{"id":83679,"date":"2008-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008"},"modified":"2017-06-25T04:16:30","modified_gmt":"2017-06-24T22:46:30","slug":"frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n
\"Mr\n\n \n\n1:: am am: COURT ~93 zmmmraxn AI' \n\nmmn mm mm 29\"' any or :s2v\u00ab.:%.}'%2~v;<~A_c\u00a7%3"  \n\nrm I-mam HR.JU3.1'I\u20ac\u00a7E..?K .\n\ncszxrzm. A9235; Ni};-._ 2156-.I2%aa.ra  I\n\nrrantlim Lansing ff':o.'Pv?:~\u00a2.I;i:a:iv.  _\nNo.20!-C. Hillaxa R_r:-a.::.s'   \nP.B.Nc.151,__3anqa,l9:e.    \nRon by ita.1m:aa:Lnar j\ufb01irc\u00e9tez \n\n2 H R I-Ieg\ufb01e  .. Appellant\n\n  ; :\u00bb*;:i%%%z-I i 4? 31% Adv.)\n\n5 Nan\ufb01gk\ufb01m\u00e9 .'r   S\nHaj ox,  1Di;!'\u00a7\u00a2t03:\n3.1!-I*_;3l-?;:oca's:s__ P\u00a2t.\u00a3.td\nm;;.\u00ab:s2;% 2" f1'i::.z:....'\n\n'  K.;\"$.G\u00a7rd\"er_:. 4\"' Crew:\n\n \u00bb Vtgazxbagiz :?.\u00a2'as:;1\n 2.ange,1:a;f.-'u -f-'f2.'.?'' .. Respondent<\/pre>\n
   9:1 9 K Vantata Roddy, Adv)<\/p>\n
 criminal appeal is filed under;\n<\/p>\n
 Station 318 c::..1=.c. against: the ozdu: dated 4-
\n‘;’i–!2.I:r\u00a3J2 passed by the XII Md1.C.x.H. Bangalore<\/p>\n
;\u20ac.n C.\u00a2.N\u00a2.. QBSMOIZOOG acquitting the<\/p>\n
 __.::espom1ent-accused for the <2-fiance punishable<\/p>\n
umia: Section 138 of N.I..Act:.\n<\/p>\n
This criminal appeal having been haamd<\/p>\n
and renamed fer ordera, coining an for
\n‘M
\nf’*~–y<\/p>\n
<;j\u00a7;"1:L ———-\n<\/p>\n
il.’\\!Ll \\.–.r\\n…4rwLJm nu.\n<\/p>\n
 2<\/span><\/p>\n
{.2
\n\u00a7
\nI-I.\n<\/p>\n
O
\n52<\/span>
\n:3
\nO
\nL)
\n:\n<\/p>\n
S2
\n:1:<\/span>
\nE
\nE
\n3<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\nH.\n<\/p>\n
O
\n‘E
\n3<\/span>
\nD
\nu
\nr
\nE
\n:\n<\/p>\n
E
\nS
\nI
\n:\n<\/p>\n
If.\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
i
\n>
\nI<\/p>\n
as
\n:3
\nO
\nL)
\n:\n<\/p>\n
Q
\n1:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
pxonauncnrnant of artists this day,
\ndelivered the following: V  <\/p>\n
J U 1: G M 3 N 2′  %<\/p>\n
The app\ufb01llnntlcaqzi\u00e9iri\u00e9f\ufb01t –\n<\/p>\n
with this appeal  gizaw
\nO4-05-2902 pmagag   Add]…
\nChiaf Hetmpcli  ‘  Bangalore in
\nc.c. No.  the complaint
\nfiled   ‘%\u00a7?.:1;a;  against the
\nroap\u00a2rzd\u00a7j:igt:V?’.’   \u00bb;.>\u00a3’\u00a3=:a;:a punishable undo}:
\nsoaiiyar. 4′  Act, holding that<\/p>\n
there iE,_Vi’1i.:> recoverable debt under the<\/p>\n
   ….  the raspondcnt tn the
\n and that the cheque in question<\/p>\n
H  in 1.-\u00abspam: or a time barred debt.\n<\/p>\n
 z  brief facts of the can in that<\/p>\n
  cvikaaplainant-appellant is stated ta have
\n 3 total sum of Ra.33,00,000\\- to the<\/p>\n
 “accused–z~ospoexdant and in dine disehaxga at a<\/p>\n
petition of tho liability, the reapcnzdent<\/p>\n
E I\ufb01hli !<\/p>\n
1:\n<\/p>\n
Q
\n:2:<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\nII\u00bb
\no
\n{E
\n323<\/span><\/p>\n
U
\n3:\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
z:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\n\u00a7
\n%
\n\u00a7
\n3<\/span>
\n22<\/span>
\nID
\n0<\/span>
\nu
\n:\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
::\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a7
\nI
\n5<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n5<\/span>
\nf<\/p>\n
issued a cheque to: P.s.25,00,0GO\/- gal’-.4\u00e93+’03~<\/p>\n
2000. The cheque when prenanted <\/p>\n
bouncsod for the season oaV’!M fpayug-g\u00e9ntii <\/p>\n
the drawer’ . The camlainantfa\ufb01p\ufb01lis\ufb01i\ufb01wip\ufb01u\ufb01d <\/p>\n
a. legal tactic: to th’e..___x\u00a2aj’m_nk2\u00a7nt.’v: }1.;\n<\/p>\n
an-wad’ an the    Since
\nthe respondent    cho\ufb01e amount,
\nthan compslniggant   ‘i\u00a7I<\u00a7.;. \u00e9 5_'\u00a7Vl\u00a2Of20oO. The
\nactcuaedl V'  said comlaint
\nfiled  % that ha had
\ntuktf\ufb01  Qppellant in the year:
\n193?}:-;#d  rapaid'cm. 20–6-96 and<\/p>\n
<:bta.i;1eci 'a\u00a7; 'd\u00a7ie.";1\u00a7.\u00a5.:ter from the appellant. at<\/p>\n
   of\u00e9vvgifailing tinanco, as per the<\/p>\n
   " '$13'-,:_.ithe ccxwlainnnt the roapondent<\/p>\n
  in blank. cheque with his signature as<\/p>\n
 \u00a7\u00a7<:u"r.iA%y and thexofmto the dishanourad ehoqne
\n not in relation to legally unfozaeabln<\/p>\n
%  "'-'. ___:\u00a7ebt, as such the respondent cannot he held<\/p>\n
guilty under 5.139 af the H.I. Act.\n<\/p>\n
,3<\/p>\n
5..\/r _ g<\/p>\n
JEXHJ \\-J’\\!Iv..l’lI_.ln nu<\/p>\n
 -…….. \\\/I ….-….m.n.m rub!-1 mum or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKAM \ufb01iw<\/p>\n
GH COUR’<\/p>\n
M\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
3. The trial. court after  than<\/p>\n
avidence at’ this parties and <\/p>\n
regard held. that than
\nracavarable debt: undar  ‘.\n<\/p>\n
the xtsponclont to   <\/p>\n
cheque in question wa:\u00a7’VL’L’i: sa:1;\u00a7dV”  at a
\ntime barred dabt;_ 3?1;e–‘_V:  that;\n<\/p>\n
it really 13::  had availed
\n\u00a315.33, 00\u00a2
\narm!   portion of.’ the
\nloan}    %  no, oco\\– is named,<\/p>\n
thar;”1f\u00a7aV  to the complainant to<\/p>\n
prtgdnge   extract ta shat: that the<\/p>\n
  had advanced finance.\n<\/p>\n
    ccurt below daclined to rely on<\/p>\n
tzh\ufb01 aga1\u00a7f’tToat1mony at 919.1 and dimiasod the<\/p>\n
 A;:\u00a2u:p”.min:: filed by the appellant. Han-co tho<\/p>\n
 has come up with this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
4. Heard the arguments or the learned
\ncaunsel for the appellant and reapondonts and<\/p>\n
perused the muzorda .\n<\/p>\n
 ……… .,.- RHKEVHIRRH Hum COURT or KARNATAXA HIGH COURT or KARNAi;e{\u00a7=\\ HIGH cow:\n<\/p>\n
5.. The laamed counsel to: the <\/p>\n
took me through the rocoxd and
\nthe issuance or cheque and tho
\non this said cheq-up in  ‘.\n<\/p>\n
rcapandont; ttzrthon    <\/p>\n
ta send. reply to  ;egQ1~
\nissued by the ‘ ‘t:\u00a31g\u00a2::oforo it: is
\nazcgusd that the <:;:\ufb01'::t  to have come<\/p>\n
to the   exist: legally<\/p>\n
racwerahle    baa been
\nissued   gamma. It is further
\nargued  tho'  in favour of the<\/p>\n
appellagzt _  'r1.\u00a3-'.~t  lg\ufb01en rebuttad by the<\/p>\n
  s\ufb01iaiittod that the raapondont<\/p>\n
   V".T~;a;::counta with the appellant: and<\/p>\n
   produ<:-ad by the roaponaont at
\n31} E<1\u00bb,.. '3 roster to a single account and
\n  the finding': of the Hagistrute that
\nh  between the appellant and the
\n xrgspondenu is confined only to the<\/p>\n
" transactions rnzerrad in 23.231 to D3 is<\/p>\n
arronooua and bones he prayod for "\n<\/p>\n
appeal by utting aside the ends:\n<\/p>\n
passed by tho trial  <\/p>\n
6. In rapport of  ~<\/p>\n
learned counsel for <\/p>\n
on tho decision  \u00abI606
\nin can of   vane-Iran<\/p>\n
H   having issued
\n  , “aithcvu-yh*, ‘ho owntd his
\naiqwnt-12:9 !;ia9:*aizr:\u00a3fr5iI1mption that
\n     or drum for
\n1\u00a2onaid:az–a\u00a7:iqnvi.__’c3:’data which choqno
\nboats; . ‘\u00ab.&:ia.\u00a7irr-holder of chnqno
\npr:a_aumod- “1′:\u00a2..VI’mva noccivod it to:
\ndiachazgg a’;\u00a3”~”‘ liability-Burden is
\n “upon acgnaedv to rebut pzoauupcion.”\n<\/p>\n
V.  he also roliad on tho dnciaion<\/p>\n
 ifgrrnn zoos an 3167 in can of me<\/p>\n
‘Even thl collateral security<\/p>\n
NH VNVIVNHVH -In IH’nf\\’\\ I —H<\/p>\n
 …,……. .. ~.mn.am mur: COURT or KARNATAKA I-HG!-I COURT OF KARNAT4Klm(X”w<\/p>\n
HiGH (SOUR?\n<\/p>\n
‘1. on the ether hand, the leangg\ufb01iti\ufb01h\ufb01vg\ufb01agl .
\nfor than respondent subtuittod  ‘
\nraapondent had diaclmzgrtd “”t:lA_1\u00a3.\u00a7   7. AV<\/p>\n
borrearad tram the <\/p>\n
due CQttifi\u00a2lte frog”  tht
\ndishanourad chgqnf ;i.i:’:”‘   nah in
\nrtaptct of an.  debt. He
\nfurther    documentary
\nevidences’   ‘:[_ew\u00a3’ the appellant
\n  ‘issue has not been
\npx\ufb01\ufb01ti\u00e9  and that \u00a3x.1).1fNo<\/p>\n
Duo Cu:Et5,fi\u00a2\u00a7’:te\u00a7;..v_tt\u00e9ig\ufb01cltsea that the respondent<\/p>\n
  “‘=t2:a._.Aantixa balance outstanding as
\n t  and there in no mount due by tho
\n  or: ‘\u00a3110 data at issue of the said
\n  grherufore it in auhtaittod that the
\nK  jt\ufb01giatrati has rightly acquitted the
\n“gtttondent and there in nu illegality oz:\n<\/p>\n
V M.’i1’1<'J0.!.'2'\u00a3GC!f221aBS'\ufb01 in tho arch: passed by the trial<\/p>\n
PK
\n:3
\nO
\nU
\nI
\n9<\/span>
\n.’.’l’.’
\n\u00a7
\ni\u00e9
\nHE<\/p>\n
. .. n.nzwu-\\u-\\!\\A user: COURT as KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0%<\/p>\n
eouxt. Hence he prayed for dimni.aaa_,L  the<\/p>\n
am: cal .\n<\/p>\n
8 . In supper: of mg cas~_:a'”‘3n\u00a7:
\nthe decision zepoztud ix;
\nem\u00bb 0: x.s.m1zA2m~zs’i    ;vs.*-94’<\/p>\n
sum or mum mm  it is mild
\nthus! I . VA  A.\n<\/p>\n
‘   %.,~_;,?’Bu_.zden__..9\u00a3 ‘a_nf-.:1\u00a2cused in
\nnot   giiapxave tho
\n ‘acme 1r:,*v5ita””*7iu”t\u00a3adt2y;’
\n  “=.\u00a3__\u00a7a:5 fburdon on the
\nbani}… ;j_ of-.  \u00ab.p’i:opg3m:iaranco of
\n  direct or
\n \u00a2i::ci::mat\u00a2xztie;1″-.v._ avidoncs, for acid
\n‘v~yuxpa5g’..Ly..he._’=..\u00a7gn also rely upon –
\n\u00abwidens:  by complainant.” V<\/p>\n
9..  the argumantu of thu<\/p>\n
 \u00e9J.b’a:a::i\u00a7d  both the parties the paint<\/p>\n
    \u00a7:_-j\u00e9va-;V=Va\u00a7:fu:’–1’foz my consideration is,<\/p>\n
gt; . \u00a7iA1iothar the cheque issued. by thb<\/p>\n
 Azoagbm\u00e9ieat was 15\u00a2: discharge, in whole car in<\/p>\n
 of my debt 0:: other liability. ‘E’ and<\/p>\n
b] iihnthar the order of the trial court<\/p>\n
is 11.169111. incorxoct. perverse and capricioua?\n<\/p>\n
\ufb02I1.”\\Is<\/p>\n
 ……….. V. m~_muu-unn.n- n’:_ur_rs \u00a3.eUUK”l’ OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT \u20ac35 KIQRNATAKA EIGH COUR:-‘<\/p>\n
Suction 133 of. ma N.I. Act; the to<\/p>\n
draw 9. pro-aumtion with zeqax:ci\u00a7’_:’.”‘*\u00e9e\u00a7j-~.:\n<\/p>\n
exist:-Ines of laganly :ocave.*e:~\ufb01$;;a: ~..,: ‘V <\/p>\n
Hawwer, than said px\u00a7\u00a7un:;p#.i;<\u00a7n,. .:\n<\/p>\n
rthuttad by the a.\u00a2’:cz; aod ‘    <\/p>\n
cantrary. In the \u00a7.nsta\u00a3t=  1 iciocizmnntaxy
\nevidence  V.  1′ ~.. ge:;\ufb01$\u00a7;21\u00a7od?\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7apendent
\nmean that” g;Etn-3′.’   z~to.3a\\8’z
\nthe  :::igQiti:”””‘}:ot made any
\ntrans  V      ainant -appol lam: .\n<\/p>\n
The   1 pxaducod by than
\nacctxa;i:”:j-\u00a39V3poz.S<:A\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:\ufb01\u00bb1\u00a7" that the accsusca had<\/p>\n
a.3..::;-asady   tits entire loan undo: the<\/p>\n
  Ciitak acaounta. In this rward<\/p>\n
   repuxted in races: 6 sec 39 in<\/p>\n
chat: v__\u00a7\u00a3.vLA.i'~$2uaymn Hanan untested supra, 115<\/p>\n
  appiieahln ta the tact: or the cesa-
\nhauzd. By producing Exam to D3 tho
\n ___:i&\u00a2.':!1\ufb02\ufb01d diachazagad his initial burden of<\/p>\n
:2.-auebutting this prdarazmtion and he named not<\/p>\n
dispzwe the ceaglainantw cram in 1:3<\/p>\n
. _……,.. .. n…..m.-…~.m mun want or KARNATAKA HIGH comer oz= KARNATAKA HIGH"'EW'W<\/p>\n
OUR?\n<\/p>\n
I2 .\n<\/p>\n
entirety and tharoforo the onus ahittaf-\u00ab.\u00a3\u00a7nvv to<\/p>\n
than \u00a2m1ainant to prove his viiizf
\ninstant ease has failed
\nccawlainant gave anriden\u00a2e =. i:h;_1tA.:’h\u00a3i>\u00a7::a\ufb01’ <\/p>\n
documents to reveal   loan’<\/p>\n
which was paid to the    lame
\nfinance, but mi  u .: p.:coducad before<\/p>\n
court for the  to the<\/p>\n
   the decision
\n   it is! hold thus:\n<\/p>\n
 mt been produced
\nVtsithc\ufb01tit tmtaon and in a cue
\nt-1-ham dodumo\ufb01\ufb01nry evidence throwing
\nlight ” 1:23. ‘~._:a;a’t:te:r:s in issue is<\/p>\n
43 ‘ ‘mzhrtittecjly in pasuesaion of this
\n” gartius  tho cane, no such
\n atgnmgnt can be allowed to he
\n _  that they were not annmaned
\n.  tkraizefore they was not produce,
\ninstleaid an adverse infaronce oz:
\n a’dv:ai~sa prasunption can be and
\n~~ should be drawn against: the party
\nhaving and withholding much evidence<\/p>\n
AA  in his poaaossian and net producing<\/p>\n
” ths um: to: peruse}. and
\naonaidenation of the Court.”\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01pplying the shave dtmiaion ta the tenets<\/p>\n
of than prasant case, since tha conwlainant in<\/p>\n
—— —–.p–:._ in an-|.I\\I’II’IIJr’lIII’\\ III’MiII \\\u00a2\\Il.J’l\\I ‘lull l\\l*’|l\\l’.l”‘lI.l”1l\\l’\\. I1l\\7rI \\-u\\JIJI\\1 K33’ AMKNHJHRA      <\/p>\n
pcaaasaian of boat avidmacu which wonl:;i”‘–.havo<\/p>\n
thrown light on the inane in <\/p>\n
withholds it, advaxso inforczxc-\u00a7.V__Vi%x\u00a7:\u00a7:i1\u00e9;’a=VV1;, ‘% <\/p>\n
can be drawn notwithata\u00a7r\u00e9.i;:r:;’1g”  J<\/p>\n
pace: dues not lie     <\/p>\n
adverse intaranca   thaw<\/p>\n
couplainant due  i\u00e9vf \u00a7h.e books
\nat accounts in   in
\nquestion-5% \ufb02\u00a7 % V % } [T J<\/p>\n
13.’ “‘1\u00e9\u20ac.3’ produced by the
\nraa;;i\u00e9:\u00a7:’r:}\u00a7iv\u00a7r\u00a7{;vf,V ‘V  \u00bb   V \u00e9\ufb02\ufb01rt below :1 early
\n put torth by the<\/p>\n
I.’E\u00a7’\u00a7OndQii?:_:V\ufb02t’\u00a3.l33.tA.”.tV1’iCJ mount had. been cleared,<\/p>\n
 j.tgol\u00a3 “””i’\u00a7 sufficient to rebut the
\n  available in favour: cf the
\n.’\u00a2t\u00a7g\u00a2V’t\u00e9;)J5g\u00a7.\u00a7;1z”$\u00a7:afa2:1::t:\/appellant undar 3.1.1.8 or mx. Act
\n and” .V’1:;_\ufb01an:.2a the failure on the part at the
\n sfg\ufb01pmxdentfaccuuad to send reply to the legal<\/p>\n
 V __ iz.otica sent by than appellant-complainant is<\/p>\n
not csf any uerinun czcnnaquonce.\n<\/p>\n
\/”3
\n1 R2
\n.,_ ,-._<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
the appellant against the re6pe\ufb01deee\u00a3 \ufb01
\nTherefore, the court below hae”fightl& e\u00e9ee \ufb01e .’
\nthe conclusion that only”on \u00b0r\u00a2L\u00a5igqW \u00a75eet5ef.”
\nevidence of PW.l it is  te
\nthat the cheque in queetion bee Seen ieeue\u00e9 by
\nthe respondent towards dischef\u00a7\u00a2’e\u00a2\ufb01ef1e\u00a7e;@\u00a7e
\nrecoverable debt. The ;es\u00a7e\ufb01de\ufb01\u00a3jie:eee\u00a2eee\u00a7ei
\nin rebutting the preeug#\u00a2;\u00a25eeev;;;ge;e in
\nfavour of the appella\ufb01\ufb01 Q\ufb01e the e\ufb01eelient has
\nfailed to adduce eyi\ufb01eeeeeEe*ere\u00a7e its case.
\nHence this appeal feiie ene 15 liable to be<\/p>\n
Accoreingly this aepeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
Sdlsf
\n1ac133<\/p>\n
E
\ni?\n<\/p>\n
\u00a33
\n2<\/span>
\nQ
\n3<\/span>
\nE
\nE
\n2<\/span>
\nas
\n\u00a7
\n:5.\n<\/p>\n
Q
\nE
\nD
\nQ
\nU
\n$
\nQ
\nE
\n2<\/span>
\n2<\/span>
\n2<\/span>
\nat
\n\u00a7\n<\/p>\n
9.
\n0<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n3<\/span>
\nO
\nU
\nI
\nQ
\nI
\n3<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n2<\/span>
\n2<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\nIL
\n0<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n3<\/span>
\n0<\/span>
\nU
\nE
\nQ
\nE
\n\u00a7
\n\u00a7
\nE
\nE
\n\u00e9g
\n32 <\/span>
\n3 <\/span>
\nD
\n.3
\nK
\nE
\n$
\n\u00a7
\n\u00a7
\n\u00a3
\n3<\/span>
\na
\n5<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\nE
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 Author: K.Ramanna “Mr 1:: am am: COURT ~93 zmmmraxn AI’ mmn mm mm 29″‘ any or :s2v\u00ab.:%.}’%2~v;<~A_c\u00a7%3" rm I-mam HR.JU3.1'I\u20ac\u00a7E..?K . cszxrzm. A9235; Ni};-._ 2156-.I2%aa.ra I rrantlim Lansing ff':o.'Pv?:~\u00a2.I;i:a:iv. _ No.20!-C. Hillaxa R_r:-a.::.s' P.B.Nc.151,__3anqa,l9:e. Ron by ita.1m:aa:Lnar j\ufb01irc\u00e9tez 2 H […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nFrontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-24T22:46:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-24T22:46:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1770,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-24T22:46:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-24T22:46:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-24T22:46:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008"},"wordCount":1770,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008","name":"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-24T22:46:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/frontline-leasing-co-pvt-ltd-vs-s-nandakumar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Frontline Leasing Co Pvt Ltd vs S Nandakumar on 29 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83679\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}