{"id":82019,"date":"2008-04-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008"},"modified":"2017-12-19T06:52:33","modified_gmt":"2017-12-19T01:22:33","slug":"nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: H N Das<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED T1-IIS THE 04\" DAY OF APRIL, zoos\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOI-IAN DAS ; T  T    ' ~\n\nPE ON 10 00c   \n\nWRIT BEIIIION N9. z21;zTT__ggV1%%{\u00a7'% 3-3 as I V\n\nBET'v'v'EEN :\n\nnun:--n--nun----\n\n1 Sri. NAGARATHNARAJAIAH   \nAG-E:59YEARSV T  \ufb02 .\nS\/OI-I.D.TAYA,PPA g \"   ~ \nwo12_K_rN<3   MArn'AGER T '  T. \nSTATE B.*xI~Ii\u20ac.OE,N.!YSOl{E   \nI1EADT.QFF*ICE,}$:Q_.RQAI?'' '  \n\nBANGALLEREE. V '\n\n2 Sri. G--SmDAIJNGAPPA._  \nAGE:5'I=YEARS'*  \u00bb' \ns\/0 LA'I'E"GANG1?.IAH "\nwolucme AS. DEPUTY MANAGER\n{(_PRI;\u20ac_MIS\u00abES DEPARZFMENT)\n STA'E'E  OF MYSOBJ3.\nA  'OFFICEBANGALORE-9.\n\n 3 E~vsAT'TANARAYANA RAG\n\nAGE;-55 YEARS .\n\nT n T s\/0 LATE VENKATADASAPPA\n\n V. ' EARLIER WORKING AS OFFICER\n=  STATE BANK OF MYSORE\n\n(amaze 12ET_r.R_E.T)), R\/Q NO. 133\n3m) MMN, SBM COLONY\n\n- :"1}'~I'u'1'v{;'-'u"~\u00a2"I'H:'%I'xT:".'C%}'.l'{\n\nBANGALORE-50.\n\n\ufb02LJ\\\/'\n\nU\n\n\n\nAh\n\nrm?'\n\nL'lI\\.l 541111.}: L!P\\.I..l.1u V J IKJA R\n\nEARLIER WORKING AS OFFICER\n\n5 1 A 1 ts BANK GF MYSGRE\n\n(SINCE RETIRED) R\/0 No.10\nGOVTNTM RAG \nSESI-IADRIPURAM,BANGALORE-20.\n H V RAMASWAMY\n\nAGE:62 YEARS\n\nSIC I-I. S.VENKAT.\u00a2.C-H.A.R '\nEARLIER WORKING AS OFFICER\n\nSTATE BANK OF ?vf'1'Sx'}n.c.""'\n\nR\/O NO. 36, SBM COLONY\nEANASHANKAR1' "' ' i STEXGE\n\nSITA CIRCLE, BANGALQRE-sir.  'A  1 \n\nSzi.MKRANGAVNATI-'I    'R\nAGE:62YEARS:W.. ;  R .\nsxo B.C.N.IYEN{1rAR  a  \n\nEARLIER-Wf\u00a73R_II;C-'r AS:-QFFICER    H R\n\nSTA 1 L BAN:'.\u20ac:; Q}? N1'? SQPJE; .\n\nNO.17.61, _ _ \n'0 E341 \"K, i.=.3TAG<E, RAEAHNAG AR\n\nBANGAI.ROE\u00a51G;~-__' = '\n\nSri. M i<V--B4'A1.AsLrB1zAra\u00bb1jNAY.21M\n(smcE DECEASED), REP=."BY HIS SON\n\n   ..... .. N\n\nR'  AS5913 v1mDc:\n\n1?!' :A_ :44 \u00ab5,n.'u\n\nR = "R10 No.55; SREEKRUPA\n\nWIT}: mg!' L111 13"1'_\n\n' INTI f'\\('1('\n\n'-0 1v.Au,V, :1  vnuoo\n\n  E3wA.'RAM,BANGALoRE-5.\n\ns4uri...S"'I\u00a2.11.IV'.\u00a7I-I1\\IA MURTHY\nAGE:61 YEARS\n\n" ' Rs.\/no S.N.SRIKANTHA SASTRY\n\nR " ~._EfiRLIER WORKING AS OFFICER\n\nSTATE BANK QF MYSQRE\n\nR RIO No.34\/21, SRIPURAM\n\nI 'CRGS SESHADPJPURA..'\u00a3\n\nBANGALORE-29.\n\nkj\n\n\n\nno\n\nSri, I S VENKATESH\n\nAGE:69 YEARS\n\nSIG I.N.SEETHARAM.A.I.Ali\nEARLIER WORKING AS OFFICER\nSTATE. B.-EJK OF I'v'IYSOP"'-'\n\nRIO N0.83,5TI-I CROS\n\nMYSORE BANK COLONY\nHANUMANTHANAGAR " ~.\nBANGALORE-50.  ET1'.'~;'I \n\n(By Sri. P s RAJAGOPAL, ADV.)\n\nAND:\n\n---u----\n\n1 STATE EANKOE MYSORE  -- -.  \nABODYCONST1TUI'ED--UNDE!--R  V  ~ A A\nTHE STATE BANK OF INDIA  \n(ASSOCIATE BANKS) AcT,_1959 , j'\nHAVIINTGITSI-IE1:\\D_.0FFICE AT. A  _ -  A\nSTATE BANK: OFMYSORE Et:ILDDsxG.f-- V. \nK.G.ROAD_.. B.\u00a2x1SIGAI.;\u00a3)RE\u00a79'   1 '\n\nBY ITS GE1\\*F.R;',-AL MANAGER A  \n(OPERA-TI.0NS)"-'  , A   '\n\n2 ASSOCIATEBA1*IKS"__ ..\n\nOFFICERS    \n\nC\/0 STATE BANK OETDIDERABAD\n\nGUN FOUNI.3R'i',.}F'!DERixBAD\n\n BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.  RESPONDENTS\n\n  1'   E:\u00a7E.T, A,Dv., EOE R1)\n"  WRTTETTTTTION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND\n\n"227 OF"'\u00abTH"E__"CQN'S'ITTu"i'ION OF IEDTA 'v'v'I'I'\ufb01 A PRAYER TO\nQUASH  ORDER DT. 10.11.99 VIDE ANN-J OF THE\n\n" i.".'G.O'Aa1\\A1TTEE_. CONSTTIUTED UNDER REGULADON 7 OF THE\n\n- . 'sTATE'E.ANK OF MYSORE OFFICERS' (SERVICE) REGULATIONS,\n"1979.  DIRECT R1 TO PLACE THE PE'ITI'IONERS IN MIDDLE\n M.AN;A.GEM_ENT GRADE SCALE 11 WITH EFFECT FROM 1.10.79\n GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS SUCH AS\n" OF SALARY, SENIORTTY AND PRQMOIIONS TO\n\n.., O, _ 'V '   5 f A ~ ..PfIGI-IER SCALES AND GRADES ON THAT BASIS AND ETC.\n\n\/)4\/'f\nU\n\n\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nSri.H.N UMASHANKAR\n\nS\/'0 LATE HS. NARAYANA iVi'U"R'i""I'\nAGE: 56 YEARS\n\nCHIEF MANAGER\n\nSTATE BANK OF MYSORE\n\nSERVICE BRANCH. N0. 2\n\nSEN! BUILDING5 I FLQOR1\n\nLADY CURZON ROAD\n\n1:Amr:I..rrnD'I:: 1    1:' "in '\nl.l1'l..L1\\..ll'l.|.J\\J'L\\.l.J Ln   .A . It-,I"&ladJ-Ll-I.'-\u00bb'.l"'J-lV\u00a7~'b\n\nnu -IAI-I-'r1\\'r'I'\\'1-'h .|1'\\'I"I1\n\n'hAu.,I:.\n\n11-1. -1:\nv\n\n(ySr1 R\n\n1  sIA1*EEANI\ufb01{R'OE MYSORE   L\nHAINVG  HEAD O1\u00abE1CE-AT.sTA1fE\nE A'~m*"r\ufb01=' MYSQP.EI BLEEDING '\n\n.I.JJ. IL V-'IL \\JJ1\n\nK.G.ROAD, BA}JGAl.ROE"2...__ A 1\nRE? E': rrs MANAGING TOR\n\n2 ASSOCIATE EANIr:s \nASSOCIATION AA ~   9\nPER BY TTS GEN"SE.YC~\n\nA  . Cro S'I'A'I'EBANK OFHYDERABAD\n\nA AEOCNDRY\n.E1v1'11_a:;e;13 ._A'I_1;);. , _ ..\n\n -. ..:A ,0 (3 'Dr ir"'= 'K nu 1:! r)\n Sn. 9 'U D.V."{."'\\_l_5 .Auv., rL'n.R1)\n\n ' L "   PETITION IS FILEDJJNDER ARTICLES 226 AND\n9227   OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER TO\n\nESPQNDENTS\n\nQUASH  ORDER DT. 10.11.99 VIDE ANN-E OF THE\n\n --COIVIMITTEE CONSTIIUTED UNDER REGULATION 7 OF THE\n\u00bb ST-A'1'E BANK OF MYSORE OFFICERS' (SERVICE) REGULATIONS,\n\nA " .._1979 AND ETC.\n\nml.\u00bb\/'\n\n\n\nTHESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN  ANT)\nILESERVED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, NAGAMOHAN DAS J.,\nPRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING; ;  \n\nnnnr.-n\nS\u00a3.lL\u00a3.\u20ac...ali'....\ufb02\n\nIn these writ petitions the petitioners  prayed for  \n\nnature of ceitiorari to quash the order  it:\n\nC--....-..i!t\u00a7f.9 c-ns._'._1ted dune: Regu1ation_Vp:'i"..of thestete amt "o;f'iwi\u00a7,*sore\n\n2.  eel: in Middle Management\nGrade Settle!  in the first respondent --- the State Bank\nof Mysore. "onp"c1..1o.19*r79pe~eh\u00a7' "reepondent Bank introduced the revised\n\nservice 'conditions cniied tifitate Bank of Mysore Officers Service\n\n I   (retina: 'the Regulations'). According to the\n\npetitioners,::lee.. giegulations they are entitled to be placed in Middle\n\nl\n\n  " l.1U.19'?9-_. Since the reaponden' B'"'i< r*f"_"ed to _"l"ce we petitioners in\n\n  "'1t4}tdGS;'~H, they approached this Court in  No. seesaw: '"d\n\nI  connected matters. This Court vidc order dated 12.03.1999 disposed the\n\n.4 writ petitions reserving liberty to the petitioners to submit an application\n\nto the respondent Bank to constitute an appropriate committee under\n\n1.'\/\\\/\\\n\nO'\n\n\n\nRegulation 7 of the Regulations and to resolve the grievance of petitioners.\n\nAccordingly. the petitioners submitted their application and the respondent\n\nBank constituted a Committee to go into the grievance of the  V' V V'\n\nUnder the impugned order the Committee rejected the claim or petitiotiers; ~  it\n\nHence, these writ petitions.\n\ncategorisation and on that 'oasi ieiiiog in iv\ufb02viGS-E\nas on 01.10.1979. As 4\u00a7i\u20acf,R6glli3li0n  oretiie.iie\u00a7guietioos the petitioners\nwho were in erstwhile_'e;Vttit!_etliff  and placement in\nMMGS-II .-to orroei,,i:e  cooreooentiai bene\ufb01ts. There is no\njusti\ufb01catioii for  not placing the petitioners in\n\nMMGS-11 whenthere werepvatcaiieiesii The respondents arbitrarily gave\n\n\ufb01hnentgand p1acernent_Vto': certain employees and refused to extend the\n\n  to" the petitioners. Reliance is placed on the following\n\ndeeisions.  ~\n\n z   Achytanantha Swamy, Manager and others Vs. State\na V " Bank ofMyt-iore and others, ILR 1932 Kai'. 1395\nV iii Order in W.A. No. 470\/1983 passed by the High Court of\n\nJudicature .Amdh_ra Pradeslh in T. Ramakrishna and others\n\n.\n<\/pre>\n
Vs. The Cl’..airraai~., Ce” a<\/p>\n
 Order of the supreme Court in The Chairman, Board of<\/p>\n
Directors of SBIAP, SLP (Civil) No. 6174\/1988 <\/p>\n
12.10.1995<\/p>\n
4. Per contra, Sri. S.G. Bhat, learned: ‘coiu1sel  the <\/p>\n
Bank contends that \ufb01tment and placement of ertsplogees wer’e.give.n ‘u\ufb02sZi\u00e9f..  *<\/p>\n
the R_egula-o_s ,-_ely -n sen..-” – – — _ \ufb01e<\/p>\n
V  I\u00bb Eu.” ‘}’3.1a’:-v.1svzvJ:1t. He
\nsupports the impugned order paseci V37 ‘T-1,ef\u20acI’;\u00e9\u00bbmms*ss:”itV:tee.M Reiiance is piaced<\/p>\n
“”” “1111,  . s  mm an an<\/p>\n
I’ll’! Iguougvau, Jvfag’. .l.J +1.5 DJ\\-‘ VV
\n:: v  …..1 ,.u……. 1)’… rut… …..,._ r1………_,.: -n..__.._.| mm\n<\/p>\n
13. ._11u.i udypu aim Uulwi vs K.-ll 11111 I1, 95 u I Dudlu U1<\/p>\n
“1 ms rotors, 331′ ms’ stiother, AIR 2001 – -46-7<\/p>\n
hss.’h%HeIgra    both the side and perused the entire writ<\/p>\n
. 1’t__is not in dispute that the ciassification of employees for<\/p>\n
0′:\n<\/p>\n
    the respondent Bank had been upheld by this Court in the ease<\/p>\n
  Ms. Aehytanantha Swamy. Manager and others Vs. State Bank of<\/p>\n
V Vt’ ,  is\/Iysoe and others, ILR 1982 Kar. 1395. Further it is not in dispute that on<\/p>\n
01.10.1979 the respondent bank categorised 222 posts in MMGS-II and<\/p>\n
a-~”~<\/p>\n
gave \ufb01tment to certain employees in MMGS-II on 01.10.1979,<\/p>\n
01.01.1980, 01.01.1981 and 01.01.1982. For the period subsequentto<\/p>\n
01.01.1982 the posts are tilled up by promotion under new ~ 3<\/p>\n
policies applicable sum time to time. “As on 01.10.1979″i1.though:  10<\/p>\n
petitioners were e1ig’ble for \ufb01tment in  to <\/p>\n
them. Accordingly the respondent Bank gave  as 1on.101..10..  <\/p>\n
to those employees who  sen_’,rs to ‘.I:I\ufb01Eiti’:y)n\u20ac115i_’ It is no. t2.’.e’ case Qt”<\/p>\n
me \ufb01etitioners mat .i’eniors to *”f”” “”””‘t-\u00a7’.f=.”**–.”te~=-* ~41 “-9<\/p>\n
“Therefore the impugned order” is  racieoirdanee  law and the
\nRegulations. I \ufb01nd no  to..in.terfere._with the impugned<\/p>\n
order.\n<\/p>\n
7. The  the petitioners’ that the respondent bank ought<\/p>\n
to have given \ufb01tment’ to lthxepetitioners with effect from 01.10.1979 is<\/p>\n
.unaccept;:bie to me. identical issue came up for consideration before the<\/p>\n
 sspme odes:  Tarsem Qvs. State Bank of Patiala, AIR 19539 so 30<\/p>\n
ass is is sast.i.so… e<\/p>\n
V n ‘d_V”Sorne arguments were advanced on the question if
\n .. V. the  of posts categorised against “Senior
\n V. __l\ufb01:1nagementGrade-Scale IV” was higher than those \ufb01lled<\/p>\n
 up W me initial ii men: under Regulation 1? . -d
\nSchedule I, the excess number of posts would automatically
\ngo, by way of placement, to the existing officers in Grade
\nA without the requirement of “promotion”. The<\/p>\n
categorisation of posts under Regulation 6 is an exercise<\/p>\n
I’ ._\/\\_\/\\
\nO’<\/p>\n
which is not in any way fettere by Regulation 7. If more
\nnumber of nests are cat’g*rised u.1″”- ‘Se:””‘r mauagi 1 t<\/p>\n
Crade S_ale IV’ .__a__ the number .1′ exi_t1’ng<\/p>\n
into the higher scale pursuant to Regulation 7 read
\nSchedule I, the proper construction to be placed   Vi” <\/p>\n
scheme of the Regulation is that thes_e~ex._t_ra  \u00bb ii<\/p>\n
posts in the higher scale would haveato be  it *  i<\/p>\n
u ‘- . I .\n<\/p>\n
nlunn Inc. 4. n –uv.-,…a-. ~<\/p>\n
…… .. I 5…. 1′! …..I …..’ .. ..’
\nyau\ufb01iuuust ” Id\ufb01f Rcgd\ufb01iiu I .1 I 7.-tutu 1| -UV ‘st U llflalwl<\/p>\n
process of acennent  <\/p>\n
,, ‘,,.\n<\/p>\n
In View of the law decla:*eti’~by the  in the decision
\nreferred to supra, the claim of   in MMGS-H<\/p>\n
with eifeet {tom 01. LG.  is ritzhtly rejected’ini_iite_hitttpug11ed order.<\/p>\n
C3’u1w u fer’eonside’ratien’before the ‘I_.’1i’g”u Conn<\/p>\n
-11 in<\/p>\n
.A. o. 470r’i9′?:3V and iitznent waegiven to the eiigibie empioyces with<\/p>\n
–‘e1if’ect   consequential bene\ufb01ts. He further<\/p>\n
Ade.-ontende_.  this of Andhra Pradesh High Court came to be<\/p>\n
awn’ H \ufb02e.(i–.byVt.l1e”.’S:u[it7ettte Court in S.L.P. No. 6174\/1998. Therefore he<\/p>\n
V eontends””that*~V oetitioners are entitled for \ufb01tment in 1\\\/IMGS-II with<\/p>\n
   appointed date on 01.10.1979. This contention of the<\/p>\n
iieatited’ ‘counsel for the petitioners is unacceptable to me. The Supreme<\/p>\n
 in the ease of K. Thimmappa Vs. Chairman, Central Board of<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a7
\n2<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
5.
\n2<\/span>
\nE’
\n\u00a7
\n\u00a7<\/p>\n
tah Colrr W 1-11 was I.tp!I.-.d hv 1 is C I<\/p>\n
nu-I –…E.- v…’ nu.-.\n<\/p>\n
well a the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in    L”  <\/p>\n
State Bank of Patiaia’s case, which was also upheld bythis V  it at
\nConn. Both in the Andhra Pradesh caseeasp\u00e9welillasltliefv\u00bb .
\nRajasthan High Court case. it was the oif\ufb01ceiss ‘of.’ the l<\/p>\n
-.1: …….-…’ 2 .\n<\/p>\n
….I….. -_,..1.,…1. …1… 1.-.: ,__…..,…_1….1 4L_’!’1..e.;., .c…. _  ‘
\nu out as y mum, wuu mm appludul\ufb01u um wuu\ufb01 Lu: U\ufb01tltlll<\/p>\n
relief and no doubt the obserVation_e’t11ade By .the
\nJudge of the Andhra Pradesh High  would suppott the vi?
\ncontention of the petitioneijs  tl1i:i   cases to a meat<\/p>\n
extent. But the judgment  the
\nhank*s appeal against tlte ‘same, deeenot. contaitt any<\/p>\n
nnnnnf ha rlcnuaa.-I that  <\/p>\n
run:-Ilandtxn ‘l”‘I.h:lIllI”I’,:V3″ ” ,
\n\\llDVU”3Ul\\JII-5 |nllV.’l’$l-I,,3’v  l”:U \\~CUIInIU\\\u00a5_ “I<\/p>\n
on merits. But it”trans13ires”th};t the-..  judgxnent of this
\n  Gacetamfls case_(_._l\u00a789) 1 sec 182 :
\n(AIR711989. ;i=1t19s9tp’Leb.t.c. 1138) had not been<\/p>\n
broughtto the notieefpef lt1tt::C0utt and when a Contempt ‘<\/p>\n
Petition hadflneenVf\ufb01ecil’fornon-hnpiementation, when the<\/p>\n
nn\ufb01 Iznrl ‘Prue ynria\ufb01nn n’F flip nu-tint and Imrniinl-If n flu:
\n ‘ LPN CW’ 9′.”‘””””V ‘,4 .1″? WW. I’M” |o’J\\IIII5llln ‘U “W<\/p>\n
“J.-‘ as<\/p>\n
l  ” tpnoticei’-of the__Court Vtheliudgtnent in Tarsel Lal Gautarn’s
\n  ease_(‘t9s9)”1 see 132 : (AIR 1939 so 30 : 1989 Lab.I.C.\n<\/p>\n
– 1133) ‘tl1e”.(j’Jou’1’et observed that the judgment in Civil Appeal<\/p>\n
e
\n~ it  observed by this Court in. di<\/p>\n
‘ust be confined to its own facts and as such the judgment
\nof Court  now to  implemented. at has<\/p>\n
posing f the contznpt<\/p>\n
   A application, when the decision of the Court in Tarsel Lal
\n Gautam’s case had been brought to the notice, would apply<\/p>\n
equally to the case in hand, more so, as against a detailed
\ndiscussion of law in Tansel Lal Gautanfs case, there has<\/p>\n
Lg… up. .1} aaaaa 4.1…. no ail rI)’|:’A .-I’… .4…’ .. 4.1-“; …l.!..
\nU991]. IIU UIEUHEBIUII. GI: \ufb01ll, WIIIIU U13 lll\ufb02blllg Ill (1113 B<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
ppeai against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High<\/p>\n
east as well as Pxajasthan High’ Court. “‘-‘M-‘-“=1-*”‘ we<\/p>\n
8’1<\/p>\n
O<\/p>\n
areof e considered oninion that the observations of the i<\/p>\n
a e of b id’ b.\n<\/p>\n
mt hag: my agplica\ufb02og to me gage 3;’
\n whiie disooging iof  i
\ngm-.11.\u00bb mm. 41…: :4 ….-…1.-: 9.1., bgv..mI:nA;n:\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7 it… 4′-‘…,’..–.,  2<\/p>\n
1d e theco t 1_f__ e ‘nth t;g_;;g;;g}
\nin Qgtg\ufb02, and have got  <\/p>\n
(underiiiie is msz~.”a)=<\/p>\n
n emm we made yr,’ ms—Supreme Court, the<\/p>\n
decision ii’! the ju\u00e9  ;_f ‘Le’  “:_’r*’ae’aesh’\u00a7-Iiigh Court Wouici oniy be<\/p>\n
applicable tciivtheivfeeievfeo” that’ eage’.’\u00abV’i*ne petitioners herein are not entitled<\/p>\n
for the relief eiaimed Vi11’11v1e*se_:w_i4it -getitions.<\/p>\n
  the reasoiismatied above, the writ petitions are hereby<\/p>\n
fejecEeciwi\ufb021’no’o1’de1f as to costs.<\/p>\n
:4:<\/span>
\n‘-‘-I
\nI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 Author: H N Das IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED T1-IIS THE 04″ DAY OF APRIL, zoos BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOI-IAN DAS ; T T ‘ ~ PE ON 10 00c WRIT BEIIIION N9. z21;zTT__ggV1%%{\u00a7’% 3-3 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-82019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-19T01:22:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-19T01:22:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1187,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-19T01:22:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-19T01:22:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-19T01:22:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008"},"wordCount":1187,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008","name":"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-19T01:22:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagarathnarajaiah-vs-state-bank-of-mysore-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nagarathnarajaiah vs State Bank Of Mysore on 4 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82019\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}