{"id":85043,"date":"2010-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3"},"modified":"2018-04-14T18:03:32","modified_gmt":"2018-04-14T12:33:32","slug":"ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3","title":{"rendered":"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 19'?\" DAY OF NOVEMBER 20 \nPRESENT Vwuiyu.\nTHE HONBLE MR.J1JsT1cE..N,_B:UM,Aifz' if \nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1cE_  \n\nWRIT PETITION _NO.4983i-$1-;'2GQ3 (S':cAfij \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt.IshwariM   _.     = ~\nAged about   .     ' \nW\/0 Sri.Sada=ir1anda  b \"  _  \"  '\nTechnical Assis.ta'nt;}_.?   ~ A \nRegional v()ffice. fiyr I*I\u00e9i;e1th\"'& Famiiyi Welfare\nGoverrimentof Iriciia,  '  . '\n\n{Ind E1oor';_E'w.ing, ' j .   _\n\nKendriya Sadan, K0.rain'ar_1ga1a;\"\n\nBangalore 580034, _ \"\n\nResident\" at N0.243; \" \"\n\n V. Sri  __5\"?_Majn\"Rn_a(ii,~\n\n ._ Cilarriarajpet,\" ~ . '_\nW,Bang'a].Qre_ 18. ... Petitioner\n\n 4 'AND: .. \n\nV'  A' '*-Thevssenior Regional Director (HFW),\n\n(by Sri;N Bhat, Adv)\n\n*  Fiegiorial Office for Health and Family\nWelfare, Government of India,\n2*\" floor, F Wing, Kendriya Sadan,\n\nKoramangala, \n\n \n\n\n\nBangalore 34.\n\n2. The Director General of Health Services,\n\nMinistry of Health & Family Welfare,\nGovernment of India,\nNirman Bhavan,\nNew Delhi 1.10 011..\n\n3. The Union of India,\n\nSecretary, V I__ \" . _\n\nMinistry of Health & Fa,rrrE1y'Welfar'e.,\n\nNirman Bhavan,    y   \nNew Delhi 1. 10 011.    Respondents<\/pre>\n
(by Sri.B.V.’1’ilak, ACGSC} _ <\/p>\n
This Writ:Peti:ti:on 11:} Filed U.n”a\u00a7_-;. 226 & 227 of
\nthe C0\ufb02Stitl1UQI3_ of;–in__dia “pr’a_,ying<_ to qiilash the order of the
\nDirectorate C}'ene_ral"ofIHeal.t;':iL '??~er'vie'es,.V1'u'ir1nan Bhavan, New
\nDelhi dt.1e.8.2.oo.1 fyide Annze…  *<\/p>\n
This   on for Hearing this day,<\/p>\n
N.K1in1ar"J,, ' made the , foi1.owi_n"g_;_<\/p>\n
 6RDER<\/p>\n
  \ufb01etitioner llll "has preferred this writ petition<\/p>\n
 passed by the Central Administrative<\/p>\n
.  Trihunalv_'\u00bbtieelfining to quash the letter dated 16.8.2001 by<\/p>\n
u""'–._d"\\\u00ab;hieh  was informed that her revised basic pay can be<\/p>\n
i   \u00a7.5s.450OM70()0\/- as recommended by the 5"' Central Pay<\/p>\n
H\/..\n<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span>
\naforesaid pay scale and alter it to the advantage of the<\/p>\n
petitioner and therefore, submits that no case for
\ninterference is made out.\n<\/p>\n
5. From the aforesaid materiai on record, it_.is_4riot’i-i:t_1V”‘ H
\ndispute taking into consideration the ed..uca;tiot1eli’ <\/p>\n
quali\ufb01cation of the petitioner, namely’l\u00bbAClase-._Masters’ disagree <\/p>\n
in Statistics, which is the minirnum quali\ufb01cationjpreseribxed_ ”<\/p>\n
L..–\/’ .\n<\/p>\n
for the said post; gishe was recruitedi–t,o the ‘post
\nAssistant in the MinistryV<3f..j\u00a3~Iealth"a;r1:d  Welfare. It is<\/p>\n
an isolated post. No pron:otionai.avenue. isyprovided under<\/p>\n
the Rules.'  uZ\u00e9ld(=f"~\u00a7h'ose ._"circumstar1ces, when the
\nrevision of 1f')a.ystool'<.<'s }')lac\u20ac_;"'after the pay commission has<\/p>\n
considered the'-.said.p'ostA'tai{ihg into consideration the nature<\/p>\n
  furjgctiopiXpcrformed';–if\u00abit has recommended the pay scale of<\/p>\n
 pmbably the respondents were justified in<\/p>\n
their"s*tAan(l.'1t.'5'is not disputed that the 5"! CPC did not<\/p>\n
 consideit.  post. They have not made any speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n
 I \u00bbfecotriI–nendation in so far as this post is C0f}.C\u20acI'}f}.\u20acd. In those<\/p>\n
 __"i:irc\u00a7umstances, the Tribunal committed a serious error in<\/p>\n
proceeding on the assumption that when the expert body<\/p>\n
lg<\/p>\n
– 9 –\n<\/p>\n
like 5″‘ CPC has not recommended the higher scale, the 5″‘<\/p>\n
CFC has considered the pay scale to be granted to the post of
\nTechnical Assistant held by the petitioner, but ha;d~.l_Vo~niy.x
\nrecommeiided the revised scale of  .\n<\/p>\n
Tribunal has no jurisdiction to acijudicate
\nWhen the 5″‘ CFC has not
\npetitioner and has not I’eC0fI]lTi’>{%lr’ICi(?d. up-ay
\npost speci\ufb01cally, it was obligatory   llribunal
\nto go into the question the “pay scale
\nrecommended by the   posts in
\ndifferent categoriesl  quali\ufb01cation is
\nprescribed  payllscale in respect of other
\nposts keepinglin  in the ill?’ CPC. Such an<\/p>\n
exercise has notybeen dohelllby the Tribunal, as they were of<\/p>\n
 ‘the   exercise has been done by the 5”?’ CPC and<\/p>\n
therefore,llthpeyhave no jurisdiction to adjudicate the same.<\/p>\n
 [.)ersor1v.V_\\_Av,ll7iio is only a Graduate is now \ufb01xed a pay scale
\nit  y”i’iligher:.than that to the post-Graduate. The argument was,<\/p>\n
   Graduates’ functions are altogether different, whereas<\/p>\n
Tl’1\u20acA1′!u1″at\u20ac’17l&l__n(‘)fi’lAVI’EEC()I'(i discloses that for the very same post<\/p>\n
EX.\n<\/p>\n
.19..\n<\/p>\n
the functioris performed by this post~Graduate is not so.
\nThe petitioner is performing the functions assigne(i’Vto’\u00bb::tiie_
\nsaid post. She is possessing the I Ciass  _
\nDegree. She has not refused to perform ”
\nassigned to her by the I’CSpOIld\u20acf1tS.:::’: If
\nthe post where the petitioner’ is worltirzg,
\nrespondents to make use of    vsrhere
\nthere is work. In those  theyrexrisvingitvscale of
\nRs.4500–700() \ufb01xed for   At any rate,<\/p>\n
the validity of   into by the<\/p>\n
Tribunal on 1: the-4″‘soIegroi:\u00a3iid’ =-that’=_the expert body has
\nconsidered _ _suIciii  ‘Si'{:L1\u00a73.tiO_I’1 and has made a
\nrecormrieridation and “the1fef{_)rti, their jurisdiction is ousuaig.<\/p>\n
The said\u00bb reasoning is contrary to the factuai reaiities of the<\/p>\n
 case.”  Wi1enA~.p_admittedIy the expert body has neither<\/p>\n
C-onsidei’ed’*\u00abtiie post in question nor considered whether it is<\/p>\n
  a statisticai iifinctiorial post, the Tribunal whose members<\/p>\n
 speciafised in this particular \ufb01eid of service law could
\nit  \ufb01;’ix_t)p10_  their mind taking into consideration the<\/p>\n
  .’:V’I.’>(3(.F:)l’I1iI1\u20acI1(1\u00a3i'[iOI1 made by the 5’51 CPC in respect of other<\/p>\n
L\/..\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
– 11 ,
\nposts, could evaluate a proper pay scale in commensurate<\/p>\n
with the educational quali\ufb01cation of the petitioner, the
\neducational qu.ali{‘:cation prescribed for the said
\nnature of function she is performing and also  .
\nconsideration that a Graduate is paidmrnorexa
\npost–Graduate in the very same
\nappropriate pay scale. in our ‘would
\nof justice. The Tribunal would  look into
\nthe observations of 5″‘  paragraph 81.17 in
\narriving at an appropriate   It is
\nneedless to    to be fixed by
\nthe Tribunal_ the minimum pay scale
\nfixed for aAC.raduate_. scale to be fixed for a post<\/p>\n
Graduate geannotibel less than what is prescribed for a<\/p>\n
  Though nature of work is also a component<\/p>\n
 beftaken into consideration while \ufb01xing the pay<\/p>\n
‘  scale,=,_if the ~peLitioner’s work could be made use for better in<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘~.__any othervrlepartrnent which would enable her to get a higher<\/p>\n
it  scale, it is open to the authorities to avail her service<\/p>\n
E\/.\n<\/p>\n
-12-<\/span><\/p>\n
and fix a pay scale appropriate to her qluaii\ufb01cation and
\ncapability. In that View of the matter, we pass the f0i1(4)\\.=.sVIi’1:”_1}\u00a7:._V’
\nORDER ‘ H’
\nI] The petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
2) The impugned order is heresy setiasitiei   i’<\/p>\n
3} The entire matter is re111itte(i\u00ab”‘o_ae*k to
\nfor fresh considerationuiin._V titer.    the
\nobservations    it<\/p>\n
Parties to bear   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 Author: N.Kumar And S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19′?” DAY OF NOVEMBER 20 PRESENT Vwuiyu. THE HONBLE MR.J1JsT1cE..N,_B:UM,Aifz’ if THE HON’BLE MR.JUsT1cE_ WRIT PETITION _NO.4983i-$1-;’2GQ3 (S’:cAfij BETWEEN: Smt.IshwariM _. = ~ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nIshwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-14T12:33:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ishwari M W\\\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-14T12:33:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\"},\"wordCount\":969,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\",\"name\":\"Ishwari M W\\\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-14T12:33:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ishwari M W\\\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-14T12:33:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-14T12:33:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3"},"wordCount":969,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3","name":"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-14T12:33:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ishwari-m-wo-sadananda-vs-the-sr-regional-director-hfw-on-19-november-2010-3#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ishwari M W\/O Sadananda vs The Sr Regional Director (Hfw) on 19 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}