{"id":83019,"date":"2009-03-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009"},"modified":"2014-02-19T08:31:12","modified_gmt":"2014-02-19T03:01:12","slug":"the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>WP N0.8}.14!Q008\n\n{N THE HIGH COURT OF I{ARNA'I'AI{{;f\u00a7;\"* f  \" \n\nCIRCUST BENCH AT gHARwA:;~\u00ab A  L\nDATED THIS THE zcrrn DA?'  \nBEFQRE   '  \u00e9 ' _\nTHE HOIWBLE MR.J{\u00a33';V\u00a7'I5 (3E\nWRIT PET1T:}; &gt;_'\u00a71 Nc;i_:\u00a7';?'\u00bb'i.'1.;\u20ac?v~';\u00bb*~;$fQ5_(Ii8.(G!sA';V(\"QI3'(vV',V)\n\nBETWEEN:  N\nTHE c:HA1RMA1~T\"   g \ni).M.LAGADAC3,'Age:at\u00a78 YEARS,  V\nHAERAT SA'i'YA\u00a3fFA'i\"'i'Ei_iWA.L!..    \n\nDARGA MANAG1NC:'C0MMi'I_frEE' K_.AR-':v,AR; ROAD\n\nDARGA}{~-QERCLE, KK3\u00a7;HNM_&gt;L'11_ '  , ='\n\nOLD EUBLI, 31:31,: - 560021.' _ _ .. . Petitioner\n\n(By St{:.A;--.A.VKa1\u00a2b\ufb01d%\u00a7ie:--.\nSri. Sat\u20ac:1aha11i,\"'_.Advs.)\n\n.A  \u00e9;rIAzui\"&lt;3}? KARNATAKA\n\nVJ 33YE&#039;\u00a7&#039;\u00bbS&#039;VSEC-RETARY\n&#039; ~:&quot;)EPAm*n2r;.x:T OF REVENUE\n&#039; vxa\ufb01azxm. soumm\nDR, AM.t}EDIz:...eo1ning on for preliminary hearing in 'B'\n\n.  ,   day, the (301111: made the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p> fFi1e f:aeTtitioner claims to be the absolute owner of the<\/p>\n<p>  in question. The petitioner \ufb01les a suit in<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;$.53&#8217;;-&#8216;No.36] 1996 for relief of declaration and injunction<\/p>\n<p>V.  V sgainst the defendants therein. The learned trial Judge has<\/p>\n<p>decreed the suit as against which the 31&#8243; ans. 3&#8243;* defendants<\/p>\n<p>have filed appeals in R.A.No.33]2008 and R.A.26\/2008.<\/p>\n<p>WP N&lt;:s.8114\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">:3:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>During the pendency of the appeal, Iespondez-ate&#8217;  .<br \/>\nmake app\ufb01ca\ufb01ons under Order 1   *<br \/>\n151 of the Code of Civil<br \/>\ncome on record indicating tbejfhate<br \/>\npamper parties to the   I1V&#8217;t&#8221;tl&#8217;a;te&#8217;v&#8217;:a})d\ufb01}ications,<br \/>\nrespondents 4 and 5  have ti\ufb02e to the<br \/>\nproperty and that in   petitioner<br \/>\ncannot be  &#8216;_a&#8217;s_;:the  The said<br \/>\n  the petitioner as Wei}<br \/>\nas by   Judge however was of<br \/>\nthe    and proper parties to the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings; _I:;ICI1(.2&#8217;C,At&#8221;il1(V\ufb01J&#8217;;&#8217;Cd the appiications. Aggrieved by<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  . 1;he..\u00a73i\u00a3i&#8217;e order, the  is before this court.<\/p>\n<p>   for the petitioner submits that<\/p>\n<p> back in the year 1969, a suit was \ufb01led for<\/p>\n<p>V.   deelara\ufb01en etc., The said suit was \ufb01led by the predecessors<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;leepondents 4\u00bb and 5 and they have been subs\ufb01tuted by<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  {be petitioner. Eventually, the said suit was withdrawn with<\/p>\n<p>liberty to \ufb01le a freeh suit. Hence, the present suit is \ufb02ied.<\/p>\n<p>He submits that if the respondents 4 and 5 have any&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I,<br \/>\ns\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8211;\u00a7&#8212;-j-IV<\/p>\n<p>WP No.8114\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">: 4 :<\/span><br \/>\nindependent right, they are required to have it deciared in an<\/p>\n<p>independent suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. MrJ\\\/Iahanteshgouda, learned counsel for 1\u00ab&#8217;s.s4\u00a7c\u00a7}&#8217;.}1&#8217;CiV\u20ac:]j&#8217;t.&#8217;3&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>4 and 5 submits that there is enough mate;fis}&#8221;on&#8217;  _ V&#8217;<br \/>\nshow that respondents 4 and I  the o:w3Ad1:ebrsV<br \/>\nproperty in question. He fmfther sn_bin_tts  At1;:e&#8217;<br \/>\nappellate Judge has rightly  the  S V<\/p>\n<p>4.   &#8216;eotxnsel for respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.3   and proper parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. 4.&#8217;K.Hatti, .:{}o\u00a7iietnsnent Pleader submits that<\/p>\n<p>neither the petitioner nor respondent No.4 are the owners of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V    it is the State who is the owner of the<\/p>\n<p>6. Solncof the undisputed fact appears to be that<\/p>\n<p>    suit was \ufb01led in the year 1969 by the predecessors<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217; &#8216;Ao&#8217;f&#8221;;espondents 4 and 5 for deciaration of title and certain<\/p>\n<p>d   &#8230;.other reliefs. It is also to be noticed that the petitioner came<\/p>\n<p>on reeoxd and the predecessors of respondents 4 and 5 Were\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>, 4 i<\/p>\n<p>WP No-.8114\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">: 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>deleted. Thereafter, the suit and the Regular Second<br \/>\nwere prosecuted by the petitioner. Thus, to that<br \/>\nof the View that the petitioner has some<br \/>\nproperty. But, however, it cannotwbe&#8217;   of<br \/>\ntime that respondents 4 and<br \/>\nhowever, What is esse13.tial&#8221;:ts:&#8221; the   L&#8217;<br \/>\ninterse between the   5 and<br \/>\nalso that of the State   tbrashed out in a<\/p>\n<p>more comprehensive sm1t.- . fI&#8217;he  is sought<\/p>\n<p>by   the 3&#8243;&#8216; respondent therein<br \/>\nand   nItt&#8217;\u00e9s:&#8221;al:s:&gt; bmught to my notice that two<\/p>\n<p>suits sre \ufb01iexiiaotli for deciaration of title and for injunction<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  _ of the subject matter of these proceedings as well<\/p>\n<p> V  sozizetotliet property.\n<\/p>\n<p>  counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits<\/p>\n<p> that one;. of the suits is aiso withdrawn. Be that as it may,<\/p>\n<p>A C_&#8221; &#8220;fact remains that the title to the property interse between<\/p>\n<p>the parties is required to be thrashed out in a more<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; comprehensive suit, since the title is claimed by Iespondents<\/p>\n<p>4 and 5, 1 am ofthe view that they cannot be permitted to\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>WP No.81}.4\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">:6:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>come on record at the stage of appeal. I-Ience, <\/p>\n<p>Judge was not justi\ufb01ed in  _&#8217;  = , <\/p>\n<p>Consequently, the following orderiivs  hi   &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>The petition is ailciweda  <\/p>\n<p>Annexuxes-A and B stand  apehea\ufb01ops \ufb01led by<br \/>\nrespondents 4 and 5&#8242;   Iejeo\ufb01on of these<br \/>\napplications shall not__   in the way of<br \/>\nrespondents  5    deciaration of<br \/>\ntitle and     &#8216;sin: property.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rule&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-&#8216;<br \/>\n]UDGE<\/p>\n<p> Vvqmlv .&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal WP N0.8}.14!Q008 {N THE HIGH COURT OF I{ARNA&#8217;I&#8217;AI{{;f\u00a7;&#8221;* f &#8221; CIRCUST BENCH AT gHARwA:;~\u00ab A L DATED THIS THE zcrrn DA?&#8217; BEFQRE &#8216; \u00e9 &#8216; _ THE HOIWBLE MR.J{\u00a33&#8242;;V\u00a7&#8217;I5 (3E WRIT PET1T:}; &gt;_&#8217;\u00a71 Nc;i_:\u00a7&#8217;;?&#8217;\u00bb&#8217;i.&#8217;1.;\u20ac?v~&#8217;;\u00bb*~;$fQ5_(Ii8.(G!sA&#8217;;V(&#8220;QI3&#8242;(vV&#8217;,V) BETWEEN: N THE c:HA1RMA1~T&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-19T03:01:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-19T03:01:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":623,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\",\"name\":\"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-19T03:01:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-19T03:01:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-19T03:01:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009"},"wordCount":623,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009","name":"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-19T03:01:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chairman-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-20-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Chairman vs State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83019\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}