{"id":81866,"date":"2010-03-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010"},"modified":"2014-06-20T06:51:03","modified_gmt":"2014-06-20T01:21:03","slug":"yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\nDATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OE MARCH, \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TAIIIT  % \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.83Q20 :OE312Go\u00e9AIISR)OI \n\nBETWEEN\n\nYAQUB ALI.\n\nS\/O ABDUR  \n\nAGED 63 YEARS,   _  \n\nRETIRED CHIEF OFFICER, \n\nCHITTACUPPA;   T. T \nTMC,DIST.\u00a7B'1_DAR.       ...PE3'I'ITIONER\n\n[BY .':f\u00a2I3{I\"1\\\/I'O:..I:IffI%v\\1\\;I::Z\u00a5V'g\/4IJE3I::)'*SPAMSUf)DIN, ADV. ,)\n\nAND \n\n1. THE I5E15UT3I'~CO.I\\\"4I.zIIssIONER,\nEII:;AR._  I\n\n% A'  \"E:HE'*COENTR(5)L'I;1$R,\n I STATEVACITCOIJNTS DEPT,\n 'em FL.QQR,fCAUVERY BHAVAN,\n\nEAI~IGALOI;?.E.\n3. THE.ASSISTANT CONTROLLER,\n\n' LOCAL_.AUDIT CIRCLE, BIDAR. ...RESPONDENTS\n\n\n\nid\n\n(BY SR1 M KUMAR, AGA)\n\n**$****\n\nThis writ petition is filed under Articles 4' 22\u20acf~a1'3d\n227 of the Constitution of India, praying to  the~--,\nimpugned orders of the respondent No.3._vide dated C \n12.3.2007 of the Assistant Controller L;)cal'A'1;.dit Circle,  'C\nBidar, as Annexure A by a writ of certiorari,__addresseVd\nto the DTC) Bidar and S.T.O. Hnumndabadlxvith a co'pj?\"t\u00a70\nthe petitioner and etc.,  _    \" '   \n\nThis petition coming oriifor _fina'1'~.h:e-arinng; this day,\nthe Court made the following: ,  \"  \n\nThe petitioner  Mtinicipalities and\neventually on:'fV'Vthe'\u00bbtVdate of\" superannuation he was\n\nworking as a  Town Municipal Council,\n\nChiT\"'~\u00a7u13ld?l&gt;l'a    District. He attained\n\n  superajnnuation\u00e9onll30.04.2005. Pursuant to the order\n\n asltstiff'i;;f\u00b01\"3,.:'\u00a3a.20o5 the Assistant Controller, Local '\n\nAudit Bidar, 1'.e., respondent No.3 sanctioned\n\n rnonthlgr pension and all other terminal and retiral\n\nC 'aloenefits which are in the nature of gratuity, etc., But\n\n,\u00a2,\u00bb-\"\n\n\n\nhowever the grievance of the petitioner is that the local\naudit was conducted by respondent No.3 andfitppwas\nfound that one extra increment was \npetitioner thus While calculating the   \nRs.8.62I3\/- was paid in excess  \nsought to be recovered. pit\" isila--1so~--.his \nreduction of his lI1C1\"\u20acII1\u20acHlL.lfI't)\u00a7liI'1  byl\nthe petitioner also   not in\ndispute that pursuan,t._,:to.t  A has\n\nbeen passe_di__.:a1lid\u00bbr'.it  that\"Vthepetitioner was paid\n\nthe s.aidlVla1'nount'l'}in excess and which is directed to be\nrecovered 4-fromp 'injs.'r'1'io1ri\u00bbthly pension. This order was\n\npassed inlthe  The petitioner allowed the\n\n\" V'   to lblemrlecovered. It appears the petitioner\n\n\"was' \"co\"1'.re~spondence with the respondent for\n\nrest_ora_.t'ion.:'~\"of the pension, but however that has been\n\n   not adhered to. Hence the present petition for quashing\n\n\"~of'Annexure A and also for refixation of pension. O\n\n\n\n\n\nnotice the State Government has entered appearance\nand filed statement of objections. V l\n\n2. Learned counsel appearing for \nvehemently submits placing rel_iance \nof the Apex Court supporting  \nis not responsible for  of' and '\nif any amount is  ing.leXcegssl\"t.he\"satire cannot be\nrecovered. He further V\"a..di_rection may be\nissued to  pension which\nhe was   was initiated.\n\n __AG1A supports the impugned\nendorsernermgl  as a result of wrong pay\n\nf1xa.}tion~the p'e'ti.tioner.\"s pension was wrongly \ufb01xed and it\n\n\u00bb  c.orrec.ted.'_ later. But in the meantime the petitioner\n\n.'was7 paiudf-jei\u00e9cess pensionary benefits to the tune of\n\n  He further submits that the said amount\n\nV'  has been recovered from the Dearness Allowance\n\nI\nr\" \n\/\/'{.----..----------.:..\nK\n\n\n\nattached to the pension of the petitioner. He further\nsubmits that the recovery was done in the year\"'--2007\nand the writ petition having been filed in \nis barred by laches. He further  \nquestion of restoration of   \n\ncircumstance does not arise,\n\n4. I have given my  Consideration.\nApparently, the petitioiner   for the folly\nof the admini-sytifatioiniiindeed the pay\nfixation is'  Administration and\nthe  the consolidated fund of the\nState.   this point of time it is rather\n\ntoo\u00abiatei'to pin \"poin_tas to who was responsible for fixing\n\n  .__of the petitioner with an additionai\n\ningremerii', -1'  however, the fact remains that on the\n\n basis ..o1f.:.1ast drawn salary the pension of the petitioner\n\nit \ufb01zwred. Indeed it is to be noticed that if the petitioner\n\n\n\n(3\n\nis not in any way responsible for wrong fixation___of the\npension the law is very clear that the said'\nwhich is paid in execs cannot be  \nfolly is attributed to the petitioner.\u00bb._In  it A\nit is not so. Hence I am of the  2\nare required to restore the\u00bbs:sfid&gt;anioti.nt \nrecovered from the pe.titioner'. if\ufb02\u00e9iny decision is\nrequired one can refer  o'f_V_the Apex Court\nin several  referred :\n\n UNION or INDIA\n\nreported._ \"A521, the Apex Court has\n\nopined thatiitVvisV'not'.ope'n for the employer to recover the\n\namdt1nt~whielh'-hgismalready been paid as pension when\n\nA  foilgr is 'attribtited to the employee.\n\nA  Anidentical View has also been taken by the Apex\n\nvia the case of SAHIB RAM .vs. STATE or\n\n   reported in 11995 SCC (Suppl. 1) \u00a38. \/\ufb02\n\n\n\n5. Having regard to the law laid down, I  the\n\nView that there was no justification for the;\"'respenderi\u00abt_\n\nto recover the said amount.\n\nI'\n\n6. The next question would the the .'restoi?ati.o'n.do.--.V\n\nthe original pension. Viiadeed   the\n\nrespondents are required to\"\"1'ecaic\"uI_ate'an'd\"determine\nthe pension which is  fpetiigioner. It is no\ndoubt true    that such a\n  and it is found that\nthe    pension less one\nincrem:ze--nt.\u00ab'.  may, the fact remains that the\n\npetitioner h'ad_dserved\"-thie institution and there can be a\n\n  on thewpart of the State in calculating the\n\n s.pen.sion:f am of the View that a direction is also\n\n ' \"per;1sionv...- :Hence the following order.\n\n1\"'3\";lw\u00a7l'\u20acC.1'  issued to the State to recalculate the\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>[1) Petition is allowed in part. The  3<\/p>\n<p>are directed to refund the sun1__Qf _ V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>which was recovered; as eX(:eS\u00abs <\/p>\n<p>(2) The responder1t@\u00e9&#8221;~.._Asheii1.__ &#8216;reealetilate then&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>pension vpayab1.e&#8221;&#8216;t.:d_:&#8217;&#8211;the petitioner having<br \/>\nregard to &#8216;t}&#8221;:;e&#8217;  received by him<\/p>\n<p>d.urin&#8217;g. hi\u00e9s 1ast:.ieg.V6f&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>CQn1p1i\u00e91rt\u00a7f;e_ of tl&#8217;1e&#8221;&#8216;di1*e:\u00a2;tiQaf1s in three months from<\/p>\n<p>t.he date of receipt ,, &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Rule 15* issueid ..$1nd&#8217;.&#8217;&#8211;rn9ade&#8221;&#8221;absolute to the extent<\/p>\n<p>indieherted kai:;3ve; =  .. _ &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221; &#8221;<br \/>\nEUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OE MARCH, BEFORE THE) HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE TAIIIT % WRIT PETITION NO.83Q20 :OE312Go\u00e9AIISR)OI BETWEEN YAQUB ALI. S\/O ABDUR AGED [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-20T01:21:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Yaqub Kali S\\\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-20T01:21:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":119,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Yaqub Kali S\\\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-20T01:21:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yaqub Kali S\\\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-20T01:21:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-20T01:21:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010"},"wordCount":119,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010","name":"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-20T01:21:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yaqub-kali-so-abdur-razak-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-bidar-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yaqub Kali S\/O Abdur Razak vs The Deputy Commissioner, Bidar on 9 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}