{"id":83634,"date":"2008-10-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-03-18T02:35:17","modified_gmt":"2015-03-17T21:05:17","slug":"r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008<\/div>\n
R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006                                    [ 1]\n\n                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA\n                        AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                              Date of decision: 1.10.2008\n\n1.      R.F.A.No.579 of 2006\n        Smt. Akko Devi and others                          .........Appellants\n\n                         versus\n\n        Union Territory, Chandigarh and another            .........Respondents<\/pre>\n
2.      R.F.A.No.1968 of 2005
\n        Sher Singh and another                             ……..Appellants<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                        ………Respondents<\/p>\n
3.      R.F.A.No.1969 of 2005
\n        Rajinder Singh                                     ……..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                        ………Respondents<\/p>\n
4.      R.F.A.No.1970 of 2005
\n        Man Singh and another                              ……..Appellants<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                        ……..Respondents<\/p>\n
5.      R.F.A.No.1971 of 2005
\n        Raj Kumar and another                              …….Appellants<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                        ……..Respondents<\/p>\n
6.      R.F.A.No.1972 of 2005
\n        Nachhattar Singh                                   ………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                        ……..Respondents<\/p>\n
7.      R.F.A.No.1973 of 2005
\n        Joginder Singh                                     ………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                        ………Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006                [ 2]<\/p>\n
8.      R.F.A.No.1974 of 2005
\n        Jot Ram                        ………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………Respondents<\/p>\n
9.      R.F.A.No.1975 of 2005
\n        Sanjeev Kumar and another      ……..Appellants<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………Respondents<\/p>\n
10.     R.F.A.No.1976 of 2005
\n        Jagga Ram and another          …………Appellants<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
11.     R.F.A.No.1977 of 2005
\n        Rai Singh and another          ……….Appellants<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
12.     R.F.A.No.1978 of 2005
\n        Krishna Devi                   ………..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ……….Respondents<\/p>\n
13.     R.F.A.No.1979 of 2005
\n        Gule Khan                      ………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ……….Respondents<\/p>\n
14.     R.F.A.No.1980 of 2005
\n        Dheera Singh                   ………..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ……….Respondetns
\n R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006                [ 3]<\/p>\n
15.     R.F.A.No.1981 of 2005
\n        Mukhtiar Ali                   ………..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
16.     R.F.A.No.2290 of 2005
\n        Bhag Singh                     …………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
17.     R.F.A.No.2291 of 2005
\n        Raghbir Singh                  …………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    …………Respondents<\/p>\n
18.     R.F.A.No.2292 of 2005
\n        Gurdev Singh                   ………..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
19.     R.F.A.No.2293 of 2005
\n        Jagtar Singh                   ………..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
20.     R.F.A.No.2294 of 2005
\n        Dilbag Singh                   ………..Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………..Respondents<\/p>\n
21.     R.F.A.No.577 of 2006
\n        Pal Singh                      …………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    ………….Respondents<\/p>\n
22.     R.F.A.No.578 of 2006
\n        Gian Singh                     …………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another    …………Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006                                        [ 4]<\/p>\n
23.     R.F.A.No.649 of 2006
\n        Ranjit Singh                                           …………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                            …………Respondents<\/p>\n
24.     R.F.A.No.650 of 2006
\n        Ujaggar Singh                                          …………Appellant<\/p>\n
                         versus<\/p>\n
        Union Territory and another                            ……….Respondents<\/p>\n
CORAM:           HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL<\/p>\n
Present:         Mr. Vikas Bahl, Mr. Amit Arora and
\n                 Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, Advocates for
\n                 the appellants.\n<\/p>\n
                 Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Additional Standing Counsel,
\n                 Ms. Lisa Gill and Mr. Deepak Sharma, Standing Counsel
\n                 for Union Territory, Chandigarh<\/p>\n
Rajesh Bindal J.\n<\/p>\n
                 This order shall dispose of the above mentioned 24 appeals, as the
\nsame arise out of a common acquisition. However, the facts have been taken from
\nR.F.A. No.579 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n
                 Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 3.7.1997, issued
\nunder Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act’),
\nChandigarh Administration acquired land in Villages Nizampur, Burail and
\nJhumru. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector’) determined the
\nmarket value of the acquired land @ Rs. 5,91,200\/- per acre. He did not award any
\ncompensation        in respect of super structures erected on the acquired land.
\nAggrieved against the award of super structures, the land owners filed objections
\nwhich were referred to the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, who
\nkeeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, upheld the award of
\nthe Collector.\n<\/p>\n
                 Learned counsel for the appellants relied upon judgments of this
\nCourt in       R.F.A. No. 894 of 1976–Hans Raj and others v. Chandigarh
\nAdministration,<\/a> decided on 8.4.1980; R.F.A. No. 2608 of 1980–Dharam Vir and
\nothers v. Union of India, decided on 18.8.1981; R.F.A. No. 2560 of 1987– Hazura
\nSingh v. Union of India,<\/a> decided on 25.2.2004; R.F.A. No. 2340 of 1998 – Suraj
\n R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006                                       [ 5]<\/p>\n
Bhan and others v. Union Territory, Chandigarh,<\/a> decided on 24.9.2008;      Jai Kaur
\nv. State of Punjab and another, 1992 LACC 501 and Union of India v. Pal Singh
\nand<\/a> another, (1994-3) PLR 569 to submit that the claim of the land owners on
\naccount of compensation for super structure was wrongly rejected by the learned
\nCourt below. The Collector had even exceeded its brief by opining on the nature of
\nconstruction by holding the same to be unauthorised, whereas no material was
\nplaced before him to record such a finding as neither he was the competent
\nauthority therefor nor any notice was issued to the land owners for the purpose.
\nThe submission is that the land owners are entitled to compensation on account of
\nacquisition of super structure at the rate claimed in the valuation report submitted
\nby them. On the other hand, learned counsel for Union Territory relying upon
\nState of Orissa v. Rajakishore Das,<\/a> (1996) 4 SCC 221, submitted that the
\nappellants in the present case have rightly been denied compensation on account of
\nacquisition of super structure as they were only entitled to the scrap value keeping
\nin view the fact that the structures made by them were unauthorised.\n<\/p>\n
                The issue regarding the entitlement of compensation on account of
\nstructure in Chandigarh and especially pertaining to Villages Nizampur, Burail and
\nJhumru has already been gone into by this Court in R.F.A. No. 663 of 2004 –
\nUnion Territory, Chandigarh v. Sajjan Singh,<\/a> decided on 2.8.2006 and in Suraj
\nBhan’s case (supra) pertaining to Village Burail, wherein it has been opined that
\nthe Collector being not the competent authority to go into all these issues in terms
\nof the jurisdiction vested in him under the provisions of the Act and there being no
\nmaterial on record to enable him to record such a finding, the land owners could
\nnot be denied the payment of compensation on account of acquisition of super
\nstructure.\n<\/p>\n
                Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Sajjan Singh’s case (supra)
\nand Suraj Bhan’s case (supra), it is held that denial of compensation to the land
\nowners on account of acquisition of super structure is not in conformity with law.
\nAs per the estimates and site plans produced on record by the land owners, the
\nsuper structures in the present case are in the form of rooms and cattle sheds which
\nare subservient to agriculture. Accordingly, the findings recorded by the learned
\nCourt below on this issue is set aside and it is held that the land owners will be
\nentitled to compensation on account of acquisition of super structure.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as the valuation of the super structure is concerned, in the
\naforesaid judgments, it has been opined that the land owners shall be entitled to
\ncompensation on the value assessed at PWD rates with 25% increase thereon.
\nTherefore, in the present set of appeals also, the land owners shall be entitled to
\n R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006                                        [ 6]<\/p>\n
compensation for acquisition of super structures at the rate determined by P.W.D.
\nplus 25% increase thereon. The value of the super structure as determined at PWD
\nrate is on record. The appellants shall also be entitled to all the statutory benefits
\navailable to them under the Act.\n<\/p>\n
                The appeals are allowed with costs in the above terms.\n<\/p>\n
                                                               (Rajesh Bindal)
\n                                                                       Judge
\n1.10.2008
\nmk\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 R.F.A. No. 579 of 2006 [ 1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 1.10.2008 1. R.F.A.No.579 of 2006 Smt. Akko Devi and others ………Appellants versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and another ………Respondents 2. R.F.A.No.1968 of 2005 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83634","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-17T21:05:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-17T21:05:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1167,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\",\"name\":\"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-17T21:05:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-17T21:05:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-17T21:05:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008"},"wordCount":1167,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008","name":"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-17T21:05:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-579-of-2006-vs-union-territory-on-1-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.F.A.No.579 Of 2006 vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83634"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83634\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}