{"id":84797,"date":"2011-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-06-10T02:39:44","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T21:09:44","slug":"kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court – Orders<\/div>\n
Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011<\/div>\n
   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                 Letters Patent Appeal No.944 of 2011\n                                     In\n             Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8262 of 2011\n                                    With\n              Interlocutory Application No. 4275 of 2011\n                                     In\n                 Letters Patent Appeal No.944 of 2011\n======================================================\n1. Kaithar Medical College, Katihar through its Managing Director,\n   Karimbagh, P.S. Katihar Muffasil, District-Katihar.\n2. The Principal Katihar Medical College.\n                                            .... ....   Appellants\/Respondents\n                                 Versus\n1. The State of Bihar\n2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare,\n   Government of Bihar, Patna.\n3. Bihar   Combined      Entrance    Competitive         Examination     Board,\n   Government of Bihar, Patna.\n4. The Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive\n   Examination Board, Government of Bihar, Patna.\n5. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura, P.S.\n   and District-Madhepura through its Registrar.\n                                                           .... .... Respondents\n6. Dr. Sadhna Kumari D\/o Yadu Singh, resident of Flat No. M\/82, Asha\n   Singh Chowk, Housing Board, Gaya.\n7. Dr. Nirendra Anand S\/o Dr. Birendra Kumar Gupta, resident of Flat\n   No.302, Deokinandan Apartment, Near Ashiana Housing Home Main\n   Road, Khajpura, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District-Patna.\n8. Dr. Abhay Kumar, S\/o Sri Narendra Sharma, resident of Village-\n   Thumathi, P.S.-Kinjer, District-Arwal.\n9. Dr. Abhishek Basuka S\/o Dr. Barkinath Gupta, resident of Basuki Villa,\n 2   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011\n\n\n                                            2 \/ 11\n\n\n\n\n                 Opposite Maria Academy, Kalisthan, Machhua Toli, P.S. Danapur,\n                 District-Patna.\n            10. Dr. Binita Singh, D\/o Ram Gopal Singh C\/o Dr. Shailendra Mishra,\n                 Sector-C,     Housing       No.C\/C60,       Peoples       Co-operative   Colony,\n                 Kankarbagh, P.S.-Kankarbagh, District-Patna.\n            11. Dr. Md. Mushir Reyaz son of Md. Niyzmuddin at and P.O. Sarsasiya,\n                 P.S. Bettia Gadar, District-West Champaran.\n            12. Dr. Sumol Ratan S\/o Dr. Amar Nath Prasad Gupta, resident of Village\n                 and P.O.-Rajapakar, P.S. Rajapakar, District-Vaishali.\n            13. Dr. Gunjan D\/o Dr. Surendra Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla-\n                 Hanuman Path Tilka Manjhi, P.S. Kotwali, District-Bhagalpur.\n            14. Dr. Gagan Gunjan, S\/o Tarakant Thakur, Resident of Mohalla-\n                 Tulsinagar Bank Colony, Bhagalpur, P.S. Tilka Manjhi, District-\n                 Bhagalpur.\n                                       ....        ....     Respondents-Writ Petitioners\n             ======================================================\n                                                      With\n                                   Letters Patent Appeal No.945 of 2011\n                                                       IN\n                             Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8314 of 2011\n                                                      With\n                              Interlocutory Application No. 4276 of 2011\n                                                       In\n                                   Letters Patent Appeal No.945 of 2011\n            ======================================================\n            Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College (MGMMC), Kishanganj, P.S.\n            Kishanganj, Dist.-Kishanganj through its Director Dr. Dilip Kumar Jaiswal.\n                                                               .... ....    Appellant-Respondent\n                                                      Versus\n            1. The State of Bihar\n            2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare,\n                 Government of Bihar, Patna.\n            3. The Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board,\n                 Government of Bihar, Patna.\n            4. The Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive\n 3   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011\n\n\n                                          3 \/ 11\n\n\n\n\n                 Examination Board, Government of Bihar, Patna.\n            5. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura, P.S.\n                 and District-Madhepura through its Registrar.\n            6. Medical Council of India, New Delhi.\n                                                                          .... .... Respondents\n            7. Dr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Son of Shri Shiv Shankar Sharma, Resident of\n                 C\/119, 2nd Floor, Near Blind School, P.S. Rajendra Nagar, New\n                 Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi 110 060.\n            8. Dr. Rani Navomita, D\/o Sri Krishna Prajapati, C\/o Dr. Panna Lal Pandit,\n                 Resident of Mohalla Ajanta Colony, Opposite Green Field Public\n                 School, Kesri Nagar, Road No.1, P.S. Patliputra District Patna.\n            9. Dr. Pallavi Sharma, D\/o Dr. Dilip Kumar Sharma, Resident of Mohalla-\n                 Chandra Niketan, Law College Road, Mahendru P.S. Sultanganj,\n                 District-Patna.\n            10. Dr. Md. Ainul Haque, S\/o Md. Abdul Rahman, Resident of Village\n                 Azampur, Markha P.S. Barari, District-Katihar.\n            11. Dr. Abhishek Sharma, S\/o Dr. Satyadeo Sharma, Resident of 1338 Sec.\n                 41 Urban Estate Near CCA School, Gurgaon, Haryana-122 001.\n            12. Dr. Sumit Garg, S\/o Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Resident of House No.113,\n                 Lane No.6C, Molaband Extension, Badarpur, P.S. Badarpur, New Delhi.\n            13. Dr. Alamgir Shams, S\/o Shamshul Haque Ansari, Resident of Mohalla-\n                 Dharmpur, Ward No.02, P.O., P.S. & District-Samastipur.\n                                                          .... .... Respondents-writ petitioners\n             ======================================================\n                                                    With\n                                   Letters Patent Appeal No.969 of 2011\n                                                     IN\n                            Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8262 of 2011\n                                                    With\n                             Interlocutory Application No. 4404 of 2011\n                                                     In\n                                   Letters Patent Appeal No.969 of 2011\n            ======================================================\n            Dr.Ram Akhilesh Singh, son of Shri Ram Krishna Singh, resident of C\/o\n            Late Jamuna Prasad Yadav, Kannu Lal Road, Mithapur, Patna.\n 4   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011\n\n\n                                            4 \/ 11\n\n\n\n\n                                                                            .... ....   Appellant\n                                                     Versus\n            1. The State of Bihar\n            2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare,\n                 Government of Bihar, Patna.\n            3. Bihar      Combined          Entrance    Competitive      Examination      Board,\n                 Government of Bihar, Patna.\n            4. The Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive\n                 Examination Board, Government of Bihar, Patna.\n            5. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, P.S.\n                 and District-Madhepura through its Registrar.\n            6. The Medical Council of India, New Delhi\n                                                              .... .... Respondents-Respondents\n            7. Dr. Sadhna Kumari D\/o Yadu Singh, resident of Flat No. M\/82 (Plot),\n                 Asha Singh Chowk, Housing Board, Gaya.\n            8. Dr. Nipendra Anand S\/o Dr. Birendra Kumar Gupta, resident of Flat\n                 No.302, Deoki Nandan Apartment, Near Ashiana Housing Home Main\n                 Road, Khajpura, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District-Patna.\n            9. Dr. Abhay Kumar, S\/o Sri Narendra Sharma, resident of Village-\n                 Jhunathi, P.S.-Kinjer, District-Arwal.\n            10. Dr. Abhishek Basuka S\/o Dr. Baskinath Gupta, resident of Basuki Villa,\n                 Opposite Maria Academy, Kali Sthan, Machhua Toli, P.S. Danapur,\n                 District-Patna.\n            11. Dr. Md. Mushir Reyaz son of Md. Nezamuddin resident of at and P.O.\n                 Sansariya, P.S. Bethia Sadar, District-West Champaran.\n            12. Dr. Sumol Ratan S\/o Dr. Amarnath Prasad Gupta, resident of Village\n                 and P.O.-Rajapakar, P.S. Rajapakar, District-Vaishali.\n            13. Dr. Gunjan daughter of Dr. Surendra Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla-\n                 Hanuman Path, Tilka Manjhi, P.S. Kotwali, District-Bhagalpur.\n                                                       ....       ....     Petitioners-Respondents\n            ======================================================\n            Appearance :\n            (In LPA No.944 of 2011)\n            For the Appellants          :        Mr. Yadu Vansh Giri, Senior Advocate\n                                                 Mr. Dharmeshwar Mishra, Advocate\n 5   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011\n\n\n                                              5 \/ 11\n\n\n\n\n                                                   Mr. Sheojee Prasad, Advocate\n            For the Respondent State :             Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-1 with\n                                                   Mr. Ravindra Kr Choubey, SC-8\n             For the BCECB            :            Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate\n             For the MCI      :                    Mr. Kumar Brajnandan, Advocate\n             For the Respondent-                   Mr. Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate with\n             Writ petitioners                      Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate,\n                                                   Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate\n                                                   Mr. Bidhan Chandra Jha, Advocate\n                                                   Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate\n            (In LPA No.945 of 2011)\n             For the Appellants           :        Mr. Basant Kumar Choudhary, Senior\n                                                   Advocate\n                                                   Mr. Dharmeshwar Mishra, Advocate\n                                                   Mr. Sheojee Prasad, Advocate\n            For the Respondent State :             Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-1 with\n                                                   Mr. Ravindra Kr Choubey, SC-8\n             For the BCECB            :            Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate\n             For the MCI      :                    Mr. Kumar Brajnandan, Advocate\n             For the Respondent-                   Mr. Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate with\n             Writ petitioners                      Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate,\n                                                   Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate\n                                                   Mr. Bidhan Chandra Jha, Advocate\n                                                   Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate\n            (In LPA No.969 of 2011)\n            For the Appellant         :            Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate\n            For the Respondent State:              Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-1\n            For the MCI :                          Mr. Kumar Brajnandan, Advocate\n            ======================================================\n            CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE\n                        and\n                        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA\n            ORAL ORDER<\/pre>\n
            (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
\n 6         Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011<\/span><\/p>\n
                                               6 \/ 11<\/p>\n
3.   08-07-2011                   These three Appeals preferred under Clause 10 of the
\n                   Letters Patent arise from the common order dated 27 th June 2011
\n                   made by the learned single Judge pending the above C.W.J.C. No.
\n                   8262 of 2011 and other writ petitions.\n<\/p>\n
                                 The subject matter of dispute is the admission to post
\n                   graduate medical courses granted by the Katihar Medical College
\n                   and    Mata      Gujri      Memorial       Medical   College,   Kishanganj
\n                   (hereinafter cumulitatively referred to as \u201ethe Colleges\u201f). Both the
\n                   aforesaid Colleges are admittedly non-government, non-grant-in-
\n                   aid, minority colleges. According to the Colleges, they being
\n                   minority, non-grant-in-aid colleges, they have exclusive right of
\n                   governance and admission to medical courses. In exercise of the
\n                   same they have granted admission to post graduate medical
\n                   courses on the basis of the result of the Post Graduate Medical
\n                   Entrance Test-2011 conducted by the Private Medical Colleges
\n                   Association, Bihar (hereinafter referred to as \u201ethe Association\u201f).
\n                   Such admissions were granted in the last week of April 2011.\n<\/p>\n
                                 The said admissions have been challenged by the
\n                   private respondents, the qualified Doctors, seeking admission to
\n                   post graduate medical courses pursuant to the result of the Post
\n                   Graduate Medical Admission Test-2011 conducted by the Bihar
\n                   Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, Government
\n                   of Bihar (hereinafter referred to as \u201ethe Examination Board\u201f).
\n                   According to the writ petitioners, they have successfully passed the
\n                   aforesaid admission test conducted by the Examination Board.
\n                   They have a right to admission to post graduate medical courses on
\n                   50% of the seats sanctioned by the Medical Council of India in the
\n                   non-government, non-grant-in-aid medical colleges.\n<\/p>\n
                                 The learned single Judge has, after hearing the parties,
\n 7   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011<\/span><\/p>\n
                                         7 \/ 11<\/p>\n
             pending the writ petitions held, “….. till Regulation-9 of Medical
\n             Council of India is declared to be unconstitutional the private
\n             medical college of India do not have a right to resist admission
\n             under 50% State quota which has been provided for in the
\n             year 2009.” Consequently, the learned single Judge has directed
\n             the Colleges to refund the full fees to those students who have
\n             been admitted on 50% State quota. The Court further directed the
\n             Colleges, “to offer admission forthwith to all the petitioners
\n             who are before this Court up to 30th June 2011”.\n<\/p>\n
                            Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid directions, the
\n             Katihar Medical College has preferred the above Letters Patent
\n             Appeal No.944 of 2011 and the Mata Gujri Memorial Medical
\n             College has preferred above Letters Patent Appeal No.945 of 2011.
\n             Letters Patent Appeal No.969 of 2011 is preferred by one of the
\n             post graduate students with the leave of this Court. He apprehends
\n             that in case above referred directions are permitted to be
\n             implemented his admission to DCP (Pathology) (a post graduate
\n             medical course) in Katihar Medical College may be cancelled.\n<\/p>\n
                           Learned counsel Mr. Y.V. Giri has appeared for the
\n             appellant Katihar Medical College. He has assailed the order of the
\n             learned single Judge on the basis of the observations made by the
\n             Hon\u201fble Supreme Court in the matter of T.M.A. Pai Foundation v.
\n             State of Karnataka,<\/a> [(2002) 8 SCC 481]. He has submitted that
\n             Article 15(5) of the Constitution read with Article 130 of the
\n             Constitution read with the observations made by the Hon\u201fble
\n             Supreme Court in the above referred matter of T.M.A. Pai
\n             Foundation followed by the Hon\u201fble Supreme Court in the matter
\n             of P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra,<\/a> [(2005) 6 SCC 537];
\n             the Colleges are, being minority, non-government, non-grant-in-\n<\/p>\n
 8   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011<\/span><\/p>\n
                                         8 \/ 11<\/p>\n
             aid institutions, fully empowered to control their administration
\n             and also admission to various courses offered by the Colleges. The
\n             State Government has no right to interfere in the said matters. Mr.
\n             Giri has particularly relied upon observations made in paragraphs
\n             45, 50, 55 and 68 of the judgment in the matter of T.M.A. Pai
\n             (supra) and paragraphs 109, 110, 121, 124, 129, 130, 132 and 134
\n             of the judgment in the matter of P.A. Inamdar (supra). He has also
\n             submitted that against the prospectus issued by the State
\n             Government incorporating 50% of the seats sanctioned for the
\n             Colleges      for    common admission test     conducted    by the
\n             Examination Board, the Colleges had lodged objection as early as
\n             on 3rd March 2011. The Colleges, therefore, cannot be compelled
\n             to give admission to the successful students of the common
\n             admission test conducted by the Examination Board.\n<\/p>\n
                           Learned advocate Mr. Basant Kumar Choudhary has
\n             appeared for the appellant Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College,
\n             Kishanganj, the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal No.945 of 2011.
\n             He has adopted the aforesaid arguments advanced by Mr. Giri.\n<\/p>\n
                           Learned advocate Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava has
\n             appeared for the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal No.969 of
\n             2011. He has submitted that if the impugned order made by the
\n             learned single Judge is sustained, some 20 students admitted to the
\n             post graduate medical courses in Katihar Medical College will lose
\n             their admission. It was, therefore, essential that such students were
\n             heard before the impugned order was made. The appellant, not
\n             being a party to the petition, his admission cannot be adversely
\n             affected by the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n
                           The appeals are contested by the learned Government
\n             advocate Mr. R.K.Choubey and the learned Additional Advocate
\n 9   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011<\/span><\/p>\n
                                         9 \/ 11<\/p>\n
             General Mr. Lalit Kishore appearing for the State of Bihar and by
\n             Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh appearing for the writ petitioners.
\n             Reliance is placed on Regulation-9 of the Medical Council of India
\n             Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000. It is submitted
\n             that proviso to Regulation-9 of the said Regulations specifically
\n             provides,      “Provided        further        that   in   non-Governmental
\n             institutions fifty per cent of the total seats shall be filled by the
\n             Competent Authority notified by the State Government and
\n             the remaining fifty per cent by the management(s) of the
\n             institution on the basis of Inter-se Academic Merit.”\n<\/p>\n
                           The aforesaid regulations have been framed by the
\n             Medical Council of India in exercise of power conferred by
\n             Section 33 read with Section 20 of the Indian Medical Council
\n             Act, 1956 with the previous sanction of the Central Government.
\n             The said Regulations, unless held to be ultra vires by a Court of
\n             law, are binding. All non-Government medical colleges are bound
\n             by the said Regulations. It is not in dispute that the constitutional
\n             validity of the aforesaid proviso to Regulation-9 of the Regulations
\n             is the subject matter of challenge before the Hon\u201fble Supreme
\n             Court in the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 584 of 2009 filed by the
\n             appellant Katihar Medical College under Article 32 of the
\n             Constitution. Pending the said writ petition the Hon\u201fble Court has,
\n             on 14th May 2011 made order as under:\n<\/p>\n
                     “As the State is in the process of sending
\n                     candidates for the 50% seats and in fact, has
\n                     already sent 8 students, interim relief is rejected.
\n                     However, admission of the students sent by the
\n                     State Government will be without prejudice to the
\n                     contentions of the petitioner and therefore will not
\n 10   Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011<\/span><\/p>\n
                                          10 \/ 11<\/p>\n
                      be a precedent for the future.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                            It is thus evident that though the Hon\u201fble Court has
\n              said that the above order shall not be a precedent, the Court has not
\n              granted stay against the operation of the aforesaid proviso to
\n              Regulation-9 of the Regulations. It cannot be gainsaid that the
\n              State Government issued the prospectus for post graduate medical
\n              admission test 2011 as early as on 11th December 2010. In the said
\n              prospectus half of the seats sanctioned for the Colleges have also
\n              been included in total number of the seats available for admission.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              Nevertheless, the Colleges did not take any action until the month
\n              of March 2011. Even then the Colleges thought it fit not to go
\n              further than lodging objection. In our view, it is apparent that
\n              lodging of the objection in the month of March 2011 was a mere
\n              formality followed with a view to saving the admissions that the
\n              Colleges intended to make in the month of April 2011.\n<\/p>\n
                            In the above circumstances, we dismiss these appeals
\n              for the reasons:- (i) The order impugned is an interim order made
\n              pending the writ petitions; (ii) The Regulations framed by the
\n              Medical Council of India are statutory in nature and are binding to
\n              the appellant Colleges as well; and (iii) While granting admissions
\n              to the students on the basis of the competitive examination
\n              conducted by the Association the appellant Colleges were fully
\n              conscious of their obligation to spare half of the seats for
\n              admission from amongst the students passing the common
\n              admission test conducted by the Examination Board.\n<\/p>\n
                            As to the Letters Patent Appeal No.969 of 2011, the
\n              appellant merely apprehends that the axe may fall on his admission
\n              if the impugned order is permitted to be implemented. At the
\n              moment the admissions have not yet been worked out. It is not
\n 11         Patna High Court LPA No.944 of 2011 (3) dt.08-07-2011<\/span><\/p>\n
                                                11 \/ 11<\/p>\n
                    possible to find out who will be the victim of the illegal admissions
\n                    granted by the Colleges.\n<\/p>\n
                                  Be that as it may, as the writ petitions are still at large
\n                    before the learned single Judge, the said appellant and any other
\n                    aggrieved person may join as party-respondent in the pending writ
\n                    petitions.\n<\/p>\n
                                  For the aforesaid reasons the Appeals are dismissed.
\n                                  Interlocutory Applications are disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
                                                   (R.M. Doshit, CJ)<\/p>\n
                                                  (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)<\/p>\n
Pawan Kumar\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court – Orders Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.944 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8262 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 4275 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.944 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-84797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"\nKaithar Medical College,Katihar ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-09T21:09:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-09T21:09:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1547,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-09T21:09:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-09T21:09:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-09T21:09:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011"},"wordCount":1547,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011","name":"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-09T21:09:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaithar-medical-collegekatihar-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kaithar Medical College,Katihar … vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84797\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}