{"id":86758,"date":"2007-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007"},"modified":"2017-09-01T07:57:18","modified_gmt":"2017-09-01T02:27:18","slug":"lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007","title":{"rendered":"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 13.11.2007\n\nCORAM:\n\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.DINAKARAN\nAND\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.REGUPATHI\n\nH.C.P.No.1143 of 2007\n\nLalitha \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t..  Petitioner\n\nVs.\n\n1.  The Secretary to Government\n    Prohibition and Excise Department\n    Secretariat\n    Fort St.George, Chennai-9.\n\n2.  The Commissioner of Police\n    Greater Chennai\t\n    Egmore, Chennai-8.\t\t\t\t\t..  Respondents\n\nPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Habeas Corpus as stated therein.\n\n\t\tFor Petitioner  :  Mr.V.Ganesh\n\t\tFor Respondents :  Mr.N.R.Elango\n\t\t\t              Addl. Public Prosecutor\n\n\nO R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>(Order of the Court was made by P.D.DINAKARAN,J.)<\/p>\n<p>\tThe second respondent herein clamped an order of detention as against the detenu  Mahesh, son of Rajendran, as the said authority arrived at the subjective satisfaction that the said detenu is a Goonda and he has to be detained under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Officers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982).\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2.  Challenging the abovesaid detention, the mother of the detenu has come forward with the present Habeas Corpus Petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to call for the records pertaining to the detention order passed against the detenu by the second respondent in BDFGISSV.No.249 of 2007, dated 16.6.2007, set aside the same and to direct the respondents to produce the body of the detenu, now detained at Central Prison, Puzhal, before this Court and to set him at liberty.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3.1. The order of detention dated 16.6.2007 was passed on the basis of ground case in Crime No.488 of 2007 for alleged commission of offences under Sections 341, 336, 397 and 506(2) IPC, complaint of which was lodged by one Rajendran.  According to Rajendran, on 27.5.2007, while he was proceeding to Kalashetra Road near the Pillaiyar Temple junction a share auto bearing Reg.No.TN 07 AE 8618 crossed him and stopped and eight persons, including the detenu were in it.  Four of them got down from the share auto.  The associates of the detenu, Vijayakumar and Arul inserted hands into the shirt pocket of the complainant and took away cell phone and cash of Rs.200\/- and threatened to kill him. When the detenu and others got into auto and tried to escape, the complainant raised hue and cry and hearing that again accused and his associates got down from the auto and pelted stones on him.  The public who were at the spot noticing the atrocious activities ran for safer places out of fear of danger to their lives and properties.  Based on the complaint given by him a case, as stated above, was registered and the detenu was arrested.\n<\/p>\n<p>   3.2. Apart from the above, the detaining authority also took note of the five adverse cases pending against the detenu, viz.,<br \/>\ni. Crime No.170 of 2007 registered on the file of Thuraipakkam Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341 and 326 of IPC with reference to the occurrence said to have taken place on 24.3.2007;\n<\/p>\n<p>ii. Crime No.73 of 2007 registered on the file of Thiruvanmiyur Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 397 of IPC with reference to the occurrence said to have taken place on 25.1.2007;\n<\/p>\n<p>iii. Crime No.438 of 2007 registered on the file of Thiruvanmiyur Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 397 of IPC with reference to the occurrence said to have taken place on 11.5.2007;\n<\/p>\n<p>iv. Crime No.478 of 2007 registered on the file of Thiruvanmiyur Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of IPC with reference to the occurrence said to have taken place on 25.5.2007; and <\/p>\n<p>v.  Crime No.479 of 2007 registered on the file of Thiruvanmiyur Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of IPC with reference to the occurrence said to have taken place on 25.5.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3.3.  The detaining authority, having satisfied that the detenu is indulging in activities which are prejudicial to maintenance of public order, passed the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. Heard both sides.  We have perused the materials produced before us.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5. The main contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the Special report dated 15.6.2007, the sponsoring authority referred to four cases said to be pending against the detenu, viz., Crime Nos.73 of 2007, 381 of 2007, 478 of 2007 and 479 of 2007, but there is no such Crime No.381 of 2007 pending against him and the detaining authority has not applied its mind to the above fact by seeking clarification of the same from the sponsoring authority before passing of the detention order.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t6. Concededly, in the order of detention five adverse cases were stated to be pending against the detenu, viz.,  Crime Nos.170 of 2007, 73 of 2007, 438 of 2007, 478 of 2007 and 479 of 2007, but nowhere a reference is made to Crime No.381 of 2007, which is stated to be pending against the detenu as per the special report dated 15.6.2007.  When there is such contradiction in the crime number referred to, the detaining authority ought to have sought for clarification from the sponsoring authority.  Non appreciation of the said vital fact vitiates the order of detention.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tFor the reason aforesaid, the detention order is liable to be set aside and accordingly, the same is set aside.  This petition is allowed.  The order of detention dated 16.6.2007 is set aside.  The detenu is directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required connection with in any other crime.  No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>(P.D.D.J.)(R.R.J.)<br \/>\n13.11.2007<br \/>\nIndex\t\t:\tYes\/No<br \/>\nInternet\t:\tYes\/No<\/p>\n<p>sasi<\/p>\n<p>To:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.The Secretary to Government<br \/>\nProhibition and Excise Department<br \/>\n  State of Tamilnadu<br \/>\nFort St.George, Chennai-9.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.The Commissioner of Police<br \/>\n  Egmore, Chennai-8.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.The Public Prosecutor<br \/>\n  High Court, Madras.\n<\/p>\n<p>P.D.DINAKARAN,J.\n<\/p>\n<p>AND<br \/>\nR.REGUPATHI,J.\n<\/p>\n<p>[sasi]<\/p>\n<p>H.C.P.No.1143 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>13.11.2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.11.2007 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.DINAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.REGUPATHI H.C.P.No.1143 of 2007 Lalitha .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Secretary to Government Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat Fort St.George, Chennai-9. 2. The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-01T02:27:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-01T02:27:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\"},\"wordCount\":867,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\",\"name\":\"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-01T02:27:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-01T02:27:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007","datePublished":"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-01T02:27:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007"},"wordCount":867,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007","name":"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-01T02:27:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lalitha-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lalitha vs The Secretary To Government on 13 November, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86758\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}