{"id":86298,"date":"2010-01-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010"},"modified":"2015-07-14T06:24:17","modified_gmt":"2015-07-14T00:54:17","slug":"fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 8308 of 2006(L)\n\n\n1. FCI OEN CONNECTORS LIMITED,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE\n\n3. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE\n\n4. THE JT.SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :04\/01\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                    C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.\n                    ------------------------------\n                   W.P.(C)No.8308 OF 2006\n                    ------------------------------\n\n           Dated this the 4th day of January, 2010\n\n\n                        J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>                        &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p>     1.    The petitioner is a company engaged in manufacture<\/p>\n<p>of connectors, which goods are leviable with Central Excise<\/p>\n<p>Duty, subject to exemption           with    respect to goods so<\/p>\n<p>manufactured exported out of the country. As per provisions in<\/p>\n<p>the Central Excise Rules, prevalent from time to time, the<\/p>\n<p>manufacturers are entitled to claim rebate of the duty paid on<\/p>\n<p>the goods manufactured and exported. The petitioner company<\/p>\n<p>was always clearing its goods on payment of duty and then<\/p>\n<p>claiming rebate on the duty so paid. The relevant notification<\/p>\n<p>with respect to making claim for rebate, prevalent during the<\/p>\n<p>period   from   26.6.2001     to    5.9.2004      is Ext.P1.  Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>contemplates grant of rebate in respect of duty paid on excisable<\/p>\n<p>goods exported and duty paid on materials used in manufacture<\/p>\n<p>or processing of such goods. The word &#8220;Duty&#8221; as defined in the<\/p>\n<p>said notification are the duties of Excise collected under, the<\/p>\n<p>Central Excise Act, 1994, the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods<\/p>\n<p>of Special Importance) Act, 1957, the Additional Duties of Excise<\/p>\n<p>(Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978, and the special excise<\/p>\n<p>duty collected under any Finance Act.           But with effect from<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).8308\/06-L                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>9.7.2004 a new levy as &#8220;Education Cess&#8221; was also imposed,<\/p>\n<p>through Finance Bill 2004. The Education Cess was collected as<\/p>\n<p>a duty at 2% calculated on the aggregate of all duties of Excise<\/p>\n<p>which are levied and collected by the Central Government under<\/p>\n<p>the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944.             Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>notification, being one issued in the year 2001, does not provide<\/p>\n<p>for grant of rebate on Education Cess, and therefore the rebate<\/p>\n<p>contemplated under Ext.P1 notification was limited only to the<\/p>\n<p>element of Central Excise duty.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.     The anomaly in this regard was rectified through a<\/p>\n<p>fresh notification, Ext.P2, dt:6.9.2004, issued in supercession of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1. In Ext.P2 an explanation is added extending meaning of<\/p>\n<p>the word &#8220;duty&#8221; to include &#8216;Education Cess&#8217; on excisable goods<\/p>\n<p>which was introduced by virtue of Finance Act, 2004. But with<\/p>\n<p>respect to the interregnum, from the date of introduction of levy<\/p>\n<p>of cess on 9.7.2004 till Ext.P2 notification dt: 6.9.2004, i.e. the<\/p>\n<p>period between 9.7.2004 to 5.9.2004, the claim with respect to<\/p>\n<p>rebate on Education Cess was rejected by the adjudicating<\/p>\n<p>authority, for the sole reason that rebate in respect of Education<\/p>\n<p>Cess was not provided in Ext.P1 notification, which governed the<\/p>\n<p>field of granting rebate, during that period.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.     Eventhough petitioner preferred statutory appeals,<\/p>\n<p>the appellate authority upheld the view taken by the 3rd<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).8308\/06-L                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent and rejected those appeals, through Ext.P3 order.<\/p>\n<p>Revision petition filed before the 4th respondent was also<\/p>\n<p>dismissed adopting the very same reasoning.             Hence the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is seeking declaration to the effect that, Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>notification which was issued in supercession of Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>notification is only clarificatory in nature and that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to get rebate on the Education Cess paid with respect<\/p>\n<p>to goods exported, during the period between 9.7.2004 and<\/p>\n<p>5.9.2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     Argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that,<\/p>\n<p>explanation appended to Ext.P1 notification will take in its ambit<\/p>\n<p>the excise duty and also special excise duty collected under any<\/p>\n<p>Finance Act.     Under Finance Act 2004 it was ordained that<\/p>\n<p>Education Cess is to be collected as surcharge on Excise duty<\/p>\n<p>payable. The said cess is a special excise duty chargeable and<\/p>\n<p>collected under Finance Act 2004 and it will fall within the ambit<\/p>\n<p>of clause 3 of the explanations to Ext.P1 notification.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently rebate is allowable on Education Cess, being a<\/p>\n<p>special excise duty payable 2004, in terms of Ext.P1.         Later<\/p>\n<p>notification including &#8216;Education Cess&#8217; is only an enumerative<\/p>\n<p>definition, and it is only clarificatory. Therefore the Education<\/p>\n<p>Cess levied as duty of excise as per statutory provisions, from the<\/p>\n<p>date of such levy is eligible for rebate under the basic<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).8308\/06-L                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>notification itself, as clarified through Ext.P2, is the contention.<\/p>\n<p>      5.     Learned counsel for the petitioner had pointed out a<\/p>\n<p>decision of the High Court of Rajasthan in Banswara Syntex<\/p>\n<p>Ltd. Vs. Union of India (2007 (216) E.L.T. 16 (Raj.))<\/p>\n<p>wherein the contention as stated above has been upheld and it is<\/p>\n<p>held that the rebate is eligible with respect to levy of Education<\/p>\n<p>Cess during the period from 9.7.2004 to 5.9.2004. On going by<\/p>\n<p>the reasoning in the said judgment, I am inclined to accept the<\/p>\n<p>dictum laid therein and to hold that the Education Cess paid<\/p>\n<p>after introduction of Finance Bill 2004 with effect from 9.7.2004<\/p>\n<p>is part of Excise duty and it will form part of the Special Excise<\/p>\n<p>Duty mentioned in Ext.P1 notification.        Therefore despite the<\/p>\n<p>explanation added in Ext.P2 notification the petitioner is entitled<\/p>\n<p>for rebate on the Education Cess, along with the rebate on<\/p>\n<p>Excise Duty, from the date on which the Education Cess became<\/p>\n<p>leviable.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.     Accordingly the writ petition is allowed.            The<\/p>\n<p>impugned order to the extent it refused claim for rebate on<\/p>\n<p>Education Cess for goods exported by the petitioner between the<\/p>\n<p>period from 9.7.2004 to 5.9.2004, which is confirmed through<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P3 and P4 appellate and revisional orders, are hereby set<\/p>\n<p>aside. It is declared that the petitioner is eligible for rebate on<\/p>\n<p>Education Cess along with rebate of excise duty for the goods<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).8308\/06-L                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>exported during the said period. The respondents are directed<\/p>\n<p>to take consequential steps for allowing the rebate, at the<\/p>\n<p>earliest, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date<\/p>\n<p>of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>okb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 8308 of 2006(L) 1. FCI OEN CONNECTORS LIMITED, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By ... on 4 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By ... on 4 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-14T00:54:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-14T00:54:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":937,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By ... on 4 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-14T00:54:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By ... on 4 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By ... on 4 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-14T00:54:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-14T00:54:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010"},"wordCount":937,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010","name":"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By ... on 4 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-14T00:54:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fci-oen-connectors-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-represented-by-on-4-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fci Oen Connectors Limited vs The Union Of India Represented By &#8230; on 4 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}