{"id":83222,"date":"2007-07-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007"},"modified":"2019-03-23T07:18:23","modified_gmt":"2019-03-23T01:48:23","slug":"ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL A No. 976 of 2007(B)\n\n\n1. ITHAPIRI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :ADV.R.V.SUJIT KUMAR(STATE BRIEF)\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN\n\n Dated :26\/07\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                      K.Thankappan, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>                               Crl. A. No.  976      of  2007<\/p>\n<p>                 &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>                          Dated this the 26th day of July, 2007<\/p>\n<p>                                          JUDMENT<\/p>\n<p>          Appellant,   an   aged   man   of   70   years,   faced   trial   for   offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable under section 55(g) of the the Abkari Act on the allegation that<\/p>\n<p>he   was   found   in   possession   of     45   litres   of   wash.     To   prove   the   charge<\/p>\n<p>against   the appellant, the prosecution examined PWs.1 to 5 and produced<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P1  to  P9.   The   trial   court  accepted   the  sole  evidence  of  PW4   Excise<\/p>\n<p>Inspector who detected  the offence  and  found  that the  appellant  guilty of<\/p>\n<p>offence punishable under section 55(g) of the Abkari Act.  PW4 stated that<\/p>\n<p>on 20-8-2003 at 5 P.M. while he was on patrol duty, he got information that<\/p>\n<p>the appellant was possessing wash in his house for distillation of arrack. He<\/p>\n<p>proceeded  to the house of the appellant and searched the house. A 30 litre<\/p>\n<p>pot and a 15 litre can were found in the kitchen and on examination it was<\/p>\n<p>found that the can and the post contained  45 litres of wash. PW4 arrested<\/p>\n<p>the   appellant,   seized   the   wash   and   registered   the   crime.   The   case   was<\/p>\n<p>investigated   and   charge   was   laid   before   the   court.       After   closing   the<\/p>\n<p>evidence,  the   appellant  was  questioned  under   section  313  of   Cr.P.C.    He<\/p>\n<p>denied the  allegation and stated that MOs.1 and 2 were not seized from the<\/p>\n<p>house  and  the  above  material  objects  were taken from nearby estate    and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.976\/2007                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the   case   was   foisted   against   him   by   the   Excise   party.           Relying   on   the<\/p>\n<p>evidence adduced by the prosecution both, oral and  documentary, the trial<\/p>\n<p>court  found   the  appellant   guilty   under   section  55(g)of  the  the  Abkari   Act<\/p>\n<p>and   he   was   convicted   thereunder   and     sentenced   to   undergo   rigorous<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment     for   one  year       and   to   pay     a   fine   of   Rs.1,00,000\/-     and   in<\/p>\n<p>default   to   undergo   rigorous   imprisonment       for   three   months.       The<\/p>\n<p>conviction  and  sentence  awarded  against  the  appellant  are  assailed  in  this<\/p>\n<p>appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          2. Since the appeal has been filed through the jail authorities and no<\/p>\n<p>counsel   has   been   engaged   to   defend   the   case   of   the   appellant,   this   Court<\/p>\n<p>appointed a member of State Brief panel to defend the case of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p>          3.   This   Court   heard   the   learned   counsel   for   the   appellant   and   the<\/p>\n<p>learned Public Prosecutor.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the trial court has<\/p>\n<p>committed serious error in finding the appellant guilty under section 55(g)<\/p>\n<p>of  the  Abkari   Act    on   the   basis  of  the   evidence   of PW4,  as   there  was  no<\/p>\n<p>independent evidence to support the  evidence of PW4.  The learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>also   submits   that   the   evidence   of   PW4   is   not   enough   to   prove   that   the<\/p>\n<p>appellant was found in possession of the contraband article,  as the definite<\/p>\n<p>case of PWs.1 and 2, independent witnesses, was that they had not seen any<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.976\/2007                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>contraband article seized from the house of the appellant and they had stated<\/p>\n<p>that they signed the paper as directed by the excise men.  It is submitted that<\/p>\n<p>even if the evidence of PW4 is accepted, the finding of the trial court that<\/p>\n<p>the appellant  had  committed  an  offence  punishable under section  55(g)  of<\/p>\n<p>the Abkari Act is not justifiable, as the prosecution had not proved the wash<\/p>\n<p>kept by the appellant is for preparation of arrack.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         5.   The   trial   court   had   considered   the   evidence   of   PW4   and   found<\/p>\n<p>that the prosecution  had succeeded in proving that the appellant committed<\/p>\n<p>an offence punishable under section 55(g) of the Abkari Act. As per Ext.P9<\/p>\n<p>chemical  analysis report, the  first sample contained    4.78% ethyle alcohol<\/p>\n<p>and the second sample contained 8.65 ethyle alcohol by volume. PWs.1 and<\/p>\n<p>2   stated   that   they   did   not   see   excise   men   searching   the   house   of   the<\/p>\n<p>appellant, seizing wash and arresting the appellant.   The evidence of PW1<\/p>\n<p>shows   that   he   signed   Ext.P1   at   Padikappu   at   the   request   of   the   excise<\/p>\n<p>officials.  The evidence of PW2  shows that he signed Ext.P1 at his shop. In<\/p>\n<p>this  context,    it  is  relevant  to  note  that  in  Ext.P1    mahazar  names  of four<\/p>\n<p>excise officials were mentioned, but non of them was examined. It has come<\/p>\n<p>out   in   evidence   that   other   persons     were   residing   nearby   or   conducting<\/p>\n<p>shops nearby, but they were not made witnesses.   Apart from the above, it<\/p>\n<p>is seen that there was no material other than MOs.1 and 2 to prove that the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.976\/2007                                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>wash was kept for preparation of arrack. The case set up by the appellant is<\/p>\n<p>that the the material objects were   taken from a nearby estate and the case<\/p>\n<p>was   foisted   against   him.   For   conducting   a   search   in   the   house,   it   is<\/p>\n<p>obligatory on the part of the authorized officer to comply with  section 31 of<\/p>\n<p>the Abkari Act. There is no evidence to show that  the above procedure was<\/p>\n<p>complied  with  by  PW4.       The   prosecution   case  is  that   the   appellant  was<\/p>\n<p>found  in  possession  of 45  litres  of wash  for  the  purpose  of  distillation  of<\/p>\n<p>arrack and the same was stored in the house.   The prosecution must allege<\/p>\n<p>and prove that the wash was  kept for the purpose of manufacturing liquor.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, there is no evidence to show that the wash was kept  for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of manufacturing liquor.    In the above circumstances, this Court is<\/p>\n<p>of   the   view   that   the   finding   of   the   trial   court   that   the   appellant   had<\/p>\n<p>committed an offence under section 55(g) of the  Act is not sustainable. In  a<\/p>\n<p>decision  reported in   Sudhepan @ <a href=\"\/doc\/496541\/\">Aniyan V. State of Kerala<\/a> (2005(2) KLT<\/p>\n<p>(Cri) 631)   this Court held that to attract an offence under section 55(a) of<\/p>\n<p>the the Abkari Act, the prosecution must allege and prove that possession of<\/p>\n<p>the contraband liquor was incidental  or in  connection with export, import,<\/p>\n<p>transport or transit of liquor.     Therefore, the finding of the trial court that<\/p>\n<p>the   appellant   found   guilty   under   section   55(g)   of   the   Abkari   Act   is   not<\/p>\n<p>sustainable.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.976\/2007                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         6. In the above circumstances, the conviction and sentence awarded<\/p>\n<p>against the appellant\/accused in S.C.No.531\/2005 on the file of the Court of<\/p>\n<p>the   Addl.   Sessions   Judge   (Adhoc)-II,   Thodupuzha   are   set   aside     and   the<\/p>\n<p>appellant   is   acquitted.   Hence,   the   appellant       shall   be   released     forthwith<\/p>\n<p>unless required in any other case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                      K. Thankappan,<\/p>\n<p>                                                                      Judge.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>Crl.A.976\/2007    6\n\n\n\n\n\n                         K. Thankappan,J.\n\n                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n\n                        Crl.A. No. 976\/2007\n\n                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n\n\n\n\n\n                               Judgment\n\n                               26-7-2007\n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL A No. 976 of 2007(B) 1. ITHAPIRI, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :ADV.R.V.SUJIT KUMAR(STATE BRIEF) For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN Dated :26\/07\/2007 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-23T01:48:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-23T01:48:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1102,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\",\"name\":\"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-23T01:48:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-23T01:48:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-23T01:48:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007"},"wordCount":1102,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007","name":"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-23T01:48:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ithapiri-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ithapiri vs State Of Kerala on 26 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83222"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83222\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}