{"id":86024,"date":"2011-02-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011"},"modified":"2018-06-11T09:47:22","modified_gmt":"2018-06-11T04:17:22","slug":"vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: R. M. Savant<\/div>\n<pre>                                         1\n\n\n\n\n                                                                              \n           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                     NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n         FIRST APPEAL Nos. 1240\/2009, 387\/2010, 1008\/2009, \n                    1158\/2009 AND 1217\/2009. \n\n\n\n\n                                                     \n                                    ---------\n\n    FIRST APPEAL No. 1240\/2009.\n\n\n\n\n                                       \n    Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation,\n    through its Executive Engineer,\n                      \n    Bembla Project Division,\n    Tq.  and  District Yavatmal.              ...                  APPELLANT.\n                     \n                                   VERSUS\n\n       1. Ramesh s\/o Shankarrao Deshmukh,\n          Aged 33 years, Occ - Agriculturist, \n      \n\n\n       2. Vasant s\/o Nago Deshmukh,\n          Aged 55 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n   \n\n\n\n       3. Damu s\/o Nago Deshmukh,\n          Aged 55 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n\n\n\n\n\n          R\/o. Pahur, Taluq Babhulgaon, \n          District Yavatmal.\n\n       4. The State of Maharashtra,\n          through the Collector, Yavatmal.\n\n\n\n\n\n       5. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\n          Bembla Project Division,\n          Yavatmal.                        ...                     RESPONDENTS.\n\n                                 ------------------\n                  Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.\n          Shri A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.\n                Learned A.G.P.  for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. \n                                   ---------------\n\n\n\n                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::\n                                           2\n\n\n\n\n                                                                               \n    FIRST APPEAL No. 387\/2010.\n\n\n\n\n                                                       \n    Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation,\n    through its Executive Engineer,\n    Bembla Project Division,\n    Tq.  and  District Yavatmal.              ...                   APPELLANT.\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n                                    VERSUS\n\n              Keshao Nathusa Gulhane,\n\n\n\n\n                                        \n              Dead through L.Rs.\n                       \n       1. Smt. Parvati wd\/o Keshao  Gulhane,\n          Aged 48 years, Occ - Agriculturist, \n                      \n       2. Ku. Vanita d\/o Keshao  Gulhane,\n          Aged 20 years, Occ - Education,\n\n       3. Mangesh  Keshao  Gulhane,\n          Aged 19 years, Occ - Education, \n      \n\n\n       4. Shailesh  Keshao  Gulhane,\n   \n\n\n\n          Aged 12 years, Occ - Education,\n          (Minor represented through his mother\n          Respondent no.1)\n\n\n\n\n\n       5. The State of Maharashtra,\n          through the Collector, Yavatmal.\n\n       6. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\n          Minor Irrigation Work No.2,\n\n\n\n\n\n          Yavatmal.                        ...                      RESPONDENTS.\n\n\n                                  ------------------\n                  Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.\n          Shri A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.\n                 Learned A.G.P.  for Respondent Nos.5 and 6. \n                                   ---------------\n                \n\n\n\n\n                                                       ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::\n                                          3\n\n\n\n\n                                                                              \n    FIRST APPEAL No. 1008\/2009.\n\n    Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation,\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n    through its Executive Engineer,\n    Bembla Project Division,\n    Tq.  and  District Yavatmal.              ...                  APPELLANT.\n\n\n\n\n                                                     \n                                   VERSUS\n\n       1. Keshav s\/o Sadusa Jaisinghpure,\n\n\n\n\n                                       \n          Aged 58 years, Occ - Cultivator, \n          r\/o. Pahur. Taq. Babhulgaon,\n                      \n          District - Yavatmal.\n\n       2. The State of Maharashtra,\n                     \n          through the Collector, Yavatmal.\n\n       3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\n          Minor Irrigation Work No.2,\n          Yavatmal.                        ...                     RESPONDENTS.\n      \n   \n\n\n\n                                 ------------------\n                  Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.\n             Shri A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.\n                Learned A.G.P.  for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. \n\n\n\n\n\n                                   ---------------\n               \n\n    FIRST APPEAL No. 1158\/2009.\n\n\n\n\n\n    Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation,\n    through its Executive Engineer,\n    Bembla Project Division,\n    Tq.  and  District Yavatmal.              ...                  APPELLANT.\n\n\n\n                                   VERSUS\n\n\n\n\n                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::\n                                          4\n\n\n       1. Shrikrishna s\/o Nago Deshmukh,\n\n\n\n\n                                                                              \n          Aged 48 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n\n       2. Narayan s\/o Nago Deshmukh,\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n          Aged about 45 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n\n       3. Damu s\/o Nago Deshmukh,\n          Aged 55 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n\n\n\n\n                                                     \n       4. Vasant s\/o Nago Deshmukh,\n          Aged 55 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n\n\n\n\n                                       \n       5. Ramesh Shankarrao Deshmukh,\n          Aged 33 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n                      \n          All 1 to 5 r\/o. Pahur, Tq. Babhulgaon,\n          District - Yavatmal.\n                     \n       6. The State of Maharashtra,\n          through the Collector, Yavatmal.\n\n       7. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\n      \n\n\n          Minor Irrigation Work No.2,\n          Yavatmal.                        ...                     RESPONDENTS.\n   \n\n\n\n                                 ------------------\n                  Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.\n\n\n\n\n\n          Shri A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.\n                 Learned A.G.P.  for Respondent Nos.6 and 7. \n                                   ---------------\n                \n\n\n\n\n\n    FIRST APPEAL No. 1217\/2009.\n\n    Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation,\n    through its Executive Engineer,\n    Bembla Project Division,\n    Tq.  and  District Yavatmal.              ...                  APPELLANT.\n\n\n                                   VERSUS\n\n\n\n\n                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::\n                                               5\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                   \n         1. Khushal s\/o Shankar Gulhane,\n            Aged 40 years, Occ - Cultivator,\n\n\n\n\n                                                           \n            R\/o. Pahur, Tq. Babhulgaon,\n            District - Yavatmal.\n\n         2. The State of Maharashtra,\n\n\n\n\n                                                          \n            through the Collector, Yavatmal.\n\n         3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\n            Minor Irrigation Work No.2,\n\n\n\n\n                                            \n            Yavatmal.                        ...                        RESPONDENTS.\n                           ig         ------------------\n                    Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.\n               Shri A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.\n                         \n                  Learned A.G.P.  for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. \n                                     ---------------\n      \n\n\n                                           CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                           DATED  : 22.02.2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>    ORAL JUDGMENT.\n<\/p>\n<p>    1.          By   consent   of   the   learned   Counsel   for   the   respective <\/p>\n<p>    parties, the above First Appeals are taken up for hearing at the stage <\/p>\n<p>    of admission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 Admit.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2.          The   learned   Counsel   for   the   parties   are   ad-idem   that   in <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                           ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                              6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>    view of the controversy involved in the above First Appeals, the record <\/p>\n<p>    and proceedings are not  necessary to be called for.\n<\/p>\n<p>    3.           By   the   above   First   Appeals   the   acquiring   body   i.e.   the <\/p>\n<p>    Appellant &#8211; Vidarbha  Irrigation Development Corporation challenges <\/p>\n<p>    the judgment and award of the Reference Court in L.A.C.No. 94\/2004 <\/p>\n<p>    dated   12.08.2008,   L.A.C.No.   256\/2006   dated   21.01.2009, <\/p>\n<p>    L.A.C.No.17\/2005   dated   10.04.2008,   L.A.C.No.3\/2005   dated <\/p>\n<p>    24.09.2008 and L.A.C.No.15\/2005 dated 10.04.2008 respectively.\n<\/p>\n<p>    4.           The learned Counsel for the appellant draws my attention <\/p>\n<p>    to   the   judgment   of   learned   Single   Judge   of   this   Court   dated <\/p>\n<p>    27.09.2010   in   a   group   of   First   Appeals   bearing   First   Appeal <\/p>\n<p>    No.760\/2009 and companion appeals, concerning the lands covered <\/p>\n<p>    by   the   same   notification.     The   said   judgment   has   thereafter   been <\/p>\n<p>    followed   in   First   Appeal   No.859\/2010  and  companion   appeals   and <\/p>\n<p>    First Appeal No.1012\/2007 and companion appeals.   The aforesaid <\/p>\n<p>    judgments have been followed in First Appeal No.1273 of 2010 and <\/p>\n<p>    companion Appeals. The award of the Reference Court has been set <\/p>\n<p>    aside   for   the   reasons   mentioned   in   the   said   judgment   dated <\/p>\n<p>    27.09.2010 and the matter\/s is\/are remanded back to the Reference <\/p>\n<p>    Court   for   de-novo     consideration   by   clubbing   all   the   references <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                          ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                             7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>    together and directing early disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>    5.            The   learned   Counsel   appearing   for   the <\/p>\n<p>    respondents\/claimants   do   not   dispute   the   applicability   of   the   said <\/p>\n<p>    judgment and order dated 27.09.2010 and the subsequent judgments <\/p>\n<p>    [supra].     For   the   reasons   mentioned   in   the   said   judgment   dated <\/p>\n<p>    27.09.2010 the above First Appeals are also required to be allowed <\/p>\n<p>    and are accordingly allowed.     Resultantly the impugned awards of <\/p>\n<p>    the Reference Court are set aside and the references in question are <\/p>\n<p>    remanded back to the Reference Court to be heard along  with  the <\/p>\n<p>    references   which were subject matter of First Appeal No. 760\/2009 <\/p>\n<p>    and  companion  Appeals.      Needless   to  mention  that   the   Reference <\/p>\n<p>    Court would abide by the directions of this Court of early disposal as <\/p>\n<p>    contained in the judgment and order dated 27.09.2010. First Appeals <\/p>\n<p>    are accordingly allowed to the aforesaid extent and are disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>    In view of the aforesaid, the decretal amounts if any, which are lying <\/p>\n<p>    in deposit in this Court in the above First Appeals be transferred to the <\/p>\n<p>    Reference   Court   on   the   particulars   being   furnished   by   the   learned <\/p>\n<p>    Counsel   for   the   appellants.        The   Reference   Court   may  thereafter <\/p>\n<p>    deposit the said amounts in a fixed deposit of a nationalized Bank <\/p>\n<p>    initially for a period of one year and thereafter renew the same, if <\/p>\n<p>    required.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                         ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>    6.     First Appeals allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>    Rgd.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 17:00:38 :::<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 Bench: R. M. Savant 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. FIRST APPEAL Nos. 1240\/2009, 387\/2010, 1008\/2009, 1158\/2009 AND 1217\/2009. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; FIRST APPEAL No. 1240\/2009. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Tq. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-11T04:17:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-11T04:17:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":471,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-11T04:17:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-11T04:17:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-11T04:17:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011"},"wordCount":471,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011","name":"Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-11T04:17:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vidarbha-irrigation-development-vs-ramesh-on-22-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vidarbha Irrigation Development &#8230; vs Ramesh on 22 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}