{"id":83902,"date":"2007-06-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007"},"modified":"2017-03-30T06:01:36","modified_gmt":"2017-03-30T00:31:36","slug":"atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007","title":{"rendered":"Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA No. 257 of 2007()\n\n\n1. ATHOLIKKAVU MEETHAL CHANDRAMATHI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SARASA, W\/O.BALAKRISHNAN, SARASA NIVAS,\n3. ATHOLIKKAVUMEETHAL JANAKI,\n4. -DO-  NARAYANI,  -DO-   -DO-\n5. -DO-    SUMATHI, D\/O.CHEROOTTY,  -DO-\n6. ASARIKKANDI VILASINI,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. NALUKANOATHIL MEETHAL ANILKUMAR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.MENON\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :08\/06\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                          M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n\n                        ===========================\n\n                         R.S.A  NO. 257   OF 2007\n\n                        ===========================\n\n\n\n             Dated this the 8th  day of  June, 2007\n\n\n\n                                   JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
       Supplemental   plaintiffs   2   to   7   in   O.S.178\/1999<\/p>\n
on   the   file   of   Munsiff   Court,   Koyilandy   who   were<\/p>\n
impleaded   on   the   death   of   the   original   plaintiff<\/p>\n
are         the         appellants.                         Defendants            are         the<\/p>\n
respondents.     Suit   was   instituted   seeking   a   decree<\/p>\n
for permanent prohibitory injunction. The  suit was<\/p>\n
instituted              seeking         a              decree         for         permanent<\/p>\n
prohibitory   injunction   and   for     damages   contending<\/p>\n
that   plaint   schedule   property   belongs   to   the<\/p>\n
plaintiff   and   he   has   been   in   possession   and<\/p>\n
defendants   including   sixth   defendant   Panchayat<\/p>\n
trespassed   into   the   property   and   committed   damages<\/p>\n
by   encroaching   upon   a   portion   of   the   plaint<\/p>\n
schedule   property   for   the   purpose   of   widening   the<\/p>\n
road and therefore plaintiffs are entitled to get a<\/p>\n
decree   for   realisation   of   Rs.21,370\/-   as   damages.\n<\/p>\n
Defendants   resisted   the   suit   contending   that<\/p>\n
R.S.A.257\/07                               2<\/span><\/p>\n
Palakunnu Ottambalam road is having a 4 meter width<\/p>\n
and   it   was   constructed   by   relinquishment   of   the<\/p>\n
property   by   the   owners   through   which   the   road   is<\/p>\n
passing and for the year 1998-99 the Panchayat road<\/p>\n
was   tarred   and   the   work   was   completed   and<\/p>\n
defendants   have   not   committed   any   trespass   and   is<\/p>\n
not liable to pay any damages.\n<\/p>\n
      2. Learned Munsiff framed the necessary issues.\n<\/p>\n
On the evidence of PW1 and Dws. 1 and 2 and Exts.A1<\/p>\n
to   A7   and   Ext.B1     to   B9     and   C1   to   C8,     learned<\/p>\n
Munsiff   held   that   plaintiffs   are   not   entitled   to<\/p>\n
the   decree   sought   for.     The   suit   was   dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
Subsequently   appellants     challenged   the   decree   and<\/p>\n
judgment             before         Sub         Court,         Koyilandy         in<\/p>\n
A.S.16\/2003.     Learned   Sub   Judge   on   reappreciation<\/p>\n
of   evidence,   though   deferred   with   the  findings   of<\/p>\n
the   learned   Munsiff   that   the   suit   is   bad   for   non-\n<\/p>\n
compliance   of   Section   249   of   Kerala   Panchayat   Raj<\/p>\n
Act,   held   that   evidence   establish   that   in<\/p>\n
O.S.41\/1994   as   evidenced   by   Ext.B1,     final   decree,<\/p>\n
plaint   schedule   property   was   divided   and   in   such<\/p>\n
R.S.A.257\/07                     3<\/span><\/p>\n
circumstance,   appellants   are   not   entitled   to   the<\/p>\n
decree   sought   for.     Learned   Sub   Judge   found   that<\/p>\n
the   plan   and   the   report   which   was   filed   in   Ext.B2<\/p>\n
and B3  in the final decree applications, establish<\/p>\n
that   the   road   was   in   existence   earlier   and   the<\/p>\n
width   of   the   road   is   the   same   as   recorded   by   the<\/p>\n
Commissioner     in   the   present   suit   and   in   such<\/p>\n
circumstance,   appellants     are   not   entitled   to   the<\/p>\n
decree   sought   for.     The   appeal   was   dismissed.     It<\/p>\n
is challenged in the Second Appeal.\n<\/p>\n
      2.     Learned   counsel   appearing   for     appellants<\/p>\n
was heard.\n<\/p>\n
      3.   The argument of   learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for   appellants   was   that   even   if   a   final   decree   is<\/p>\n
passed,   till     delivery   of   the   respective   shares<\/p>\n
allotted   thereunder   are   taken   by   the   respective<\/p>\n
sharers   to   their   possession   and   till   then<\/p>\n
property   continues   to   be   co-ownership   property   and<\/p>\n
one   among   the   co-owners   is   entitled   to   file   the<\/p>\n
suit.     Learned   counsel   also   argued   that   courts<\/p>\n
below should not have relied on the report and plan<\/p>\n
R.S.A.257\/07                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
submitted   in   another   suit,     even   if   it   is   in   the<\/p>\n
final   decree   application,   without   examination   of<\/p>\n
the   Commissioner   and   in   such   circumstance,   the<\/p>\n
report   and   plan   should   not   have   been   relied   on.\n<\/p>\n
Learned counsel also argued that evidence establish<\/p>\n
that sixth respondent  Panchayat  encroached upon a<\/p>\n
portion of the property belonging to appellants and<\/p>\n
other   co-owners   and   widened   the   road   and   thereby<\/p>\n
caused  damages    and  therefore  a  decree  should  have<\/p>\n
been  granted.  Learned counsel further argued that<\/p>\n
though   the   trial   court   dismissed   the   suit   holding<\/p>\n
that   the   suit   is   bad   for   non   compliance   with   the<\/p>\n
provisions   of   Section   249   of   Kerala   Panchayat   Raj<\/p>\n
Act, learned Sub Judge found that a notice has been<\/p>\n
sent   as   provided   under   section   249   by   one   of   the<\/p>\n
co-owners   which   is   sufficient   and   in   such<\/p>\n
circumstances,   first   Appellate   Court   should   have<\/p>\n
granted the decree sought for.\n<\/p>\n
      4.     On   hearing   learned   counsel   appearing   for<\/p>\n
the   appellants,   I   do   not   find   any   substantial<\/p>\n
question of law involved in the appeal.   Though it<\/p>\n
R.S.A.257\/07                     5<\/span><\/p>\n
was  argued  that  even  after  the  final  decree  passed<\/p>\n
by   the   courts,   the   property   continues   to   be   a   co-\n<\/p>\n
ownership property, Ext.B4 to B8 establish that the<\/p>\n
properties   allotted   to   the   respective   sharers<\/p>\n
were already taken delivery.  In such circumstance,<\/p>\n
appellants   cannot   be   heard   to   contend   that   the<\/p>\n
property   continued   to   be   a     co-ownership   property.\n<\/p>\n
In   view   of   the   factual   position,     findings   of   the<\/p>\n
first   Appellate   Court   that   plaintiffs   are   not<\/p>\n
entitled   to   the     decree   sought   for   is   perfectly<\/p>\n
correct.\n<\/p>\n
      5.   Though   it   was   argued   that   the   report   and<\/p>\n
plan  submitted  in  another  suit  cannot  be  relied  on<\/p>\n
without   examination   of   the   Commissioner,   it   cannot<\/p>\n
be   disputed   that   the   report   and   plan   relied   on   by<\/p>\n
the   courts   below   are   the   reports   and   plans   marked<\/p>\n
in  the    final  decree  proceedings  wherein  the  first<\/p>\n
plaintiff   was   also   a   party.   Moreover   under   the<\/p>\n
final decree the report and plan were made part of<\/p>\n
the   decree.        In   such   circumstance,   no   formal<\/p>\n
evidence is necessary to admit the report and plan,<\/p>\n
R.S.A.257\/07                  6<\/span><\/p>\n
when they form part of the decree.  When the report<\/p>\n
and plan forms part of that decree, they are   also<\/p>\n
admissible   without   any     evidence   like   the   decree.\n<\/p>\n
Both   the   courts   on   the   evidence   found   that<\/p>\n
appellants   have   not   established   that   they   have<\/p>\n
right to claim the reliefs. It is a factual finding<\/p>\n
which   cannot   be   interfered     in   exercise   of   the<\/p>\n
powers of this court under section 100 of C.P.C.   No<\/p>\n
substantial   question   of   law   is   involved   in   the<\/p>\n
appeal.\n<\/p>\n
      Appeal is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n
                                     M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR<\/p>\n
                                                JUDGE<\/p>\n
tpl\/-\n<\/p>\n
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n
    ———————\n<\/p>\n
     W.P.(C).NO. \/06<\/p>\n
    ———————\n<\/p>\n
        JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
    SEPTEMBER,2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA No. 257 of 2007() 1. ATHOLIKKAVU MEETHAL CHANDRAMATHI, … Petitioner 2. SARASA, W\/O.BALAKRISHNAN, SARASA NIVAS, 3. ATHOLIKKAVUMEETHAL JANAKI, 4. -DO- NARAYANI, -DO- -DO- 5. -DO- SUMATHI, D\/O.CHEROOTTY, -DO- 6. ASARIKKANDI VILASINI, Vs […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAtholikkavu Meethal ... vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Atholikkavu Meethal ... vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-06-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-30T00:31:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-30T00:31:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\"},\"wordCount\":915,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\",\"name\":\"Atholikkavu Meethal ... vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-30T00:31:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Atholikkavu Meethal ... vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Atholikkavu Meethal ... vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-06-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-30T00:31:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007","datePublished":"2007-06-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-30T00:31:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007"},"wordCount":915,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007","name":"Atholikkavu Meethal ... vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-06-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-30T00:31:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/atholikkavu-meethal-vs-nalukanoathil-meethal-anilkumar-on-8-june-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Atholikkavu Meethal … vs Nalukanoathil Meethal Anilkumar on 8 June, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83902\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}