{"id":85897,"date":"2010-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2"},"modified":"2014-03-27T16:00:05","modified_gmt":"2014-03-27T10:30:05","slug":"sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE EHGH COURT OF KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE\nmmn ms THZE osm my or smmmumm, . u\nTm HCJWELE rmwmcz B.sm3:EmvAs\u00a7    V\n\nM.F'.A. No.11 19:2,\/%2ws %(MV) %%A * %  \n\n9 ND  %  % %    %\nM.F.A. No.1 1 191\/2063' (MV)_,_ \nM.F'.A. N0. 1'1 1 93:]2C}G;i\u00a7_f(MV)\n\nIN M.F'.A. NO. 11 190     \n\nE3\n\n8RII(8HRI1)HA.R_ \"\".. _ \"   L %\n3\/05121 1cEmAn'1\u00abIA..s;    \nAam&gt;mom45mms\u00bb.%%V   '4\nRIATNO asgangam    \n3121:: moss, magma aamm-rs mm\n\n(sv.%.3m: K tr_;f;ai:I1zt:nn:ira;.ir:V2a.s.}sn 3.. aA'rmrAna.L}\n\n 1.<\/pre>\n<p>  so :92; mummsms cmmnas<br \/>\nNC? 37&#8242;,&#8221;-I.ADY&#8221; airmen ROAD,<\/p>\n<p>V      \u00a33&#8242;::mmAL mamzancs co um<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; 3.9 H&lt;..&#039;=\u00ab4~g(45, we commmx.<br \/>\nmamsmmn ROAD cams<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">   25<\/span><\/p>\n<p> V   ammmx. BARAGER<\/p>\n<p> ESPQNDENTS<\/p>\n<p>(art: 3121; 5 &#8216;\u00a381-IIVALLI FOR R? AND R}. szmmny<\/p>\n<p>mm mm ma 173(1) or xv ACT <\/p>\n<p>wnamm AND AWAR9 DATED: 5.7.2ooa PA$8E!) m  .<br \/>\n193712007 {)3 ms ms are&#8217; THE IX ADDL. JUDGE,  _<br \/>\nSMALL causms, nmasmz. Inc&#8217;:-7. nm&#8217;rRoPoLmAu T<br \/>\nBmcmmxm, (soc.H.1t.7), 1-&#8216;ARTLY ALLOWE?G_* THE<br \/>\nman man coamaxmnon Am amtmzq&#8217; EEEAECJEQKQKT <\/p>\n<p>OF GOEENSATIGN.\n<\/p>\n<p>IN M.F.A. NO.11191I2008    %<\/p>\n<p> E<\/p>\n<p>munmaanuaaansmg<br \/>\nn\u00e9o KAII.A$HCHA1!D.Ba\\;K\ufb01AL3L@ K1m.asa&amp; BAMALI<\/p>\n<p>A EDABOU&#8217;i&#8217;15YE&amp;_\u00bb%;i:~       <\/p>\n<p>war no 251, mm canoes,  Mamasxeno smcm,<br \/>\nmacmwax 70      %<br \/>\nman Rsmssm   *&#8217;*1:&gt; B&#8217;*:?%%HA1T&#8217;\u00bb&#8217; mama<br \/>\nFA&#8217;I&#8217;\u00a3&#8221;IER em i\u00e9ranasimmams<br \/>\n@KALLA$HBANE&amp;ALI     &#8216; &#8211;<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n{BY am: KT  samvapm\n %   \"     &amp;\n\n1.  {xxx PVT LTD\nrm 192-  crmnmsm\nNO. :57,  camzox ROAD,\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>~  &#8216;Tm oamma IEEUEAHGE co ma<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; 2 &#8216;go are 4-4; 45, Im GOIWLEX,<\/p>\n<p>%   Emu crease<\/p>\n<p>  ~m&#8217;xrsam1omLuaNAGm<\/p>\n<p> A  ssrsaxvam ma RSAND<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> 25<\/span><br \/>\n RESPONDENIE<\/p>\n<p>1\/   iycrnc\ufb01 &#8216;to :2: rs Dmvmamzs wrrm<\/p>\n<p>&amp;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Bmmwss, ($CCH.NO.7}, PARTLY ALLOWING TI-IE cum<br \/>\nPETITION FOR coumnaanon Am) smxnze Exmmcmmxrr<\/p>\n<p>U13&#8242; CQHFENSATIGH.\n<\/p>\n<p>mass APPEALS column on ma. <\/p>\n<p>THIS D$Y. THE CQURT IJELIVERED THE  V <\/p>\n<p>   A <\/p>\n<p>Theme appeals are m-r  v..__the   V.<\/p>\n<p>cnhanccment ef campenaation   <\/p>\n<p>2. Heard,  as that:\n<\/p>\n<p>appeals are   and award<br \/>\nof the T\ufb01bgng&#8217; Jogcmer for \ufb01nal<\/p>\n<p>disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. _;Fo1j \ufb01fe  &lt;\u00a7\u00a7&#039; \u00e9\ufb01nwnimnoe, the par\ufb01es are<\/p>\n<p>re;i%r\u00e9i\u00a7i\u00a2;i _:f}a. \u00aba;\u00a7:\u00a7:A&#039;.*.h:V:4ey&quot;  ar\u00a7V&quot;&quot;\u00a5\u00e9fmed to in the slain}. petition<\/p>\n<p> \u00bb . _b\u00a2forz1.&#039;\u00a3  &#039; <\/p>\n<p>V .    Th\u00e9bxief \ufb01acts csf the case:<br \/>\n . {)_&quot;n.\u00a71.1.2007, when the claimants were trawcllxng&#039;<br \/>\n bearing miauation Na. KA-05-?-7234 being&#039;<\/p>\n<p> by claimant in lwc No.1937\/2007 an NH-206<\/p>\n<p>6%\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>near Shivaaaxxdra Gate, 3 Mahendra Belem Vmhjele<\/p>\n<p>bearing registration No. K9.\u00bb-o3-2\u00abm~7s:s came in <\/p>\n<p>and negligomt manner and dashed their car.   <\/p>\n<p>the claimants fell down and  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>they \ufb01led claim petitions beforg: <\/p>\n<p>seeldng compensation.  that  stof &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>eampenaatian awarded<br \/>\nthe above appeals sacking  <\/p>\n<p>5. As    occurrence of<\/p>\n<p>accidmt,    the insumr of the<br \/>\na\ufb01bndixlg vetiiel\u00e9, thet\u00e9t  that arism far my<\/p>\n<p>2 A tha companaaticn awarded by<br \/>\ntile&#8221;-&#8216;If;ibai&#8217;1*;gat_\u00a7_1&#8217;\u00a7,s\u00a2&#8221;just and reasonable or dam it<\/p>\n<p>  _ califsar gnht\u00e9hccment?<\/p>\n<p>:       hearing the learned counsel appearing for<br \/>\n   and perusing&#8211;the judment and award of the<\/p>\n<p> I am of the View that the mzmpenm\ufb01enw <\/p>\n<p>&amp;(.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Tribunal is not just and reasonablgit is<\/p>\n<p>an the lower side and hacnce it is required ta be V<\/p>\n<p>in the first two appeals.\n<\/p>\n<p>The \ufb02  &#8216;3 one Sri  .  V<\/p>\n<p>fracture: of ma: anteriaor wall   at 1..-.-.5; -uh<br \/>\n , Iumzm    L5. The<br \/>\n sustained   from that:\n<\/p>\n<p>d\ufb01\ufb01fmzge nabs   mm&#8217; of the<br \/>\nclaimant   mum} 9 as ma-4 and 5<br \/>\nrespectrve1y&#8217; .     bely after the aucident was<br \/>\ntakml to Chgbbi.   and than-% he was<br \/>\n ts; spans  and mad as mm: for a<\/p>\n<p>  rm dachsr wm mm rm c}aims.nt<\/p>\n<p>  2%  &#8216;5 than&#8217;  of 20% to the hit upper<\/p>\n<p>      left Lamar mas and 13% to the whole body.<\/p>\n<p>   Comideaing the nature of injuriea, 123.135.0001-<\/p>\n<p> hy the Trihtmal towards &#8216;pain am su\ufb01brm &#8216; is just<\/p>\n<p>%.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>az\ufb01 proper and mm: is rm aeexpe far enhanoememt <\/p>\n<p>3. As Rs.13,500\/- wanted by  <\/p>\n<p>inwards &#8216;medzm 1 expezw&#8217; is based<br \/>\nproduced by tbs ehmant     <\/p>\n<p>4. Comiderirmg the   it is just<br \/>\nand proper to    towards<br \/>\n&#8216;eonveyame,  charges&#8217; amt it &#8216;3<br \/>\nawardadi  T.   .   ..\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   of his r.:anheI1ti\u00a2m. that he<br \/>\nis   was eaxmg a sum of Ra 5,0001 &#8211;<br \/>\nper   the copy of the; I.&#8217;).L. at Ex.P~26. In<\/p>\n<p>   of imczxm, the Tribunal has rightly<\/p>\n<p>~   at Rs.4,000\/- pm&#8217; month. The nature of<\/p>\n<p>  that he must haw beam undar rest and<\/p>\n<p> Eur a periad of 3 months and th\ufb01re 1&#8242;). sum of<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>Rse12,0G0\/- h awardm towards &#8216;has of income duringlaicl<br \/>\nup period&#8217; as man: Rs.8.000l- awm-dad by the  AL %<\/p>\n<p>5. Camidemng&#8217; the disability stated by  %<br \/>\nan amoum of dhcam\ufb01zrt an-A     2<\/p>\n<p>to umwgo in his future me, it is just   <\/p>\n<p>sum of R8.15,000\/- mwm\ufb02s  amk &#8216;  &#8216;3 &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>awarded an mm: Ra.1o,om;-  Tram.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. &#8216;I&#8217;1:nechw11t&#8217;  is aged&#8217;   the time of<br \/>\naccident, and  group is 14.<\/p>\n<p>His income    ;,.m.. r-w-5, the do-ctnr<br \/>\nwho mama  that than &#8216;3 aiaabaizy of<br \/>\n20% in   k\u00e9uoea m tha h\ufb01 Io\u00b0wm- limb and<br \/>\n139\u00a7&amp;m.  mmuom disability as assessed<\/p>\n<p> at  &#8216;lma cal&#8221; \ufb01xmm income&#8217; works out In<\/p>\n<p>kL%%:1\u00a7*%a.%57,2\u00a33:3\/\u00bb: pwtzoxxc; 3.00:z12x14} and it is awarded.<\/p>\n<p>   , tha c1a.mnn&#8217; : is gamed for the following<\/p>\n<p> mmmmmm<\/p>\n<p>  Painand 3  &#8212; Ra.35,G\ufb02O<\/p>\n<p>   b) Medical erpemm &#8212; i2u.13,5{X}<\/p>\n<p>ac} Cerwayancc, mm\ufb01hmt __<br \/>\nand attemant charges &#8211; Ra.6,000<br \/>\nti) Lose &amp;vof&#8217;n3:c\u20acx1ne;c1ux-3%   &#8216;~<\/p>\n<p>but! up permd &#8211; Ra.12.;Q\u00a7jQV&#8217;: A.\n<\/p>\n<p>e) Loss of amenitzim &#8212; Ra.1\u00a73;{)O0&#8217;~ &#8211;  _\n<\/p>\n<p>1) bass affutum imame &#8211; Ra._6&#8217;232;&lt;3Qj _ j &quot;  <\/p>\n<p>TUFAL  Rs%.%A1,43,$oQ.k%%T<\/p>\n<p>9\u00bb A&lt;=&lt;\u00bbrm1v&#039; 1-the   The<\/p>\n<p>judi and award   is  to<br \/>\nthe exam stated   far a<br \/>\ntotal   an w\ufb01mt<br \/>\nRs.66,500[-&quot;  with intmest at 5%<br \/>\nM. an tlw   ofRs.82,200f- frocm the<\/p>\n<p>dam ufcw-n..   tizitha date of rea.ha&#039; tion.<\/p>\n<p>   Company is d\ufb02ected to deposit the<\/p>\n<p>     mm. ..m,,~mW.- .4<\/p>\n<p>   montim  data at&#039; receipt ofa copy ofthia order.<\/p>\n<p>    5Out cf the enharwcd compensation, Ra.60,000]-<\/p>\n<p>    mm mm&#039; a is ordered in be tastes&#039; and in \ufb01xed<\/p>\n<p> ha tha name of clarman&#039; t in any Ratiaaaliw<\/p>\n<p>\u00a35?\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Bank] Scrwduked BanklPoat O\ufb01ice for a. period of 9&#8242;.-yam<\/p>\n<p>rims once in 3 31%. Rmairzing <\/p>\n<p>preportiomtg interest is orclwad to be releawd     <\/p>\n<p>the clnizzmnt immediately after the . &amp; <\/p>\n<p>The claimant &#8216;in omvxyzm.  has<br \/>\nsustained rageci wound    and wound<br \/>\nd8 nt and Z&#8217; way;  auntained by<br \/>\nthe ciaimam    oeramam Ex.P-12<br \/>\na\ufb01  45  of the claimant,<br \/>\nclainzant   %m3,,,,,d an Pm-1, 2 and 5<br \/>\nmspectiw1Y- hi  Eeerti\ufb01cate, the  are<br \/>\n gii\u00e9apbg  The claimant, immediately a\ufb01er<br \/>\n  tn Gubbi Primary Heath Centre and<\/p>\n<p> Ltheraaihevv .&#8217;  smiled&#8217; to Say: Apollo I-Iaapxta1&#8242; and<br \/>\ny   as  an a day. Pw-5, the doctor who treatzad<br \/>\n*     fit has not atamd anytmm about the diaability.<\/p>\n<p>T 2; Comidcrirg that the claimant a\ufb01cr austammg<\/p>\n<p> um talam m Gubbi Primary Heahh Centre anti<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IN M.F.A. NO.11193_l300\u00a7 [MW<\/p>\n<p>The claimam is am Sr\u00a3 Kamh <\/p>\n<p>sustained \ufb01achzre ofnack aflnzwus and    <\/p>\n<p>of hit humus. The  suatame,;d&#8221;&#8216;by\u00ab    &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>evidexa from the wtauzud m*t::\ufb01m&#8217;    .,<\/p>\n<p>oral evidence of the claiwt and&#8217;    &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>as PWB&#8211;1 and 5    afbar<br \/>\nthe aocidmt was talem to G\u00a7\u00a7bi%  Centre and<br \/>\nummmmm   1:2-mind<br \/>\nas inpaaem; far   the doctor who<br \/>\nclaimant   taendemoas over the at<br \/>\ns.hopmer,_;  gr   ma; shoulder mvemem,<br \/>\n $3;  thus he summed the daabimy<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;of  limb, 20% in the at lower limb and<\/p>\n<p>  jkz;  the mum of marina, Rs.60,000\/-<\/p>\n<p> the Tribunal towards &#8216;pain mi au\ufb02crixig&#8217; is on<\/p>\n<p>%&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">13<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\ufb01mhigbm-sidemtdthweiam awpemrmhamammtaygdw<\/p>\n<p>3. As Ra.2,00,000\/-~ awarded\u00bb by   <\/p>\n<p>tnwanis &#8216;medical am inxzidnntal er:p%\u00a2xgar;~&#8217;~ \u00a7::  <\/p>\n<p>aczzu\ufb01ny ofthe him by the    sm-<\/p>\n<p>4. The  603% granibe<br \/>\nbusiness and  mu: the name is not<br \/>\nestablished  In that: absence of<br \/>\npmaf nf   assessing his income at<br \/>\nRs.6,000[f-i gm  bin u-mum: period<br \/>\n sum of Rs.18,000\/- tawards<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;InssAL\u00a3:\u00a3&#8217;_  laid up period&#8217;. &#8216;The sum in an the<\/p>\n<p> side.\n<\/p>\n<p>r   f%i5.- Cormidarixag the disability stamd by the dam: and<\/p>\n<p>.  of dkcamfnrt and uz1happanesa&#8217; the chi&#8217; 1: may<\/p>\n<p> in rm mm lifts, Rs.25,000\/- awardad by the<\/p>\n<p>&amp;&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda IN THE EHGH COURT OF KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE mmn ms THZE osm my or smmmumm, . u Tm HCJWELE rmwmcz B.sm3:EmvAs\u00a7 V M.F&#8217;.A. No.11 19:2,\/%2ws %(MV) %%A * % 9 ND % % % % M.F.A. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-27T10:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-27T10:30:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1212,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-27T10:30:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-27T10:30:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-27T10:30:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2"},"wordCount":1212,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2","name":"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-27T10:30:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-shridhar-vs-ms-goa-mineral-pvt-ltd-on-8-september-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri K Shridhar vs M\/S Goa Mineral Pvt Ltd on 8 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85897\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}