'%f;?HE<\/p>\n
IUDGMEM AND AWARD DATED 13\/12\/zoosPAss%E9+IIs1I._
\nMVC No.3o9\/04 0\u00bb: THE FILE or: "{Mi~_<;E'~.._?'R?f_ES1DI'F~\u00a3G\u00e9
\nGFFICER, ADDL MACT & FAST TRACK C*_Z}URT~.';_II :<mI,,  ‘<\/p>\n
PARTLY ALLOWING ms \u00a3:LAI_M’  “PETITICN’.,V_’V’EQR<\/p>\n
C\u20ac)MP*ENSA’\u00a5ION AND SEEKING 7. E’NH3X\u00a5%\u00a5\u00a7iEMF,N\u00a7I..,,_ {}if ”<\/p>\n
COMPENSATION.\n<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL COMINC\u00a7”I*\u00a7\u00a5Vi FOR”~.\u00a7f)\u00a3~\u00a7Is\u00a7’IOI\u00a7I ‘rms<\/p>\n
DAY, MANJL}%3ATH J., D.ELIV\u00a7RE\u00a3)vTH\u00a3_ FOLLGWIN3″: ~<\/p>\n
Theugai  liI3 *:\u00a2d”f\u00e9r\u00e9dmission, with the
\nconsent O:f”v.Ij.h5E3V1\u00a7\u00a73i:f\u00a7v\u00a7\u20ac$.’V’@{5U\u00ab–FI’S\u00a5\u00e9i \u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01earing for the parties,
\nthe r\ufb01atter is.’  ‘  <\/p>\n
2. ‘Thvis”  ‘is by the claimant seeking<\/p>\n
en,h.i\u00a7rIcement” _ce;’\u00a7Ipensatien awarded by the MACT,<\/p>\n
I \u00a7<a ;;pa%\u00a3 ,IA.,%\u00a2ajtea 13.12.2995 in we N530?\/04. The<\/p>\n
 ~aI\u00a7.pe\u00a7l\u00e9'rI\u00a75$.__f\ufb01is\ufb01and by name 6. Ramachandra died in a<\/p>\n
ro\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9 t:v*\u00e9f.\ufb01c"'V'accident. He was running a hote\u00a3 at Toranga!<\/p>\n
V.   fiwwavy' 'Station. He was aged about 48 years. According<\/p>\n
"'V\u00a3::c:I"t'tie appeiiant, her deceased husband was earning a sum<\/p>\n
"  "hf Rs.1S,0\ufb010\/- per month. The "I"riburIa\u00a3, after considering<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
the decurnents produced by the appellant<\/p>\n
came to the conclusion that the deceasedj\ufb01les'\u00e9?.Ll'nn;ne'<\/p>\n
hetel in the Railway Station at  <\/p>\n
that the appellant — claimant c\u00a5ie"–.n'et progzlt\u00e9ce'a'ny';ethe?=Ly<\/p>\n
document, the Tribunal a\u00e9seseed tne_"'irt:or\ufb01;e mo? the<\/p>\n
deceased at R$.100,!t..g_erV-\ufb02glillvvt'censidefine the age
\nfurnished in the \u00e9rieln-Q that the
\ndeceased wes'::.eg–ed  the date of the
\nincident.   the 'less of dependency'
\nat  ef"'Re.1G,006\/- wee awarded
\ntowar\u00a7\u00a7.$   .Re.?,0GCl\/- towares 'loss sf<\/p>\n
censortiutmt Rs.V5'_l0t3%;t\/%~*i'tewarc\u00a5s 'mass to the estate' and<\/p>\n
  tov\u00a7ard—-s–~\u00ab'\u00a5oss of lave and affec\ufb01on. In ail,<\/p>\n
 '  ls awarded. Being not satis\ufb01ed wlth the<\/p>\n
C::.{\ufb01eerl$a1:Vt\u00a7':$l\u00a7' vewarded by the Tribunal, the present aepeal<\/p>\n
 is fEle::\u00a3.t*\u00ab:_ V<\/p>\n
x  3.' The point to be considered by us in this appeal
\n" whether, the compensation awarded by the
\nTrleunal is just and proper and does it require<\/p>\n
any enhancement? "'<\/p>\n
(ff .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. It is not in dispute that the appeiian’–:.V_j_rs._a4’_s-._not<\/p>\n
prociuced a positive evidence in regard too”‘ti\u00a7e.i’L:’~:aTct:i_ei._<\/p>\n
income of the deceased. 8ut,__:his_ Coortg’*~cen\u00e9i’ot”.V!oose”.:”‘–..<\/p>\n
sight of the documents pro<:i.ucegi..:b)?'\u00bb._the" 'a";i;it:~eii'*a!,iju:t.<\/p>\n
Admittedly, deceased was ' ' jruegiingii 'a ixhntei  AVV*:\ufb01h'\ufb02 mR.eiii\u00e9:a–yi '<\/p>\n
Station at Torangai.  He haetifg..jr.a;orc\u00a7\u00e9c:et.i%'i%tnTe accident
\nhas occurred while   If he had no
\nsufficient income,  have ourcheseo
\na motorcy_cie   'He was aiso<\/p>\n
maintei_nin*g..Vhisqnrife_'anVdv\u00abrei'n_or  Even on the date of<\/p>\n
the e'c_cicient,V:tise-Ao:irvaoAes::"p.eyabie to an ordinary Coolie, is
\nnot iessiiithwen  day. Yherefore, income of a<\/p>\n
heteiiieir c_annot"be___iAess than Rs.15\ufb01\/- per day even if it is<\/p>\n
' Visccizsicivereeg-a's.._a smailest hotei in a place Eike Torangai that<\/p>\n
. "t:o'o;  ';"'7."n__e'e=.r"'Vti~;e Railway' Station where there is frequent<\/p>\n
movefeent of generai public.\n<\/p>\n
5. In the circumstances, we are \u00e9nciined to assess<\/p>\n
Vfthe income of the deceased at 9.3.150\/– per day out of<\/p>\n
‘which, }.[3”’ has to be deducted towards persona?<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
expenses. Hence, the actual loss of income:\u00ab.._\u00a7ias’–to.V\u00a7;e<\/p>\n
assessed at Rs.100\/- per day, Rs.3,090\/-‘Ft:_::persVV.:r\u20ac\u20ac'<$r2\u00bbti\u00a7i.<\/p>\n
Censtdering the age furnished in fih\u00e9 'drivi:'ig l.\u00a7c\u00e9Vn:e,.V w\u00e9 eats '<\/p>\n
not in a position to disturbthe \ufb01nd4inigi of <\/p>\n
regard to tiie age of the decessed. 'i'hz9,:fefoi'e,VV"&si'\u00e9'h\u00e9i've ts'<\/p>\n
appiy the muitiptisr  \u00a7a,s:h\u00a7 loss of
\ndependency has to 5;;  in
\nad\u00e9ition to   is entitled for a
\nsum of .__t:i\u00a7_ei".\u00a7;cwr.'ventier:al heads since
\nthis  EM";-:i\u00b0:.'i'izg a sum of Rs.40,G00\/-
\ntowatds "'i_os's 'loss to the estate', 'less of<\/p>\n
love and affe=:::tien._' ar;d'\u00ab'..f{zneral expenses'.<\/p>\n
.  tTi1e._._rasuit;the appeai is ailowed \u00e9n part.<\/p>\n
 V\u00e9t\ufb01xpensation awarded by the Ttibunai is<\/p>\n
e\ufb014han.__;::e*d,i'\u00ab:""frorn Rs.3,15,_E)OB\/~\u00bb to Rs.4,72,eo9\/- with<\/p>\n
 ..intei;est' @ 6% per annum from the date of the claim<\/p>\n
ti 'AAV_V'pe':*.:.'it\u00a5o:1 tit! the date of actuai payment.<\/p>\n
Out of the enhanced compensation, 375% sf the<\/p>\n
amount with preportionai mterest, sha%| be invested in a<\/p>\n
KW'<\/p>\n
\ufb01xed deposit in any nationaiised bank in thejeint <\/p>\n
the appeiiant –~ ciaimant and her minor sen tm the  <\/p>\n
son attains the age of majerity, The ap:i\u00e9l'a'nt\u00ab\u00ab:_~ '}<;iai.mj:A-j r'\u00a7t_  <\/p>\n
is entitled to draw the per\u00e9cdicai integest.   A<\/p>\n
E\ufb01gg<\/p>\n
ma?'<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 Author: K.L.Manjunath And Das IN TFEE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT SHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17?” DAY OF MARCE, 2eo\u00a7f f%:.’ PRESENT THE HoN’8:..E MKJUSTICVFE’K.\u00bbL\u00a2MA\u00a5Kf3′{}’4N:;\u00a7\u00a73f}\u00a7.VV’ AND Tag HOBFBLE MR. 3UST\u00a3\u20ac;:E-~.H.N. NA_GA_\u00a71’i3H)i\\f\\I”*S\ufb01$’: MESCELLANEQUS EQWST A.P.\u00a75EAL’”\u00a75\u00a3Q.\u00a7;1_;’1i\/2G(\u00a7?(MV) BETWEBQ: Sm’ 3A:~aA;<:'~v%_ m ' […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-27T19:10:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T19:10:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1016,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T19:10:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-27T19:10:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T19:10:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009"},"wordCount":1016,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009","name":"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T19:10:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-janaki-vs-the-divisional-controller-apsrtc-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Janaki vs The Divisional Controller Apsrtc on 17 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}