{"id":83369,"date":"2009-04-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-11T21:39:36","modified_gmt":"2018-04-11T16:09:36","slug":"ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 925 of 2009()\n\n\n\n1. M\/S. HAM SAVENI CARBIDES\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. K.S.E.B AND OTHERS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJU JOSEPH\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN\n\n Dated :08\/04\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                 P.R. RAMAN &amp; P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.\n                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          W.A. NO. 925 OF 2009\n                     = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n            DATED THIS, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009.\n\n                             J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>Raman, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      This appeal is directed against the order dated 3.4.2009 passed by the<\/p>\n<p>learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 6134\/2009 pending further consideration<\/p>\n<p>of the matter. The appellant is the writ petitioner. The writ petition is filed<\/p>\n<p>seeking to quash Exts.P14 and P16 and for issuing a writ of mandamus<\/p>\n<p>declaring that the petitioner is entitled to get re-connection in the light of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 and on the basis of the recommendation of the respondents 4 to 6<\/p>\n<p>without paying any amount towards cost of works in the distribution side<\/p>\n<p>and for other consequential reliefs.      The learned Single Judge, by the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order, directed the petitioner \/appellant to pay an amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.36,00,493\/- and       to execute agreements as       conditions to give<\/p>\n<p>reconnection, of course with a further condition that he will commence<\/p>\n<p>payment of the installments within a period of one month from the date of<\/p>\n<p>payment of the above said amount of Rs. 36,00,493\/-. This is a provisional<\/p>\n<p>W.A.925\/2009                         :2:\n<\/p>\n<p>arrangement and subject to the result of the writ petition, without prejudice<\/p>\n<p>to the contention of the other side. Aggrieved thereby the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>preferred this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2. We, in the normal course, would not have been entertained a writ<\/p>\n<p>appeal against an interim order. But having due regard to the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>main prayer sought for in the writ petition is      for a direction to give<\/p>\n<p>connection without insisting for any further payment from him and by way<\/p>\n<p>of an interim order petitioner has been directed to remit a sizable amount<\/p>\n<p>pending further consideration and thus, virtually dealt with one of the main<\/p>\n<p>reliefs in the writ petition.    Hence     we heard the matter on merits.<\/p>\n<p>Admittedly, petitioner&#8217;s connection was dismantled he having defaulted<\/p>\n<p>payment of electricity dues. He want to restart his industry. For this, he<\/p>\n<p>made a representation. Discussions were held at the highest level and<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P8 shows that certain decisions were taken in the meeting held between<\/p>\n<p>the parties. Three points were raised for decision by the Special Officer in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P10 issued pursuant to Ext.P8. By Ext.P11 the decision of the Board<\/p>\n<p>has been communicated by the Special Officer (Revenue). Ext.P11 is dated<\/p>\n<p>3.2.2009. It clearly shows that the petitioner had paid the principal amount.<\/p>\n<p>By the said communication, he was asked to remit the duty arrears<\/p>\n<p>W.A.925\/2009                         :3:\n<\/p>\n<p>amounting to Rs.2,34,522\/-            Further, he was directed to file an<\/p>\n<p>undertaking regarding withdrawal of all the cases and also to pay the<\/p>\n<p>interest as per One Time Settlement. Subsequently, as per Ext.P13 letter the<\/p>\n<p>Special Officer (Revenue), informed the Deputy Chief Engineer, Electrical<\/p>\n<p>Circle, Palakkad, that the appellant has remitted the entire principal arrear<\/p>\n<p>amount as suggested by the Chairman of the Kerala State Electricity Board<\/p>\n<p>in the meeting in order to effect reconnection as a revival measure and<\/p>\n<p>since the appellant has complied with the direction of the Chairman of the<\/p>\n<p>Board, the Deputy Chief Engineer was requested to do the needful for<\/p>\n<p>effecting reconnection as per rules so as to resume production by 15th<\/p>\n<p>February, 2009. It also mentioned that an amount of Rs.4,25,816\/- is lying<\/p>\n<p>at the credit of the consumer towards security deposit.             However<\/p>\n<p>reconnection was given in stead Ext.P14 letter dated 21.2.2009 was issued<\/p>\n<p>advising the petitioner to remit a further amount of Rs.13,50,493\/- towards<\/p>\n<p>the cost of works in the Distribution side for effecting supply to the<\/p>\n<p>appellant firm. Later, a statement is filed requiring the petitioner to pay a<\/p>\n<p>total amount of Rs.36 lakhs which includes the collateral contribution to be<\/p>\n<p>made as mentioned in Ext.P14 of an amount of Rs. 13,50,493\/- as also an<\/p>\n<p>amount of Rs. 20 lakhs being the security deposit to be made for giving new<\/p>\n<p>W.A.925\/2009                           :4:\n<\/p>\n<p>connection.\n<\/p>\n<p>       4.   Whether or not the petitioner is liable ultimately to pay this<\/p>\n<p>amount of Rs. 36 lakhs need not be considered at this stage since we are<\/p>\n<p>only considering as to whether as a condition for reconnection any further<\/p>\n<p>amount is required to be deposited by the petitioner as a provisional<\/p>\n<p>arrangement and if so, how much amount he has to remit. In this regard, we<\/p>\n<p>have already pointed out that no mention is made in Exts.P11 and P13 about<\/p>\n<p>the further amount of contribution he has to make, as contained in Ext.P14<\/p>\n<p>order &#8211; the security deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs. Be that it may, if the appellant<\/p>\n<p>is statutorily liable to pay such amount, we cannot say that he is not liable to<\/p>\n<p>pay this amount at all. However, these matters are yet to be considered by<\/p>\n<p>this Court. Admittedly, some amount is lying with the respondent Board as<\/p>\n<p>balance towards security deposit. Therefore, the deficit to make the amount<\/p>\n<p>of Rs. 20 lakhs will roughly come to Rs. 16 lakhs. Though the appellant<\/p>\n<p>disputes his liability to pay this amount until a final decision is taken , we<\/p>\n<p>cannot accept the said contention at this stage. Therefore, there will be a<\/p>\n<p>direction that in case the petitioner deposits a further amount of Rs. 16 lakhs<\/p>\n<p>(Sixteen lakhs) within two weeks, the respondent shall restore supply by<\/p>\n<p>reconnection within a period of two weeks thereafter. The amount as<\/p>\n<p>W.A.925\/2009                          :5:\n<\/p>\n<p>directed above will be provisional and subject to the contentions that are<\/p>\n<p>available to be raised by either side. This is only in partial modification of<\/p>\n<p>the order made by the learned Single Judge and the appellant is also liable<\/p>\n<p>to make instalments \/ payments as directed in the order with which we are<\/p>\n<p>not interfering.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The writ appeal is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                     P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>KNC\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 925 of 2009() 1. M\/S. HAM SAVENI CARBIDES &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. K.S.E.B AND OTHERS &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.RAJU JOSEPH For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-11T16:09:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-11T16:09:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":961,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-11T16:09:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-11T16:09:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-11T16:09:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009"},"wordCount":961,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009","name":"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-11T16:09:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ham-saveni-carbides-vs-k-s-e-b-and-others-on-8-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. Ham Saveni Carbides vs K.S.E.B And Others on 8 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83369\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}