{"id":80616,"date":"1999-11-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-11-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999"},"modified":"2018-10-29T20:11:49","modified_gmt":"2018-10-29T14:41:49","slug":"harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999","title":{"rendered":"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: 2000 IAD Delhi 972, 2000 (52) DRJ 308<\/div>\n
Author: M Sarin<\/div>\n
Bench: M Sarin<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
Manmohan Sarin, J.<\/p>\n
     IA No. 4220\/98 in S.No. 1157\/92<\/p>\n
1.     In view of the case having been taken up for arguments, learned  counsel for the petitioner does not press this application, which is  dismissed as withdrawn.\n<\/p>\n
     S.No. 1157-A\/92<\/p>\n
     By  this  order,  I would be disposing of IA No.  2180\/93,  which  are objections filed by the respondent\/UOI to the award dated 28.2.1992.\n<\/p>\n
     Petitioner  had been awarded a contract of the construction of  Suchna Bhawan  vide agreement 2EE(C)\/DCD-III\/85-86. Disputes and  differences  between  the parties were referred to the Sole Arbitrator, Mr. R.J.  Bhakhru, who made and published his award on 28.2.1992.\n<\/p>\n
2.   Learned  arbitrator rejected claims 4, 5 and 6 and allowed claim  Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8 totalling to Rs. 2,37,197.- Learned Arbitrator also awarded simple interest @ 14% p.a. from 1.5.1990. Learned counsel for the  petitioner very fairly concedes that the said date would not correspond to  the date  either of the notices given for invocation of arbitration.  In  these circumstances, he submits that the petitioner would be satisfied and  would not  have  any  objection to the interest being awarded from  the  date  of reference  i.e. 2.11.1990. The award in respect of interest is modified  to interest  being granted from the date of reference i.e. 2.11.1990 till  the date of payment of realisation. The petitioner has not preferred any objection and the objections preferred by this IA are by the respondent.\n<\/p>\n
3.   Learned counsel for the respondent\/objector submits that the  arbitrator  had committed misconduct in making an award in respect of  claim  No.3 inasmuch  as  166  cement bags which were damaged were in  custody  of  the contractor.  Arbitrator has held that the damage was caused on  account  of flood, which was beyond the control of claimants\/petitioner, who could  not be  responsible  for  lack of adequate drainage or the flood.  It  is  also stated  that cement bags were found to be the property of  the  respondent. Reasons  given by the Arbitrator are cogent and there is no error  apparent in  the  said reasoning. This court in the exercise of  jurisdiction  under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 does not question the  reasonableness of reasons. Objection in this regard has no merit and is rejected.\n<\/p>\n
4.   Learned  counsel  then  submitted that the arbitrator  had  failed  to appraise the evidence and misconstrued certain documents. Nothing  material  has  been pointed out. Appraisement of the evidence is again in the  domain of the arbitrator exclusively.\n<\/p>\n
5.   Learned counsel next contended that the rejection of counter claim No. 3  was vitiated by an erroneous approach and suffers from errors  apparent, inasmuch  as the arbitrator failed to notice that the defendants  were  responsible  for  the  consumption of the electricity and  tampering  of  the meters.\n<\/p>\n
6.   Learned  arbitrator  has noted the contention of  the  claimants  that electric connection was in the name of the Assistant Engineer and the meter was  located  at the site office of AE with  locking  arrangement.  Learned arbitrator  held that the dispute between the respondents and the DESU  was still not settled and no liability could have been established against  the claimant\/contractors  as they have paid the consumption charges as per  the undertaking given. This has to be considered in the light of the submission made  by  the  petitioners before the arbitrator namely  that  the  dispute between DESU and respondents was still pending and no liability against the respondent had been finally established, which may be raised by the DESU on settlement  of  disputes between DESU and respondents. Based  on  this,  it would  appear that the rejection of the counter claim is based on the  fact that the dispute between the respondent and DESU was still pending and  the liability  had  not  crystalized. Accordingly, respondent  could  not  have claimed, at this stage, the amount from the petitioner, especially when the consumption  charges as per the undertaking had been paid. Accordingly  the award  as made does not suffer from any error apparent on the face  of  the record,  which call for interference under Sections 30 and 33 of the  Arbitration Act, 1940.\n<\/p>\n
7.   Learned  counsel for the petitioner accepts that the award being  made rule  of court with regard to the rejection of the counter claim,  at  this stage  would  not  come in the way of the respondents  seeking  any  remedy available  at law upon crystaliza tion of liability and the DESU can  stake its  claim  against  the respondents for recovery of the  said  amount,  as permissible  at law. The objections are dismissed with the  direction  that the  dismissal  of the objections against the award in respect  of  counter claim  will not come in the way of respondents seeking to recover the  said amount  in  independent proceedings from the petitioners in case  they  are held liable to the DESU.\n<\/p>\n
8.     Decree in terms of the award be drawn up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 Equivalent citations: 2000 IAD Delhi 972, 2000 (52) DRJ 308 Author: M Sarin Bench: M Sarin ORDER Manmohan Sarin, J. IA No. 4220\/98 in S.No. 1157\/92 1. In view of the case having been taken up for arguments, learned counsel […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHarbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-11-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-29T14:41:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-11-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-29T14:41:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\"},\"wordCount\":816,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\",\"name\":\"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-11-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-29T14:41:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-11-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-29T14:41:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999","datePublished":"1999-11-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-29T14:41:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999"},"wordCount":816,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999","name":"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-11-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-29T14:41:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harbanslal-bhayana-sons-vs-u-o-i-anr-on-22-november-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Harbanslal Bhayana & Sons vs U.O.I. & Anr. on 22 November, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80616"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80616\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}