{"id":804,"date":"2010-01-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-18T10:24:00","modified_gmt":"2017-01-18T04:54:00","slug":"shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                 Central Information Commission\n                                                             CIC\/OP\/A\/2009\/000107-AD\n                                                                 Dated January 27, 2010\n\nName of the Applicant                     :     Shri S.Ramanujam\n\nName of the Public Authority              :     Southern Railway, Chennai\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The Applicant filed `an RTI application dt.4.8.08 with the CPIO cum CE(Construction),<br \/>\n      Southern   Railway,   Chennai   seeking     authenticated   copies    of   agreements   &amp;<br \/>\n      measurement books, all related to M\/s.Simplex Concrete Pile Foundation. Shri<br \/>\n      R.P.Diwakar, PIO replied on 20.8.08 stating that information sought is from 1998<br \/>\n      onwards and that huge quantum of manpower is needed for collection of data for reply<br \/>\n      and that cost towards the manpower charges are to be borne by the Applicant and<br \/>\n      requested the Applicant&#8217;s confirmation for payment so as to arrive at and advise the<br \/>\n      cost.   He further added that information is spread over       nearly 1000 pages and<br \/>\n      requested the Applicant to pay Rs.2\/- per page as photocopying charges. The<br \/>\n      applicant then wrote on 2.9.08 to the PIO informing his willingness to pay the cost of<br \/>\n      the copies @ Rs.2\/- per page.Shri Rajesh Argal, PIO replied on 11.10.08 informing the<br \/>\n      applicant to deposit Rs.10,314\/- also towards cost of materials and manpower. The<br \/>\n      Applicant, aggrieved with this reply,     then filed an appeal dt.Oct, 2008 (Date not<br \/>\n      mentioned) with the Appellate Authority stating that despite expressing his willingness<br \/>\n      to pay the cost towards photocopying charges, till date he had not received any<br \/>\n      information. He also added that as per provisions contained in the RTI Act, PIO has to<br \/>\n      advise the information seeker the exact amount involved in photocopying charges<br \/>\n      which has not been provided. He further added that more than 30 days have passed<br \/>\n      and information has not been provided to him, he insisted that the same should be<br \/>\n      furnished to him free of cost. Shri R.P.Diwakar, PIO on behalf of the Appellate<br \/>\n      Authority replied on 28.10.08 informing the applicant that office has replied on<br \/>\n      20.8.08 within the period of 30 days and with reference to the applicant&#8217;s letter<br \/>\n      dt.2.9.08, office had replied on 11.10.08 informing him to deposit Rs.10,314\/-.         He<br \/>\n      added that as there is no delay, applicant is requested to pay Rs.10,314\/-. The<br \/>\n      applicant then wrote a letter dt.4.11.08 to the Appellate Authority stating that as per<br \/>\n      the Cost and Fee Rules under the RTI Act, CPIO is expected to collect charges for<br \/>\n      photo copy of the relevant documents @ Rs.2\/- per page.              Collection of service<br \/>\n      charges in the form of wages of staff, as has been done by the CPIO is not permissible<br \/>\n      under the provisions of the Act. He also reiterated that since more than 30 days has<br \/>\n      lapsed, information should be furnished free of cost. Shri R.P.Diwakar, PIO replied on<br \/>\n      24.11.08 stating that cost of manpower charges are made as per section 7(3) of the<br \/>\n      RTI Act and hence the total cost of Rs.10314\/- was communicated vide office letter<br \/>\n        dt.6.10.08.   He also relied on CIC Decision No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2007\/01430 dt.30.4.08.<br \/>\n       Being aggrieved with the reply, applicant filed a second appeal dt.8.12.08 before CIC<br \/>\n       reiterating his contention as given in the first appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the hearing<br \/>\n       on January 27, 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Shri Anil Kumar Khandelwal, Chief Engineer &amp; PIO and Shri S.Mohandass, Head Clerk<br \/>\n       represented the Public Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     The applicant was not present during the hearing.<br \/>\nDecision<\/p>\n<p>5.     Shri Khandelwal, PIO who had joined only 4 months ago on receipt of the hearing<br \/>\n       notice from the Commission wrote to the Appellant          on 31.12.09 requesting him to<br \/>\n       inspect the records in view of the voluminous information sought by him and to take<br \/>\n       copies of documents he requires . The Appellant in his submission dt.5.1.10 stated<br \/>\n       that the PIO has not yet withdrawn his earlier letters whereby he has advised him to<br \/>\n       remit a sum of Rs.10,314\/- towards staff charges. He also brought to the attention of<br \/>\n       the Commission that in CIC Decision No.4398\/IC(A)\/2009 dt.31.8.09 the Commission<br \/>\n       has deprecated the practice of asking for exorbitant charges from the information<br \/>\n       seekers by the Public Authorities.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     After reviewing the submissions made and noting that information sought is indeed<br \/>\n       voluminous, the Commission advises the Appellant to inspect the information put<br \/>\n       together by the Public Authority and identify only the documents he requires so that<br \/>\n       there is no undue wastage of paper. As the Appellant was informed well within one<br \/>\n       month that there are 1000 pages to be photocopied, the Appellant is advised to pay<br \/>\n       Rs 2000\/- after which information may be furnished to the Appellant. Any additional<br \/>\n       pages of information beyond 1000 pages may be provided free of cost. As for the<br \/>\n       Appellant meeting the cost of manpower and         materials, the Commission holds that<br \/>\n       there is no such provision in the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.     The entire exercise should be completed by 28.2.2010 and the Appellant is directed to<br \/>\n       submit a compliance report to the Commission by 6.3.2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.     The appeal is accordingly disposed off.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                              (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                      Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy Registrar<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    Shri S.Ramanujam<br \/>\n      No.1\/10, Sree Apartments<br \/>\n      49th Street<br \/>\n      Korattur<br \/>\n      Chennai 600 080<\/p>\n<p>2.    The PIO<br \/>\n      Southern Railway<br \/>\n      O\/o Chief Admn. Officer (Con.)<br \/>\n      Egmore<br \/>\n      Chennai 600 008<\/p>\n<p>3.    The Appellate Authority<br \/>\n      Southern Railway<br \/>\n      O\/o Chief Admn. Officer (Con.)<br \/>\n      Egmore<br \/>\n      Chennai 600 008<\/p>\n<p>4.    Officer incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.    Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 Central Information Commission CIC\/OP\/A\/2009\/000107-AD Dated January 27, 2010 Name of the Applicant : Shri S.Ramanujam Name of the Public Authority : Southern Railway, Chennai Background 1. The Applicant filed `an RTI application dt.4.8.08 with the CPIO cum CE(Construction), Southern Railway, Chennai seeking [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-18T04:54:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-18T04:54:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":842,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-18T04:54:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-18T04:54:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-18T04:54:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010"},"wordCount":842,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010","name":"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-18T04:54:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-s-ramanujam-vs-southern-railway-chennai-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri S.Ramanujam vs Southern Railway, Chennai on 27 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=804"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/804\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}