{"id":82741,"date":"2008-10-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-01-16T13:01:04","modified_gmt":"2018-01-16T07:31:04","slug":"m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 185 of 2002()\n\n\n1. M.ALAGARAJA,S\/O.MUTHUSWAMY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :15\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                            THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n                           --------------------------------------\n                             Crl.R.P. No.185 of 2002\n                           --------------------------------------\n                    Dated this the 15th day of October, 2008.\n\n                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>             Heard both sides.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.    Revision petitioner faced trial in the court of learned Additional<\/p>\n<p>Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam in C.C.No.206 of 1997 for offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable under Section 3(a) of the Railways Property (Unlawful Possession)<\/p>\n<p>Act, 1966 (for short, &#8216;the Act&#8217;). He was found guilty, convicted and sentenced to<\/p>\n<p>undergo simple imprisonment for one year and pay fine of Rs.1,000\/-.             He<\/p>\n<p>preferred appeal but, conviction and sentence were confirmed.          Hence, this<\/p>\n<p>revision.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.    It is contended that MO1 is not proved to be a railway property as<\/p>\n<p>defined in Section 2(d) of the Act. It is also contended that there is no sufficient<\/p>\n<p>evidence to show that revision petitioner was in possession of MO1.<\/p>\n<p>       4.    Case is that on 26.2.1994 at about 11.45 p.m. revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was found carrying MO1, railway parcel kept in a gunny bag on a cycle. Offence<\/p>\n<p>is said to have been detected by PW1, Head Constable attached to the Railway<\/p>\n<p>Protection Force (for short, &#8216;RPF&#8217;). He stated that on the relevant day, time and<\/p>\n<p>place he found revision petitioner carrying a gunny bag on the carrier of a cycle.<\/p>\n<p>Revision petitioner was proceeding from railway platform No.IV to the nearby<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.185\/2002<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>road. PW1 felt suspicious, intercepted the revision petitioner and checked the<\/p>\n<p>gunny bag when he noticed railway parcel in that gunny bag. PW1 arrested the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner and seized the said article and cycle as per Ext.P1, mahazar.<\/p>\n<p>MO1 is the parcel and MO2 is the cycle on which according to PW1, revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was carrying MO1. The said properties along with revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>were produced in the office of the RPF. There, statement of revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was recorded by the officials which is Ext.P3. Ext.P2 is the report which PW1<\/p>\n<p>handed over to the RPF. PW2 stated that on 26.2.1994 at about midnight he<\/p>\n<p>saw revision petitioner going with a cycle. MO1 was on the carrier of the cycle.<\/p>\n<p>Revision petitioner was arrested by RPF staff. PW2 is an attestor in ExtP1.<\/p>\n<p>PW3, Parcel Supervisor stated that he found MO1 on the railway platform on<\/p>\n<p>26.2.1994. It contained the railway mark. On 27.2.1994 he found the same<\/p>\n<p>missing and gave report. Ext.P5 is the report. Later, he examined MO1 at the<\/p>\n<p>office of RPF and issued Ext.P4 (to the effect that it is railway parcel). PWs 4<\/p>\n<p>and 5 are railway officials at Ernakulam Junction.        They stated that MO1<\/p>\n<p>belonged to the railway. According to PW4, MO1 was unloaded at Ernakulam<\/p>\n<p>Junction and thereon necessary entries were made in Ext.P6. PW5 proved<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P7, extract of unloading register.     PW6 is     the Chief Parcel Clerk at<\/p>\n<p>Muradabad. He stated that MO1 was booked by him on behalf of Balaji Metals<\/p>\n<p>Houses. Ext.P9 is the copy of the forwarding note. Ext.P10 is the copy of way<\/p>\n<p>bill. According to PW6 also, MO1 contained railway mark. PW7 is the Markman<\/p>\n<p>who put railway mark on MO1. PW8, Senior Commercial Clerk stated that on<\/p>\n<p>30.1.1996, wagon concerned was unloaded by him. Ext.P11 is the copy of the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.185\/2002<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>unloading register. Parcel No.6914 (which is MO1) was booked to Ernakulam<\/p>\n<p>Junction from Muradabad Station. PW9 was loading and unloading Supervisor.<\/p>\n<p>He stated that he unloaded the said parcel from train No.7058. Ext.P12 is the<\/p>\n<p>relevant extract of the register. PW11, Sub Inspector of RPF recorded the<\/p>\n<p>statement of revision petitioner (Ext.P3).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       5.    It is contended that MO1 is not a railway property as defined in<\/p>\n<p>Section 2(d) of the Act. Section 2(d) defines railway property as including &#8220;any<\/p>\n<p>goods, money or valuable security, or animal, belonging to, or in the charge or<\/p>\n<p>possession of, a railway administration&#8221;. It is clear from Section 2(d) of the Act<\/p>\n<p>that the property need not be owned by the railway but, it is sufficient thatat the<\/p>\n<p>relevant time it was in charge of or in possession of the railway administration.<\/p>\n<p>Here, evidence revealed that MO1 was booked at Muradabad to be delivered to<\/p>\n<p>Balaji Metals Houses at Ernakulam and the same was transported through<\/p>\n<p>railway.   That, the said article was booked as above stated, transported to<\/p>\n<p>Ernakulam and unloaded at Ernakulam Railway Junction are proved by<\/p>\n<p>documentary and oral evidence. Necessarily          therefore, MO1 was in the<\/p>\n<p>possession of, or at least in the charge of a railway administration during the<\/p>\n<p>relevant time.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       6.    Exts.P1 and P2 and evidence of PWs 1 and 2 show that MO1 was<\/p>\n<p>seized from the possession of revision petitioner. Revision petitioner has not<\/p>\n<p>accounted for his possession. He was not able to produce any document to<\/p>\n<p>show that he was authorized or entitled to possess MO1. Therefore, Section 3<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.185\/2002<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                           4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(d) of the Act applied and conviction of revision petitioner is legal and proper.<\/p>\n<p>        7.    On the question of sentence, learned counsel made a fervent plea<\/p>\n<p>for leniency. Counsel submitted that revision petitioner is the only breadwinner<\/p>\n<p>of his family consisting of wife and two children who are studying. According to<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel, wife of the revision petitioner is afflicted with all sort of illness<\/p>\n<p>and revision petitioner, at the relevant time was working as Clerk in the railways.<\/p>\n<p>Now also he is working in the railways. His salary is the only source of income<\/p>\n<p>for the family. It is submitted that revision petitioner was aged 38 years at the<\/p>\n<p>time of incident and that if the imprisonment awarded to him is sustained, he will<\/p>\n<p>cost his job which will affect the entire family. Learned counsel submitted that<\/p>\n<p>an opportunity may be given to the revision petitioner to           correct hmself.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel submitted that imprisonment is not mandatory since revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is only a first offender. He placed reliance on the decision in Nirmal<\/p>\n<p>Lal Gupta v. State of Orissa (1995 Supp (2) SCC 713) where, instead of<\/p>\n<p>sentencing the offender for imprisonment, he was sentenced to pay fine of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>        8.    I went through the statement of the revision petitioner recorded by<\/p>\n<p>learned magistrate on the question of sentence. He only stated that he has a<\/p>\n<p>family to be maintained. Though further details are not stated by him, I find no<\/p>\n<p>reason to discard the submission made by the learned counsel at the Bar. It is<\/p>\n<p>not shown that revision petitioner is involved in any other case.           In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances I am inclined to think that sentence of fine of Rs.2,500\/- is<\/p>\n<p>sufficient punishment in the ends of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.185\/2002<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      Resultantly, Revision Petition is allowed in part in the following lines:-<\/p>\n<p>                   Sentence imposed on revision petitioner is modified as fine<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.2,500\/-   (Rupees Two thousand and five hundred only) in default of<\/p>\n<p>payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. Bail bond is<\/p>\n<p>cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Crl.M.P.No. 1248 of 2002 shall stand dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                     THOMAS P.JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                                JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>cks<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.185\/2002<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                       6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                          Thomas P.Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                          Crl.R.P.No.185 of 2002<\/p>\n<p>                                ORDER<\/p>\n<p>                          15th October, 2008<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 185 of 2002() 1. M.ALAGARAJA,S\/O.MUTHUSWAMY, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE For Petitioner :SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-82741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-16T07:31:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-16T07:31:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1156,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\",\"name\":\"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-16T07:31:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-16T07:31:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-16T07:31:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008"},"wordCount":1156,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008","name":"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-16T07:31:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-alagaraja-vs-state-of-kerala-on-15-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Alagaraja vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82741"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82741\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}