{"id":84725,"date":"2011-01-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011"},"modified":"2017-11-15T00:46:05","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T19:16:05","slug":"mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011<\/div>\n
                                In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                            at\n                                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000600\u00adAD\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a013,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a013,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n             Appellant\n\n             Faiz\u00a0Usmani,\n             Islamia\u00a0School,\n             Nagla\u00a0Qila\n             Aligarh\u00ad\n\n             The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n\n\n             Respondents\n\n             Aligarh\u00a0Muslim\u00a0University\n             Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Finance\u00a0officer,\n             Finance\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Department\n             Aligarh\u00ad\u00a0202\u00a0002\u00a0\n\n             Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0\u00a0Nafees\u00a0A\u00a0Farooqui,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0Mohd.\u00a0Afzal\u00a0Ali,\u00a0SO\u00a0(Admn),\u00a0Aftab\u00a0Ahmed\u00a0\n             Chaghtki,\u00a0SO\u00a0(Admn),\u00a0Shakeel\u00a0Ahmed,\u00a0DFO,\u00a0Nasir\u00a0Ahmed,\u00a0SO(Controller\u00a0office(now\u00a0retired))\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                                  Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nThe\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0a\u00a0chance\u00a0to\u00a0put\u00a0forth\u00a0his\u00a0grievance\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0\n\nAuthority.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0failed\u00a0to\u00a0avail\u00a0of\u00a0it.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0such,\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0\n\naction\u00a0remains\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0As\u00a0regards\u00a0furnishing\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0information,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0accepts\u00a0the\u00a0\n\nRespondents'\u00a0submission\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0have\u00a0records\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant's\u00a0RTI\u00adqueries,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0\n\nbeing\u00a0more\u00a0than\u00a030\u00a0years\u00a0old..\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nFaiz\u00a0Usmani\u00a0Vs\u00a0AMU\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.600\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Page 1 of 4\n                                 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                            at\n                                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000600\u00adAD\n\n\n                                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0on\u00a003.11.2009.\u00a0This\u00a0application\u00a0contained\u00a0<\/p>\n
             following\u00a0queries:\n<\/p>\n
\n             (A) How\u00a0much\u00a0portion\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0left\u00a0unpaid\u00a0to\u00a0me\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a01978\u00ad82\u00a0in\u00a0SS\u00a0Hall.\u00a0<\/p>\n
                   How\u00a0much\u00a0portion\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0left\u00a0unpaid\u00a0to\u00a0me\u00a0during\u00a01983\u00ad95\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0controller’s\u00a0office.<\/p>\n
             (B) A\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0paper\u00a0containing\u00a0remarks\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Vice\u00adChancellor\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Syed\u00a0Hashim\u00a0Ali\u00a0(late)\u00a0<\/p>\n
                   written\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0on\u00a0my\u00a0request\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0esteemed\u00a0office\u00a0probably\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a01988\u00a0may\u00a0kindly\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
                   provided\u00a0to\u00a0me.”\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.           The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0was\u00a0about\u00a0thirty\u00a0years\u00a0old\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
             no\u00a0record\u00a0corresponding\u00a0to\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office.\u00a0He,\u00a0however,\u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0 \u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
             give\u00a0some\u00a0documents\u00a0such\u00a0as\u00a0appointment\u00a0order\u00a0or\u00a0\u00a0attendance\u00a0report\u00a0for\u00a0that\u00a0period\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0<\/p>\n
             could\u00a0examine\u00a0his\u00a0case.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01 st\u00adappeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
             (AA)\u00a0on\u00a003.02.2010.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0AA,\u00a0through\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0dated\u00a027.03.2010,\u00a0endorsed\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO’s\u00a0reply\u00a0<\/p>\n
             and\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0open\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0recourse\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0to\u00a0settle\u00a0grievances.<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
3.           During\u00a0 the\u00a0 hearing,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Respondents\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0casual\u00a0<\/p>\n
             worker\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0salaries\u00a0paid\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
             available\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0paid\u00a0not\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0head\u00a0but\u00a0from\u00a0contingency.\u00a0 \u00a0They\u00a0further\u00a0<\/p>\n
             stated\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0Period\u00a0of\u00a0preservation\u00a0of\u00a0Records,\u00a0Appendix\u00a0IV,\u00a0Sl\u00a0No.\u00a013\u00a0all\u00a0Salary\u00a0Vouchers\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Register\u00a0\u00a0are\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0\u00a0retained\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0period\u00a0of\u00a01\u00a0year\u00a0only,\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0that\u00a0these\u00a0were\u00a0expected\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
             destroyed.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0any\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0paid\u00a0almost\u00a030\u00a0years\u00a0ago\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0on\u00a0record.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Faiz\u00a0Usmani\u00a0Vs\u00a0AMU\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.600\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Page 2 of 4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 4.           On\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0hand,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0argued\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0writing\u00a0several\u00a0letters\u00a0over\u00a0the\u00a0years\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
             the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0to\u00a0sort\u00a0out\u00a0his\u00a0grievance.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0AA,\u00a0\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
             he,\u00a0through\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a003.04.2008,\u00a0had\u00a0invited\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0come\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<\/p>\n
             along\u00a0with\u00a0relevant\u00a0papers\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0his\u00a0case.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0never\u00a0turned\u00a0up.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
5.           After\u00a0examining\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0upon\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n
             was\u00a0given\u00a0a\u00a0chance\u00a0to\u00a0put\u00a0forth\u00a0his\u00a0grievance\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n
             failed\u00a0to\u00a0avail\u00a0of\u00a0it.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0such,\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0action\u00a0remains\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0<\/p>\n
             in \u00a0 this \u00a0 regard.\u00a0 As\u00a0 regards \u00a0 furnishing\u00a0 of\u00a0 information,\u00a0 \u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 accepts\u00a0 the\u00a0 Respondents’\u00a0<\/p>\n
             submission\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0have\u00a0records\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant’s\u00a0RTI\u00adqueries,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0being\u00a0<\/p>\n
             more\u00a0than\u00a030\u00a0years\u00a0old..\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.           The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0observation.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                                   (ANNAPURNA\u00a0DIXIT)
\n                                                                                                           INFORMATION\u00a0COMMISSIONER<\/p>\n
AUTHENTICATED\u00a0TRUE\u00a0COPY\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.SUBRAMANIAN)
\nDEPUTY\u00a0REGISTRAR<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
1.    Faiz\u00a0Usmani
\n           Islamia\u00a0School,
\n           Nagla\u00a0Qila
\n           Aligarh\u00ad<\/p>\n
2.           The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n             Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Registrar,
\n             Finance\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Department
\n             Aligarh\u00a0Muslim\u00a0University,
\n             Aligarh\u00ad\u00a0202\u00a0002\u00a0<\/p>\n
3.           Central\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,
\n             Aligarh\u00a0Muslim\u00a0University
\n             Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Finance\u00a0officer,<\/p>\n
Faiz\u00a0Usmani\u00a0Vs\u00a0AMU\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.600\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Page 3 of 4<\/span>
\n              Finance\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Department
\n             Aligarh\u00ad\u00a0202\u00a0002\u00a0<\/p>\n
4.           Officer\u00a0In\u00adcharge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n
Faiz\u00a0Usmani\u00a0Vs\u00a0AMU\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.600\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Page 4 of 4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000600\u00adAD Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a013,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a013,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant Faiz\u00a0Usmani, Islamia\u00a0School, Nagla\u00a0Qila Aligarh\u00ad The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present. Respondents Aligarh\u00a0Muslim\u00a0University Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Finance\u00a0officer, Finance\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Department Aligarh\u00ad\u00a0202\u00a0002\u00a0 Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0\u00a0Nafees\u00a0A\u00a0Farooqui,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0Mohd.\u00a0Afzal\u00a0Ali,\u00a0SO\u00a0(Admn),\u00a0Aftab\u00a0Ahmed\u00a0 Chaghtki,\u00a0SO\u00a0(Admn),\u00a0Shakeel\u00a0Ahmed,\u00a0DFO,\u00a0Nasir\u00a0Ahmed,\u00a0SO(Controller\u00a0office(now\u00a0retired)) Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice The\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0a\u00a0chance\u00a0to\u00a0put\u00a0forth\u00a0his\u00a0grievance\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0 Authority.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0failed\u00a0to\u00a0avail\u00a0of\u00a0it.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0such,\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0 action\u00a0remains\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0As\u00a0regards\u00a0furnishing\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0information,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0accepts\u00a0the\u00a0 Respondents’\u00a0submission\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0have\u00a0records\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant’s\u00a0RTI\u00adqueries,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0 being\u00a0more\u00a0than\u00a030\u00a0years\u00a0old..\u00a0\u00a0 Faiz\u00a0Usmani\u00a0Vs\u00a0AMU\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.600\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Page 1 of 4 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000600\u00adAD ORDER Background […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-84725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-14T19:16:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-14T19:16:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":542,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-14T19:16:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-14T19:16:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-14T19:16:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011"},"wordCount":542,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011","name":"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-14T19:16:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-faiz-usmani-vs-aligarh-muslim-university-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Faiz Usmani vs Aligarh Muslim University on 13 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}