{"id":83048,"date":"2008-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-05-30T17:18:34","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T11:48:34","slug":"the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n<pre> &lt; &#039;Major in age,&#039;\n\n1\n\nMFA N0. i77f2OG6\n\nIN TEE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATES TRIS THE 26TH mv OF NOVEMBER :2.Qi3sff  ~ _\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HOBPBLE rm. msrxcs K. ;BJi&quot;{AKftI-iAV;&amp;.&#039;i$:s;g;,,;;.i&#039;.~  \n\nMXSCELLANEOUS \u00a7&#039;1RsTTVAPP;\u00e9\u00bb..L\u00bb&#039;;*:\u00a7.377j:2\u00a7{)&#039;o5\u00ab. &quot; \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nThe New India Assurance Co. L_td.,\nDivisicmai O\ufb01cc, V \nBclgaum,\n\nThmugk Regional O\ufb01ice,\nP Kalinga Rae Road, \nBangalc-re--27.\n\nBy Duly constitufcd   \n\n(By Sri I)ata1&quot;,V Adv;;&quot;f&lt;;_o\u00a7: apf:e1jaz1 t} \n\n3. vi\u00a3::=:n\u00a5&#039;  \n\n _ S&#039;[ {3 \nf 0 -Shivaji  &#039;\n&quot;  &quot; 1\n\n \u00e9f.&#039; Asz\u00a7\u00a21a_S&quot;5\u00ab4avarkar,\n in age&#039;,\n\nMavarkaf: Petroleum,\n\n  V  Ka\ufb02hiargi Road,\n. _ &#039; L L 4_ &#039;r-\u20acAc:,a_&#039;.:j&#039; Kanaka\u00e9asa Cimlc,\n Belgaum.\n\n(By S V Prakash, Adv., for Rwl)\n(By Sri Ravish B\ufb01ilii\ufb02i, Adv, for R-2)\n\nAppellant\n\nRe: spondents\n\n\n\nIVIFA No.177:&#039;2G06\n2\n\nThis Misce\ufb02aneous First Appeal is \ufb01led under Section 30(1) of the\nWorkmen&#039;s Compensation Act, against the judgment and order ciateci\n17.10.2005 passed in WCA:SR-124\/ 2004 01:: the \ufb01le of the Commissioner\nfor Wor1&lt;men&#039;s Compensation Sub--Division 2, BeIgaun1;&#039;\u00e9iWat*ding\ncompensation of Rs.63,158\/--- and directing the appel3antV~.h\u00a3:rein. to\ndeposit the same.  _   \nfollowing:\n\nJUDGMENT 4\n\nThe appellant] insurance Compaii\u00a7=.:ls\u00bbbefore&#039; this  for\n\nsetting aside the impugned orfderldatetll &#039;15?51\u00e9&#039;;A2o0s asad\u00e9l in WCA:SR--\n\n124\/ 2004 on the \ufb01le of the   Compensation,\n\nBelgaum. _ AV  _ 9 i\n\n2.  \u00a53ou}jsei:&quot;-fe&#039;1* submits that respondent<\/pre>\n<p>Nos.l and 2  respondent No.1 claimed that<br \/>\nzespendent .gf\\f\u00a7\u00a7:&#8217;&gt;.&#8217;2 i.&#8217;srothe1-\ufb01res his employer and he was working as helper<\/p>\n<p>in the   he alleged to have sustained fracture. But, the<\/p>\n<p>1.,,mspond&#8217;ent&#8217;l&#8217;._l&#8217;\u00a7.e;1  proved that he was a Werkman zmder the<\/p>\n<p>VV3:esfio_ndent&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;No.2&#8217;  that he sustained alleged fracture during the<\/p>\n<p>U  empleyihent and out of empleyment. It is also submitted that<\/p>\n<p>tile tespgendeiit No.1 has not proved Wages that he was getting<\/p>\n<p>  f~&#8217;\u00a7sll:;a&#8217;3{).(}.;;&#8211;~ per month and he sustained pezmanent disablement to the<\/p>\n<p> 40% though the Medical O\ufb01cer has deposed that the workman<\/p>\n<p>has disableme\ufb01t to the extent of 20%.\n<\/p>\n<p>L\\\/<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal coming on for healing thisday,   <\/p>\n<p>MFA No.17?\/2986<\/p>\n<p>3. On the other hand, learned Counsel for Iespon\ufb01em No.1<\/p>\n<p>submits that there is no illegality 01&#8242; ixl\ufb01rrnity in the ~ V.<\/p>\n<p>4. When the matter had come up for&#8217;5iiimi$giez;1    <\/p>\n<p>iearned Single Judge of this CourtVhasb&#8217;:&#8217;::1e1z:iae._1{\ufb01ed  &#8216;:2g.\u00a7.\u00e9;&#8217;~Appgg;1;_.Aj&#8217;T+;;m A&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>substantial question of law has not been:fo1mui\u00e91te,d;<br \/>\nS. In View of the grounds, urged,___fhe__s%1bstae1&#8217;t\u00a7a1_&#8217;Aq2;\u00a7istion of law<br \/>\nthat arises for consideration in    \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9er:\n<\/p>\n<p>Whet1;e:~%the.VV{1x$:;a\ufb01ii:s\u00a7;io:ier was gusei\ufb01ed in \ufb01xing<br \/>\nthe wagee &#8220;e.f&#8217; the msmnaent No.1 at Rs.1,800\/~ and<br \/>\n&#8216;t}:1a&#8217;:\u00a7;.c&#8217;1V&#8221;2;1;3.&#8217;*:&#8217;1i1g  ieouzse of employment and out of<\/p>\n<p>V  f c1;i:\u00bbx\u00a71o_yi\ufb01e3:i\u00a7:;\u00ab._._he seefained mjuxy which resulted in<br \/>\n  f3t3&#8217;L!&#8217;f${:\u00a5!::1:t:J3:&#8217;\u00a3&#8217;v V&#8217;C1;i::&#8217;5\u00a7&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;I:1)1Cmf3Il{ &#8216;\u00a30 the extent of 40% and<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9=.\u00a7&amp;*\ufb01ing ebge\ufb01ensa\ufb01on as per the impugned oreier ?<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&lt;&#039;:i_, Merely  respondent Nos.1 and 2 are brothers is not a<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a30 contend that there was no workman and empieyer<\/p>\n<p>&#039;A   between the respcndexzts herein.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00ab. V7L&#8221;Resp0m:1ent No.2 hag \ufb01led objec\ufb01ons admitting some of the<\/p>\n<p>..&#8221;V,e~&#8217;sz&#8217;e1;;&#8217;ii.1ents 0f the application and denying that there was 11:) grievcus<\/p>\n<p>injury etc. In support of the ease cf the workman, he has got him<\/p>\n<p>MFA No.1&#8217;F7l2{)(36<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>examined as P.W~1 besides examining Medical O\ufb01ioerf Dr. S R Angadi as<br \/>\nP.W-=2. P.W-2\/ Medical Omcer, who assessed the disahie1x:Iie_t};t._V of the<\/p>\n<p>workman, has assessed at 20% with Ieference to <\/p>\n<p>the Commissioner has \ufb01xes permanent disablement.at_A&#8217;%i0f&#8217;2E\u00a7A.i$\u00a7\u00a2\u00abithoi1t <\/p>\n<p>basis. The Commissioner was justified in \ufb01xinguwage-s of&#8217;ii1e-wofkiiian at, &#8216;_j<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,8{}O\/&#8212; and that he was a Worktgian iiz\ufb01ier theiv-:&#8217;eAspond1eiit N072<br \/>\nherein and during the course of employxiient and~.oiit  ti-\u00e9iispioyment he<br \/>\nsustained the grievous inju1\u00a73*;..\u00a2_  &#8220;.or.fesu_1t&#8217;eVt&#8217;1&#8217;A  permanent<\/p>\n<p>disablement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Thefe is   Appeal to the extent that the<br \/>\nCommissioner    compensa\ufb01ou \ufb01xing permanent<br \/>\ndisabiement; &#8216;a-a,49\u00b0,\u00bb\u00a3 of 20\u00b0\/o. Accordingly, the substantial<\/p>\n<p>(2}1Ji.f\u00a7S-V1Z1i()TI1&#8242; .f_o&#8217;1mi71!stes\u00abfor consideration is answered partiy in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>    9&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>9. Isithe  the Appeal is partly allowed and the impugneci<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; is  holding that the respondent No.1\/claimant is entitied<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;rs:  of Rs.31,579\/- (Rs.1,89(}x6{}%x146.20&#215;2(}\u00b0\/o) instead of<\/p>\n<p>  ~ along with intexest as awarded by the Commissioner.<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; The Counsels for the contesting parties are \u00e9izected to file a joint<\/p>\n<p> mgaxding the amount, which the respondent N&lt;).1[workms,n is<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7v{FA N0. 1 7752006<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>entitlezd and the Registry is diracted to transfer the same  &amp;?1\u00a7_ the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner for disbursement and the same ammmt sha\ufb01 be<\/p>\n<p>to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>N0 casts.   V <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 Author: K.Bhakthavatsala &lt; &#039;Major in age,&#039; 1 MFA N0. i77f2OG6 IN TEE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATES TRIS THE 26TH mv OF NOVEMBER :2.Qi3sff ~ _ BEFORE THE HOBPBLE rm. msrxcs K. ;BJi&quot;{AKftI-iAV;&amp;.&#039;i$:s;g;,,;;.i&#039;.~ MXSCELLANEOUS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-30T11:48:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-30T11:48:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":611,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\",\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-30T11:48:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-30T11:48:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-30T11:48:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008"},"wordCount":611,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008","name":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-30T11:48:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-vidur-shankar-mavarkar-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vidur Shankar Mavarkar on 26 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83048\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}