{"id":85622,"date":"2008-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008"},"modified":"2014-01-26T20:48:30","modified_gmt":"2014-01-26T15:18:30","slug":"m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Manjula Chellur Nagaraj<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ms MFA as men :;,:s :?3\u00ab:1> 0? MV ACT AG;s.::x\u00a7s*\u00a7jT?HE
\nauaemem Ai\\I\u00a32′.> AWARD m~rem1.s.o3 PAs$.E_\u00a3f:r j naa % mvc.<\/p>\n
N0\/%$8fC:2 022: THE FILE Ga’-‘ THE ems. sugars
\nHAREHAR, PARTLY ALLOWENC-3 THE CLAN P\u00a3=__T\u00a3Ti’0N ma
\ncempemsmom AND $55:-1jc.’*.1\u00a7\u00a7fz\u00a7e5’  \u00e9axeii.<\/p>\n
2. in;    t’i”f a1:l _:t?’1e’ ‘s\u00e9spondents have net
\nc\u00e9iaiiersge\ufb01.  ?s’\u00e9\u00a7.$:1n:;\u00a7\u00a5 3% far as me raa\u00e9z a\ufb01\u00e9
\nneqiig\u00e9at d.r%v\u00e9E1\u00a7: “‘%:\u00bbf:’ft\u00a7\u00a7::e1 tfie offending vehic\u00e9e. i\u00e9aere is no
\nneed to  cg?’  \ufb01e said issue.\n<\/p>\n
  :3. “\u00a5”%1-an c\u00a2\u00a7r1%ng;_\u00a7t.u\u00e9fa%i\u00abn\u00e9\u00a5:+ %:jy.__th{\u00e9’\u00e9ppe%\u00a7ant Girijamma in the sa\u00e9d accident and her<\/p>\n
fre\u00e9ime\ufb01ti . av? in-upazierat at Bataan’? Medicai \ufb01efiege Hssge\u00e9\u00e9ai.<\/p>\n
—  \u00a3\u00a5av_ang5e’r\u00e9..\n<\/p>\n
   4. According ta the Seamed coLmse\u00a5 fer the am:-e\u00e9iant the<\/p>\n
‘ “age of the 3;:-peifarzt was 53 years as :36? the petition and therefcre,<\/p>\n
having regard ts: her age. the Tribunai Guam :0 have tak\u00a2n.\u00e9\u00a7:$ S~.cf<\/p>\n
mcame 0f the appeiiant based on the not\u00e9cmaf in\u00a7\u00e9”m\u00e9.’_’v:-3$_’1’ .5; _
\nhousewife which awarding tn: the aapeiiant  i:e ‘  <\/p>\n
Rs.1S8i- per day he. as housewife and1__a\u00a7s<a;\ufb01igfin\ufb01-T:a'i\u00e9Q'ri~\u00e9\u00a7 'wafkw <\/p>\n
home.\n<\/p>\n
5, Ass aga\u00e9ns\u00e9 this. 3% iearrz’v%\u00a7:iv~.V\u00a7;?\u00a2;:gV1’seiV r\u00e9\ufb01faon\u00e9ents
\nsubmit thrcauahsut the r1r1e~s\u00bbA’V:.\u00a7.i:\u00bbi}’f\u00e9ti_re?;V<::Vc2r\u00a7:3sL" _\ufb01%ed 'c\ufb01\u00e9af\u00e9vm pei\u00e9\ufb01an
\n{\ufb01e ace of the agpeiiant  a\u00a7~\\f\u00a7q\u00ab \u00a7\/6&5 and there\u00a7ore.
\n\ufb01e: age canni:-t \u00a3._\u00a7-\u00e9 \u00a2';:.\u00a3\u00a7s:d\u00a2;r\u00a2d   ef the accident He
\nfurther   \ufb01{v\u00a31a*\u20acs0ever was meciuced
\nfegardirg\ufb01t\u00e9\u00a7%\u00e9r\u00a7::\u00a7\u00a7_Vw$?i\u00a7V:ir\u00a7\ufb01'e.V\u00a73i  acatzrding to him questian
\nsf \u00a7:ra::\u00a7V%"r*::;" any  3935 cf future inst:-me as a<\/p>\n
\ufb01ausewife b;%"':-a\u00a7~:\u00e9'::gV;1st\u00e9\u00a2–s:ai~~\u00abi'%icome wcuid not arise in View of ihe<\/p>\n
 V,  _ai:3e.=vu;:+\u00a7}:*;\u00a2e;\u00bb_r.;s;\u00a7' m%edEc$i"e%*\u00e9\u00e9.e31ce t0 the effect that she is net cambie cf<\/p>\n
 'a%.?\u00e9'r:::\u00a7iTng..4\u00e9v=\u00a7n. her day-to-day house werk as a housa wife.<\/p>\n
\\w <\/p>\n
A  5, 255% gene through the evidence cf the ame\u00e9iant and<\/p>\n
Hszzx aisd  orthopedic dearer whc treated her at \ufb01asui\u00e9 hosssita\u00e9.
\n"_\u00a7?:e\u00a7;:5\u00a7T\u00a737\u00a7s reveai that she susza\u00e9ne\u00e9 inter trcuzshantric ffaciur\u00e9 of the
\n {\ufb01ght femur and the reduction \u00absf the fracture became more \ufb01ainfui<\/p>\n
v am} siressfui an account G? the appeiiani being a known d\u00e9abet\u00e9c<\/p>\n
aatient fer the 16 years (me: is the accident. Because efvt\ufb01g\u00e9ge<\/p>\n
and the natufe of the fracture' \u00e9\ufb01ctars deci\u00e9ed ta ?_\u00a79\u00e9i::\u00a7i\u00e9f:;e—J:  .<\/p>\n
framsre by \ufb01iif\ufb02i\ufb01ai intervention with \u00e9mcigpnts. '\u00a75ie'a\u00a79:\u00a77\u00a2jj~s\u00a7<\u00a7'ii\u00a7\u00a7e\u00ab.tha\u00a7"  <\/p>\n
she wa$ in 'me \u00e9zesp\u00e9tai an we first <:_r;as%\u00a7rs._\ufb01etxveerzv"VE?,\u00a7'f'\u00a79S{\u00a73'gin <\/p>\n
8.44999. in aii 106 days. Medicai 'r\u00e9c\u00a7;;ss%incs;;\u00a2\u00e9%;;'gT me \u00a7;.gseVVshee:
\nand disaiwarge summayy \\c2{<;_ei2\u00a5d t\u00e9jere  i\ufb01factien of
\nthe wand and the same cgtsg\u00e9' ::$0t?\u00a7fd\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9fdr__\u00e93$\u00a7i\u00a5 \ufb01ecaasa sf
\nhe: diabeies.  :\u00a7\u00a7he; i\u00e9\ufb01d  far the geccmd
\ntime in the \u00a7\u00a2\u20ac\u00e9\u00e9r':.3"31:S9"3V\u20acc.:t?\u20ac$'j'.-:!;j\u00e9z~:::v%f\u00a7a\u00a5L'v\u00ab: with aii the bee? mediaaf
\nfacii\u00e9tieg ~'a*2!\u00e9iEai\u00a3V.1\u00a7i'ia? '\u00a3c;'\u00a7**\u00e9?\u00a7\u00a5;  :i'i\u20ac'fEc':3\u00a5ity in awaiting and waikirzg
\n{orig disV\u00a7;a33\u00e9e'_ ax  mar to the accident. Med\u00e9cai<\/p>\n
exgerts evi{\u00a7e:2_;\u00e9evvn \u00a7*\u00e9*;h\u00e9:e" ra\u00e9f\u00e9fs is the fact that she is zma\ufb01e to<\/p>\n
 V.  at2e_m\u00a7;'i:.ta:::  Vvday-'t\u20ac3'–=:\u00a5a.\u00a7f.\u00a5\ufb01e'i':r\u00a7< as a house wife. ir-iewevegz accar\u00e9ing<\/p>\n
 ':c\u00a7V'theVd<\u20ac\u00a2\u00a3ar't!\u00a7\u00e9:\u00a7_ \u00a35 siwrtening ef the right iee by 2". there wi\u00e9i be<\/p>\n
"'ci~i;i'f\u00a7<\u00a7.:%i-tyvv"ir\u00e9 "sau\u00a7?itti%1a and she weuid not be we to walk isng<\/p>\n
V .k aiat\u00e9nce awn. wan aii this disabiiity he offers. 46%<\/p>\n
, ';   . :ger:n$n\u00e9f\u00a5:\u00a2disability to: the rigfzt iower iimb but hewever he {Sues not<\/p>\n
  *:3.\u00e9'f'o:'i what basis he comes ta such cmciusiore. He has not state\u00e9<\/p>\n
  -\u00bbva{\u00a7y’whe{e in the evidence that she wiii not be abie to aitenci {-2<\/p>\n
minimum househoid work as we\ufb01. Under mesa circumstance\ufb01. we<\/p>\n
ere ef the epirs\u00e9en question ef awarding Jose ef future ieee-me.._en<\/p>\n
eetienei inceme basis weuid net arise. Se aiso theref\ufb01\u00e9’eee-e.i;}\u00a3:e\u00a7_3\u20ac’ _<\/p>\n
no evidence that she was capabie ef deigjg taiieri\ufb01e’*\u00a21:e{\u00e9<:e';\u00a7ertAfref\ufb01 * V. <\/p>\n
the house work she had to do. Hexihje re\u00a7jefrd4'–te':4tije–.esgseei-ef; vibe'<\/p>\n
epeeiient and the fact that ehe.ee_:j::es'fr:)vgii* ru:e\u00a5eV\u00bbeee%\u00e9}gfeu\u00e9\u00a7;d "wee,<\/p>\n
cannot accept the eententien ef tieveuer.-zreiierii 'there at Effie age aise
\nshe has to werk fer the'ee\u20aci_re feVr.r1iVE3}.e'-':.\u00a3\\_: e"r*e_ethereriee! it is not a<\/p>\n
case where she is tetaiiy di-3a'biet:\u00a3 .te eftee\u00a7i"fe1'V.i\ufb01_i'eimum heuee heid<\/p>\n
work. The faat"{e r'*neir:e t\ufb01eA eiie–'eeiejje end the me\u00e9-en\u00e9en
\nreeuiting in  e$i,Sieie':ter:\u00a7'above. she wou\u00e9d eeffer
\neiecerefert"  ":izi'ceiriV1\u00a7'ertabieness throegheu: her
\n\ufb01fe in 1"whefev'e-fj  see indutgee in. Therefore.\n<\/p>\n
ee\ufb01niteiy e\u00a51e_V\u00a2\u00a5eeeh.aes*je’ei<.feend proper cempeneat\u00e9en ee far as the<\/p>\n
 V. \u00ab_ ee;"eei{ei:_e'ew}ageewhi\u00a7\u00a71\u00a7:1ciudes Ease of amenities of \ufb01fe as we\ufb01.<\/p>\n
3  T. "es the exeenses and ether incieentai charges we<\/p>\n
.siet iee th_a;t'v\u00e9\u00e9;:V_%1=\u00e9tes:er medicines avaiiabie at Beeuji hes:-ita\u00e9 were<\/p>\n
 beueht "i5I";;.t?\u00a7e \u00a71esp\u00a3te\u00a7 which re\ufb01ect in the biifs ef the heep\u00e9iai but<\/p>\n
A  eerfre medicines were puschesed from euzeide whenever such<\/p>\n
Ejneeicinee were not aveiiame in the hoseitai. The Tribunei was not<\/p>\n
V Mkeset\u00e9fied in exciauding she We peneining re the purchases meee<\/p>\n
suts\u00e9de the izosgx\u00e9tai. Se a\u00e9s-30 attendant charges when she waa<\/p>\n
?'i\u20ac}$\u00a73ita\u00a7i\u00a7\u00e9d for #06 \u00e9avs deaerves to be granted. L\u00e9\u00a7grse\u00a7g'%\u00e9}\u00e9"\u00a7\u00a7E'\u00a7.  f\u00a7%*age-3<\/p>\n
was abie 'ac: fen:-i\u00ab: after herseif within the 2391339 at ";r:ai\u00e9'\u00e9t  <\/p>\n
have taken {he services of Etf'Ef'!\u20ac'.\u00a73\ufb02t3\u00bb__ Th\u00e9ff\u00e9fdfef ':;~:%;\u00a7je–.c\u00a71es5\u00a7:t\u00a7_f\u00e9:r; :::
\nbe awarded suitabie cc:npensat\u00a3a::}__und\u00e9\u00a5'.\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 f0i\u00a5oa5.\u20ac\u00e9i\u00a7ag;.?\u00a7:\u00a2f\u00a7\u00e9dsf\u00a7; 3 .\n<\/p>\n
GENERA\u00a3’VB\u00bb\u00e9fv%.AGES”    %<\/p>\n
{3} ingisry pain and su1″fari\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7;~.A_  Rs. v.’v;’\u00a7G.\ufb01v?’.?(2r;’-\n<\/p>\n
{bit Permanent d\u00e9sabiiity and 533′    n<\/p>\n
of amenities. 9f Eifei.-~–  _  A. _ U 25,000!”-\n<\/p>\n
Aifkj  s%%sC:\u00e9\u00a3L g%;.zysA::kgs%kk%<\/p>\n
(a) Media}? e-x;::{s:n5e*s \u00a7n<:i:3i:\u00a3%~ng"\n<\/p>\n
fu={:s\u00a5s3 past of 33.::rgis>–ry’for ” ”\n<\/p>\n
:.;’emoxzaTi’;:f in3p:\u00e9;ajr2is_  _ ‘ 353000;’-\n<\/p>\n
{b’) Atignt\u00e9ant and mixer’ \u00a7!’_’j\u00a3Ci-=
\ndenfaiu cizarges tiuring ..’\u00a31\u00a2:>$–\n<\/p>\n
. — .,;:fta:isa’E\u00a7c_.sn fc:\u00abrT1G6*- c\u00e9ays<\/p>\n
.. \u00ab  3?’ the rate “cf {.30}? ”\u00a3 0,660?-\n<\/p>\n
.’ {:2}, _V i_r m ide:itai’ charges inciudirze<\/p>\n
V _ T. aitgnd\u00e9ia\ufb01 \u00e9itxarges for another
\n” .  3’mcnth5 when she was at home<\/p>\n
dgri\ufb01g\ufb01a\u00e9 recavery peric\u00e9 \u20ac4,063!-\n<\/p>\n
R$.’\u00a7.? 5,509\/-\n<\/p>\n
in 35% she is entitieci to Rs.\u00a5.’%5,5GOf- as against {he award of<\/p>\n
‘Tribunai tcgether with interest at 8% PA. from the date :35 giepcesii<\/p>\n
13%? me date ef aayment.\n<\/p>\n
Accerdingiy. the appeai is \u00e9:’:\u00a3\u00a2~&;.’\u00a7_d”T in ‘p:a%7r\u00a3.<\/p>\n
e\ufb01hancing the com\u00a7::~ensatioh._ _”te_% R$f”i..i_5;5Q\u00a33-3} ‘~a:Qair2st’ <\/p>\n
Rs.’:’8,98?:’- awarded by the Tribqnaif ” v?he>.,c;enc\u00e9i*ne.d. re\u00e9\u00e9gsan\u00e9ent \u00a7$
\ndirected to deposit the ccrnfiensa\ufb01it\u00e9n :.a}ii\u00e9ii;:\u00a7\u00a7;’iogether with intere\ufb01t<\/p>\n
avvarcied above within eigfat ‘we\u00e9\u00e9\u00a7<S.*  ' "\n<\/p>\n
sA\u00a7<;28a5cs2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 Author: Manjula Chellur Nagaraj ms MFA as men :;,:s :?3\u00ab:1> 0? MV ACT AG;s.::x\u00a7s*\u00a7jT?HE auaemem Ai\\I\u00a32′.> AWARD m~rem1.s.o3 PAs$.E_\u00a3f:r j naa % mvc. N0\/%$8fC:2 022: THE FILE Ga’-‘ THE ems. sugars HAREHAR, PARTLY ALLOWENC-3 THE CLAN P\u00a3=__T\u00a3Ti’0N ma cempemsmom AND $55:-1jc.’*.1\u00a7\u00a7fz\u00a7e5’ \u00e9axeii. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-26T15:18:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-26T15:18:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1331,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\",\"name\":\"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-26T15:18:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-26T15:18:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-26T15:18:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008"},"wordCount":1331,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008","name":"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-26T15:18:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-girijamma-vs-the-managing-director-on-27-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Girijamma vs The Managing Director on 27 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}