{"id":85717,"date":"2009-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-21T23:49:37","modified_gmt":"2015-12-21T18:19:37","slug":"ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL,O.i\u00a7E:\u00bb_'~..vv\nOATEO THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEi\\\/EBER_.,2;i:?id_9fPT'  \nBEFORE    CC C\n\nTHE HOi\\E'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R.:\"iKU:MCA'RAS'WA\/M'? \n\nWRIT PETITION E\\lo..'V3&gt;_'~3~.\"$,:'\/\"-..'3'.\u00bbE)\u20acJIA'&gt;.V'(Lj--Pi?')f_,  \nBETWEEN: C   C\n\nM\/s Canbank Financial ServicesALinTi'ted,.._\"'* \nKareem Towers, 19\/S\u00bb&amp; 19\/6,\"-ff   .,\nCunningham Road,Ba.nVga!O:re~:56'O \nRepresented by i'_t.s\"--E&gt;&lt;CejVC_c__u_tivje_ _DiIfeC--t&#039;Off .\n\nSri V. Srinivasari._ ,:   Petitioner\n\n(By Sri Irfana, A.dy,&#039;C&quot;i&#039;;:rV._i?i,&#039;s&quot;8anga!ore Law Associates)\nAND: C   C A  \n\n1. The Union of India,~._\n Mini stry Vof--.&quot;i;.a ob U r,\nSh a rima S h akt hi &#039;Bh a Va n ,\nNew &#039; De In i.+{i-- .1 (3 G9 1,\n\n v  By its Se&#039;creia&quot;:fy\n\n The Centra&quot;i~.Provident Fund Commissioner,\n\n-- i,&quot;,&#039;f33&#039;%&#039;.&quot;*&quot;&#039;Fioor, Mayor Bhavan,\n2    &#039;Cof_nnVa&#039;u&#039;ght Circle,\n M;-w,_D\u00bbei.i1i--11O 001.\n\n$3,],-\n\n\n\nunder Section-7Q of the EPF Act. Therefore once\n\nimposing levy of interest at 12% under \n\nseparately is iliegai. The petitioner is levied,~ir:te:i*e:st:twice&quot;  \n\nboth under Section-7Q and under Se._ction&#039;A.7i.-#9~..Br-.of-\n\nAct. Therefore Section-7Q is bad in lax:\/ii&#039;.-._  ;i\\\u00a3oV&#039;d&#039;isj\u00a7:re.tVio&#039;h  \n\nvested with the respondent   the<\/pre>\n<p>damages. The third resporiden&#8217;*ti__ri}ashurriedly. The<br \/>\nimpugned order at Aii\u00abn_exu:r&#8217;e\u00a51ii 12.12.2002.<br \/>\nThe petitioner   under Ruie-\n<\/p>\n<p>7(2) of  1997. But the<br \/>\nappeai is nivotpiiani  Therefore the<br \/>\npetitioner &#8216;Section-7Q of the EPF Act as<\/p>\n<p>ui1i&#8217;coi=i.9tit&#8217;otioi1&#8217;ai &#8216;a.nd taset aside the Circular No.12 dated<\/p>\n<p> 29.S&#8217;L3..9:&#8217;9_8u vij.y,:&#8217;.the second respondent vide Annexure-<\/p>\n<p> to&#8221;-\u00ab4setf.__va&#8217;s.id~e2the order dated 12.12.2002 passed by<\/p>\n<p>2 r__es.p&#8217;oi1dent vide Annexure-A.\n<\/p>\n<p>petitioner be directed to exhaust the alternate <\/p>\n<p>available under law.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. I have heard the learned cou&#8217;riAsel&#8217;for,<\/p>\n<p>as well as learned counsel for the respond&#8217;e_nts.   &#8221; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>5. Normally the cons_t.itutioVn.alV:A&#8221;tra&#8217;ii.dity.&#8217;oi\u00ab:t_het.vEstatute<br \/>\nwill be challenged if  by the<br \/>\nLegislature, if it isyieiative;ief ag :fueVeiementeitight or if it is<br \/>\nultra vires the   of the Legislature in<br \/>\nquestion. if  the Court finds that<br \/>\nthe Legisla&#8217;ture.&#8217;_  &#8216;beyond its power or<br \/>\ncompetence orllin_tra.n&#8217;5gAr&#8217;essi.on of limits imposed by the<br \/>\n i.tself._,_&#8217;sulchwanenactment is called a colourable<\/p>\n<p>legisVlat&#8217;iVo_n.V\u00abi&#8217; iti&#8217;f\u00ab..itvhejjLe~gislature enacts the law in the pretext<\/p>\n<p>the exercise .ofAthe legislative power though actually it<\/p>\n<p>l&#8221;4&#8243;do4es:&#8217;r1otpossess such power, the legislation to that extent<\/p>\n<p> yoi&#8217;d&#8217;._lo&#8217;r&#8221;becomes voidabie on a deciaration to that effect<\/p>\n<p> Constitutional Court. In the instant case, the learned<\/p>\n<p>ex<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner has not pointed out these aspects<\/p>\n<p>whether the law made or the Circular is violative,..oif-.._:th_e<\/p>\n<p>fundamental rights or the Legislature did not  <\/p>\n<p>to pass such legislation. Further this Cotlrt i&#8217;nW\\&#8217;l\\1ir&#8217;:i.tf,\u00bb?et.i&#8217;tion._ &#8216;Au<\/p>\n<p>Nos.5810\/2006 and 35359\/2oo3il, lii_a\u00a7,i. iliphl\u00e9lali<\/p>\n<p>constitutional validity of Sectior:lvgj&#8221;&#8216;~&#8230;_7-QA&#8221;&#8216;of   Act. &#8221; ll<\/p>\n<p>Therefore the contentionsVrazised_.b&#8217;y&#8217;:.t_h&#8211;e&#8221;&#8221;l\u00bbearned&#8217;counsel for<br \/>\nthe petitioner that the4&#8243;V.a&#8217;lidit&#8217;}&#8217;  7-\u00abQ is<\/p>\n<p>unconstitutional ha.s~no&#8217;jfor\u00a3:_e and the&#8221;vsjat&#8217;n_&#8217;e&#8221;Vjis rejected.<\/p>\n<p>6. On p_erl.lsaVl&#8221;lof~th?e objection of the Respondent No.3,<br \/>\nit is clear that thepvetit_ion.e~r::&#8217;i*l\u00bbsas preferred an appeal before<br \/>\nth4_eV.&#8217;Appe\u00a7fl.g&#8221;tve~ Aut&#8217;h&#8221;or:it_y_._. Even in the writ petition,<\/p>\n<p>pe&#8217;ti.tione{..gha\u00a7~..r;ie&#8217;nti.oned that he has got 60 days time t_o<\/p>\n<p> an lalapleail &#8216;giaaieriaule 7(2) of the EPF Appellate Tribunal<\/p>\n<p> 199&#8217;7.v$&#8221;A&#8217;;_53lv.lt it is his contention that appeal is not an<\/p>\n<p> remedy. The Appellate Tribunal which deals<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  the EFF Act is specialised in examining the levy of<\/p>\n<p>:*tl&#8217;*int.erest and also the damages. But in the instant case,<\/p>\n<p>if,<\/p>\n<p>result of that appeal has not been furnished to this Court.<\/p>\n<p>EPF Act provides for the institution of compulsory Provident<\/p>\n<p>(pension) Fund and Deposit-linked Insurance <\/p>\n<p>benefit of the employees in factories~&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7\ufb01d:Jiotherl\u00e9 <\/p>\n<p>establishments. Such being the case,, thei::jon&#8217;tention'&#8221;of-..the_:A<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitione&#8217;r_th_at  not   <\/p>\n<p>interest or the damages when  proi\/i\u00abcled_.:\u00a7for the<br \/>\nsame has no force and  This Writ<br \/>\nPetition is dexl\/oid .ofi:&#8221;in_erii;&#8217;sV&#8217;V&#8217;an\ufb013 &#8220;is liable to be<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. In vi\u00e9wloflll&#8217; discussion, I pass the<\/p>\n<p>fo4llnwing_\u00bb:&#8217;5;, <\/p>\n<p> is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-*<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL,O.i\u00a7E:\u00bb_&#8217;~..vv OATEO THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEi\\\/EBER_.,2;i:?id_9fPT&#8217; BEFORE CC C THE HOi\\E&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R.:&#8221;iKU:MCA&#8217;RAS&#8217;WA\/M&#8217;? WRIT PETITION E\\lo..&#8217;V3&gt;_&#8217;~3~.&#8221;$,:&#8217;\/&#8221;-..&#8217;3&#8242;.\u00bbE)\u20acJIA&#8217;&gt;.V'(Lj&#8211;Pi?&#8217;)f_, BETWEEN: C C M\/s Canbank Financial ServicesALinTi&#8217;ted,.._&#8221;&#8216;* Kareem Towers, 19\/S\u00bb&amp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Canbank Financial Services ... vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Canbank Financial Services ... vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-21T18:19:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-21T18:19:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":572,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Canbank Financial Services ... vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-21T18:19:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Canbank Financial Services ... vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Canbank Financial Services ... vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-21T18:19:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-21T18:19:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009"},"wordCount":572,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009","name":"M\/S Canbank Financial Services ... vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-21T18:19:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-canbank-financial-services-vs-the-union-of-india-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Canbank Financial Services &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 18 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}