{"id":83230,"date":"2011-01-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011"},"modified":"2017-02-13T15:54:03","modified_gmt":"2017-02-13T10:24:03","slug":"mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\nRoom\u00a0No.296,\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\u00a0B\u00a0Wing,\u00a0August\u00a0Kranti\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Bhikaji\u00a0Cama\u00a0\n                     Place,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00ad110066\n     Telefax:011\u00ad26180532\u00a0&amp;\u00a0011\u00ad26107254\u00a0website\u00adcic.gov.in\n           \u00a0\u00a0Appeal\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001284\u00a0\n\nAppellant\u00a0\/Complainant         :      Sh.\u00a0\u00a0Harihar\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0\nAgra\u00a0\nPublic\u00a0Authority               :      National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0\nCorpn.\u00a0Ltd.,Kolkata,\n                               (Sh.Bhattachrjee,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0and\u00a0\n                               Sh.\u00a0Amitabh\u00a0Das,\u00a0AA\u00a0-\u00a0through\u00a0\n                               videoconferencing)\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0               :    \u00a010\/01\/2011\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision               :    \u00a010\/01\/2011\u00a0\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\u00ad\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>1.     RTI\u00a0request\u00a0dated\u00a03\u00a0December\u00a02009\u00a0was\u00a0preferred\u00a0<br \/>\nby\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0<br \/>\nCompany \u00a0 Limited, \u00a0 Kolkata \u00a0 seeking \u00a0 information\u00a0<br \/>\npertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0claims\u00a0to\u00a0repudiation\u00a0ratio\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncompany \u00a0 from \u00a0 1 \u00a0 April \u00a0 2004 \u00a0 to \u00a0 31 \u00a0 March \u00a0 2009 \u00a0 and\u00a0<br \/>\nrelated \u00a0 fats. \u00a0 \u00a0 He \u00a0 also \u00a0 south \u00a0 to \u00a0 have \u00a0 information\u00a0<br \/>\nregarding \u00a0 whether \u00a0 information \u00a0 available \u00a0 in \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAgent&#8217;s\u00a0 \u00a0Handbook\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0as\u00a0or\u00a0at\u00a0variance\u00a0with\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0kin\u00a0the\u00a0policy\u00a0bond\u00a0as\u00a0well\u00a0<br \/>\nas \u00a0 the \u00a0 meaning \u00a0 \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 terminology \u00a0 &#8220;computer&#8221; \u00a0 and\u00a0<br \/>\nnature \u00a0 of \u00a0 relationship \u00a0 that \u00a0 is \u00a0 entered \u00a0 into \u00a0 between\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 company \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 beneficiary \u00a0 of \u00a0 a \u00a0 cover \u00a0 note \u00a0 &#8211;\u00a0<br \/>\nenclosed\u00a0herewith\u00a0as\u00a0Annexure\u00adA.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     The \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 vide \u00a0 his \u00a0 order \u00a0 dated \u00a0 13 \u00a0 January \u00a0 2010\u00a0<br \/>\nprovided \u00a0 information \u00a0 as \u00a0 sought \u00a0 under \u00a0 points \u00a0 4 \u00a0 to \u00a0 8\u00a0<br \/>\nand \u00a0 promised \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 information \u00a0 under \u00a0 points \u00a0 \u00a0 1\u00a0<br \/>\nto \u00a0 3 \u00a0 on \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 same \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 holder \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\ninformation.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Not \u00a0 being \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 order \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 applicant \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dated \u00a0 3 \u00a0 March \u00a0 2010\u00a0<br \/>\nbefore \u00a0 the \u00a0 First \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 which \u00a0 was\u00a0<br \/>\ndisposed \u00a0of\u00a0vide \u00a0FAA\u00a0 order\u00a0 dated\u00a0 31\u00a0March \u00a02010\u00a0 vide\u00a0<br \/>\nwhich \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 was \u00a0 directed \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 information\u00a0<br \/>\nrequested\u00a0for\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0appellant\u00a0through\u00a0points\u00a01,2\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n3\u00a0within\u00a0two\u00a0weeks.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     Being \u00a0 aggrieved \u00a0 and \u00a0 not \u00a0 being \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nabove \u00a0 orders \u00a0 the \u00a0 applicant \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 second \u00a0 appeal\u00a0<br \/>\nbefore \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission. \u00a0 The \u00a0 matter \u00a0 was \u00a0 heard \u00a0 today\u00a0<br \/>\nthrough \u00a0 videoconferencing. \u00a0 Both \u00a0 parties \u00a0 were \u00a0 present\u00a0<br \/>\nas\u00a0above\u00a0and\u00a0presented\u00a0arguments.\u00a0 \u00a0Respondent\u00a0stated\u00a0<br \/>\nthat \u00a0 they \u00a0 had \u00a0 complied \u00a0 data \u00a0 as \u00a0 sought \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n appellant\u00a0through\u00a0points\u00a01\u00a0&#8211;\u00a03\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0time\u00a0on\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 request \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 IRDA \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 year \u00a0 2008\u00ad09 \u00a0 which\u00a0<br \/>\nthey \u00a0 would \u00a0 provide \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondent. \u00a0 \u00a0 Information\u00a0<br \/>\nfor\u00a0previous\u00a0years\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0them.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                            Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.   After\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0<br \/>\nas\u00a0follows\u00a0:\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>Point\u00a01\u00a0: the\u00a0respondent\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n          claims\u00a0received\u00a0and\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0repudiations\u00a0<br \/>\n          for\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a02008\u00ad09.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>Point\u00a03\u00a0:\u00a0respondent\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0<br \/>\nby\u00a0the\u00a0appellant.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    During \u00a0 the \u00a0 discussion \u00a0 it \u00a0 was \u00a0 amply \u00a0 clear \u00a0 that\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0word\u00a0&#8216;computer\u00a0Insurance&#8217;\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0amplified\u00a0<br \/>\nto\u00a0 clarify \u00a0that \u00a0it\u00a0does \u00a0not\u00a0cover \u00a0laptops \u00a0which \u00a0are\u00a0<br \/>\nmobile\u00a0thereby\u00a0misleading\u00a0proposers\u00a0to\u00a0believe\u00a0 \u00a0that\u00a0<br \/>\nthey\u00a0could\u00a0make\u00a0a\u00a0claim\u00a0in\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0loss\u00a0\/\u00a0repair\u00a0for\u00a0<br \/>\nlaptops.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0accordance\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0powers\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission \u00a0 u\/s \u00a0 19(8)(a)(iii) \u00a0 the \u00a0 public \u00a0 authority,\u00a0<br \/>\nthrough \u00a0 its \u00a0 CMD \u00a0 is \u00a0 directed \u00a0 to \u00a0 ensure \u00a0 that \u00a0 this\u00a0<br \/>\nclarification\u00a0is\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0website,\u00a0policy\u00a0bond\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0cover\u00a0note\u00a0 \u00a0so\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0ensure\u00a0\u00a0transparency\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nproposer\u00a0regarding\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0scope\u00a0and\u00a0degree\u00a0of\u00a0insurance\u00a0<br \/>\ncoverage\u00a0provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   Information\u00a0 \u00a0as\u00a0above\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0within\u00a0two\u00a0<br \/>\nweeks\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        (Smt.\u00a0Deepak\u00a0Sandhu)<br \/>\n                               Information\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0(DS)<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(T.\u00a0K.\u00a0Mohapatra)<br \/>\nUnder\u00a0Secretary\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\nTel\u00a0No.\u00a0011\u00ad26105027<\/p>\n<p>Copy\u00a0to:\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>1.    Shri\u00a0Harihar\u00a0Sharma<br \/>\n      33,\u00a0Bhaghya\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n      Sikandra\u00a0Road,\u00a0Agra\u00ad282005<\/p>\n<p>2.    The\u00a0Central\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n      National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.\u00a0<br \/>\n      3,\u00a0Middleton\u00a0Street,\u00a0<br \/>\n      Kolkata\u00ad71<\/p>\n<p>3.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n     National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.\u00a0<br \/>\n     3,\u00a0Middleton\u00a0Street,\u00a0<br \/>\n     Kolkata\u00ad71<br \/>\n     \u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   The\u00a0Chairman\u00adcum\u00a0\u00adManaging\u00a0Director<br \/>\n     National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.,\u00a0<br \/>\n     3,\u00a0Middleton\u00a0Street,<br \/>\n     Kolkata\u00ad71\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission Room\u00a0No.296,\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\u00a0B\u00a0Wing,\u00a0August\u00a0Kranti\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Bhikaji\u00a0Cama\u00a0 Place,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00ad110066 Telefax:011\u00ad26180532\u00a0&amp;\u00a0011\u00ad26107254\u00a0website\u00adcic.gov.in \u00a0\u00a0Appeal\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001284\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0\/Complainant : Sh.\u00a0\u00a0Harihar\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0 Agra\u00a0 Public\u00a0Authority : National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0 Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.,Kolkata, (Sh.Bhattachrjee,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0and\u00a0 Sh.\u00a0Amitabh\u00a0Das,\u00a0AA\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0through\u00a0 videoconferencing) Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0 : \u00a010\/01\/2011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision : \u00a010\/01\/2011\u00a0 Facts :\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0 1. RTI\u00a0request\u00a0dated\u00a03\u00a0December\u00a02009\u00a0was\u00a0preferred\u00a0 by\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0National\u00a0Insurance\u00a0 Company \u00a0 Limited, \u00a0 Kolkata \u00a0 seeking \u00a0 information\u00a0 pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0claims\u00a0to\u00a0repudiation\u00a0ratio\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0 company \u00a0 from \u00a0 1 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-13T10:24:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-13T10:24:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":488,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-13T10:24:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-13T10:24:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-13T10:24:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011"},"wordCount":488,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011","name":"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-13T10:24:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harihar-sharm-vs-insurance-division-on-10-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Harihar Sharm vs Insurance Division on 10 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}