{"id":82689,"date":"2011-09-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011"},"modified":"2017-08-05T23:50:47","modified_gmt":"2017-08-05T18:20:47","slug":"md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                                             1\n\n    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0                Cr.\u00a0Revision\u00a0No.\u00a0908\u00a0of\u00a02007\n        (Against\u00a0the\u00a0judgment\u00a0dated\u00a028th\u00a0August,\u00a02007\u00a0passed\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0\n        learned\u00a0Sessions\u00a0Judge,\u00a0Giridih\u00a0in\u00a0Sessions\u00a0Trial\u00a0No.387\/2005)\n                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n        Md.\u00a0Asin\u00a0@\u00a0Md.\u00a0Yasin.                   ...     ...     ...    ...   ...Petitioner\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00adVersus\u00ad\n        1.<\/pre>\n<p> The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand.\n<\/p>\n<p>        2. Md.\u00a0Safdar\u00a0@\u00a0Mustakim.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3. Md.\u00a0Habib.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4. Md.\u00a0Abbas.               &#8230;     &#8230;     &#8230;     &#8230;     &#8230;Opp.\u00a0Parties\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n        For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner:             Mr.\u00a0\u00a0Vishal\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Trivedi,\u00a0Advocate.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<pre>        For\u00a0the\u00a0State:                  Mr.\u00a0T.N.Verma,\u00a0A.P.P.\u00a0\n        For\u00a0the\u00a0O.P.No.2:               Mr.\u00a0A.K.Sahani,\u00a0Advocate.\u00a0\n                                        Mr.\u00a0Ajit\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Advocate.\u00a0\u00a0\n                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0P\u00a0R\u00a0E\u00a0S\u00a0E\u00a0N\u00a0T\n<\/pre>\n<p>        CORAM:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MRS.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0POONAM\u00a0SRIVASTAV<br \/>\n              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.UPADHYAY<br \/>\n                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\nPoonam\u00a0Srivastav<br \/>\nD.N.Upadhyay,JJ.       The \u00a0 instant \u00a0 revision \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 acquittal \u00a0 is \u00a0 received\u00a0<br \/>\n           after\u00a0remand\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Apex\u00a0Court\u00a0in\u00a0Criminal\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.51\u00a0of\u00a02009,\u00a0<br \/>\n           arising\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0S.L.P.(Cri.)\u00a0No.5185\/2008\u00a0Md.\u00a0Safdar\u00a0@\u00a0Mastakin\u00a0&amp;\u00a0<br \/>\n           Ors.\u00a0Vs.\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Anr\u00a0to\u00a0this\u00a0Court.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>           2.             A\u00a0Division\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0allowed\u00a0the\u00a0revision\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n           remanded \u00a0 the \u00a0 matter \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Trial \u00a0 Court \u00a0 for \u00a0 a \u00a0 fresh \u00a0 decision \u00a0 vide\u00a0<br \/>\n           judgment\u00a0dated\u00a029th\u00a0April,\u00a02008,\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0challenged\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n           Apex \u00a0 Court. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Apex \u00a0 Court \u00a0 was \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 view \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 judgment\u00a0<br \/>\n           allowing\u00a0the\u00a0revision\u00a0was\u00a0cryptic\u00a0and\u00a0sketchy\u00a0and\u00a0is\u00a0devoid\u00a0of\u00a0proper\u00a0<br \/>\n           reasons\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0judgment\u00a0was\u00a0set\u00a0aside.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>           3.             We \u00a0 have \u00a0 received \u00a0 the \u00a0 record \u00a0 after \u00a0 remission \u00a0 from \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n           Hon&#8217;ble\u00a0Supreme\u00a0Court.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>           4.             Heard\u00a0the\u00a0Counsel\u00a0appearing\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0revisionist\u00a0<br \/>\n           i.e. \u00a0 the \u00a0 first \u00a0 informant \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 S.T.No.387\/2005, \u00a0 arising \u00a0 out \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n           Dhanwar\u00a0P.S.\u00a0Case\u00a0No.\u00a0190\/2004\u00a0(G.R.No.2227\/2004).\n<\/p>\n<p>           5.             The \u00a0 Sessions \u00a0 Trial \u00a0 proceeded \u00a0 against \u00a0 three \u00a0 accused\u00a0<br \/>\n           under\u00a0Section\u00a0498A\/34\u00a0and\u00a0304B\/34\u00a0Indian\u00a0Penal\u00a0Code.\u00a0The\u00a0learned\u00a0<br \/>\n           Sessions\u00a0Judge\u00a0had\u00a0granted\u00a0a\u00a0clear\u00a0acquittal\u00a0coming\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0conclusion\u00a0<br \/>\n           that\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0evidence\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0dowry\u00a0death\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0substantiated\u00a0<br \/>\n           and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0it\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0said\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0deceased\u00a0was\u00a0subjected\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\n           cruelty\u00a0and\u00a0tortured\u00a0by\u00a0in\u00adlaws\u00a0for\u00a0demand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry\u00a0and\u00a0she\u00a0died\u00a0an\u00a0<br \/>\n           unnatural\u00a0death\u00a0within\u00a0seven\u00a0years\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0marriage.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6.             We\u00a0have \u00a0examined\u00a0the \u00a0judgment\u00a0impugned\u00a0as\u00a0well \u00a0as\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 record \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 trial \u00a0 court. \u00a0 Evidently \u00a0 the \u00a0 death \u00a0 has \u00a0 taken \u00a0 place\u00a0<br \/>\nwithin\u00a0 \u00a0seven\u00a0years\u00a0of\u00a0marriage.\u00a0The\u00a0incident\u00a0took\u00a0place\u00a0after\u00a0five\u00a0<br \/>\nyears\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0to\u00a0presume\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0deceased\u00a0met\u00a0an\u00a0<br \/>\nunnatural\u00a0death\u00a0within\u00a0seven\u00a0years\u00a0of\u00a0marriage\u00a0is\u00a0in\u00a0existence.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>7.             The\u00a0second\u00a0requirement\u00a0to\u00a0constitute\u00a0a\u00a0dowry\u00a0death\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\ndemand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry.\u00a0The\u00a0allegation\u00a0of\u00a0cruelty\u00a0and\u00a0demand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\nmade \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 F.I.R. \u00a0 itself. \u00a0 A \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 witnesses \u00a0 of \u00a0 fact \u00a0 were\u00a0<br \/>\nexamined,\u00a0namely,\u00a0P.W.\u00a01\u00a0(Samid\u00a0Ali),\u00a0P.W.\u00a02\u00a0(Rubia\u00a0Khatoon),\u00a0P.W.\u00a03\u00a0<br \/>\n(\u00a0Diljan\u00a0Ansari),\u00a0P.W.\u00a04\u00a0(Md.\u00a0Saddique)\u00a0and\u00a0P.W.\u00a05\u00a0(Md.\u00a0Asin),\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0first\u00a0informant.\u00a0Though\u00a0the\u00a0witnesses\u00a0of\u00a0fact\u00a0have\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0this\u00a0<br \/>\nwas\u00a0a\u00a0&#8216;Golat&#8217;\u00a0marriage\u00a0and\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0no\u00a0demand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0<br \/>\nof \u00a0 marriage \u00a0 but \u00a0 these \u00a0 witnesses \u00a0 have \u00a0 unequivocally \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that\u00a0<br \/>\nsubsequent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0marriage,\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0consistent\u00a0demand\u00a0of\u00a0T.V.\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0Motorcycle.\u00a0No\u00a0doubt\u00a0P.Ws.\u00a01,2\u00a0&amp;\u00a03\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0declared\u00a0hostile\u00a0<br \/>\nbut\u00a0P.W.\u00a04,\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0resident\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0village\u00a0where\u00a0the\u00a0&#8216;Maika&#8217;\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0deceased\u00a0was\u00a0situated\u00a0and\u00a0P.Ws.\u00a07\u00a0&amp;\u00a08\u00a0are\u00a0the\u00a0brothers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0<br \/>\ninformant.\u00a0They\u00a0have\u00a0squarely\u00a0supported\u00a0the\u00a0contention\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0<br \/>\nwas \u00a0 demand \u00a0 of \u00a0 dowry \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 deceased \u00a0 used \u00a0 to \u00a0 tell \u00a0 her \u00a0 family\u00a0<br \/>\nmembers \u00a0 that \u00a0 she \u00a0 is \u00a0 ill\u00adtreated \u00a0 on \u00a0 account \u00a0 of \u00a0 non\u00adfulfillment \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\ndemand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry.\u00a0She\u00a0was\u00a0subjected\u00a0to\u00a0cruelty\u00a0as\u00a0well.\u00a0\u00a0P.W.\u00a04\u00a0who\u00a0<br \/>\nresides \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 same \u00a0 village, \u00a0 where \u00a0 the \u00a0 first\u00a0 informant \u00a0 resides, \u00a0 has\u00a0<br \/>\nstated\u00a0in\u00a0paragraph\u00a05\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0statement\u00a0during\u00a0trial\u00a0that\u00a05\u00a0or\u00a06\u00a0days\u00a0<br \/>\nprior \u00a0to\u00a0 death, \u00a0the \u00a0 deceased \u00a0had \u00a0visited \u00a0her \u00a0&#8216;Maika&#8217;\u00a0and\u00a0 informed\u00a0<br \/>\nthem\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0ill\u00adtreatment\u00a0for\u00a0non\u00adfulfillment\u00a0of\u00a0demand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0was\u00a0subjected\u00a0to\u00a0cruelty.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>8.             We \u00a0 have \u00a0 perused \u00a0 their \u00a0 statements \u00a0 and \u00a0 it \u00a0 appears \u00a0 that\u00a0<br \/>\nthere\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0demand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry.\u00a0Last\u00a0but\u00a0not\u00a0the\u00a0least\u00a0\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0family\u00a0<br \/>\nmembers \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 villagers \u00a0 visited \u00a0 the \u00a0 house \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused, \u00a0 they\u00a0<br \/>\nfound\u00a0the\u00a0dead\u00a0body\u00a0of\u00a0Nasima\u00a0Khatoon\u00a0lying\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0floor\u00a0and\u00a0froth\u00a0<br \/>\nwas\u00a0coming\u00a0out\u00a0from\u00a0her\u00a0mouth.\u00a0It\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0clear\u00a0indication\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\nnot\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0natural\u00a0death,\u00a0besides\u00a0there\u00a0were\u00a0injuries\u00a0found\u00a0on\u00a0her\u00a0<br \/>\nbody.\u00a0However,\u00a0we\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0inclined\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0our\u00a0opinion\u00a0on\u00a0merit\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\nassessment\u00a0of\u00a0evidence,\u00a0since\u00a0we\u00a0are\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0opinion\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nacquittal \u00a0 was \u00a0 not \u00a0 justified \u00a0 and \u00a0 it \u00a0 calls \u00a0 for \u00a0 a \u00a0 fresh \u00a0 assessment \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\nevidence\u00a0and\u00a0a\u00a0new\u00a0verdict.\u00a0The\u00a0learned\u00a0Judge\u00a0should\u00a0have\u00a0taken\u00a0<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>into\u00a0consideration\u00a0that\u00a0mere\u00a0existence\u00a0of\u00a0three\u00a0aspects\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\ndemand\u00a0of\u00a0dowry\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0result\u00a0whereof\u00a0death\u00a0occurred\u00a0within\u00a0seven\u00a0<br \/>\nyears \u00a0 of \u00a0 marriage \u00a0 and \u00a0 death \u00a0 appears \u00a0 to \u00a0 be \u00a0 apparently \u00a0 unnatural\u00a0<br \/>\nimmediately \u00a0 the \u00a0 onus \u00a0 shifted \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 shoulder \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused \u00a0 to\u00a0<br \/>\nsubstantiate\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0natural\u00a0death\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0there\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0no\u00a0demand\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0dowry\u00a0in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0presumption\u00a0drawn\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0under\u00a0<br \/>\nSection \u00a0 113B \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Evidence \u00a0 Act. \u00a0 The \u00a0 learned \u00a0 Sessions \u00a0 Judge\u00a0<br \/>\ncommitted\u00a0an\u00a0error\u00a0while\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0trial\u00a0as\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0regular\u00a0trial,\u00a0<br \/>\nwhere \u00a0 a \u00a0 burden \u00a0 lies \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 shoulder \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 prosecution \u00a0 to\u00a0<br \/>\nsubstantiate\u00a0its\u00a0case\u00a0beyond\u00a0any\u00a0reasonable\u00a0doubt,\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0<br \/>\ndone\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0&#8220;Dowry\u00a0Death&#8221;.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>9.                It\u00a0is\u00a0made\u00a0clear\u00a0that\u00a0we\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0expressing\u00a0any\u00a0opinion\u00a0<br \/>\non\u00a0merit\u00a0or\u00a0assessment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0evidence.\u00a0We\u00a0only\u00a0remit\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ntrial\u00a0court\u00a0for\u00a0re\u00adtrial\u00a0and\u00a0for\u00a0recording\u00a0evidence,\u00a0if\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0necessary\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a0113B\u00a0Evidence\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0made\u00a0clear\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\nview\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a0113B\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0an\u00a0opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\ndischarge\u00a0its\u00a0onus\u00a0since\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0presumption\u00a0against\u00a0them.\u00a0The\u00a0case\u00a0<br \/>\nis\u00a0remitted\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0court\u00a0of\u00a0sessions.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0event\u00a0the\u00a0Sessions\u00a0Judge\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\nnot \u00a0 available, \u00a0 the \u00a0 District \u00a0 Judge \u00a0 shall \u00a0 mark \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 to \u00a0 any \u00a0 other\u00a0<br \/>\nCourt\u00a0having\u00a0equivalent\u00a0jurisdiction.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>10.               With\u00a0these\u00a0observations,\u00a0the\u00a0revision\u00a0is\u00a0allowed.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       [Poonam\u00a0Srivastav,J.]<\/p>\n<p>                                                       [D.N.Upadhyay,J.]<\/p>\n<p>Jharkhand\u00a0High\u00a0Court,\u00a0Ranchi<br \/>\nDated\u00a0\u00a0\u00a021st\u00a0September,\u00a02011<br \/>\nP.K.S.\/N.A.F.R.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 1 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Cr.\u00a0Revision\u00a0No.\u00a0908\u00a0of\u00a02007 (Against\u00a0the\u00a0judgment\u00a0dated\u00a028th\u00a0August,\u00a02007\u00a0passed\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0 learned\u00a0Sessions\u00a0Judge,\u00a0Giridih\u00a0in\u00a0Sessions\u00a0Trial\u00a0No.387\/2005) \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad Md.\u00a0Asin\u00a0@\u00a0Md.\u00a0Yasin. &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230;Petitioner\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00adVersus\u00ad 1. The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand. 2. Md.\u00a0Safdar\u00a0@\u00a0Mustakim. 3. Md.\u00a0Habib. 4. Md.\u00a0Abbas. &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230;Opp.\u00a0Parties\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner: Mr.\u00a0\u00a0Vishal\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Trivedi,\u00a0Advocate.\u00a0 For\u00a0the\u00a0State: Mr.\u00a0T.N.Verma,\u00a0A.P.P.\u00a0 For\u00a0the\u00a0O.P.No.2: Mr.\u00a0A.K.Sahani,\u00a0Advocate.\u00a0 Mr.\u00a0Ajit\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Advocate.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0P\u00a0R\u00a0E\u00a0S\u00a0E\u00a0N\u00a0T CORAM:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MRS.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0POONAM\u00a0SRIVASTAV \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.UPADHYAY \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad Poonam\u00a0Srivastav [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-82689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-05T18:20:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-05T18:20:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":964,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-05T18:20:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-05T18:20:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-05T18:20:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011"},"wordCount":964,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011","name":"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-05T18:20:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/md-yasim-md-yasim-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Md.Yasim @ Md.Yasim vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 21 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82689\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}