{"id":84881,"date":"2008-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-05-17T20:11:07","modified_gmt":"2018-05-17T14:41:07","slug":"mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
‘.3<\/p>\n
SENTENCING AF?EE.LA\ufb01T,!’ACCUSED i’VE(3.1 TO UNDERGO R.’2;’–.\u00bbFGR
\n1′ YEARS, APPELL}?.\ufb013TjA{.’IC.’USED \u00a7-18.2 TO UNDERGG SJ, [FOR A<\/p>\n
PERICEEB (SF 5 Y\u00a7AR’$ FGR THE OFFENCE ?UP\u20acI$HA8i…E U}’$:’.’30’?<\/p>\n
R\/W, 34 19:; AND Fi.iRT\ufb01ER SENTENCIM5 APPELLAf23T1″A*CjC3EJS:?\u00a3)”‘ _
\nl\\iO.1 TO umnenso R1. FOR 6 M{3=’.NTHS_  \ufb01u’!_D* ‘ _
\nAPF’ELLANT,’AC<3USED Iva: T0 UNDERGG $.}..F!ii%R"6; %\u00a7\u00e93rx:":':-is' . "
\nFOR At\u00bb? QFFERCE PUNESHAELE airs.  SECT"E{}?~\u00e9 '3\u00a2?j.0T*'..
\nIPC. 3cm; THE smrgmcss SHALL Rm: CQNt3UR_REN'\ufb02__Y.-,   f<\/p>\n
This agpeai caming oi': fGf'heaf\u00a7'n\u00a7'this \u00e9 .\u00a5a5\u00a7r,'..ih\u00e9 <\/p>\n
delivered the fwlawi\ufb01g:  <\/p>\n
Cenvicted accug\u00e9g.\/.A_ ‘\u00a7%i’i.._:\u00a7;;:;ea\u00a5  \u00e9a$ ivi”:$t the
\njzzdgement pasge\u00e9 by \u00a7.’;$i.2rt, Beigaum
\nin sessiens cg*se”\u00abA1.r\u00a2%~;,5i\u00e9.x2a=:Eo’ \u00e9r”G?;J;_1T\u00a7D2 Cafzvigtin\ufb01 tha
\nappeiiarztg ,f   \ufb01g\ufb01ishabie under Seczticn
\n307 9!’ t}\u00a7’\u00e9 “iPC:.\u00a74a?;a\u00e9::\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a3\u00a7’\u00a7 ::?\u00e9::fEia;)’r{3\u00a5’i}\ufb02\u00e9f the 19:;<\/p>\n
 “E-4’ie5arz’:i : ceunsei, Sri,K,P, Shiva<\/p>\n
Prasa\u00e9\ufb01or {ma ‘a;:g&iia*:\u00a7t:~~~’:nd sri, Ramesh Kumar, iearne\u00e9<\/p>\n
 ” ~r.\u00a70v\u00e9.f:\u00a7:r:?;s{ntV..?\u00a3e2aA$\u00e9rv;**fn 36? read with Secticn 34 G?’ ti’_1..&__  ;e”\u00a7:\u00a7ia_i\u00a7\u00b0:”st*\u00ab'[  <\/p>\n
the said judgement, the accused: ars;-J  \u00e9ppgia\u00e9; ”  <\/p>\n
6. Learned agvipeiiantsf geunseiv’C*:>:1tet:\ufb01\u00e91t\u00a73\u00e9t tf\u00e9re <\/p>\n
is absaiutaiy no materiai evieiei9i’i;Ve:’%’i:\u20ac:_Vbrii1\u00a7.’Ai\u00e9ta\ufb01usigbetween<\/p>\n
the acts cf the a<:c:u's\u00a7; ;i . argd  efV'Air\ufb01\u00a7.;ries by
\nfiacesaheb or MaA::\u00a7s\u00a71a.'_…._\u00a7-i eV  Manisha, the
\nccmpiainarzt  v\u00e9bgariy a\u00e9mitted she
\nreached  assauite\u00e9 airz\u00e9
\nVtai-can as an eye-witn\u00e9ss
\na:::mnt, ~ $\u00a7'miiari:;;%AAI%j\u00a7;\u00e9:_'\u00a2:\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01}:;'::cis that evi\u00e9erzce of PW-4 I<\/p>\n
daes ,::@t_ inf\ufb01s\u00e9h t\u00e9vh\ufb01\ufb01e\ufb01\u00e9e as he aim reached the snot<\/p>\n
'  "'i'at ei*'; 5\u00bb*i??.'\u00a7tfi*;.."_:=eegaAi= \u00e9Wit} nature bf ihjurlm mffered by<\/p>\n
   ccmtenticn that the injiiries ware found to<\/p>\n
  be A$–\u00a7.lfVr\u00b0}[:)i_E *\u00a7l:'\u00a7 fE'?:3:'1\u00a3UfE! and therefzzre, charge of effence under'<\/p>\n
T """–. Ee;::tia2'{ SS7 of the IPC was impreper 3:13 the iearne\ufb01 Trial<\/p>\n
A  j;\u00a7udg\u00e9.~'has aisa seriousty erred in ignering materiai evidence<\/p>\n
   ,;::_:f15 retard which disrneis aii aiiegatierss abaut intentirm in the<\/p>\n
 '  mind nf the accused to km the '\\.iiCZi\u00a5'\u00a5'1$. He wasufd corzten\u00e9<\/p>\n
aw<\/p>\n
 V' "c.r'dit:a'%yi\u00bb–.ct:u'rsAe at h\u00e9iiite to cause death.<\/p>\n
V –Vthat1'\u00e9n..f\u00e9f:e't\u00e9nce from Primary Health Centre, he admitted
\nK  vtiaosaheb and feund fcsiiowtne injuries and he was<\/p>\n
 on admissier: ts the hc:-s;ftai:-\n<\/p>\n
F \\<\/p>\n
K51}<\/p>\n
examine\ufb01 a5 ?W–: and Dr. Deegieak: Madhukar Katttbie
\nexamine\u00e9 as PW-3′ 59th at thesa cmct\u00e9rs have
\nand treated the victim pw-3, E
\n12, As per evidence at PW-1 — D2′,
\nwhen _PW–3 was groduced before
\n6,03 p.,m., he found the fc:\u00a5i0va;.\u00a7’ng. i!’1j4i=i&’\u00a7’i;t2{}’S\u00a7-‘–:- ‘ t. V t. ‘V<\/p>\n
” (3) Cat iacerated vv:3untiVt’t\u00a7}etr_theV’it-.. Qc\u00e9igttai
\nternbcrai re\u00e9iera m\u00e9a_$urind”s’*.Z’\u00a7;  1″:  V\n<\/p>\n
(b) Cut iacerate\u00e9\u00b0’w_<mm\u00a7vV\u00e9\u00a7aQ:t\u00bb.\u20ac);S ';=:.Q.5 cm<\/p>\n
ever the iefi:\u00bb5\u00a7d& G:.f'*t*\u00a72\u20ac2:':h&$t\u00bb,'_" I <\/p>\n
HeAdgscribed"t.hs\u00e9&..jh\u00a7u'ries 33 simpie in nature and<\/p>\n
aczimits i.nLc:r\u00ab\u00a7fs'::{1exafnitiat\u00a56%: that they were not sufficient in<\/p>\n
 , %'"3,3; "'V".'T;'h\u00e9.:='\u00e9\u00a7}idence cf Dr. Be\u00e9pak Madhukar a<amt:;e ;s<\/p>\n
at<\/p>\n
and his famiiy members. The Parties were agitating the<\/p>\n
matter in cm: court is aise not my admitteet…ey.4'_:'the<\/p>\n
accused but the accused want the Cetirt te <\/p>\n
statement. In fact, the accused hei\u00e9e  <\/p>\n
copy cf the document reiating pA'f'eeeed,ih'\u00a7e';~~;VVIt tsjaisc '' V<\/p>\n
hot in dispute that e evhehnei theivheeiee ef A1
\nand Raeeahet: and hit feihtiiy  usirsg the said
\nehermei fer wete-;rfQttv_ irri\u00e9etiefittieit\u00ab.i'f\u20ac%.htt;  accused were
\nunhappy cf;   'Vett\ufb01 Vtiterefere, they after:
\npreventeei**P\\tif   .ce\u00ab$i.eeti:igi wetert<\/p>\n
  'PW~3 was eeiiec;-tine water<\/p>\n
the is1eiee:;\u00a7i\u00a7\u00abi.tg%g\u00a7;:Veecutrieeitit'Free': this, it is deer that the<\/p>\n
 ._va:h\u00a5itfit\u00a7'~sity:'tzetweehthewaccused and the vietim is a geeesie<\/p>\n
Vigfetit't'epn\u00e92a\ufb01e:\u00a7i'v.Aij'u.errei between them and the incident in<\/p>\n
rji.i'eetier:. ".3;}{it.7'vi1.8.99, the accused having feend PW-3<\/p>\n
\ufb02eeiieetih\u00e9tztiaiter appears te have attacked him. The pertior:<\/p>\n
it "v~Itet:t'he..Abetjy chosen fer the attack is head and ieit parties: cf<\/p>\n
 ehest. The ebject use\ufb01 in the aseauit is axe.<\/p>\n
'V V   tthdeubtediy, when a person causes injury er: a vitai pert ef<\/p>\n
the heady with a weapon iike axe, certainly, has to be<\/p>\n
53%<\/p>\n
;…$
\nJ;.~.\n<\/p>\n
is hit PW-3 and her overt act is oniy causing isjury to PW-2,<\/p>\n
Tbs issrrzed Trisi Judge found her siss guiiiy sf4…\u00a7ffsrzs:e<\/p>\n
uncier Sectisirz 30? of the IPC because she is  _<\/p>\n
suppiisd are is A1 regarding <\/p>\n
svidsase is cc:z1vin\u00ab:ing=<\/p>\n
v<\/p>\n
20: Heme, it w::i:s.\u00a7.d bss”\u00a7’mstssis{_ is ‘f\u00e9s’s’*nsr using<\/p>\n
i\u00e9mvisisn under Sestish   far sttemst
\nan the \ufb01fe sf   \ufb01n the basis
\nof this  .’;’;\u00a7;n%zi:;::sn sf A2 far sffencs
\nunder $sCtiss.:’:ss\ufb01iifi-\u00a7Vs\u00abf  impmper and needs
\ninierfsrsf.-..:\u00e9g.’_  his acquitted cf the sffense
\nunset sS’sst\u00a7s’:*:.V3&?VV:sf  EEFQC,<\/p>\n
 ‘{hs””‘s.;:Vs_s;tEvsn is what sffsracs she has<\/p>\n
 ‘.__ssV%%ti:’:3\u00a7t*n:–ss;\u00bb j\u00e9\u00a7\u00a3:a:.s:r*dir:\u00a7 is the prssssutisn and victim, she<\/p>\n
ss’:.;ss<;i asses  sisns an the "wrist sf PW-2 and dsctsrs<\/p>\n
'have sss\ufb01rn\u00e9ed it, She wiii therefsrs be iissie fer csmiicti\u00e9n<\/p>\n
 "'..fg2\ufb01AVd'e::;Ss?stisn 323 sf the IPC and rust Ssctisrs 33?. is far as<\/p>\n
 ssncsrnsd, on ths basis of what is discussed shave, I<\/p>\n
sis: sstisfisd that his sssvictisn under Section 30? cf the I?C<\/p>\n
3:1,<\/p>\n
;_.1
\nL2'?\n<\/p>\n
is wsii bsisnssd, susssrtss by rsssssinss sf the is_s__mss<\/p>\n
Trisi Judge ass E thsrsfsrs, ssn\ufb01rrn the same,<\/p>\n
22, New ssmisg to the susstisr: sf ssiif’1%:s:f;r:s.},f’s-“‘i7: :..i’:\u00a7_: <\/p>\n
seen that A: has been ssntsm:sd'”‘i:–::y If1rssfsVlj:iss–sssVs..A<\/p>\n
imprisonment ans A2 hss seen se:r:fsVnsssi”fs if5*1gfs~s.rs. si:-.\u00a7\ufb01;::vi’sV._<\/p>\n
imsrisonmsnt, As discussed –ssj\u00a3res.rs t}”:s__ c;\u00a7r:srris–:Vshc\u00e9s in ”<\/p>\n
w\ufb01ish the sffsnss has bssfi .cis:\u00a5\u00e9fi:T\u00a7iit–ssE”‘s~1i3;:ishe manner sf
\ncsmmissisr: 0%’  dffsrrts} “‘sf:\u00e9”1V”‘rvsisvsst factors far
\n::sns\u00a7s’srstisi”:_V ssj,-.’;s ‘i2\u00a7s%1e{‘t%iisf;’t\u00a71s ‘;\u00bb.j2s7’rissi sf imprisonment<\/p>\n
impssscivsss\ufb01 ss%jVV3%2″\u00a7s’_juss ssiici prspsr, an ssrssisszrins<\/p>\n
sit facts ‘s:3s’– s\u00a5rcgfr’;stVss’s.ss\u00bb,\u00ab.Vi fiimj the ssntsnss is fssrsh,<\/p>\n
Hence, it nss\u00a7:isV_}f*sr:3Li’ctisn=\u00e9”‘3&.s rsvgsrds A; is csrassrined, sinss<\/p>\n
” V’ i:s’\u00a7~r.\u00e9,\u00a7:’sss\u00a5ssi..Adswri”i\ufb01sv charge frsm sffsnss snssr Sestisr:<\/p>\n
“3__z’::’?_.tus–~sf._3g3 IPC and as sins is s wsrnsn, she is<\/p>\n
sssissssci.  s \ufb01ns sf R.s,5,au’3Qi~ sis: sf which Rs,5U0\/\u00ab-<\/p>\n
 ‘~-\u00ab.__ s.i2sii ss”  payable is stats and Rs,4,.5Q0,f- shsii bs said ‘is<\/p>\n
   yisi\u00e9m Ls, Evisnishs -~ ?’v’v’-2. As far ss A1 is ccmsemssf,<\/p>\n
  have ssn\ufb01rmss the finding sf the Trisi Csurt thst hs is<\/p>\n
u:.”ssiEt<y of the s\ufb01smts unssr Ssstisn 3:37' of the IPC, he is<\/p>\n
ssrstsrzcsd ts 2 years rigsrsus isssprissnrssswi with 3 fine sf<\/p>\n
as<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 Author: Jawad Rahim ‘.3 SENTENCING AF?EE.LA\ufb01T,!’ACCUSED i’VE(3.1 TO UNDERGO R.’2;’–.\u00bbFGR 1′ YEARS, APPELL}?.\ufb013TjA{.’IC.’USED \u00a7-18.2 TO UNDERGG SJ, [FOR A PERICEEB (SF 5 Y\u00a7AR’$ FGR THE OFFENCE ?UP\u20acI$HA8i…E U}’$:’.’30’? R\/W, 34 19:; AND Fi.iRT\ufb01ER SENTENCIM5 APPELLAf23T1″A*CjC3EJS:?\u00a3)”‘ _ l\\iO.1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-84881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-17T14:41:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-17T14:41:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1284,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-17T14:41:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-17T14:41:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-17T14:41:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008"},"wordCount":1284,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008","name":"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-17T14:41:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadev-ramu-parit-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-spp-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mahadev Ramu Parit vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Spp on 10 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84881\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}