{"id":85899,"date":"2011-09-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011"},"modified":"2015-11-06T16:38:07","modified_gmt":"2015-11-06T11:08:07","slug":"umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Rajesh H.Shukla,<\/div>\n
  \n Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n    \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCR.A\/2305\/2011\t 5\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2305 of 2011\n \n\n \n \n=========================================\n\n\n \n\nUMESH\nKUNDANLAL KABRA & 1 - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================\n \nAppearance : \nMR\nPP MAJMUDAR for Applicant(s) : 1, \nMR. MAULIK NANAVATI, APP for\nRespondent(s) : 1, \n========================================= \n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE RAJESH H.SHUKLA\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 21\/09\/2011 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
Rule.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tpresent Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 14,
\n\t21 and 226 of the Constitution of India as well as under Section 482
\n\tof the Criminal Procedure Code for the prayer that the FIR being
\n\tI-CR No. 26 of 2011 registered with DCB Police Station, Vadodara
\n\tCity (at Annexure-A) may be quashed and set aside on the grounds
\n\tstated in the memo of the Petition inter alia that the present FIR
\n\tis not maintainable.\n<\/p>\n
Heard
\n\tlearned Advocate Mr. P.P.Majmudar for the Petitioners as well as
\n\tlearned APP Mr. Maulik Nanavati for the Respondent – State of
\n\tGujarat.\n<\/p>\n
Learned
\n\tAdvocate Mr. Majmudar submitted that for the same or the similar
\n\toffence, earlier FIR being I-CR No.279 of 2010 was registered with
\n\tSayaniganj Police Station, Vadodara for the same allegations, and
\n\ttherefore, the subsequent FIR, i.e. the present FIR being I-CR No.
\n\t26 of 2011 is not maintainable as it would amount an abuse of
\n\tprocess of law.\n<\/p>\n
Learned
\n\tAdvocate Mr. Majmudar has also referred to and relied upon the
\n\tjudgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of T.T.Antony v. State
\n\tof Kerala and Others,<\/a> (2001) 6 SCC 181 in
\n\tsupport of his submission and pointedly referred to the observations
\n\tmade in paragraphs 19, 20 and 27 thereof.  He therefore submitted
\n\tthat this is a fit case to exercise the discretion under Section 482
\n\tof Cr.PC or under Article 226 \/ 227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
\tLearned
\n\tAdvocate Mr. Majmudar has also submitted that even on merits, there
\n\tis no cause to file any such complaint as no case has been made out.
\n\t He submitted that the scheme was made and it was regarding the
\n\tinvestment for profit sharing in the business of gold, and if the
\n\tamount was collected and deposited on profit sharing basis, no
\n\tgrievance could be made, and therefore, whatever the amount which
\n\twas invested was with a clear understanding, and the alleged offence
\n\tcannot be said to have been made out.  He therefore submitted that
\n\tthe present FIR may be quashed and set aside and the present
\n\tPetition may be allowed.\n<\/p>\n
Learned
\n\tAPP Mr. Maulik Nanavati submitted that as per the say of the
\n\tPetitioner himself the earlier FIR being I-CR No.279\/2010
\n\twhich has been registered for a similar offence, the charge sheet
\n\thas been filed and it has not been challenged.  Further, if there is
\n\tanother FIR, which is filed by a different complainant for the
\n\talleged offence qua him the complaint would be maintainable and in a
\n\tsubsequent judgment the Hon’ble Apex Court has clarified that the
\n\tratio in case of T.T.Antony v. State of Kerala and Others<\/a>
\n\t(supra) do not lay down any guideline, and therefore, the submission
\n\tthat subsequent FIR is not maintainable may not be accepted.  He has
\n\treferred to and relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court
\n\tin case of (2004) 13 SCC 292, Upkar Singh v. Ved Prakash
\n\tAnd Others and Kari
\n\tChoudhary<\/a> v. Mst. Sita Devi and Others, (2002) 1 SCC 714.\n<\/p>\n
\tLearned
\n\tAPP Mr. Maulik Nanavati referred to the papers and submitted that a
\n\tbare perusal of the FIR itself discloses the cognizable offence
\n\tunder Section 154, and therefore, it cannot be said that the FIR is
\n\tnot maintainable.  He therefore submitted that considering the scope
\n\tof exercise of inherent powers under Section 482, the discretion may
\n\tnot be exercised.\n<\/p>\n
\tIn view of
\n\tthe rival submissions, it is required to be considered whether the
\n\tpresent Petition can be entertained or not.\n<\/p>\n
\tThough the
\n\tsubmission has been made by learned Advocate Mr. Majmudar for the
\n\tPetitioner that the earlier FIR being I-CR No.279\/2010 has been
\n\tregistered with Sayajiganj Police Station for the similar or the
\n\tsame offence, the present FIR being I-CR No.26\/2011 registered with
\n\tDCB Police Station, Vadodara is not maintainable.\n<\/p>\n
\tIt is required to be
\n\tmentioned that merely because the Sections or the alleged offences
\n\tare the same qua the Petitioner \/ Accused, it cannot be said that a
\n\tseparate FIR is not maintainable.  The complainant in both the FIRs
\n\tis different, and therefore, a different cause of action would arise
\n\tqua the separate complainant with regard to the transaction
\n\tregarding the alleged offence and \/ or having duped him, and
\n\ttherefore, the submission cannot be accepted that it would be an
\n\tabuse of process of Court.  It is also to be mentioned that at the
\n\tthreshold such an FIR cannot be thrown out.  At the most, if there
\n\tare many such complainants, it could be a recourse available to the
\n\tPetitioners to apply for clubbing as it was done in Telgi’s case.\n<\/p>\n
\tFurther,
\n\tthe submission made by learned Advocate Mr. Majmudar that even on
\n\tmerits, considering the FIR, no offence is made out and the scheme
\n\twas regarding the profit sharing and the investment was made with
\n\tfull knowledge and awareness, cannot be accepted at the face value
\n\tin light of the averments made in the complaint itself. As the Court
\n\tis not required to go into these details at this stage, it is
\n\tsuffice to say, a bare perusal of FIR clearly discloses the
\n\tcognizable offence, and therefore, it cannot be said that it has
\n\tbeen wrongly registered.\n<\/p>\n
\tLearned
\n\tAdvocate Mr. Majmudar has submitted that  Petitioner No.2 was not
\n\tthe Director at the relevant time in the Company.  Though this
\n\tsubmission has been made as it is stated in the FIR itself that for
\n\tduping the people the letters have been sent with the photographs of
\n\tthe Director or the officer concerned including the present
\n\tPetitioners.\n<\/p>\n
\tTherefore,
\n\thaving regard to the aforesaid aspect and also considering the scope
\n\tof exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.PC or
\n\tconsidering the exercise of discretionary powers under Article
\n\t226\/227 of the Constitution of India, the Court is not inclined to
\n\texercise such discretion as no case has been made out for such
\n\tdiscretion and the present Petition deserves to be dismissed and
\n\taccordingly stands dismissed.  Rule is discharged.\n<\/p>\n
(Rajesh H.\n<\/p>\n
Shukla,J)<\/p>\n
Jayanti*<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 Author: Rajesh H.Shukla, Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCR.A\/2305\/2011 5\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2305 of 2011 ========================================= UMESH KUNDANLAL KABRA & 1 – Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 – Respondent(s) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nUmesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-06T11:08:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-06T11:08:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":995,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-06T11:08:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-06T11:08:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-06T11:08:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011"},"wordCount":995,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011","name":"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-06T11:08:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/umesh-vs-state-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Umesh vs State on 21 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85899\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}