{"id":86315,"date":"2011-06-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2"},"modified":"2017-07-07T07:15:37","modified_gmt":"2017-07-07T01:45:37","slug":"mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2","title":{"rendered":"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Ks Jhaveri,<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSA\/105\/1982\t 6\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSECOND\nAPPEAL No. 105 of 1982\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI\n \n========================================================\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo be\n\t\t\treferred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nMANSURI\nYUSUF ABDUL RAHAMAN ISMAIL & 1 - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nRAMABEN\nW\/O ASHOKKUMAR GANDHI & 3 - Defendant(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nDF AMIN for\nAppellant(s) : 1 - 2. \nNone for Defendant(s) : 1,1.2.2  \nMR YM\nTHAKKAR for Defendant(s) : 1.2.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 1.3.3,1.3.4 -\n4. \nNOTICE SERVED for Defendant(s) : 1.2.3,1.2.4\n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 23\/06\/2011 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
1.\tThe
\npresent  appeal  is  a  Second  Appeal  under    Section  100  of
\nCivil Procedure Code, filed  by the original defendant,  whereas the
\nrespondent is the original plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
2.0\tBefore proceeding on the merits of the matter, it  is necessary to examine  the  scope  and  ambit  of  the  present appeal.\n<\/p>\n
3.0.\tThe  scope  of section 100 of Civil Procedure Code and the powers of  the High Court while exercising jurisdiction as a second  appellate  court  are  by now well defined and require no  detailed discussion.  The Supreme Court has, in the  case  of Ramaswamy  Kalingaryar  Vs. Mathayan Padayachi (AIR 1992 Supp (1) SCC page 712), and in the case  of  Parsini  (dead) through  Legal  Representatives Vs.  Atma Ram (AIR 1996 SC 1558), clearly reiterated the principle that  the  High   Court   cannot,  while  functioning  as  a  second  appellate court under section 100 CPC, upset the findings of  fact  recorded  by  the  lower  appellate  court   by  reassessing  the  evidence,  or  eassess the qualitative value of such evidence on record, and thus cannot reverse  such findings of fact.  In fact, the  High  Court  cannot interfere with such findings of fact even by examining or  reappreciating   the   evidence   from   the   aspect  of”sufficiency of proof “.\n<\/p>\n
4.0 \tThe  respondent-plaintiff  had  filed  suit being Regular Civil Suit No. 337 of 1975 before the learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge (J.D.), Godhra for permanent injunction against the defendants for not fitting a flour mill and for removal of encroachment made by the defendants on the suit premises. The learned trial Judge vide judgement and decree dated 29.09.1978 decreed the suit so far as encroachment was concerned.\n<\/p>\n
4.1\tBeing aggrieved by the order of the trial Court, the defendant preferred appeal being Regular Civil Appeal No. 75 of 1979 before the District Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra wherein the appeal was dismissed vide judgement and order dated 31.07.1981 by confirming the judgement and decree of the learned trial Court. Hence, this Second Appeal.\n<\/p>\n
5.0\t At the time of admitting the matter, following substantial questions of law have arisen which are as under:\n<\/p>\n
\t“1.\tWhen the evidence of Gani Ismail Exh. 66 shows that the \tdisputed land was in h is possession as a tenant upto 1949 and \tafter he vacated the said premises Abdul Gani Sattar occupied \tthe said premises whether the trial Court and the Appellate Court \terred in holding that the defendants have made encroachment \tupon the suit land?\n<\/p>\n
\t2.\tIn view of the evidence on record, whether the Appellate \tCourt and the Trial Court erred in not holding that defendants are \ttenants of the suit land?\n<\/p>\n
\t3.\tWhether the trial Court and the Appellate Court erred in \tconstruing the pleadings of the parties?\n<\/p>\n
\t4.\tIn view of the fact that the plaint does not disclose the \tcause of action for relief as to removal of encroachment, whether \tthe trial Court and the Appellate Court erred in holding that the \tsuit cannot be dismissed on that count<\/p>\n
\t5. In view of the fact that the plaintiff has not specifically stated in\tthe plaint that when the defendant encroached upon the suit land,\twhether the Trial Court and the appellate Court erred in holding\tthat the defendant encroached upon the suit land in the year 1975\tand therefore, the question of limitation does not arise?\n<\/p>\n
\t6.\tIn view of the fact that the defendants have taken the\tcontention as to limitation, whether the Trial Court erred in not\tframing issue as to limitation and whether the appellate Court\terred in holding that the question of limitation does not arise.”\n<\/p>\n
6.0\tLearned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant contended that the trial Court has committed error in not framing the issue regarding the encroachment which was made prior to 1954.\n<\/p>\n
7.0\tLearned advocate appearing for the appellant further submitted that the lower Appellate Court has committed error in disbelieving the deposition of witnesses, viz., Abdul Gani Ismail at Exh. 66 who is close relative of the appellant and Champaklal Bhurabhai at Exh. 60 who was the tenant of one part of the northern side of the suit premises. He submitted that both these witnesses have stated that the suit land was in possession of the defendants from the very beginning and the shed of iron sheet on the suit land was in existence for last many years. He submitted that the learned Judge has erred in discarding the evidence of the said two witnesses and misread the evidence of the said witnesses.\n<\/p>\n
8.0\tLearned advocate appearing for the respondents supported the orders of the trial Court as well as appellate Court. He submitted that the appeal may be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
9.0\tHeard learned advocates for the respective parties. Few facts which emerge from the record are that suit premises was let out to the defendant but the additional portion which was encroached was never rented out. On the basis of the evidence, the lower Appellate Court concluded that the encroachment was made recentely. From the record it seems that the defendants could not be in possession of the land between the shop and the partition of the iron sheets, when they were not tenants in the year 1947. The defendants came in the suit premises in the year 1954 and thereafter the encroachment on the suit land was made.\n<\/p>\n
10.0\tWith regard to the issue of limitation it is observed by the lower appellate Court that it is true that the plaintiff has not mentioned the exact date on which the encroachment was made by the defendants but in para 3 of the plaint, the plaintiff has mentioned that since sometime prior to the suit, the defendants have made encroachment on the suit land. The suit was filed on 22.08.1975 and, therefore, the plaintiff’s allegation would amount to the encroachment having been made in the year 1975 or thereabout. As against this, the say fo the defendants in the written statement that he is in possession of the suit land since 1947 and the say of the defendants is not acceptable. The specific plea of the defendants that they are in possession of the suit premises since 1947 and the question that suit is barred by limitation or not is to be decided on the basis of their plea and when they have failed to prove that they are in possession of the suit premises since 1947, the plea of limitation will not survive.\n<\/p>\n
11.0\tThe defendants have also failed to prove by giving evidence as to how they came into possession of the suit land. As against this, the plaintiff has examined Champaklal Bhurabhai at Exh.60. He was the tenant of one part of the Northern side of the suit premises and he has stated that since Samvat 2006 and 2007, the defendants were not rented any portion in front of the suit shop and only the suit shop and  shop was in possession of the defendants. It is true that this witness was serving with the plaintiff. It is also observed in the judgement of the trial Court that this witness was remaining present whenever the plaintiff remained present in the Court. Therefore, it can be said that he is an interested witness but from the cross-examination of the said witness, it does not appear that he is stating falsehood. Even if the evidence of this witness is not taken into consideration then also the fact remains that the defendants have failed to prove as to how they came into possession of the suit land after the suit shop was rented to them. The defendants have also examined Surendrakuma Radhakrishna at Exh. 63. He is residing near the suit premises. According to him, he is there since the last 40 years. He further submitted that he did not know whether Champaklal was there as a tenant of the suit premise or not. This Champklal who was a plaintiff’s witness was examined at Exh. 60 and he has stated that he resided near the suit premises. This witness also stated that he had seen katcha roof of Defendants shop. He deposed that he has been seeing that roof since long. There is no change in width and length of this roof. According to him, the roof is in the same position from his knowledge. He has admitted that he did not know who built the roof and when it was built up. He appears to be a chance witness and has no knowledge about the time since which the construction were made on the suit land. In view of these circumstances, I am of the view that no case is made out by the appellant to cause interference in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
12.0\tIn the   premises  aforesaid,  no  substantial   question of law arises in the present appeal, which would justify interference by this Court under section  100  of  CPC. This appeal is therefore, dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
    \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(K.S.JHAVERI, J.)<\/p>\n
niru*  <\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 Author: Ks Jhaveri, Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SA\/105\/1982 6\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SECOND APPEAL No. 105 of 1982 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI ======================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-07T01:45:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-07T01:45:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\"},\"wordCount\":1445,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\",\"name\":\"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-07T01:45:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-07T01:45:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-07T01:45:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2"},"wordCount":1445,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2","name":"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-07T01:45:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansuri-vs-ramaben-on-23-june-2011-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mansuri vs Ramaben on 23 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86315"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86315\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}