{"id":80746,"date":"2010-02-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-08-22T19:01:42","modified_gmt":"2016-08-22T13:31:42","slug":"krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16084 of 2008(M)\n\n\n1. KRISHNAN NADAR, S\/O PONNU NADAR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. L.VIJYAKUMAR, KUTHIRAVATTOM,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.S.KALKURA\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.B.PRADEEP\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :08\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n           ------------------------------------------------\n                  W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008\n            -----------------------------------------------\n        Dated this the 8th day of February, 2010\n\n                           JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<pre>        Judgment         debtor        in      E.P.No.316\/06    in\n\nO.S.No.124\/05       on     the     file   of    the     Sub  Court,\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>Thiruvananthapuram has filed this writ petition. Ext.P5<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the learned Sub Judge directing issue of<\/p>\n<p>warrant against him for realisation of the decree debt,<\/p>\n<p>negativing his plea of no means, is challenged in this writ<\/p>\n<p>petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>        2.    The learned Munsiff, after examining the<\/p>\n<p>materials produced by both sides, the decree holder and<\/p>\n<p>the judgment debtor, came to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/judgment debtor has means to pay the decree<\/p>\n<p>debt and thereupon ordered for issuing warrant against<\/p>\n<p>him. Propriety and correctness of that order, Ext.P5, is<\/p>\n<p>impeached invoking the visitorial jurisdiction vested in<\/p>\n<p>this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p>        3. I heard the counsel on both sides. No material<\/p>\n<p>whatsoever has been produced by the decree holder to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>                          :: 2 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>show that the petitioner\/judgment debtor since the date<\/p>\n<p>of the decree has the means to pay the amount of the<\/p>\n<p>decree or a substantial portion thereof and has refused or<\/p>\n<p>neglected to pay the same, is the submission of the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the judgment debtor.        Relying on<\/p>\n<p>Ramatheerthan v. R.T.O. Trivandrum {1980 K.L.T.<\/p>\n<p>374}, the learned counsel for the judgment debtor<\/p>\n<p>contended that only in a case where it is established that<\/p>\n<p>the judgment debtor proceeded against in execution of a<\/p>\n<p>decree has means or has money to pay the decree debt, a<\/p>\n<p>warrant for his arrest can be issued by the Civil Court.<\/p>\n<p>The execution court, without adverting to that essential<\/p>\n<p>factor, which has to be satisfied in the issue of a warrant<\/p>\n<p>against the judgment debtor ,has passed Ext.P5 order,<\/p>\n<p>which, according to the learned counsel, is liable to be<\/p>\n<p>interfered with, exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction<\/p>\n<p>vested with this court. On the other hand, decree holder<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the petitioner\/judgment debtor was a<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>                           :: 3 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>permanent     employee    in   the  Agricultural  College,<\/p>\n<p>Vallayani, Thiruvananthapuram and after his retirement<\/p>\n<p>he is profitably engaged as a document writer. He has a<\/p>\n<p>document writer&#8217;s licence and he is attending the office of<\/p>\n<p>a licensed document writer as borne out by his own<\/p>\n<p>admission on examination before the court below,<\/p>\n<p>according to the learned counsel. After his retirement, he<\/p>\n<p>has also collected his gratuity and pensionary benefits, a<\/p>\n<p>substantial sum, is the case of the decree holder, which,<\/p>\n<p>however, is disputed by the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4. Perusing Ext.P5 order, it is seen that both the<\/p>\n<p>decree holder and also judgment debtor got themselves<\/p>\n<p>examined to substantiate the rival case canvassed by<\/p>\n<p>them before the execution court.     The learned Munsiff,<\/p>\n<p>who had opportunity to watch the demeanour of the<\/p>\n<p>witnesses found, the testimony of the decree holder<\/p>\n<p>reliable and convincing. Admittedly the judgment debtor<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>                           :: 4 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>is a retired farm labourer in Agricultural College. He is<\/p>\n<p>attending to a document writer&#8217;s office and engaging<\/p>\n<p>himself as a document writer. He possesses a licence for<\/p>\n<p>writing document for presentation before the Registrar&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Office. It is a circumstance indicating that he is getting<\/p>\n<p>income which is more than sufficient to meet his<\/p>\n<p>livelihood.  Apart from his engagement as a document<\/p>\n<p>writer, being a retired farm labourer from a Government<\/p>\n<p>institution, he could be expected to collect his pension as<\/p>\n<p>well.  In that factual backdrop, the plea of &#8216;no means&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>canvassed by the said judgment debtor can never be<\/p>\n<p>accepted. Further more, the burden cast upon the decree<\/p>\n<p>holder, when a plea of &#8216;no means&#8217; is raised to resist the<\/p>\n<p>execution of a decree is very little. He need only assert<\/p>\n<p>that the judgment debtor is possessed of sufficient means;<\/p>\n<p>and, when he has mounted the box and given evidence<\/p>\n<p>challenging the plea of &#8216;no means&#8217; by the judgment<\/p>\n<p>debtor, the burden shifts on the judgment debtor to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>                           :: 5 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>establish that he lacks &#8216;means&#8217; to pay the decree debt.<\/p>\n<p>On the materials placed and the circumstances presented,<\/p>\n<p>the conclusion formed by the learned Munsiff that the<\/p>\n<p>judgment debtor is possessed of the means and, still,<\/p>\n<p>defaulted payment is unassailable.\n<\/p>\n<p>        5.   Learned counsel for the judgment debtor<\/p>\n<p>requested for an opportunity to discharge the decree debt<\/p>\n<p>in instalments. No doubt, in execution proceedings over<\/p>\n<p>a money decree, plea for discharge of the decree debt in<\/p>\n<p>instalments can be granted only with the approval of the<\/p>\n<p>decree holder.     Counsel for the decree holder has no<\/p>\n<p>objection in giving instalment facility, provided substantial<\/p>\n<p>amount is initially remitted by the judgment debtor.<\/p>\n<p>        6. Considering that the decree debt due as and<\/p>\n<p>when    Ext.P4    order  was    passed    was   more   than<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,36,000\/-, I find that the request to discharge the<\/p>\n<p>decree debt in instalment can be extended to the<\/p>\n<p>judgment debtor only on condition of depositing a portion<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>                          :: 6 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>of the decree debt at the first instance. The judgment<\/p>\n<p>debtor shall deposit Rs.25,000\/- towards the decree debt<\/p>\n<p>within one month from the date of this judgment as a<\/p>\n<p>condition precedent for having an instalment facility to<\/p>\n<p>discharge the balance amount due under the decree at<\/p>\n<p>the rate of Rs.10,000\/- per month, so that the entire<\/p>\n<p>decree   debt   is  discharged   in  12  equal   monthly<\/p>\n<p>instalments. In case on the 12th instalment, the balance<\/p>\n<p>amount due under the decree is found to be more than<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/- he shall remit the entire sum, irrespective of<\/p>\n<p>the amount of instalment fixed. Subject to the deposit of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,000\/- within the period fixed above, the instalment<\/p>\n<p>payment shall start from the month of April, 2010<\/p>\n<p>onwards. The instalment as above shall be paid on or<\/p>\n<p>before the 5th of every month, and in case the 5th of the<\/p>\n<p>month happens to be a holiday, he shall positively tender<\/p>\n<p>the amount on the next working day.      In the event of<\/p>\n<p>default of any instalment as ordered, it is open to the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.16084 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>                           :: 7 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>decree holder to proceed with the execution to realise the<\/p>\n<p>amount outstanding as a whole. In the event of default in<\/p>\n<p>tendering initial deposit of Rs.25,000\/- or of any<\/p>\n<p>instalment, the court below shall straight away issue<\/p>\n<p>warrant on such a request being made by decree holder<\/p>\n<p>intimating the default in payment.\n<\/p>\n<p>        Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is<\/p>\n<p>closed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                          Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                              (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN)<br \/>\n                                         JUDGE<br \/>\nSK\/-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16084 of 2008(M) 1. KRISHNAN NADAR, S\/O PONNU NADAR, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. L.VIJYAKUMAR, KUTHIRAVATTOM, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.R.S.KALKURA For Respondent :SRI.K.B.PRADEEP The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN Dated :08\/02\/2010 O R D E R [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-22T13:31:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-22T13:31:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1063,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-22T13:31:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-22T13:31:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-22T13:31:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010"},"wordCount":1063,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010","name":"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-22T13:31:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnan-nadar-vs-l-vijyakumar-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Krishnan Nadar vs L.Vijyakumar on 8 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}