{"id":83717,"date":"2010-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2"},"modified":"2015-02-22T00:43:30","modified_gmt":"2015-02-21T19:13:30","slug":"shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur<\/div>\n
BETWEEN\n1 .\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. J. s. KHEHAR, CHIE_}\u00a5'\u00a7V_;J'U'.;'~3V5\u00a3jf\u00a3j:(_2:I\u00a3._t \n\nTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE'M.ANJU'\u00a3A\"f\u00a7HEELIjR..1\n\nWRIT APPEAL'E2RV\\TC,30='lR8 er'. 2OE1\u00e9._*-~ \n8: WA 3270-74 0332010 [LA-AR};-'S) \n\nShaukhat A1i,S\/0 Abdu1'S\u00e9i;ttarV\"    .\nAged about 36 yrs,\" _  1V  ' '\nR\/ at Dodd;1m.aral;iVadi~ _  \nKanakap1ire'j;1TFa1uk   \n  \n\nAbdul M1;'miff',3f:S\/d'-Sheik'Mahideen\nAged abcitii: V 5.5\"yea.r_s' -  '\n\nR\/\u20ac1_t D\u00e9odda\ufb01liiraiayadi \nKana}~\u00a7apture'~Te'1hJk  '\nRa1nan'a.gara,rn Dist1'i\"ct.\n\n _ .\u00ab-i_Raj;L1.A s\/0 Dasegewda\n,  Agetdeabbut 35 years,\n _ R,\/\u00e9tt._AvI3\u00bbddd\u00e9m1ara1avadi\n --Kariaka_pL;\"re Taluk\n\n' .__'Ramanagaram District.\n\nJeiytaram, s \/ 0 Dasegowda\n\n., * \u00abAged about 45 years,\n*  R'\/at Doddamaralavadi\n\nKanakapure Taluk\n\nRamanagaram District. ..APPELLANTS\n\n(By Sri. Kashinathrao Patii, Advocate}\n\n\n\nAND\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 State of Karnataka by
\ntin: Secr\u00e9tarys
\nMinor Errigatiexl I:}\u20aci’}_Z}\u20ac1I”t111\u20acI1E,
\nViclhaxia Soudha
\nBangaiom-O 1.\n<\/p>\n
:2. \u00a7f)\u20acp’:_1t’:_y Commissionar,<\/p>\n
F\u20acaI11anaga;ra1n Distzrici: …:L21+:sP1?;;%\u00bb%TS’T:’#  5  .  =<\/p>\n
Tfiese writ; appeais are \ufb01i\u20ac(i.:UIid{3I’  ~4 of4.’?::1e.,V
\nKajnataka High Cmm: Act prayirig tQ.,S;t:t a\u00a7iz1\u00a7\u00a7’t}1e..0_;_’dt:;% f
\npassed in writ petition Nos.17124\/ 85 <\/span><\/p>\n
dated 12\/7\/2010.  ‘_<\/p>\n
These: appeals coming Off for.VVPre1i111_i:11:i1*y Eriearixzg
\nthis day, \ufb01ihief J11.stic\u00a2:”dg.:1ive::*e:i-316 \u00a77o}1owi11g:~ <\/p>\n
J.S.KI\u00a7*EH:XI\u00a3g U % 5<\/p>\n
ET)111*i:a*1_g”i:3\u00a7”:\u00e9’ <:\u00e911r'\u20acs.\u00e9"'.;-Iaf hearirzg we tried to pass a<\/p>\n
 i"\u00a3Li1"fi;\u00a7}8I' {)i' quns, to the iearned ciaunsei for the<\/p>\n
 ‘a..:g3’p%:1ia.T.:;t3.’git:is no: possibl\ufb01 for as to asC\u20acI1:a’m Wh\ufb01thfff’<\/p>\n
he i::};’ssi:1\u00a5:%i’:3f;*13f3I\u00a7: de\u00ab::\u00a7ir:6;::i to 1″\u20ac:s~;p0z1d in the: same or<\/p>\n
 ther\u00e9: gv\u00e9xg Some c:\ufb011e.:*ju$ti\ufb02t:ati0r; themof. ii. $(i\u20acII1S that<\/p>\n
A { ‘:\u00a7;r1:s he C{}I1′{ii11l\u20acd to zi\u00e9cline to<\/p>\n
r\u00e9ispcmii {\u00a33 rm: qmsstiozls postaci by {he {f1our’i.. In the<\/p>\n
CT<\/p>\n
.  _}1\u20acI’aiiIiri\u20ac:r:”%–\n<\/p>\n
afors:-:$a;id Vi.CVz3 0f the: ma’i:ie}:’, t}:1r::~re was 0111:; one
\n:”e{:0z,.1r:3& open 1:0 L13, nameiy’, E3 go through the grounds
\nG!’ appeai, and t9 take a decision in the matter bahssz\u00e9dp an<\/p>\n
the: grtzmxda raised,<\/p>\n
2.. Halvirxg p<3ru.sed the: grsurzcis of ap\u00bb\u00a7:iGgI;:.\u00a7.;=s::e$ s2:**\u20ac:~  "
\nsaiis\ufb01ed mat only EWO iagai s:1b:q;1isS_i<\u00a7m\u00abr3 'weife Vgg\u00e9iizagi\u00e9gggi<\/p>\n
by the appeliazxts ta assaiVi\u00bbTVi;if1e 1j1*:;<f*e–ss 02f5v–}::::f{j't1\u00a7i;sii;i($i*1. <\/p>\n
Firssily, that that': acquisition  app\u00e9'i1a\u00a7fii$" laind mug:
\nbe cieexned to have 1a;:{\u20ac;;\u00e9::i oji  the f\u00e9ttgt that no
\naward was rertzdsred bjsg\ufb01ze "'A\u00a7\u00a7q?;1j.siti0r1 Co\ufb02ect.0r<\/p>\n
witfuixl two ?_f\u00a7re:\u00e9;;i;?rs  Q?' 'silgz\u00e9 \u00a7L3._bl:i{:a%i0n 0f the final<\/p>\n
dec1ara*:i01'i.._ {zi;: j_t;hi\u00e9:- 'b.;e'1':t\u00a7_aifV"\u00aeg;r'01i;1\u00a3i 110.? raised in $116<\/p>\n
gru31ds Qf x\u00e9tfg\u00e9pergisiv.j,s*\u00ab.,\u00a7’\u00e9::i\u00a2x’a1_:t and is bififlg extracted<\/p>\n
  “” ?V._}~In 1984, section 7:} sf the Lazixi
\n ‘~–.V’A\u00a2qLii–sii;ic\u00a711 Act} is axrsmiciad. As per the
\n s\u00a7e<;z[i<_3"{3; A \u00a71-\ufb01x. award is {G be passed within
\n' tgiig years from the C{1)I):1III61"1C\u20acI}fl\u20acI1t of the
\n;:':?{:-Ceedings. "\n<\/p>\n
 We \ufb01\u00e9ifsi\u00e9 given (mgr thouglxtfui ccmsideratiaxl ta<\/p>\n
 V. ..,\ufb01i<: first legal $t,1bm.ission raisad by the Eea.-Irnczd Counsel<\/p>\n
V for the appeilantsi<\/p>\n
It emerges from 816 fist Of dates<\/p>\n
u.\n<\/p>\n
U”\n<\/p>\n
haI:<i\u00a3:<:i saw' ':10 us by the Iemiae\u00e9 {){)'1.iI'iS\u20ac} far that<\/p>\n
I'f3Sf3G11d\u20ac1{1T;S; t\ufb01ai tbs: }:}\u20acpLi'E}f Coznmissimzrsr,<\/p>\n
Ran1s.1*\u00a71aga1"a, issued a r1<:}ti\u00a7icat:i.<m u;,"1dfi.V{2fV
\ntbs: Laud Acquisit.ic\u00a71_: Act, 1994 (.11er<%.:ir1a\u00a3'tz=::* .\u00a7*eftf::i*i*\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7
\nas '$335: Act') on 24.98. 3986 s14:e’s.\u00e9i<Vi" '-<\/p>\n
:10t.:i.ficati0\u00a71 was pufaiisfaed "the V'  on\n<\/p>\n
17. 121937. Public. J%n.g:ice:’%’5;:f %A%san1%\u00e9L  issued
\nundctr secti-m1 4 (2)     1988. The
\naforesaid  ‘–i.i&ss.1.;_\u20ac;.H gander section 4
\nof the  V.   $520 ::.ewS1\u00a73apers5; on
\n32′<}1.:V1\u00a7S \u00a7g'-  gone through ih\u00e9f<\/p>\n
pr\u00ab:3r::ess"en\\;*isag<;\u00e9i' saaiztiarz 4 of the Act, the Staajaa<\/p>\n
C}O"%{*E{\u00a7iT}'i3"\u00a31\u20acI}t $131: issued a final f\u00a3Ot\u00a7\ufb01CaTiOI1 Elfld\ufb01i'<\/p>\n
  "ihe \ufb01at) on 19.01.1989. The said
\n__  pu\u00e9zsiished in the official garxrtte on<\/p>\n
-V 2\u20ac>.\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a7’ Poss,\u00bbs:ssi0r: :11′ me Eand owned by \ufb01le:<\/p>\n
x V’ “L!\u00e9L\u00a7;;)\u20ac_\ufb01a\u00a7’i’i:.s Whi\ufb01tii was the Subje(::\u20ac’. 1’r2a\u20ac.ite:” <3-if aszqtiisition
\n  faker} on 1.:'3,\u20ac}5. \u00a3989, Wh6:I'tZ?"i,.2p\u20ac)1"l, the \ufb01nal<\/p>\n
" Wi1G'Li\ufb01ca1'i(\u00a7:1 :.1;t'1dc2i\u00b0 sec'\u00a3;i::::11 6 was pubiish\u00e9zd in two<\/p>\n
:1<-zwspaptzxg an \u20ac)'3}.iI}}.199i') am} '2?.{}2.?;\u20ac}9(}. .E<?iav:i\ufb02g<\/p>\n
E7<\/p>\n
gczrw \ufb02\u00b01i'{\u00a7"\u00a3,I\u00a7.3;i'1 {;h\u20ac~: \u00a7)".E"\u20ac)C\u20acSS emvisagad Iifid\ufb01if' sectjora 6 of
\ntide Act, the: Lsmci Acquisitiora i\u00a3e<:\u00a3:c:r f;h\u20ac:n passe\u00e9 an<\/p>\n
award on 24.01. 3991 under S\u20acCtiOI"1 1 .1 -A of \u20ac336 ACft…__<\/p>\n
4. it is with r*\u20acfe:’ence {.0 th\u00e9: aforesaid <1a:t}s;"'L!i1':iga:
\nthe \ufb01rsi <:c2nt;t3:I}ti0:': a\u00e9vanceci by the  V'
\ntin': appe\ufb01iaxzts $3 :0 be c{3n$i(i\u00a2:-'r:*d;~-.
\nfacttuai position 3:10t;ice\u00ab:i flgraizz\u00e9iug\ufb01'-Ag ._<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation under S(':':(3i.i{)\ufb02 (3 "ton. I\u00a73E;…p'1_:1bi\u00a7Vsf1%ec1 on V<\/p>\n
26.07, 398% Wflezreas, pim  A;:qp.isi%.i::n v%%’f  and as such, it is rim;<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.pos;$i:i::h::-~.f0r_11s tt the \ufb01rst ccntsntiora. advanceti<\/p>\n
 L._b’\u00a7r__{he ::3\u00a7:=\u00a7;1*I\u00a7’1\u20ac:\u00a5; %;.:0m1sai for the appeiEam.s,3s 15116 factusi<\/p>\n
a$s<:rtTi<311~I_:ife;de by this Eea\ufb01xszi cmmsel for 1:113 app\u00e9zllant<\/p>\n
"  "is not "b::)3V*11e {mt on me: r\u20ac:\u00ab:::r’ci of the case.<\/p>\n
=   in So far as the sacond Conteritian is c:>ncer1″:&d,<\/p>\n
VA  2 _\u00a7_f_. \u00a7 is the as33er1″,i0n of the Eearned {:o11r2seE for the<\/p>\n
V’ app{\u00bb:1_ia\ufb01’Es, i:.E1:a.t H:a1’k'<':f: vamt: 0f {he ac:q1.:i.r\u20ac:d iasnad<\/p>\n
-.\n<\/p>\n
I.–u-mu-5<\/p>\n
\u20ac(\ufb01}\\<\/p>\n
Sizmizkl haw: E861′: grailtad {G the ap’p{iH8f1\u00a7S, 8:116; $in<:\u20ac:,
\n'(he a}i;p\u20ac:13,ant.s were 110?, grantezci market, vaizle, the crime<\/p>\n
a<::q11isi'\u00a3i011 pm(:\u20ac:e<1i:1gs, were \ufb01abiti: 12:: be set asic:ie,.__ In<\/p>\n
ihis b\u00e9thaif, g*01_1I1d 3:m.8 was sought to be raisasti<\/p>\n
grmmcis of appeal. Greund 80.8 is bemg  '\u20ac:+;At1f$a?;\u00e9E".c:ii_""T "<\/p>\n
her\ufb01undei':\n<\/p>\n
” F’ur1:her the iand A\u00abt2iq_1\u00bb\ufb01$iAti011″‘Qfficcr V’
\ndid not pay the C{)II1pf3i1S\u00a7itiQI’i’-51$ per:
\naf the Lazrxzi AcqL1isiti(:sn”VAct, 03113;’ T1i1ar}\u00a76:t”‘
\nvalursz of the iands is giV<:n';'?'1  . "\n<\/p>\n
EE. is not possibie for 1:15.45-;)_fa:::C\u20ac::jpt fnstant colitmzticizrl
\n0f the iearilczii ceunsci.-‘for.  ap_13’@.\ufb01a;\u00a7jiS7  View of the<\/p>\n
fact, {\u00a3131 3″,: \u00e9saf-..almi;\u00a7j:_s\u00bbcipei11__t.{> .3 3;a3f1ai:’\u00e9i%r:1er to 213333} the<\/p>\n
co:11ps:i1Sat.i\u00e9s*r.;\u00b0’a’iP:;;;;:fc%r:=:,:i’ ff_;?t> “}’}.\u00a7.1;:;f;H_  maving \u00a31 refercncc<\/p>\n
p\u20actit._is:n _111″1cu\u00a7<:z1: :f;\u20ac:s\u00a7sf:\u00a3e3’1%; ~ 1321516 by the: Land \ufb01acquisifion Coileetor is<\/p>\n
*\u00a7:.1a:r;\u00a7_f;1:i3;’a’31i;\u00a7i?%\u00a7\u00a71.'(.wiijT’,~..-acquisitiozl pr<:s::t-.3131}-01:1 advazlced by the Iearned cauxxsek far tha<\/p>\n
”  ‘;;:__p’;:;<::E1ar:tss,<\/p>\n
\ufb01at\u00bb-uvtm\ufb02r<\/p>\n
6. Bfi’S\u00a7;(i{.i8 me: afo:*\u20acsaid two if-zgz-31 subnlissiaras
\nre_i::>1*:in_g iii: the m_\u20ac1″its of the Con1:1″0v\u20ac:’:=.;y_, the fcdiowizlg
\ngrozmds were also raised in \ufb02fiii grounds of appea;i:-<\/p>\n
“E. Tfie Court carz\ufb02ot pass an ergier _\u00a72.:f_T
\n}t1dgm\u20ac1’1t 011 I’\u00a31\u20ac\ufb01I”i’\u00a3S when the advocate isggzot ” *<\/p>\n
}3i’\u20ac’\u00a7Sf\u00a7I1′{.w N0 judgment came to be \u00a7_.;”\u00a3sS\u20ac:t\u00a7;.’,j”—-._” -3′ <\/p>\n
witE101,1t hezaring the aiivocata MR 197*}-E; :?{C. L” ‘M
\n\u00a7age 62 ILR Q98 K81′. E5’age_f3?{)%}?’.  ”  ”\n<\/p>\n
2. E\ufb01ictatioza 0:” ;::c1gn1enJ:%  Eh:\n<\/p>\n
s\u00a7:e110graph\u20ac1* in C()”t}.I’t \u00a7S :10: ajudgm\u00a2z513’i.ax1{i  ‘
\n“\u00e9hat date is mat CiE1i\u20ac’,. \u20ac}f jI}{\u00a7”g;{IE\u20acI1tL
\njlldgfll\ufb01f\ufb02l should ha  }’f;zj\u20acj:i1a:3u11cfr::.r._i  Er: the
\nprea\u00e9nm 0f the, AdVecaf{:”v.’o:’–~_. pa1’ti\u20acs._Aa;ff.er
\ngiviiig rzotic\u00e9 Of’f_”1’i’a? date _fO’1’\u00bb._{}I’f}i”iI:()’E1I”\u00a3\u00a3”:\u20acI1}\u00a3’3\u00a3’11Z
\nof\u00a7udgn1e21’t (ILR %’:9<;<3 K3*::',} :2 i_5~'j;,).   _<\/p>\n
3. \u00a7!i1}E\u20ac\u00a7gIf11-jEI1t  ‘3;:1:1;’sT;.. ‘v\u00a7:)\u20ac4 rgigxed and
\n_{)r<3z1m1I?j'\u00a3e::6:{\u00a7;~'  i:"1.  '{}7i'\u20acH ope.:1" "C\u00a9~urtT in the
\n}}1'\u20acSii11C\u20ac3\u00ab\u00ab\u00a7}}:)"v52\u00a7E\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7  Li' ?l_1i'\ufb01i\u00a3' Advocates. if
\nit is 1";c}t:e:iC31}\u20ac ii i$.VIu1'C}fi; 3' Ji;1(i\u00a7;"1I1ent. AIR 1980<\/p>\n
 "   23:11.31 the date sf<\/p>\n
V-'.?._ *Sibg1f1m.g th\u00e9 "juc'ign1ent, if judgxrlsnt is not
\n *-3.ig_r;ed"after pr0r1un<:e:I11tmt, in Gpiiifl C{:rm*\u20ac;,<\/p>\n
_ \u00bb.i*m_t"~j~1i juvzigznerzt AIR 3.966 \u00a7a11ahaE)a<:1
\n  \u00abp"ag%E;~ .22~j, "\n<\/p>\n
A’ “:1 R0 j::a<'ig;m\u20ac:ni; 1,1312%} the data: sf
\nSigiiling 1ihc:: jtzdgximxxt if} the open Court AER<\/p>\n
 *  SC 1Q534\u00a7}\u00a3:1g\u20ac3 194.\n<\/p>\n
{>, ‘\u00a7’1’::\u20ac: judgfzs have p(}W\u20aci”‘ to Ch\u00e9i\ufb01g\ufb01 ‘G516:
\nmimi till the _p1’OIi1\u20ac)’i_1I3.(3\u20acII1\u20acI1[ :31?’ the judgmt::I1t
\nin ‘?, 113%? 3986 K31″ 2151, AR
\n3980 SC 1037.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur BETWEEN 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. J. s. KHEHAR, CHIE_}\u00a5’\u00a7V_;J’U’.;’~3V5\u00a3jf\u00a3j:(_2:I\u00a3._t THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE’M.ANJU’\u00a3A”f\u00a7HEELIjR..1 WRIT APPEAL’E2RV\\TC,30=’lR8 er’. 2OE1\u00e9._*-~ 8: WA 3270-74 0332010 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-21T19:13:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-21T19:13:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1527,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-21T19:13:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-21T19:13:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-21T19:13:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2"},"wordCount":1527,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2","name":"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-21T19:13:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaukhat-ali-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-16-september-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shaukhat Ali vs State Of Karnataka, on 16 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}