{"id":83071,"date":"2010-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-05-10T15:06:44","modified_gmt":"2016-05-10T09:36:44","slug":"sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE !*\u00a52GH CIGURT GEF KARNATAKA, BANGALQRE\n\nomen THE} THE 24?\" mar 05 AUGUST 2016 \n\nBEFCJRE\n\nme HON'8L\u00a7 MR. JUS'f'IC\u00a7 RAVI MAuMf\u20ac$H'%\u00a7'jAL*F%A:    _\n\nBETWEEN\nSR1 (EANWH KUMAR\n\nAGED 44 YEARS,\nS10 SR1 MANJAPPA\n\neHAmaA1'r-:1 RESIDENCEQ: .\n3&amp;1-msn)  TEHPLEV\u00bb\nMAuaaa.oas~s7soe2  A;    \n\n   %  \n\n(av saxit\ufb01asgsx-\u00e9\u00a7;A.w111%Aj'Pa.\u00e9sAn;V%Aovomrs)\n\nAKD:\n\n   =    A1  L%'*c\u00a7amaA1:&lt;3:eaAm&lt;\n\n CGRPQRATIGR BANK HQUSE,\n V _  RUCTS PQST BOX 930.34,\n&quot;  \u00abMANGAi.\u00a7i\u00a7E~5?Sm1\n\n2  5:41&#039; aAvImA GAME?!\n was 35 YEARS,\n~  wig GANE$H WMAR\n, &quot;&quot;_\u00abB1-MAQIRATHIRESIDENCE\nL &amp;%s55mm. co:-wwm\nBEHIND NMGALADM &#039;rEhm..E,\nmasmams-srmz\n\n.. . RE8P&#039;DN\ufb02E\u00a593TS\n\nMO&#039;\n\n\n\n(BY SR1 V 3 RAvzsHAHKAR, AWOCATE FOR R1,\nR2 - seavea)\n\nTHIS W.P FILE!) UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 22?&quot;*OF\n\nTHE C0f~iSTITUTION 0? INDIA PRAYING To QUf\u00a7$H* 5&#039;fH:E\u00abv,&#039;\namen PASSED 3*: me am aanezmoae m   \n\nDT.4.111.G9, VIDE ANN-B ETC.\n\nThis pet\ufb01tian coming on for  \n\nGroup this day, the Caart rrsa\u00a3;&#039;}e_&quot;-age fo!:m*;Eng:%_v &#039;  \n\nThe respondent-Bu\ufb01ttk&#039;\ufb01!\u00a2t\u00a7 \u20ac\u00a7.;\u00a7\u00a7f%!e;;:3&#039;2\u00a71200? bafore<\/pre>\n<p>$16 mam   rwaovary<br \/>\nof the    amthar. By the<br \/>\ncsrder \u00a2gase::T2f:%. %s;*2%.:\u00a7:23; ed.&#8217;A.ssa:.&lt;\u00a732s\/2907 was aiiowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>An    :31&#8242; the Ljmitatian Act was<\/p>\n<p>mada_ by  pa:\u00a3it\u00a7c\u00a7b.g&#8217;r&#8217;\u00ab\u00a7\u00e9r condanatian af delay of 1738<\/p>\n<p> r  1Adag?$&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;\u00ab:Sn;b_f\u00a7:!ing&#8217; t\ufb01\u00e9&#8221;&#8216;aagik:ati:an sesl\u00e9ng so set aside the ardar<\/p>\n<p>  amt! by the Tribunal. By the impugned<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9iwri\ufb01f V.71i\u00a5.J11.2W9, the app\ufb01catien was rsjacted.<\/p>\n<p>7 Hen\ufb01m,  mtition.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. Sri\ufb01hashikan\ufb01x Prasad, isamed wmmsei appearing<\/p>\n<p>  the pati\ufb01oner eonbands that are Tribunal has not<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; considered the sufmvent cause shawn by him white<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nrejecting hf\ufb01 appiicatian. He contends that this Tribuna%__has<\/p>\n<p>cam:-aimed an er-mr in disbaiiaving the case <\/p>\n<p>petitianer that he: was physicatiy unweii me attan\ufb01&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>pmceedingse He further $631!-&#8216;:\u00e9&#8217;fId5_ <\/p>\n<p>accemrrwdatian was ahaded, wh\u00a7r;:b_s\u00a7*A:\u00a2$&#8217;v <\/p>\n<p>rribunat. Hem, he submiwkjt\ufb01at%th\u00a7%:mpugnga&amp;@j\u00a2m% is k %<\/p>\n<p>bad in law and m was mg in a\u00ab,a:\u00a7e$fs7f%?t:e;%A%.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Sri. V.B.Ravisff\u00a7rfE\u00a7*a\ufb02L..vi\u00a7s\u00a7vrr\u00a5\u00a7t\u00a7:_ f\u00e9taunaai agswaring<\/p>\n<p>for 319 1&#8243; rmpa\ufb01dant .:f;\u00a71Q\u00e9;tV__ti\u00a7e&#8221;:;?,;\u00a7t:itionar has an<\/p>\n<p>altemaiiia\u00e9Vai&#8217;:\u00a7?.\u00a7.#:f\u00e9E\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3:Ec\ufb01jusjrarr\u00e9\u00e9dy&#8217;  &lt;&#039;.:f an appea! and<br \/>\nhence, 52:2&quot; for. He submas that tha<\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01tiarger is\u00e9a lf.&#039;i&#039;H.I:IVi,t&quot;7\u00e9J&amp;jA\u00a5&quot;v;3&#039;\ufb01f&#039;1$:L3fw\u00a5&#039; and hence, interferema in<\/p>\n<p> V&#039;  .633-&#039;:s \u00a7??Id:,._&#8211;:\u00a7rei\u00a7r w&lt;$\u00a5.\ufb01:i&quot;&#039;Ev\u00e9 urznacwry. He ylacas mi\u00e9ance on<\/p>\n<p>: 1\u00a7:&lt;._;.f am judgment reyorted in II! (2919)<\/p>\n<p>at:% % 495&#039;%%(*.;\u00a7%} (warren Mm: or man -vs-<\/p>\n<p>  ._sA1&#039;m\u00a7:a.&#039;r: memos mm amass), to contend that<\/p>\n<p>A &quot;:L:&quot;\u00a7r.s\u00a7 &#039;stay 3? an action in exercise cf&#039; the powers under<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;   Afticie 226 13! um Canstitution of India shcui\u00e9 he wepirxg<\/p>\n<p> in mind this aitsmativa and a\ufb01icackzxus rarmdy avaifabka.<\/p>\n<p>Ha furthav placed raiianea an paragraph ~ 27&#039; of we same<br \/>\njudgmmt no csmtzerzd that the exercise as; discrfg\/;i,m a<\/p>\n<p>garitiun under Artide 225 of me Canstitut\u00e9cn ef . Inid~ia<\/p>\n<p>simuid bra dame with cau\ufb01an, care and circums\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9\u00a5i\u00a2:hV\u00a7.i&#039;Lj&#039;*~   <\/p>\n<p>4. Heard bo\ufb02w counsei.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. The pvatitionar if&#8217;! <\/p>\n<p>wndanation of de\ufb01es: of 178 Vdays ift\u00a5fi i&#8217;ing,  <\/p>\n<p>he was haadrieidarz and hancajv ct&gt;ul\u20ac3~.Vri&lt;;t\u00a3.V-I<br \/>\nwhen O.A.f\u20aca.326i20(3?:1a:;as ;\u00a7!i$y\u00a7\u00e9\u00a33._. .;:T%1-g \ufb01n:\u00a7viVtig&#039; Vm:.orded<br \/>\nby \ufb01ne Tribune: E15 that the  awe af\ufb01davit<\/p>\n<p>is incarrett. Thergis  n&#039;1ea1?a\u00e9e&#039;ri&#039;a!i3a?;ffai.1a_I{_t:\u00a7VV%&#039;e far the Tribunai<\/p>\n<p>ho d\u00a555i31\u00a7B3f@ &#039;ref the petitioner. Meaty to say<\/p>\n<p>that \ufb01a\ufb01   Wtitioner is meorraact is<\/p>\n<p> unmi\u00e9t\u00e9\u00e9nabte.  ~ V <\/p>\n<p>V T_ 3%-::\u00a7\u00a7a::..uf awe reasons mm in me affidavit, I&#039;<\/p>\n<p>afr3_\u00a7:%f&#039;d1\u00a7\u00a7.:\u00a7f\u00a7\u00e9&#039;\u00a7j\u00e9idered vista that the reasons far the delay in<\/p>\n<p> _fi\u00a7i:-kg&#039;  \u00e9pptkatbn waking aondamticn are just and<\/p>\n<p>1\/ 1.ff&quot;r\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00ab5ahie. The petiticner having stated in the affidavit<\/p>\n<p>   blink ha was rrmdicaiiy unfit mquires to be accepted. I&#039; am<\/p>\n<p> bf the considsra\ufb01 -View that the pet\ufb01imer has shown<\/p>\n<p>suffkisnt cause fer the mndana\ufb01on cf dam&#039;. The order of<\/p>\n<p>tha Tribuna! is unjust and mquims to has inlwrfered with.<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>7&#039;. &#039;rm citation mind upset: by the \u00e9aame\ufb01 eounsayfor<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02-we r\ufb01ponderxt B with mferenca tn: the acmn in.&#039;..:e&quot;5\u00e9\u00a7g;-\u00a7\u00e9.ELi.zs}\u00e9vv.,<\/p>\n<p>:3! we pnwers under Artide 226 emf the Can$\u00a7I;fitz;\u00a3i\u00a7gr3 &#039; <\/p>\n<p>India. In paragraph-18 a!&#039; the said-}\ufb01\u00e9g\u00abm;eif;t, fe\ufb01afe\ufb01ce <\/p>\n<p>has bun ma\ufb01a with regard tog an  ex\ufb01r\u00e9is\ufb01s sf<\/p>\n<p>power :21&#039; \ufb01ves High Court in  p:\u00a7\u00e9r3;:girt~iz\u00a7\u00a7v_;  of &#039;V V<\/p>\n<p>auction&#039; In the cam \u20acOri\u20ac~\ufb01_F_&quot;f!8d; f~ffgi1-ACo;.|rt had<br \/>\ninbe:-fared with the mf\u00a7\u00e9r_&quot;wha;&#039;\u20acin wara<br \/>\nsought to he p:.:&amp;* \u00ab\u00a7sg::.   It is under<br \/>\nmom circurrt\u00a7\u00a3&#039;\u00a7i1\u00a2\u00a7i&#039;a&quot;s;&#039;.._&#039; in paragraph 18<br \/>\ncame  ba;  Suprums Court of India<\/p>\n<p>has aI5o&quot;ns\u00a7tad&#039;  same paragrayh thatlthe<\/p>\n<p> exs1f\u00a2.is\u00e9 {if ah &quot;as.I\u00a7\u00e9fnat\u00a7ve tamed}: is a ruh af discretion,<\/p>\n<p> fbut_ Lizat&quot;&quot;\u00a7Ar:ss{&quot;&#039;\u00a2;f tiampufsmn. Under am cirnumsitanaas in<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7i:bi\u00a2i\u00a7.A\ufb011?\u00a7\u00a7&quot;&quot;g::\u00a7fx\u00e9\u00e9i;fV&#039;\u00a3i:as passed, I&#039; am af the mns\u00e9derw viaew<\/p>\n<p> _ tlwa\ufb01it   relatrabh tn th\u00e9 cam can hand. The<\/p>\n<p>.  . \u00a7nxh\u00aba_;:stinafr of an aiizsrrxative remedy in the ins\ufb01ant ewe is<\/p>\n<p> T&#039;.&#039;11n\u00e9t&quot;a\u00a7; ef\ufb01caciws rerfmiy. This is an apgiication snaking<\/p>\n<p>  cartdenatim of deiay of 1?8 days. Tim -aiternahe<\/p>\n<p>A V  appeiable remedy garmat be carssidex-ad as an a\ufb01\ufb01aac\u00e9aus<\/p>\n<p>rarnedy undsr the present: circumstnnca.<\/p>\n<p>QT?\/r<\/p>\n<p>mat: 31$ said amczmt &#039;gs suff\u00e9ciaent ts shew his m_&#039;rt=\u00a7:fE\u00a7_i s:,:_,<\/p>\n<p>net withsanding his t:cn*\u00a3:en&amp;ns Mfore the  <\/p>\n<p>undertaking 3 accardircgiy raccr6aad&#8230;.. <\/p>\n<p>   _  L %<\/p>\n<p>Mm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 Author: Ravi Malimath IN THE !*\u00a52GH CIGURT GEF KARNATAKA, BANGALQRE omen THE} THE 24?&#8221; mar 05 AUGUST 2016 BEFCJRE me HON&#8217;8L\u00a7 MR. JUS&#8217;f&#8217;IC\u00a7 RAVI MAuMf\u20ac$H&#8217;%\u00a7&#8217;jAL*F%A: _ BETWEEN SR1 (EANWH KUMAR AGED 44 YEARS, S10 SR1 MANJAPPA eHAmaA1&#8217;r-:1 RESIDENCEQ: . 3&amp;1-msn) TEHPLEV\u00bb MAuaaa.oas~s7soe2 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-10T09:36:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-10T09:36:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":831,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-10T09:36:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-10T09:36:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-10T09:36:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010"},"wordCount":831,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010","name":"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-10T09:36:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ganesh-kumar-vs-corporation-bank-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Ganesh Kumar vs Corporation Bank on 24 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83071\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}