{"id":83094,"date":"2011-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011"},"modified":"2016-08-10T00:35:44","modified_gmt":"2016-08-09T19:05:44","slug":"pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                                        1                       WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008\n\n\n\n\n                              WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008\n\n                  Prof. (Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary                            ... ... ... Petitioner\n                                                  -V e r s u s -\n             1.   State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Higher Education, Human\n                  Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.\n             2.   Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department,\n                  Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.\n             3.   Ranchi University, Ranchi through its Vice Chancellor, Ranchi.\n             4.   Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi.\n                                                                             ... ... Respondent\n\n                       PRESENT\n                       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT\n\n            For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Shree Krishna Pandey, Advocate\n            For the University              Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate.\n\nP.\u00a0P.\u00a0Bhatt,\u00a0J.             Heard the parties.\n\n            2.              The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of\n\n                  India interalia praying that the respondents may be directed to make\n\n                  calculation headwise of the dues of the petitioner like gratuity, interim relief,\n\n                  D.D.A., A.D.A., Group Insurance Scheme, commutation of pension, dues of\n\n                  revised pay scale in the old and new U.G.C. Pay Scales, interest - statutory\n\n                  and penal on this on the amount payable under different heads. It is further\n\n                  prayed that the respondents may be directed to pay adequate compensation\n\n                  and interest, as directed by the Court earlier.\n\n            3.              The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the\n\n                  petitioner was serving as Head of the Department - cum - Dean of Post\n\n                  Graduate Department of Commerce, Ranchi University, Ranchi who\n\n                  superannuated on 30.04.2001. The petitioner filed Writ Petition being W.P.\n\n                  (S) No. 6885 of 2005 for payment of his retiral benefits and other dues\n\n                  stating in details the heads and amount payable to him which totaling about\n\n                  Rs.26,19,406\/- plus penal interest @12% per annum, which comes to\n\n                  Rs.34,99,970\/-, totaling Rs.61,19,376\/- up to the year 2007.\n                             2                       WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008\n\n\n\n\n4.             It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that having\n\n     regards to the facts and circumstances involved in the matter, this Hon'ble\n\n     Court was pleased to pass the order which is annexed with this petition vide\n\n     Annexure-1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to and relied\n\n     upon the order passed by this Court dated 07.04.2006, 15.05.2006 and the\n\n     order passed in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 468 of 2006 dated 21.04.2008,\n\n     07.05.2008<\/pre>\n<p> and 23.07.2008 i.e. Annexures &#8211; 2, 3 and 4 respectively.<\/p>\n<p>     Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a<\/p>\n<p>     senior citizen and awaiting for his retiral benefits since long.<\/p>\n<p>                       It is submitted that the petitioner has made several<\/p>\n<p>     representations to the respondent &#8211; University but there is no response.<\/p>\n<p>     Therefore, the petitioner is constraint to file the present writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>5.             The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 has referred<\/p>\n<p>     to the counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 3 and 4 and pointed out from<\/p>\n<p>     Annexures-A, A\/1, B, B\/1 and Annexure-C respectively that the amount<\/p>\n<p>     payable to the petitioner was calculated under different heads as per<\/p>\n<p>     Annexure-C and upon release of grant by the State Government on<\/p>\n<p>     16.04.2008 as well as 07.06.2008, an amount of Rs.2,17,873\/- plus<\/p>\n<p>     Rs.5,26,377\/- have been paid to the petitioner and in support thereof, he<\/p>\n<p>     has referred to and relied upon the receipt produced on Page-41 of the<\/p>\n<p>     compilation to show that the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.7,44,250\/-<\/p>\n<p>     on 01.07.2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>                       Learned counsel for the respondents has also referred to<\/p>\n<p>     and relied upon para 5 to 8 of the supplementary counter affidavit filed on<\/p>\n<p>     behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4 and submitted that as regards gratuity<\/p>\n<p>     at the enhanced rate, the Human Resources Development Department,<\/p>\n<p>     Government of Jharkhand by its Resolution contained in Memo No. 601<\/p>\n<p>     dated 06.07.2006, took a decision to enhance the ceiling of Gratuity from<br \/>\n                       3                      WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1 Lakh to Rs.3.5 Lakh and the State Government has started releasing<\/p>\n<p>the amounts towards enhanced Gratuity only in April, 2009. However, the<\/p>\n<p>University has paid Gratuity at the enhanced rate by cheque dated<\/p>\n<p>15.12.2006 from its own internal resources upon the instruction issued by<\/p>\n<p>the State Government that the amount would be reimbursed later on. As<\/p>\n<p>regards Provident Fund on P.F., D.D.A., the amounts were paid to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. It is further mentioned that the Bank makes payment of interest<\/p>\n<p>on the amount of P.F. lying in the P.F. Account of the account holder.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the petitioner has been paid interest on P.F. by the Bank.<\/p>\n<p>          As regards UGC arrears for the period 1986 to 1995, it is<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the State Government has released the arrears in<\/p>\n<p>installments in different periods. The 5th and the last installment is still<\/p>\n<p>awaited but since the petitioner had superannuated, the University has<\/p>\n<p>made payment to him from its internal resources.\n<\/p>\n<p>          As regards delay in making payment of the arrears of UGC Scale<\/p>\n<p>of pay, it is submitted that on the date of superannuation of the petitioner, he<\/p>\n<p>was drawing his pay in the old pay scale as is evident from the Service<\/p>\n<p>Book. It is stated that only after his retirement, the State Government has<\/p>\n<p>fixed his pay in the revised U.G.C. Pay Scale in 2003 &#8211; 04. After the pay<\/p>\n<p>fixation was made by the State Government, the University made a claim<\/p>\n<p>before the State Government for payment of arrears. The State Government<\/p>\n<p>has taken a decision and released the payment for the period 15.11.2000<\/p>\n<p>onwards i.e. the date on which the State of Jharkhand came into existence.<\/p>\n<p>          It is further submitted that the State Government is releasing the<\/p>\n<p>U.G.C. Arrears in phase manner which is still continuing as on date as a<\/p>\n<p>result of which, the teaching employees are still receiving U.G.C. Arrears.\n<\/p>\n<p>                           4                      WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p>               It is also submitted that the petitioner has been paid U.G.C.<\/p>\n<p>     Arrears for the said period on priority basis upon release being made by the<\/p>\n<p>     State Government vide letter dated 17.06.2008 as contained in Annexure-B\/<\/p>\n<p>     1 of the counter affidavit. It is also stated that the Director, Human<\/p>\n<p>     Resources Development Department had informed the University that the<\/p>\n<p>     arrears for the said period i.e. 01.01.1996 to 31.03.2000 would be payable<\/p>\n<p>     only after receipt of funds from the Central Government. However, to avoid<\/p>\n<p>     contempt, the State Government after two months released the funds by<\/p>\n<p>     issuing a cheque in favour of the University on 16.06.2008.<\/p>\n<p>               it is further submitted that the petitioner has also been paid UGC<\/p>\n<p>     arrears even for the period 01.04.2000 to 14.11.2000. Therefore, no<\/p>\n<p>     statutory interest is payable on these accounts.\n<\/p>\n<p>               Learned counsel for the University has submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>     respondents &#8211; University has not delayed in making payment on receipt of<\/p>\n<p>     funds from the State Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.             Considering the aforesaid rival submission and upon perusal of<\/p>\n<p>     the counter affidavit filed by the respondent nos. 3 and 4 and supplementary<\/p>\n<p>     counter affidavit filed by them along with the relevant Annexures, it<\/p>\n<p>     transpires that the amount has been calculated under different heads as per<\/p>\n<p>     Annexure-C and paid to the petitioner on receipt of grant from the State<\/p>\n<p>     Government. Now the limited question which remains to be decided is with<\/p>\n<p>     regard to payment of interest. It appears that while passing the order in W.P.<\/p>\n<p>     (S) No. 6885 of 2005, this court has passed an order dated 07.04.2006 and<\/p>\n<p>     directed the respondents &#8211; University and the State to release the amounts<\/p>\n<p>     forthwith failing which appropriate order for payment of compensation shall<\/p>\n<p>     be passed and the respondents were directed to release the entire retiral<\/p>\n<p>     dues together with interest and handover the cheque to the petitioner on<\/p>\n<p>     07.05.2006. It appears that the said direction was not complied with fully<br \/>\n                                5                      WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p>     and there is apparent delay in making payment. It appears from the receipt<\/p>\n<p>     of payment, produced by the respondent nos. 3 and 4 that the payment has<\/p>\n<p>     been received by the petitioner on 01.07.2008. Therefore, there is apparent<\/p>\n<p>     delay of about two years in making payment i.e. from May, 2006 till the<\/p>\n<p>     actual payment is made on 01.07.2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.                 It appears that the petitioner is senior citizen and retired Professor<br \/>\n     of the Ranchi University and has struggled for his legitimate pension and<br \/>\n     other retiral dues since long and, therefore, in light of the ratio laid down by<br \/>\n     the Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court in its various Judgment, one of which is cited by<br \/>\n     learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of S.K. Dua Vs. State of<br \/>\n     Haryana reported in 2008(2) JLJR 83, it is the duty of the State<br \/>\n     Government and the University to make payment of interest on account of<br \/>\n     delay occurred in making payment of legitimate retiral dues payable to the<br \/>\n     petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.                 Under the circumstances, this Court is of the view that the<br \/>\n     petitioner is entitled to get the interest at least for the period from May, 2006<br \/>\n     to June, 2008. Accordingly, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 are directed to<br \/>\n     make payment of interest for the period from April, 2006 to June, 2008 @7%<br \/>\n     per annum. The State Government is directed to release the grant in favour<br \/>\n     of the University for the purpose of making payment to the petitioner within a<br \/>\n     period of two months from the date of this order. On receipt of grant, the<br \/>\n     respondents &#8211; University shall make payment to the petitioner without<br \/>\n     further delay.\n<\/p>\n<p>               With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition<br \/>\n     stands disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>               Copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the State as<br \/>\n     well as University for their onwards communication to the authorities<br \/>\n     concerned.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                           (P. P. Bhatt, J.)<br \/>\n     Jharkhand High Court<br \/>\n     Ranchi dated 19th August, 2011<br \/>\n     RC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 1 WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5354 OF 2008 Prof. (Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; Petitioner -V e r s u s &#8211; 1. State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Higher Education, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-09T19:05:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-09T19:05:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1199,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-09T19:05:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-09T19:05:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-09T19:05:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011"},"wordCount":1199,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011","name":"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-09T19:05:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pro-dr-parshuram-tiwary-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pro.(Dr.) Parshuram Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 19 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}