{"id":86488,"date":"2008-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2"},"modified":"2015-06-26T20:52:03","modified_gmt":"2015-06-26T15:22:03","slug":"the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre>38% N45 H\u00a5C\u00a7\u00a7~\u00a7 CGURT GF KARMAYAE-{A5 EANGALCRE\n\nmrsa '11-us 'ms 4\"' DAY as mcamaaa, 2o';:e\u00e9%';._ .\n\nBEFGRE\n\n1':-gs \u00a7-\u00a7G\u00a5\\.\u00a5'ELE MR1s\u00a7I\u00a7i}3'T_.J\u00a7\u20ac'E..\u00a7{\"Bi.L.t\ufb01'F%\u00a7:R   \n\nk*\u00a7\u00a5.P.\u00a5i\u00a70.\u20ac03G2i2E5_\u00a7,\u00a7;'{\u00a73';\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n\"fine Secreiary   \n\nThe common Cadre Cor:2r:\u00a7%ttee--\u00bb_ 3 V ._  \n\nFor Emp\ufb01oyees \u00abof Primary Ca~oper3a::ve_\"T'..   .\nAgricuituraf and Rurai 5eye\u00a3dpme_nt Ba\u00e91kV!td~~..f jv --. \nKamataka States; \ufb01\u00bb.\u00a3__ur v;;n:&lt;a:a::ac;_ R--ofa.d; V\nC%:amara;&#039;pet.2&#039;Baf1*gaio:&#039;\u00e9-.5633 818&quot; _  \n\n.. .  &#039;V _  &quot;  A PETYHONER\n\n{$32 8%&#039;: ,G5:opasa;z%\u00a7&#039;s;%.%;}a%V ;*%\u00abi\u00a7\u00a7&#039;e--g};}se --- Adm}\n\n\u00a3-_Ef.\u00a72.\n\n &#039;\u00a7v.&#039;:_ :3ri;,\u00a7{ei\u00a7s3rNa3}\u00e9E;ii or\u00e9er at Annexure\ufb01, the seccm\ufb01\n\nrs:*fg;\u00a7s4es';\u00a75:\u00a7'eza\u00a7V_ha\ufb01dirested the petitioner to pay the saiary of the \ufb01mt\n\nA V:Vf'e3por:,\u00a21!e~r3'H.;\u00a7fv$i}e per\u00e9ec; from 23\"?-19% to 33\"?-s em\n\n_-%\u00a2.'~;;*\u00a7\u00a7:;riieve\u00a7 by mat, the petitioney has \ufb01ie\u00e9 this writ petition,\n\n ~ ;  ,  $24 brief, ifm facts are, the f\u00a7i'$\u00a5 respondent was wark\u00e9ng as<\/pre>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;ai&#8221;s-\u00e9gervisor at Saga: in ?&#8217;C.A &amp; RD. Bank: He s.:.:a$ tsansf\u00e9rred tn<\/p>\n<p>.&#8211; Sraba by srder dated 3-3-3996, but, he was not aiiewed is @9214<\/p>\n<p>there. The tyansfer srder was msdif\u00e9ed and he was peste\u00e9 $9<\/p>\n<p>RAJ<\/p>\n<p>Hcsanagar, where aisc, he wa\ufb01 not a\u00e9fswed to work. fhereafter, he<br \/>\nwas transferred to Kappa by aides&#8221; dated 22\u00bb?-$96, Hefafas not<\/p>\n<p>a\ufb01owed ta wcfk there aise, The firm respondent appr\u00a2a\u00a2\u00a7fi&#8217;e\u00a7i&#8221;-ih\u00e9s<\/p>\n<p>Cesar: E: W.PJ\\\u00a7Q.2823?;&#8217;\u20ac996, This cwzt direatad\ufb01-e&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7%&#8217;\u00a3}:$r\u00a7\u00a7i&#8217;&#8212;&#8211;&#8216;\u00a7.\u00e9~- <\/p>\n<p>seaside: the representa\u00e9cisn ef the f%;jst.,;*j\u00a2$;&#8217;:&gt;::s:f*:&#8217;&amp;\u00e9:&#8217;i?::f:&#8217;_f\u00a7\u00e9icQ?&#8217;d\u00a7n\u00a7\u00a7y,*. <\/p>\n<p>the representation ef the f\u00e9rst responzient :\u00a7*:&#8217;as&#8211;5be2;~;; \u00a2\u00a7%s2;d&#8221;*;&#8217;s:z\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>by W59? \u00e9ated 3G.?,&#8217;E\u00a7S&#8217;Z. the Efst\u00ab&#8230;fesp\u00e9$r;-d\u00e9xrzt V\u00a7&#8217;:a;:sv:i5;1e%,g:\u00b0\u00a7z._V\u00a7ii;fe_:;\u00a7:&#8217;sejd? t\u00e9 &gt;<\/p>\n<p>regort ta duty at \ufb01agazi Acco::\u00e9i&#8217;iV\ufb01&#8217;:g1i3!.\u00a7VVt\u00a71\u00e9&#8217;\ufb01:*\u00a7t&#8217;\u00a7es\ufb01\u00a2nc\u00a7ent has<br \/>\nreamed foei dzgty 3% Sagf:;\u00a7f -an S3S_?, &#8220;\u00abThe saiafy of %he fits?<br \/>\nrespcnderzt has not been\ufb01aiij  :t?:a&#8221;~.\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9:&#8217;:\u00a7f:\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;-from 23.&#8217;?,&#8217;i\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 is<\/p>\n<p>3&amp;?.&#8217;%:_99?_. &#8211; X  fresponder\u00e9\ufb01 has approache\u00e9 {he<br \/>\nsecond&#8217;te_s1?,~m\u00a7en\u00a3&#8217; \u00e9z\u00e9j*;:.&#8217;2\u00a7\u00e9;:\u00a7g\u20ac:e&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7~.:e\u00a2Laa&#8211;&#8216;2:0$;2\u00a793\u00ab~@4; The sesozrz\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>resgjmn\ufb01ent 4Ey*-.::;ric\u00a7e f d\u00e9&#8217;%&#8217;edv 2\u00bb?-23% has \u00e9igected ihe petiiiener ts<\/p>\n<p>.  &#8221; &amp;;p\u00e9i%\u00a7;\u00ab:\u00e9h\u00e9:%&#8217;L3a\u00a57&#8217;ar3\u00a7 cf t\u00a7f\u00e9%*E% st respendent far: the peria\u00e9 from 23-E?-3\u00a7\u00a78<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  .. :Vter.j;.33\u20acr-  . V <\/p>\n<p> .\ufb01\u00ab;g?\u00a7:&#8221;i$v\u00e9d by that the pet\u00e9t\u00e9zmer hag f\u00e9ie\u00e9 this writ getit\u00e9onx<\/p>\n<p>7:&#8217;. &#8216;?he ieamed cmnsei for the peti\ufb01ener corztende\u00e9 tha\u00e9 &#8216;me<\/p>\n<p>A &#8216;p\u00bbe;t\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7cner has not wo\u00a7*kec\u00a5 for the per\u00e9a\u00e9 from 23\u00bb-J?&#8217;-\u00ab&#8217;E\u00a796 3:6 3%?\u00bb<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;\u00a399? and tberefsre, the pei\u00e9tiener is mt&#8217; Q\ufb01iiii\ufb01d far the saiarya He<\/p>\n<p>a\u00e9sa submitted mg? the aonaerrze\u00e9 bank is mat a party 20 the<\/p>\n<p>V.\n<\/p>\n<p>.|.&#8217;.-.&gt;.\n<\/p>\n<p>proceedings and tfzerefare, the imgugned er\u00a7?e_r..__&#8217;4;:\u00e91;\u00a7&#8217;\u00a7s\u00e9\u00e9;::&#8221;&#8216;%\u00a7;e<\/p>\n<p>sustained is&#8221;: iaww<\/p>\n<p>8. As aga\u00e9nsi this&#8217; the Eeigzrraes\ufb01-T ;ai~:s:T3r%.;$1e\u00a7&#8221;\u00a7&lt;$\u00e9&quot;V:\u00a7=2.\u00a7 =a\u00a7\u00a7,r$t<\/p>\n<p>respandent aubm\u00e9tted that the f&quot;%rsi:__~:&#039;es;3\u00e9:3\u00a2&#039;5e&#039;awt vveTs&#039;\u00a7?*1\u00a7Ar\u00a3\u00a7;f:etr\u00a7;\u00ab3  L.<\/p>\n<p>Sagar ta Samba and therea\ufb01e\u00a7V;VL&#039;L&#039;E\u00a7\u00a7&quot;V&#039;Hg$ar\u00e9ga&#039;f:avfad g\ufb01zerea\ufb01eg is<br \/>\nKappa and \u00a7f&#039;t a\u00e9\u00e9 these gaz\u00e9jf\u00e9ees, r;e;.f%_7pandenfV\u00a7\u00a5\u00a7a\u00a7v not a\ufb01owecf<br \/>\nta wogk and therefore,  this Court in<br \/>\nw\ufb01zazsvsa zn\u00e9s Qsa\u00e9\u00e9z 3:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2t;ed.ih\u00e9&#039; petitioner ze censi\u00e9er<br \/>\nthe represi\u00e9&#039;\u00a7\u00e9t;\u00a2%f\u00e9g%%&quot; \u00a7\u00a72s ;\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7n\u00e9\u00e9nt and accerd\u00e9ngiy the<br \/>\n;&#039;epre\u00a7\u00e9&#039;rifati\u00a2;\u00a7i: o:f.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7 &quot;f\u00a7r$i&#039;.V{%\u00e9p;z%2\u00a7iei1i:&quot;\u00a7i&quot;:a$ been considwed am&#039; by<br \/>\ncrdervldgt\u00e9vzi:  .re$p$r%d@nt hag baerz \ufb01iracied to<br \/>\nfepari fe\u00a3VV&#039;d2;;tyv.at\u00a2V E&#039;;g;fg\u00a72_;&#039;&quot; accerdingiy, the first rewencient has<\/p>\n<p> %&#039;c;r d::i1%*,&#039;;&quot;&#8211;~iai&#8230;$.;B\u00a78r an 3&#039;E~?-W97 and he is werk\u00e9ng there&#039;<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb :\u00a7~\u00a7&#8211;ss_ aE$,;\u00a7 ;-3.a%s\u00a7::;%\u00e9&#039;:&quot;E&#039;\u20ac\u20ac3:ed that the \ufb01rsi: respondent was not aiicwed to werk<\/p>\n<p>  aria themfareg the petitioner came: contend the<\/p>\n<p>f\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7 res\ufb01orzrikzzt is \ufb01at ani\u00e9iied fez)?&#039; {ha sa\u00e9ary for the pezicd from 23-<\/p>\n<p> ~?~ .<\/p>\n<p>egst\u00e9\ufb01ed far the miary for the gsericd :\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;\u00e9\u00a7:*s*:&#8217;-2j3g*fg3i9_;\u00a7&#8217;SAT\u00a7\u00a73&#8211;?. V &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u20ac216 gemnd respandent considefing &#8216;\u00a3!~\u00bb{aV rn\u00e9at\u00e9fiai e\u00bb&#8217;e*z_V:91ec:\u00a7zr\u00ab:i s\u00a7\u00a7:?{i_.;\u00e9&#8217;\u00a7sV\u00a2<\/p>\n<p>taking me aaresideraiion the fa\u00a3\u20ac$&#8221;~Va_\ufb01d c\u00a7fm;ms{am;e&#8221;s \u00e9f&#8217;\u00e9h\u00e9 cas\u00e9 V<\/p>\n<p>$335 d\u00e9reated the petition\ufb01&#8217; ta \u00a7a;\u00a7.\u00a3..i:i}{\u00e9&#8217;V$a&#8217;is;:fy of f&#8217;he..f\u00a7rst:\u00a7respondent<\/p>\n<p>fat&#8217; the mrio\ufb01 from 23\u00bb?!&#8217;\u00a7  is -.459 not find any ewes&#8217;<br \/>\n63\u00b0&#8217; i\u00a5iega\u00a7\u00a72y Er: \u00a31; ?herefo;e&#8217;,&#8221;En\u00ab \u00e9}jyVca\u00a7s\u00bbsi_\u00a7e.\u00a3f;ee:\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;i%*%7&#8217;e%\u00e9.v, there is as merit<br \/>\nin zh\u00e9s writ peti\ufb01ion\u00e9ahgi h\u00e9ncg  is,_   \ufb01\u00e9 dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e9:;ardE::\u00e9gAV!\u00a7}\u00bb;-&#8220;\u00a7.t ~\u00a7:3_:ii:i\u00a7&lt;s\u00bb:1\u00a71&#039;\u00e9\u00e9:\u00e9%&lt;fi_&quot; 3 &#039;<br \/>\n       Sd\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>Iudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 Author: H.Billappa 38% N45 H\u00a5C\u00a7\u00a7~\u00a7 CGURT GF KARMAYAE-{A5 EANGALCRE mrsa &#8217;11-us &#8216;ms 4&#8243;&#8216; DAY as mcamaaa, 2o&#8217;;:e\u00e9%&#8217;;._ . BEFGRE 1&#8242;:-gs \u00a7-\u00a7G\u00a5\\.\u00a5&#8217;ELE MR1s\u00a7I\u00a7i}3&#8217;T_.J\u00a7\u20ac&#8217;E..\u00a7{&#8220;Bi.L.t\ufb01&#8217;F%\u00a7:R k*\u00a7\u00a5.P.\u00a5i\u00a70.\u20ac03G2i2E5_\u00a7,\u00a7;'{\u00a73&#8242;; BETWEEN: &#8220;fine Secreiary The common Cadre Cor:2r:\u00a7%ttee&#8211;\u00bb_ 3 V ._ For Emp\ufb01oyees \u00abof Primary Ca~oper3a::ve_&#8221;T&#8217;.. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Secretary The Common Cadre ... vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Secretary The Common Cadre ... vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-26T15:22:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-26T15:22:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":703,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\",\"name\":\"The Secretary The Common Cadre ... vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-26T15:22:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Secretary The Common Cadre ... vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Secretary The Common Cadre ... vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-26T15:22:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-26T15:22:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2"},"wordCount":703,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2","name":"The Secretary The Common Cadre ... vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-26T15:22:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-secretary-the-common-cadre-vs-sri-kollur-nayak-on-4-december-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Secretary The Common Cadre &#8230; vs Sri Kollur Nayak on 4 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}