{"id":86602,"date":"2009-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009"},"modified":"2016-08-25T00:42:41","modified_gmt":"2016-08-24T19:12:41","slug":"united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH mug? 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE\nmcym THIS mg 10\"' ms' 0? aecmaea, 2oc>9:\"\"\u00bbT.\n\nBE F0 RE\n\n\"ma HQNBLE MR.}U5T\"ICE A.rs.vEs~\u00a7usop;A:g\u00a7g-%:;Vciis?;:$'A \"   \n\n:v2.:sCELi..A:~;;E9U$ FIRST APPEAL' r~zc\u00a7 .AS3_9\"3T\/209$  '  \n\n3E\"3\"V%iEEf'\u00e9:\n\nwaited India Insuranczeio. Ltd-.r,\"  \nDiv\u00e9siorzaf Office,   T . W\n\nB.?~'\u00a7,Read, Robertsonpet; \"\n\nBy R5 Re.-giona\u00e9 Office,  \nSharsk:3:rnaray'a',naaB\u00bbui!c\u00a7.i4rtg_, _\n\u00a5*sE-3,25;'.\u00bb\/3,\"'*'*Fioa:>r,\":'-!i'.;{',3;R.\u00a7sq;\"- '\nBanga%efeV\u00a5 S610.Gi3-1;- '  \nRepresente\u00e9 by its D'epL:i;y Manager.\n \u00bb '   '- ...APPEL1_ANT\n\n. lAf'-->'.\u00a7;+'i2Aa3'u, \n\n  .,\n\nH -M. V . V\n\n3, '$rr2t__.;' \u00a7'$\u00e9'\u00a7\u00e9atamma;\n\u00a5%i,fs.'\u00ab;Late Sr\u00a7.?\u00bb\u20acun%s;'a$pa;\n__Ag\u00e9'\u00e9? abaut 31 yaam.\n\n 'sfasanthamma,\nWis. Lata Sri\ufb01duniyappa,\nAged abeut 26 years.\n\n\n\n(N)\n\n3. Sunan\u00e9iag\n;'a. Late Sri. Murziyapsa,\nAge\u00e9 abeut 1% years.\n\n4. K.M.\ufb01xmaravathi,,\nDX0. Late Sri.Mur:iyappa,\nAged about 13 years.   \n\nS. Subramani,\nS\/3.. Late Sri.Muniyappa,\nAged about 5 years,\n\n$5 Hanumakka, __\nM,\/*0. Late Sri.Muniyam:a, _\nAged abeut 61 years} ~  --.\n\n\ufb01\u00e9i are' :\u00b0'fes\u00a7r:i tan:  'Ka\ufb01 :13-san\u00a3i_'ia\"\"t}E\u00a7iag as-2,\nAvari-i Hob\ufb01, 'f%%;;\u00a7Vbaga'i\"a-E,;;k-; .\n\nKeEar'E';\u00a7str%c'L,. \n\n?. Sr; $.Ab\u00e9\"di V'Bas\u00a7';~.ir;'--V_ \nS\ufb01a, Sffi. S%%a\u00a7'\u00e9\u00a5=';.._;GaudvSaheb,\n\u00a7rra:\u00a7._s5r\u00e9%.B.$. !\\i\u00ab::';2:,.'\n\n'A ' Vf\u00e9\u00e9aar F~a'.>3\u00a7 Gf\ufb01ce,\n\n Q\u00a7m;?\u00a7'pgt; \"i*{9i'a}'.,\n\n3;' T\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9 \u00a7Efs\u00a7E's?\"\u00a7\u00e9:_:*f;a\u00a7 Manager,\n?'~%,;\u00e9'-3. Qrie\ufb01iaf Insurance 58. Ltd,\nE?\u00bb*\u00a5L~~\u00a531\u00a3\u00a73d\u00a5ngE 15' ffear,\n\n A. iZii_:b\ufb01<':afnpet Mam Read,\n \ufb01\u00e9eazr Square,\n \ufb01ar\u00e9ga\u00e9ore M 569 3&2.\n\nVT  -~'\u00a7; Sr\u00a7, '\ufb01wiru K.9har':apat%1i,\n\n5;\/9. S{i.\u00a7<rishnan,\n\nEv\ufb01ettzzraz viiiage, Ne.5,!6\u00a7\n'xfaigpan\u00e9a\u00e9 Reaci, \ufb01xfc\ufb01fi Taiuk,\nE2\u00a7}A.A, msirict, Tamiinadu,\n\n\n\n1\u00a7.SrLA;F\\Earayanaraju,\nSfo. Sri.Appairaju, major,\nEehind District Ceurt, Koiar.\n\n11, Sri, N.Sud\u00a51akaran,\n\nS\/0. Sri\ufb02atesh Mudaiiar,\n930,1\/85, Read Street,   \nChannathur viiiage,   j;\nArani Taiuk, "RS, District \u00bb~-- 632 3"C1V1,<_ A'\n"famiiiiadu.  -.    "  _ g\n\n ..RE.S $0 BED E'i\\iTS\n\n(By \u00a7ri.K,\u00a7i*'   ._\n55%. N.'a*'.GuruprakasVh,-~Ad3:. fofV~R1i*)_  \"\n\nThis? ~-:~ez:m %ssV%f::\u00e9!Aa . \u00a7.:'n,d\"\u00e9\u00e9; Section 173(1) cf MV Act\nagasngsznzije agicgmerst am\"'Award dated 19.10.2904 passed\n\n :'_A-\u00a5'\u00a70\u00bb292fi9':*%9--~\u00ab'on the f\ufb02e of the Pri.Civ\u00a7! Judge\n{S;r*;{;'2,:fr}..vg:'.VC\u00ab:\u00a7_\u00a5\ufb01,___MAC\"\u00a5', Koiar, awarding compensation sf\n\n3F;$ ,l'i',_2f;?g'2i}'f:i,?'\u00bb interest at 5% PA. from the date cf\npeii\u00e9tigsz tiik gamer}: and the agpeiiant herein prays to set\n\na \u00bb_  x;2;sE\u00a7e :;~?: \u00e9\u00ab;_at2:.3\u00b0s;e ja\u00e9gment arm award an\u00e9 exeszerate the\nV' :j\u00a7.\u00a7aEf;:\u00a7\u00a7%:\u00a7,: 3\u00a7aE\u00a7':st the appe\ufb01iant finsazrance Csmpany.\n\n \"':\u00a7'%';\u00a73 apgeai gaming at'; far crders this @352, the Ciaart\n\n\" hl\u00e9\u00e9f\u00e9xserea the f@E\u00a7ow\u00a7ng:\u00ab\n\n\n\nEUDGMENT\n\nis 3: read traf\ufb01c accident that cccurred  _\n\nat 813$ am. in frerrt of KMF Dairy at i\\\u00a5,.H,~:$\u00bb..uz\u00a7eaVr'--T.\u00a7\u00a7e.ia5,;\"  \n\nimeiying bus bearing registrat\u00e9on \n\niarry bearing registration \u00a5\\i_;).TP\u00a7\u00a3V?-.'3V\u00a74?\u00e9Sf\u00a7c';\"v'M' \nE'vmn\u00a7yap;'1a --~ yassenger in  $\u00a71st\u00e9\"i31--\u00e9\u00a7T '\u00a7'i1}a;\u00a7:;fgias and\nsuccumbed. The Saga!'   petition\nunder 5:166 ef the   at Koiar.\n\nAppeiiani' i.\u00a7ii\u00e9=;:Las'\u00e9t'-.V\u00bbo;$f'i\u00a2fry~\"-iz\u00e9ar\u00e9ng registration No.\n\"\u00a7'\u00a7*\u00e9\u00ab~23~'?\"E':576,'_  \ufb01aetition was contested by\n\nsame cf ti{eL\"--\u00ab.;;esg*.:\u00ae_d\u00e9:34ts;\u00abi\u00e9efere the MACY'. Issues were\n\n Evid\u00e9hice. _____ was recorded in which, for the\n\n;:'2e\u00a7ft';i;\u00a7-:;;[f:egf;;=?;\"'\u00a5,%'~.\u00a2\u00e9':$' =1 and 2 deposed and Exs,P1 ts P8 were\n\n:\":'a'a;.r\u00a7:\u00e9\u00a7 \u00a7a*:':\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9j'j_f\u00e9%ifV'the resgartderxts RW'-1 dfepesed and the\n\n _\u00e9n$as{\u00a7&n::\u00e9\u00ab:\u00a7:\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7cy was marke\u00e9 as Ex\ufb01i. After appreciatian\n\nA Qfef: 'T\u00e9e*2{i\u00a7a:r2ge as': ramrci with reference ta 'she rivai\n\n::\u00a7\u00a7:t'\u00e9\u00e9\u00a7t\u00a73nsi urged far cerzsideratien by the ieamed\n\n h\u00e9\ufb01vgcates agrpearing for the parties, the Tribuna\u00e9 he\u00e9\u00e9 that\n\nmsniyaggsa has \ufb02ied due ts rash and negiiggnt driving at'\n\n\n\n\u00a313:\n\n\u00a3393': t\ufb01\u00e9 vehi\ufb01es E.e:., bus bearing registration  \n\n31?? arm the terry bearing registration \n\nby the fespegt\u00e9ve cirixzers and the :\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7a _i\"'rep'r_esezii;\u00e9ti3:\u00a7sTofu\"1\n\nthe deceased Mumtyawa are 3'3_titEa?33'*--'\u00a7\u00a7'--the c\u00e9r\ufb019Vsa7ts\u00a2;s'nV\ufb02%'~\n\nit was hem by the Tr\u00e9bunai thaf\"'L:1:V\u00a7\"ivers sf h_9th:.'thT\u00e9' bWzi\u00e9 'and\n\ufb01ery'?! are equaiiy neg\u00a7igse:r1~:_ az\"s_:3\u00a3V\"i?' efsV;:S\u00e9;;rV1'$\"E-bAie fofvviiaii\u00e9\u00e9ng the\n\nacci\u00e9ent and their i\u00e9abiii-E35  '\"J's!'$SV  50% each.\nDetermining t\u00a7f%:ie'*g.VL\u00a7:V1:\".ass::__ca:,s$\u00e9id\"\u00ab.5\ufb01\".i_'~a:;\u00a7;\u00a7$u\u00e9t of death of\n\nMuniyagpaj t\u00a7;\u00e9:_> \"\"T?\u00a7bu'n\u00a7-EL \"';a$.};:3E*:$eci' compensaticn at\n\nR$.3;2\u00a3; 2\u00a7\u00a3};f~ \u00a7i\u00a7:?{\u00a71..:ii\";E\u00e9?=\u00e9\u00a7'E~..at 56% p.a. from the date of\n\npez\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9an %:}'\u00a7\u00a7 V%:\u00a7\":VeVV\";\u00a75a'te\u00bb'.:'5o};'?4payment, directing the 4*\"\n\n ra$;?\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a7:\u00e9e':1t be%mr.:e  it  appeiiant harem, ta depasit the\n\n  manths fram the aate of the award fai\u00e9\u00e9rag\n\n%\u00a7;a:i%'\u00a7ii;' \u00a7:.\u00a7f:;;, 'iof\u00a7\" Enigma: sha\u00e9i be \u00a7% pa.\n\n Aggr\u00e9eved, the \u00e9nsuras\" of th& Eerry Exes \ufb01ie\u00e9 this\n\n  \u00a7\u00a7;\u00a3}}\u00e9:\u00a7'\u00a7;'\u00a7\u00a7 Sri P5, Raju, iearsze\u00e9 a\u00e9wcate appearing fer the\n\n ggipei\u00e9ant szsbmits that the bus was awned by the 3.3'\n\n rewagzdegzt befare the Tribunai szamaiyg the 'Em respondent<\/pre>\n
hera\u00e9n, wag did net pagsess vaiid insurance and therefcre,<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
Cmzrt in the case of ‘I20, ANTHCDNY Vs. KARVARNAN 43_1_VD<\/p>\n
934533, (2093) 3 so: ?43 and submitted that jpia’<\/p>\n
of compesite negiigence, each wrong deer %s”auf1d _”‘j ”<\/p>\n
gexsemiiy Eiabie tn the injured \/ iega} ?ep~re$\u00e9.\ufb01ta\ufb01\u00a7\u00e9$_ rifvfhevf<\/p>\n
dieceaged, for payment of entir\u00bbia   zinc:\n<\/p>\n
petitioners have the choice of Vpr.e:f:’>j”c’:~:-‘_=,\u00bbediz’1 g Vagai\ufb01gjiz  \u00e9ny
\nef them. “fhe petEtionar::\u00bb_nee\u00a2V-;3*o;f_:esSta.bE\u00a7shA’the aa\u00e9tent of
\nresgsrzsib\u00e9iity cf “each  $\u00e9\u00a75_ar\u00a7te\u00a3y, n\u00e9r is it<\/p>\n
necessary for t\u00a71e. \u00a7ia;3rt;:t\u00a7$V’\u00a7’;\u00a7f:;&r_\u00a7fr3i.\u00a7je_\ufb01\u00e9eg\u00e9i\ufb01terzt of liability<\/p>\n
of eachjwrg\u00e9igf 5{:3″c\u00a7esfA:’\u00abse;3\u00a7E’a,1;e!y,’ It is for the apgzeiiant be
\nmake the’ \u00a7:2:a ym’er’2.t z\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9:_4″r-a%i6Qer the amount from the 3.”<\/p>\n
resg\ufb01swergt b\u00e9\u00a5mje ti\u00a7e f”ri!$unai and the petitieners cannot<\/p>\n
  m.:,\u00a7d\u00e9’ tQ:’V’A:;\u00a71ffe:’. ‘mL\u00e9arned ceunse\u00a5 submitte\u00e9 that the<\/p>\n
A\u00a72et\u00e9t’\u00a73\u00a7:e%$’\u00bb,\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a3\u00a7s-egg-7’3″ parties are entitied to recover the<\/p>\n
 _ am:3′:;,:.;:t fr”c:;:f;s.7~”fhe appa\ufb01ant algae er at their aptien, fmm<\/p>\n
 “”–.. \u00a7’i1gT\u00a7:\ufb01.e’r\u00abZresgeszdents in the Tribgmai, against wham the<\/p>\n
 _  \u00a7’ir\u00a7?\u00a7\u00bb\u00a7”\u00a3\u00a7*:?iaS been mgged. R<\/p>\n
\/,7<\/p>\n
4, in view :32?’ the rivai contentions and the record,<\/p>\n
the saint far censideration Es:-\n<\/p>\n
” What \u00a7s the relief to which the ap;;1. a’!Vi:a’:’$.i.iLj’~.?i:\u00a7.,<\/p>\n
If<\/p>\n
entitie\ufb01 ‘:9 En this appeai?\n<\/p>\n
5. PW\u00bb-2 has deposed aboutthe.  \ufb015ic$. P,3.  V<\/p>\n
and 92 are the FIRs and Ex.P3 is tfhe 3?:b3fVrg\u00e9+-sV’E\u00a7exet..VV <\/p>\n
cha:’ge-sheet is against the bu\u00a7_c:1″1%.xger ckdy. V <\/p>\n
mahzar shows that the, .ac<:E::!gr2\u00ab*1: A'I'*i.~".-as"–.;akeh"'place?in the<\/p>\n
middle  ief  the MU report: shows<\/p>\n
extensive the bus and the lorry. It is<\/p>\n
,\u00bb \u00a7<eep}\u00bb\u00a7s'-il:gvvi'!\u00a7 Vviegni'~tr;_\u00a2___<avidence of PW-2 am the said<\/p>\n
A"2_Vd:3\u00a7;:;\u00bb?*3e:fs};a2fy\u00abE\u00e9xsi\ufb01ence, the Tribunai has held that there<\/p>\n
%#a–$;' v:*:@\u00e9\u00b0%\u00a7\u00a7S'$:\u00a7.tgT::."z\u00e9egiigersce by the \u00e9rivers cf bath the<\/p>\n
~Vs;e\u00a7*z%\u00a7'\u00e9\u00a7:r\u00a7 \u00e9\u00a73\u00a7i.'\u00a7\u00a7ab\u00a7i\u00a7ty was appartiene\u00e9 at 53% each an the<\/p>\n
 the Eorry an\u00e9 issage Fig.1 was answamd<\/p>\n
—J&’.~a\u00a7\u00a2;:\u00a7 \u00a7’:\u00e9%ngEyg The quantum cf compensatisn was<\/p>\n
T \ufb02\u00e9i\u00e9rmined keaging in view, the evidence 91” PW—-1 and the<\/p>\n
3 \u00e9gcumentary evidence showing the age of the deceased<\/p>\n
\/f<\/p>\n
ii}<\/p>\n
s\u20acpa:*at.\u20ac1\u00a7L On the: other hand. where a parser:<\/p>\n
5u\u00a77=I%::’s i:1}1.1ry, pax\ufb01y due: to the I1eg1igen<:\u20ac~: QITfL '\u00e9h\u20ac:<\/p>\n
part <3i'a110the1' pergaztm or pssrsozxs and par\ufb01i\ufb01? ,4<\/p>\n
rf:$uit of his own riegiigerica, than the  A ~<\/p>\n
cm tbs part 01' the: i_11j1.1r\u00a3:d which contz\ufb01-*;a:Ait\u20acd"%::Qr the "<\/p>\n
acrttidezm. 11$ :'*efer1'ed to {as his. "\u00ab_c\u20ac\u00e931:_i*;\u00a3b;1.?{J{31\u00a7j_ <\/p>\n
m:g'i_ig<:\u00e9z"1Cs: "J.?'Ir1\u00a7\u00e9’:1″a1}E\u00e9  respect of the<\/p>\n
i.:’3g1.:ri.::s Stand red;j.iC\u20ac:\u00a7i’ \u00a7:f1 _.p1?%\u00a7;3\u00a7\u00a71%t;i_o11 3:0 his<\/p>\n
ccg\u00a51t.:*EE_\u00a7:j:g~\u20ac?:Iy  .\n<\/p>\n
?. ” ._I:?: view 5e\u20ac?’i,-fw\u00e9-~:f\u00a7t;\u00a7\u00a3S of law dectared by the Apex<\/p>\n
CQL\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a7,;’i.T\u00a7’}’-T.?,j TrE’$EiuVr\u00a7ha’i’c1anf\u00a7’t.”be heid ta have committed error<\/p>\n
  i’n &d;E_”:’*L’-a’V:’tEE’e*’2″g Efee pay\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9t cf cempensation amount by the<\/p>\n
Vs_w:\u00a7$\u00a5\u00a7:.\u00e9:%;’\u00a7;e*s’v\u00a7Vt_”.T~Q}appe\ufb01arzt. TM petitieners before \ufb01he<\/p>\n
Z  5\u00e9\ufb01x$’ET__f :_es;.2;\u00a7\u00a7’:d\u00e9nts E. is 5 herein, are entitied to weaver<\/p>\n
T “=__\u00a7:’:”agjan%<::\u00a7\u00a7:t either fmm the appe\ufb01ant or frcm the<\/p>\n
'  i:'%\u00e9%$f;\u00a7s3:;*\u00a7':'\u00a7e::ts gr: whem the iiab\u00e9i\u00e9ty has beers fixed by the<\/p>\n
\/,3<\/p>\n
1}<\/p>\n
8, The Tribunai has heid that respondent \u00a3_\\__io.-4<\/p>\n
hafere it L9,, the present appeiiant is i\u00e9abie to dep_o'a\u00a7t"\u00abtt\u00a7'e_<\/p>\n
entire ammmt and get 50% reimbursern\u00e9nt4"'"–fifc.i3'i'-.,.'~<\/p>\n
regpm\u00e9eent f\\\u00e9o,1,i As a result of th\u00a7sJfT..nd_ing,_-'it""h\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7_';\u00bbdiVfe<;'ted "<\/p>\n
t\u00e9za 4"' respsndent ~– United India Ii'i4sur}a:2..?.i'e \u00ab\u20acc_\u00a7rcsg:3}'an'\u00a7;*V:'Lt;i1ij<\/p>\n
-~ insigrer of Sorry bearing regvi\u00e9_t:<a.tion"'i*i\u00a2%. TN~'~?_:31{?\u00bbS6V5,.\u00bb3to%<\/p>\n
deyasit the amount and recevefV'E.\u00a3i)%._V_am\u00a75u\u00ab–ni::Aiaiqvi\u00e9g with
\nfurther interest from th\u00e9'\u00ab-ti::sta'\u00e9.gf :gje_=:p\u00a33$i5"tA:'t'ii3ii recovery frcm<\/p>\n
S. Abdui B&S\u00a7'3B\u00a3?,!". — r\u00a2\u00a7i3\u00a7nIdeht\u00bbit"'N\u00e9;"i_ V.:'.."~:'.v"'t:$'.xA1r:er of bus<\/p>\n
bearing1?,regist.r9\u00e9ti\u00a7:n:Lj"i\u00a7ti;-t.::_:'i<;\ufb02i'-(ii1-13-3579, without any<\/p>\n
fairther pro\u00e9agciingti\u00e9  fiiing the execution petition<\/p>\n
 on titg\u00e9taisis of V.t%1'e:a\u00a7\u00a7:Aa.:'d. The Tribunai has not correctly<\/p>\n
A";_;%2\u00a2\u00a7:z\u00a7\u00a7ed.,VA_t't:e\u00a7t+:,n_uitimate \u00a7ar't_ sf its crater. Ne exception<\/p>\n
$::a;*sF';':Ia  the exterzt ef homing that there is<\/p>\n
V ~Vcsm\u00e9\ufb02git\u00e9iair\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01iigencet Grace it was heid that there is<\/p>\n
u'V"4"'Vgt\u00a7%::i;3:es%t=\u00a7\u00e9 neg\u00e9\u00e9geace, the ciaimants being 3" parties, their<\/p>\n
.'.tj'_ei:vtV\u00a7tis\u00e9:;:2ant ta recever from any we er aii ef the<\/p>\n
T '<'..::Vt\u00a7t'tfeasQrs is unrestricted: The choice is ieft for the<\/p>\n
it miaimants to groceed against 3% or any at' the tartfeasors.<\/p>\n
if arsy we cf the tortfeasora makeg the payment, in View<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
E2<\/p>\n
9? the agportianment of Eiabiiity at 50%, the tor”\u00a3:feaser_.x\u00a7:ho<\/p>\n
makeg the entire payment should have the <\/p>\n
recover the amaunt, over and above its <\/p>\n
apportianed by the Tribursai, from\u00bbt\u00bbh.e4&ot&:\u00e9fV”‘tc;%1f\u00a7\u00e9:5\u00a7:{s.’-_ <\/p>\n
Yhis positian has not been <\/p>\n
whiie passing tha Er:\u00b0:pugned \ufb01.u:Vt:4;;_mer\u00a7’t  a\u00a7{4[\u00e9\u00a7.rAdA’;\u00a7. “He;*{ce,<\/p>\n
ciarification is necessary.\n<\/p>\n
in the resuit, thzf-V.z_V_ 2s;A::;p\u00e9\u00a7i’fV\u00bbVfa-iii;’AA\u00a7’;\u00a7;\u00bb__’\u00a7he extent of<\/p>\n
::ha!ieng;’\u00e9'””‘ 539.8;  ‘”\u00a7rf:–\u00a7>\u00a7J*gned_””jiidgment and award.<\/p>\n
Howeve}, it is;n\u00e9\u00a3\u20ac’\u00e9’L\u00ab:;E’;e.~;i\u00a7Vf=-ifiif\u00e9ggt in case, the appeliant pays<\/p>\n
the entire 13$-;%ar’dVam6Mt~.-‘~\u00a3o the respondents 1 to 6 or if<\/p>\n
“V”\u00ab.\u00a7%:e..’:L;?;;2s;\u00a7\u00a7:’::$%_er2tS’ recever the whole ef the award<\/p>\n
L?:*’\u00a7f:F:”V:?ta:”a\u00a7:y\u00a7iiant; an payment X deposit of the award<\/p>\n
a\u00a7i:c\u00a7::9:i\u00a7Vth\u00e9\u00e9igi\ufb01\u00e9ilant shaii have the \ufb01berty as reserved by<\/p>\n
 ,_:he \u00a7:E.bi:.:;f_1aVi, to recmzer ma amount ever 3:13 above its<\/p>\n
V’ ‘v.:Lj’E\u00a7:$ bf\u00e9\u00a7’\u00a7–ty 9? 58% \u00a7rem the 1” resgcndent in the ‘Tribunai \u00ab-<\/p>\n
  respendent herein ~- 3. Abdul? Basheer, i.e., in the<\/p>\n
 \ufb01annar directed \/ germittad by the Tribunai.<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
3.3<\/p>\n
The Trihanai had granted 3 mcmths’ time from the<\/p>\n
data af passing 9:’ the award ta deposit the award <\/p>\n
with interest at 6%. in dafautt, it has  .\n<\/p>\n
Entarest at 9% pm. Appeiiant ha_s….bar2a _\u00a7”?d7e” *<\/p>\n
this apgeai. In the circumstances?’-if t\u00a33’_’eA.\u00e9\u00e9pf\u00a7e_Iytarj:t <\/p>\n
aaaosit the award amount w’\u00a7:i_:_h’i~r} 8 2waak$_f:”\u00a7m.i._’teda\u00a5, it <\/p>\n
Sinai! me: ha Eiabie to pay the intafaat  9%’  <\/p>\n
Appeai stands a’i\u00e9r}1’is se\u00a3:ii’  the said<\/p>\n
absersgastfit\u00e9a “arid cEa\u00a7}j:f\u00a7ca’t\u00a7\u00a7i1.
\nAn9’3:au:’:: in  appeal, is ordered to be
\nEransfarred ta thawT:”\u00a7bi\u00a7na”\u00a7.for necessary action.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
TVaa:* ..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH mug? 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE mcym THIS mg 10″‘ ms’ 0? aecmaea, 2oc>9:””\u00bbT. BE F0 RE “ma HQNBLE MR.}U5T”ICE A.rs.vEs~\u00a7usop;A:g\u00a7g-%:;Vciis?;:$’A ” :v2.:sCELi..A:~;;E9U$ FIRST APPEAL’ r~zc\u00a7 .AS3_9″3T\/209$ ‘ 3E”3″V%iEEf’\u00e9: waited India Insuranczeio. Ltd-.r,” Div\u00e9siorzaf Office, T […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nUnited India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-24T19:12:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-24T19:12:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1262,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\",\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-24T19:12:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-24T19:12:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-24T19:12:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009"},"wordCount":1262,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009","name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-24T19:12:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-venkatamma-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Venkatamma on 10 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86602"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86602\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}