{"id":83571,"date":"2009-07-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-07T07:10:52","modified_gmt":"2016-05-07T01:40:52","slug":"sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>&#8216;*9-3%;<\/p>\n<p>Mm N(3.304i\u00a7V!3.::]&#8217;2\u00e9i}(\u00a7\u00e93:     _<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA AT;  <\/p>\n<p>DATED THIS THE 15TH DA?\n<\/p>\n<p>BEF::)re_g<br \/>\nTHE HC)N&#8217;BLE MR. _\u00bbN.Ai\u00a5A!\u00a7.l\u00a7_A <\/p>\n<p>M.F.A.NO;;..:\u00a7Q5!g  c:;:*2\u00ab:&gt;o [2\u00a7g&#8217;:~.4v)<br \/>\nM.F._A.NQ.3Q4_;3_ oF k2oo\u00a7_uy1\\_r)<\/p>\n<p>BF:'&#8221;l&#8217;WEF3N:: L <\/p>\n<p>I.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A * \u00bb .f1fUm;1Ja angst<\/p>\n<p>smys RU&#8217;rIfAiAH_\u00bb  _   &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Sf0&#8243;SRI..SIU{)A&#8221;h&amp;1%LiAIA%i<br \/>\nAGED A\u00a5~&#8217;3C)U&#8221;l'&#8221;!&#8217;&#8211;S2 i&#8217;.&#8217;P?AR&#8217;.&lt;\u00a7<br \/>\nPROPRIETETOR s L M ~Ro.:m LINES<br \/>\n\u00a7?;fA&#039;.&#039;i&quot;_ HULIEMR &#039;ROAD<br \/>\nGHIKKANAVA s&lt;*.&#039;a.:~:,5_p;ar.r.1<br \/>\n* CHSiiEI\u20acAi&#039;\u20ac\u00a3sYAKANAHALLI TQ<br \/>\n APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p>{:33    RAJA, ADVOCATE)<br \/>\nZ  Ahfi) &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>SR1&#8243; D..\u00a7;AKsHMA1AH<br \/>\n* = 310 LATE DODDA KARAPPA<\/p>\n<p> . &#8216;AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS<br \/>\n&#8221; . RfAT SRI F.&#8217;AN{}APAJA NILAYA<\/p>\n<p>E JYOTHINACERA<br \/>\n7 SIRA TOWN<br \/>\nTUMKUR&#8217; DEST<\/p>\n<p>UNITED INBIA INSURANCE CO LT9<br \/>\nJAYAEEVA COMPLEX<\/p>\n<p>FIRST FLOGR B H ROAD _.  &#8216; &#8216;A j;  *&#8217;<br \/>\nTUNIKUR-1  REsP0Nn2:;~\u00a7*rs:g_ L-<br \/>\n(By Sm. M R SHASHIDI-{AR FOR R1:   &#8221;   &#8221; &#8221;   4&#8242;<br \/>\nSri.A.M.VFENKA&#8217;I&#8217;F!SH more R2) .<\/p>\n<p>MFA N&#8217;0.304,\ufb01j&#8217;20\u20ac}8:\n<\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN: #<\/p>\n<p>1 SR! S PUTTAIAH  .\n<\/p>\n<p>s\/0 SR1 SIIBDA MALi..&#8217;z&#8217;!\u00a7A&#8217;\u00a7% ,<br \/>\nAGED AROEYT 52 vramg *<br \/>\nmomxmon s L M ROAE&#8217;L.I_Ni-13 j<br \/>\nR\/AT HULIYAR ROAD   &#8212; .. j &#8216; A.<br \/>\nCI-HKKANAVA\u00a7{.&amp;.NAHAf=JJ 1.<br \/>\nCHIKKANAYAKAEEQHALH TQ<\/p>\n<p>TUMKUR   V   .T&#8230;APPELLAN&#8217;I&#8217;<br \/>\n(By Sri.<br \/>\n1 SMT.S.i{;&#8217;SHARAVA&#8217;fH f ~  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>W\/0.SRI VENKATESK .\n<\/p>\n<p>I)\/0.S;R;&#8217;I-\u20acAREH&#8217;Am_IMA\u00a5AH<\/p>\n<p> . 450523&#8242; 23.\u00ab.BQU&#8221;1&#8217;_45 YE;A&#8217;R&#8211;S&#8211;~ *<\/p>\n<p>R,&#8217; C313&#8242; &#8220;SF?I&#8217;;&#8217;S&#8217;. K. KRISHNAPPNS HOUSE<\/p>\n<p> vAz~z:~: ESEEIEIM WORKS<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Egan: \ufb01A\u00a733R\u00bb<br \/>\nsIi?A&#8221;I&#8217;.\ufb010wN,<br \/>\n&#8216;1&#8217;LIm;UR Diszrggzm.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; .2. Lm1&#8217;I*E:i:&gt; mam INSURANCE co LTD<br \/>\n~  &#8220;-._J2%.YADEVA&#8212;COMPLEX<br \/>\n &#8216; ..FiRST&#8221;PTLOOR B H ROAD<br \/>\n Tmmmaul  RESPONEENTS<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  my  M R SHASHIDHAR FOR 12::<br \/>\nw &#8216;S\ufb01.A.M.VEN\u00a5(A&#8217;\u00a5&#8217;F3SH ma R2)<\/p>\n<p>MFA8 FILED HIS 173(1) OF&#8217; MV ACT&#8217; AGAINST THE<\/p>\n<p>.}UII&gt;GMEN&#8217;I&#8217; AND AWARD DA&#8217;f&#8217;ED:3G.\u20ac)9.2&#8217;0C16 PASSED IN PJEVC<\/p>\n<p>NOJ053\/1997 8; 1054\/1997 ON THE FiLE OF CIVIL JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>(SR.DN.) &amp; ADD1&#8243;I&#8217;IONAL MAUI&#8217;, SIRA, A\u00a7v.is:\u00e9:jI:\u00a7rJc3<br \/>\ncompswsmom 0? Rs.:._2,30,912\/m 8: 12s.5o,oQo;g3.wITH&#8211;&lt; 1&#039;<br \/>\nINTEREST @ 6% rm. mom THE agfrn 0I?&quot;&quot;Pi?.*i.&#039;I&#039;_I&#039;_IOI*I  &#039;A<\/p>\n<p>PAYMENT.\n<\/p>\n<p>These appeals, coming on \u00b0for&#8217;&gt;.hi2az&#8217;iI&#8217;:&#8217;g_. this k~i&#8217;:\u00a7j,r, &#8216;~<\/p>\n<p>Lhc; Cuurt, dclivcxcd (ht: foHr:wi\u00a71g;<\/p>\n<p>These: appeals    of the vehicle<br \/>\ncontending that.   have been<br \/>\nfastened       and also<br \/>\ncomgaensatigp  is on the higher<br \/>\nSide&#8217;  &#8211;  T.  .  .\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;2.   learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for appeilanf:i&#8217;n(i $1r*i.\u00a7\u00a3.M.Venkatsesh, learned counse!<\/p>\n<p>   company and Sri.M.R.Shashidhar,<\/p>\n<p>i\u00e9ka\ufb01\ufb01gti  claimant and I have been taken<\/p>\n<p>V V&#8217; .t.hm1 igh  judgrnent and l&#8221;\u20ac&#8217;,t&#8217;X)7&#8217;\ufb02S.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;A   is seen \ufb01mn T&#8217;f&#8217;.&#8217;.CI)I&#8217;dS, that appeilant was the<\/p>\n<p> bus (stage marriagc=:) imroived in the accident.<\/p>\n<p>[ :A&#8221;f t.ht=: time of accident the bus: was over fended.<\/p>\n<p>Therefnre, insurance company has taken 3 speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n<p> -~&#8211;~~ \ufb01n-~45\u00bb T _<\/p>\n<p>defence that its liabiiity is limited to 32  <\/p>\n<p>the policy was ismred to co&#8217;.r\u00a2=:&#8217;ir~..th\u00e9i <\/p>\n<p>passengers. The insurance dimfiai\ufb01y has-<\/p>\n<p>contended that it had<br \/>\npassengers before the Ipkada-lauf\ufb01_:&#8217;a\ufb01t1&#8217;\u00a7I$(i  piirstlant<br \/>\nto the awanis made:   has<br \/>\nfaiied to notiqg;   by insmmnce<br \/>\ncompany.   of objections \ufb01ied<\/p>\n<p>by ins11i$\u00a7ih&#8217;x:A:&#8217;i:otii:fii&#8217;a11ji&#8217;.$ho1:l\u00a3i&#8221;&#8216;h\u00a5ive framed a speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n<p>issue   liability raised by the<\/p>\n<p>itismantxi:  A<\/p>\n<p>  21-.  in 2007&#8242; Sci? 5237 (in<\/p>\n<p>ij9,i*m1:1omL Imuzums company LTD.<\/p>\n<p>  _&#8217; heid,<\/p>\n<p>mi.&#8217;  &amp;. (IRS. , the Supreme Ctmrt. has<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  Then arises the question, how to<br \/>\ndetermine the compensation payabie arr how<br \/>\nto quantify the mmpensation since there was<br \/>\nnomeansqfascertainingwhoautofthe<br \/>\noverioaded ieragerzs ccnst\ufb02ute the<\/p>\n<p>2N . 0;\/X <\/p>\n<p>passengers covered by the insnmnce \u00abT E   .<\/p>\n<p>aspermitted ta beaarried by  e<\/p>\n<p>As this court has     .\n<\/p>\n<p>Act is to bring bene\ufb01t to<br \/>\nare either injured or<br \/>\nserves it sacial purpose.&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>we think that the<br \/>\nwould be to hold  <\/p>\n<p>in such a     the<br \/>\nhigher fa?&#8217;     &#8216;  will be<\/p>\n<p>   _v  .. of catered<br \/>\n  mg.\u00bb  In the case on hand, 42<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00ab_  the onm who have been insured<\/p>\n<p>   company, 90 persons have<br \/>\n or got injwed 61 the accident.<\/p>\n<p> have been passed for zwzeci sums.<\/p>\n<p>  ofthe 42 awczmls made, add them up<br \/>\ni and direct the insurance oornpany to deposit<\/p>\n<p>thcztlumpsum. &#8216;I&#8217;hus,theliabzIityofthe<br \/>\ninswmuaecompwtywmddbetopaythe<\/p>\n<p>benq\ufb01t is derived by the<br \/>\nthe Passengers of the   h.\u00b03.d&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>that the 42 awards tVc&#8217;J&#8217;\u00ab&#8211;.I_f,-e eeme\ufb01ed<br \/>\nmsurcznce company<br \/>\nhighest of the  &#8216;  -;  the<br \/>\nhigher of the  into<br \/>\naccount    Qfthase<br \/>\n the canmmt<br \/>\ne   ee tribunal thereq\ufb02er<br \/>\nto   qf the money so<br \/>\n \u00abby   insurance company<\/p>\n<p>  all the  here all<br \/>\n   leave all the cla\ufb01nants to recover<\/p>\n<p>._  the awner of the vehicle. bu<br \/>\nX  it will be necessary for the<\/p>\n<p>tri!Q1\u00a7t:zal,_evencdfthe1&#8217;nitia1stagq,mmake<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;appropn&#8217;ate\u00a2m:!e1s to ensure thatthe amount<br \/>\n be recovered from the owner by<\/p>\n<p>ordering attachment or by passing other<br \/>\nre~.=;t1ictiyem&#8217;dersagai7Lsttheowner:s:oa.sta<\/p>\n<p>$3  &#8216;*\u00bbC\u00e9_ ,<\/p>\n<p>ensure the satisfaction in \ufb01dl Qf the  &#8221;<br \/>\nthatmaybepassedult::nate&#8217; ly.&#8217;.   &#8216;     <\/p>\n<p>5. Therefore, the matter<br \/>\nthe fribtmal. Since the<br \/>\n\ufb01xrther discussim&#8221;: is ;.li}(ely&#8217;v.taviV:k&#8217;;\u00a711i&#8217;Se.tpiiejikiimvi to the<br \/>\nparties before the ttib1:iii1.eti\u00a7_;&#8217;     i ii<\/p>\n<p>6. In the.vre$&#8217;sv1]t, <\/p>\n<p>      The impugned<br \/>\naward     is remanded in the<\/p>\n<p>tritmnal  -:3  issue mgarding plea of<\/p>\n<p> ._limif\u00a7\u00e9ii I;i;*&#8211;ji:iv]i1&#8242;.3r z;ai:~&#8217;=-.-edby the insurance company and<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8211;\u00bbdt:a&lt;ri\u00e9ie ia&#039;}\u00a74iV\u00a7..-ii.1e.&lt;: on merits in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>  deposited by the appeilant. with this<\/p>\n<p>  \\~-::_p1m:&#039;si&#039;~1VVa_ui} be paid to claimants. If the trihamai were to<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;f\u00e9\ufb01IEIi&quot;&#039;_\u00abl\u00a7\ufb02?\ufb01l\u00a7ty on the insurance company the ammmt<\/p>\n<p>  m claimants by this court. shall he id by the<\/p>\n<p>if \/&#039;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02\\, -&#039; ,   K&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>insuranr:e company to appellant (owner of   <\/p>\n<p>and the rernair\ufb01ng compensattion to c1aitx1a_r:.*.sem _: V  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>The  are dinected to    4&#8217;   H<\/p>\n<p>Office is directed to   V<\/p>\n<p>witha copy 0}&#8221; this order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 Author: N.Ananda &#8216;*9-3%; Mm N(3.304i\u00a7V!3.::]&#8217;2\u00e9i}(\u00a7\u00e93: _ IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA AT; DATED THIS THE 15TH DA? BEF::)re_g THE HC)N&#8217;BLE MR. _\u00bbN.Ai\u00a5A!\u00a7.l\u00a7_A M.F.A.NO;;..:\u00a7Q5!g c:;:*2\u00ab:&gt;o [2\u00a7g&#8217;:~.4v) M.F._A.NQ.3Q4_;3_ oF k2oo\u00a7_uy1\\_r) BF:&#8217;&#8221;l&#8217;WEF3N:: L I. &#8216;A * \u00bb .f1fUm;1Ja angst smys RU&#8217;rIfAiAH_\u00bb _ &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-07T01:40:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-07T01:40:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1012,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-07T01:40:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-07T01:40:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-07T01:40:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009"},"wordCount":1012,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009","name":"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-07T01:40:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-puttaiah-vs-sri-d-lakshmaiah-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S Puttaiah vs Sri D Lakshmaiah on 16 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83571\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}