{"id":81519,"date":"2009-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-27T20:20:05","modified_gmt":"2017-09-27T14:50:05","slug":"k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nEN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BAN\u00a7;m.Lg\u00a7I\u00a7\u00a7: \" \n\nDATED THIS THE gem DAY OF Ju1%.,!Y ;?a.{3\u00a7.J%ij:  T 7'   J \n\nPRESEN'};'; \n\nTHE HQWBLE MR.,}\"LfS'\u00a7'I\u00a7;\u00a7; 'N.K.PAfI5{LV\" '  %\n\nAN:q.._'*~\u00bb\n\nTHE HQNELE :\"\u00a7e1R.gJ\u00a5J'S'Pf'{;;'.V'H,BILiA'PPA:\n ;:921_\/2lf}(}:2.__{1\\vdV}  \n\nK. G. S-Iareya, V 135;'. 0.._K;+G;J_\u00e9.gada3sh,\n\nAged about 8  minor\nRepresented thr&lt;m&#039;gh\u00bb~her natural guardian\nFather K.G.~J;;tgadessh AS&quot;\/0 Goneappa,\nAgacl abaut 4}; \u00a7.ziea.rs,v Rice Merchant,\n\n  Ma\ufb01;1Lasid::1eshwai*a&#039;&amp; \u00a330., Chowkipet,\n.  __ .. APPELLANT\n\n \u00ab;$%\u00a7i,LsMks:\u00a5::. mjppin, Adv.,)\n\n~. 1.&#039;  S\/0 Rama Ran,\n&#039;  \u20ac)wz&#039;ier--cum--Rider 01&quot; Meter Cycle bearing\n\n&#039;Reg. N6.AP-{)9\/AG 1277,\n\n    39% Cross, Vi&lt;:1ya:r1agar&#039;Last\n\n3213 Step, Davanagere.\n\n1\/\n\n\n\n \n\n2. The Manager,\n\nNationa} Insurance Co. Ltd.,\nChigateri Mercantiie Building,\nP.B.N0.&#039;?4, Chamarajpet,\n\nDavanagare.     \n\n(By Sri. Vishwarzath S.Shetta1&#039; \u00a3&lt;\u00a7:~.R\u00e9)\n\nThis MFA \ufb01led u.[S 1?3&#039;(13j*er Ev\u00a7._V Act against the\nJudgment and awaVr:1&#039;:%&quot;dat:ed;V- v3G-...(_}9.&quot;2004 passed in\nMVC No.22?&#039;\/03 913. the .\ufb011:=:f 0f&quot;thc.QIT&#039;-A_d;di._, Civi} Judge\n(Sr. D11) :35 III AMACT,vV--Dai:a:1gere&#039;,&quot;paf\u20ac;1y&#039;allowing the\nclaim peti1;i&lt;3~.n_ &#039;afar; coi\u00a71pe1*1~%ti($I}* and seeking\nenhanccmgm:o}?&#039;c\u00e9c;\u00bbI13\u00a7::IisatiQ1&#039;}g&#039;--V &#039; \n\n &quot;&quot;&quot;   hearing this day,\nH. BELAPPA? 9,  __\u00a3:I:3c following: -\n % 7 $d\ufb01\u00e9MENT\n\n This  is&quot; directed against the judgment\n\n   30--9~2()O4, passeci by the I Add}.\n\n ci\u00bb;},;;.Ta\u00a2;:%ge {$2-*;&#039;Dn.) &amp;IIIAdd1. MAST, Davanagere, in\n\nZiIIV~&#039;:&quot;3.E&#039;\u00e9.i\u00a7:;22&#039;;?\/2003.\n\n &quot;   By the impugxed judwent and award, the\n\n has garxted compensatian of Rs.58,300\/-\n\nz\/\n\n\n\nwith irltereet at 6% per armum free&quot;: the \n\npetitien til} the date of realisation.\n\n3. Aggrieved by that, the&quot;  f\u00a7&#039;1eej.,,&#039;  n\n\nthis appea}, seeking enhaneemema.  V &#039; A\n\n4. In brief, the  ?fm:;&#039; :igi2e;2&lt;3o3\nat about 4 13.111, av-13en the  A&#039; eoming\nhome, after attendingg&#039;  Main Cross,\n\nTaralahalu  i\u00a7aYef:geI\ufb01;.%&#039; respondent<\/pre>\n<p>drove?  fiietefifieg\ufb01ehicie  No.AP&#8211;09\/AG-1277,<br \/>\nin 3   manner and came from<\/p>\n<p>behind   the appellant. As a result<\/p>\n<p> r  ., N.-&#8216;:e_j   sustained injuries. The<\/p>\n<p>   compensation of Rs.5,00,00()\/-.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I&#8217;Ai*3.e%  has awarded compensation of<\/p>\n<p> ARs.58v,3\u00a7}O\/- with interest at 6% per annum from the<\/p>\n<p> \ufb02ate&#8217; of petition til} the date of realisatien. Aggrievw<\/p>\n<p>  that, the appellant has \ufb01led this appeal, seeking<\/p>\n<p>enhancement.\n<\/p>\n<p>L\/,<\/p>\n<p>5. The iearned counsel for the -. K<\/p>\n<p>contended that the compensatien   V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal towards pain and   <\/p>\n<p>and attendant charges and loss of &#8216;\u00e9\u00a5II1\u20acI]iI;&#8217;i\u20aci{S&#8217;:Of &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>totally inadequate. He    sthe<br \/>\ncompensation awar;\u00a7\u00e9;d    &#8216;awards<br \/>\nmedical exp\u00e9nfs\ufb01s     is also<br \/>\ninadequat eV.%_&#8221;; &#8216;  &#8216;V  Q&#8217; that the<\/p>\n<p> to be modi\ufb01ed.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;   \ufb01he learned oounsel for the<\/p>\n<p>second &#8216;r&#8221;c:s\u00a7c\u00a71de:1\u00e9t._\u00bb&#8217;s1~i&#8217;bmitted that the Tribunal on<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V&#8217;  .  c0nsid\u00e9&#8217;m:i0&#8217;n ef the material on record, has<\/p>\n<p> and reasonable compensation and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;\u00a3;ig1E:ref9fe:,&#8217;\u00a7-.V_it:;cioes not call for interference.<\/p>\n<p> We have carefully considered the<\/p>\n<p>  sif\u00a3)missions made by the learned counsel far the<\/p>\n<p>l\/<\/p>\n<p>appellam and 21150 the learned counsel for the.<\/p>\n<p>respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. The point that arises for T\u20ac&gt;_:1i*._c\u00e93:;15i:(i&lt;::*\u00a73,iii\u00e9:;_1 <\/p>\n<p>is, whether the Triburu\ufb01    <\/p>\n<p>reasonabie oompensation? L&#039;   &#039;<\/p>\n<p>9. it is rel:-:\u00a7\u00e9L*i1t &#8220;I&#8217;;(:\u00ab}&#8221; I:1o&#8217;:\u00a7=:2L;v:%.  has<br \/>\nawarded    1\u00a7s.j:2%.5,Q0\u00a3:L\/5 V&#8217;t\u00e9;v\u00a79a1&#8217;ds pain and<br \/>\nsutfexang\u00e9.  \u00a7pp\u00e911;{\u00a7:it.__1if;1\u00e9&#8217;v.;sa13taz&#8217;ned the following<br \/>\ninj11fi\u00e9\u00a7:4n_V V\u00bb A I<\/p>\n<p> \u00bb1)\u00a7  3 x: 4 &lt;.:ms., over the<br \/>\nmar 3.\/3rd cflefi ieg.\n<\/p>\n<p> V 22) 1a\u00a2\u00e92*at\u00a2\u00a7d wound measuring 1 x I c1113.,<br \/>\n \u00a3)v_\u00e9i:I&#8217;\u00ab1;11e right side of the occipital regigrn.<br \/>\nV&#8217; *  &#8220;}V(&#8220;1-\u00a7;erf.\u00e91fg;* shows comminuted fracmI&#8217;e\/\\1ower<br \/>\n {if ma tibia and \ufb01bula. &#8216;V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; Tfhe appellant has taken treatment as inpatient<\/p>\n<p>   a period of 8 days and thereafter, fol1ow&#8211;up<\/p>\n<p> trwtmcnt The Tribunal has awarded a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,000\/&#8211; towards pain and suife\ufb01ngs which is<\/p>\n<p>L\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>inadequate. Having regard to the nature of <\/p>\n<p>duration and natum of ueatment, in {)1.;tI&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>view, a sum of Rs.4G,O\u20ac}O\/- wQ:.1l.d__ be_&#8211;  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>sum towards gain and su\ufb01e\ufb01ngs Aiiiiij<\/p>\n<p>is awarded.     _ 1\n<\/p>\n<p>10. The &#8216;I&#8217;rib1__1na1 % sum of<br \/>\nRS300\/&#8211; iiowards   charges,<br \/>\nwhich is   enhanced.\n<\/p>\n<p>Accordi11g}y, \u00a7&#8221;i1;__  tar: \/ -.<br \/>\n  &#8221;  awarded a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5,OG0j]+\u00ab.Vtow\u00a7.:fds, lc-$35 of amcr\ufb01\ufb02es of \ufb01fe. The<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~  _  ._hasZ sugared fracmre of kower third of left<\/p>\n<p>     and it has resuitcd in permanent<\/p>\n<p>  iower iimb. The appellant is a minor<\/p>\n<p> and  has tr; suffer the discomfort throughout hcr<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;   Therefore, in our considemri view, having rewrd<\/p>\n<p>.   the nature of disability and the dis\u00e9omfort the<\/p>\n<p>appellant has ta su\ufb01er, a sum of Rs.2{),0O0\/&#8211; would<\/p>\n<p>t\/<\/p>\n<p>be a raasonabie: sum towards loss of amerxities of life<\/p>\n<p>and accordingly, it is awarded.<\/p>\n<p>12. The compensation awarded   <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal towards medical expengaes  ~\u00a7!;os;$   <\/p>\n<p>earnings is just and proper and fh_ei*&#8217;e-;fare,p&#8217;it%.d&lt;3es <\/p>\n<p>call for interference.\n<\/p>\n<p>13. The total Vc;&lt;;ii2}g)\u20acnsa;L1{i5I1_&#039;L[p\u00a7.3Iable cemes to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.9SZ,5()0\/ ~ and the bI*r:&quot;\u00e9k}&quot;1.1:5 <\/p>\n<p>(a) To7v\u00e9ii4dsA    &#8216;   Rs. 40,000] &#8211;<br \/>\n(23) Towm  Rs. 5,000 \/-\n<\/p>\n<p>(C)  \u00e9\u00e9eff\ufb01onveyanee,<br \/>\naagd attendant&#8217; ghagrges Rs. 5,000\/ &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbA (\u00a7i)&#8211;\u00bb &#8216;:If9tA%a;z*ds ii3$s of amenities of life Rs. 20,000] &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>H   offuture e-amings Rs. 22,500\/&#8217; &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;..-ma.&#8211;&#8230;&#8230;.&#8211;._&#8230; &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;-..u&#8230;-&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>TOTAL Rs. 92,5031.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>u..&#8211;&#8230;&#8230;..-an&#8230;-&#8230;&#8230;_a&#8212;-. &#8211;.u&#8230;&#8230;.\u00bb..<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  14. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the<\/p>\n<p> judment and award passe\u00e9 by the<\/p>\n<p>L\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal in MVC.No.2&#8217;27\/2003 stands <\/p>\n<p>granting compensation of R8.92,500\/-,  <\/p>\n<p>Rs.58,300\/ &#8211;, with interest at 6%     <\/p>\n<p>date of petition till the date of  :7- <\/p>\n<p>amount shall be investedV&#8217;\u00a7I:_\u00a7&#8221;<br \/>\nnationalised or  \u00b0ti,1.} \u00a3he&#8217; ~&#8211;.a9\u00a5;el;lant<br \/>\nattains majority and  is<br \/>\nentitled to withgxfaw   \u00e9pend for the<br \/>\nupkeep 9,\u00bb     A <\/p>\n<p>f3raw-   ac:6&lt;)1&#039;&lt;1it1gly.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>}UD@E<\/p>\n<p>   ma<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BAN\u00a7;m.Lg\u00a7I\u00a7\u00a7: &#8221; DATED THIS THE gem DAY OF Ju1%.,!Y ;?a.{3\u00a7.J%ij: T 7&#8242; J PRESEN&#8217;};&#8217;; THE HQWBLE MR.,}&#8221;LfS&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;I\u00a7;\u00a7; &#8216;N.K.PAfI5{LV&#8221; &#8216; % AN:q.._&#8217;*~\u00bb THE HQNELE :&#8221;\u00a7e1R.gJ\u00a5J&#8217;S&#8217;Pf'{;;&#8217;.V&#8217;H,BILiA&#8217;PPA: ;:921_\/2lf}(}:2.__{1\\vdV} K. G. S-Iareya, V 135;&#8217;. 0.._K;+G;J_\u00e9.gada3sh, Aged [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-27T14:50:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-27T14:50:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":679,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\",\"name\":\"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-27T14:50:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-27T14:50:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-27T14:50:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009"},"wordCount":679,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009","name":"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-27T14:50:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-g-shreya-vs-k-ramakrishna-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K G Shreya vs K Ramakrishna on 20 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81519\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}