{"id":86973,"date":"2010-10-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010"},"modified":"2014-04-12T06:49:41","modified_gmt":"2014-04-12T01:19:41","slug":"k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
A14 1 Al'\n[N 'l'H}E3 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT EAI\\IOA;I,O_RE\nDATED THIS TIIE 25TH DAY OR OCTOBER, 20I~0j\n\nPRESENT\n\n'mE I~IOI\\I'I3LE MR. JUST\u00a3CE.V,G.SA.B'F\u00a3I'I;H'i:T'\"~._  \n\n      \nTHE HONBLE MRS. \n\nBETWEEN:    i    L\n\nS\/() LATE     \nSENIOR Cl'l\"I.Z\u00a3\u00a7N5\u00a7H1P NOT.'_cI. \" IIVIED.\nAGED AB'OUT'j72 Y'3EfL'&RS., QCCENIL;\n\nR\/O NQ.8,  6T:H{.VCR_O'-SS,\nSAJAYANAOAR, * .j-~ I   1- '\nBANGALORE, ' ' 'V\n\n L  APPELLANT\n\n ._ {By.SaI'iI s.M.cRAIxIp_RAsHEKAR, ADV.)\n\n\"I h  BZ&Nf;;1\u00a7L>SRE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA\n\n-. __ IJLANMNG AUTHORITY.\nNO, 10, IST FLOOR, sI~IAI\\I'I'I NAOAR,\nS13 LIBELE ROAD, DEVANAHALLI TOWN.\n\n\"  E';I.ORE RURAL DIST,\n\n REP BY ITS MEIVIBER SECRETARY.\n\nU  DIRECTOR,\n\nRENAISSANCE HOLDINGS 81 DEVELOPERS PVT\nLTD, NO.I2, EST CROSS, 6TH MAIN\".\nMALLES}'1\\NA.RAE\\\/I , BAN GALORE} 5 5 .\n\n3 SOB}-IA LlF]\u00a7\u00a7S'.I\"YLI*3,\nSY. N035, TIMMEGOUDAN l~{OSAHAl.l.l VILLAGE\nKASABA l\"IOI3LI, I.)EVA.NAI\"{.ALL} TOWN,\n\n\n\n')\n\nBANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.\nREP BY ITS DIRECTOR.\n\n REsPoNi;i\u00a7;Nfrs\n\n{By Sri: S.G.PAl\\lDIT FOR R1, SRI KSUMAN  \nP.S.RAJAC'zOPAL FOR SR1 lVI.l\\\/LDESHPANDEE. AIJfV\"., : '\n\nTHIS WRIT APPEAL 'l:S'\"--~.FILFl.13: llU_\/s'@iw..1 THE \n\nKARNATAKA HIGH comm' ACT_\"PRAY1N'o_ 'l\"O.'.=SE27l' ASIDE\nTHE ORDER PASSED 1N_H_'*-T_Hr._\u00bb WRIT PETITION\nNO.1028\/2010[GM~RES']'DATED13..\/:01.\"\/2010.  \n\nThis Appeal coniingzlolnlolr  Hearing this\nday, SABHAHITJ..,:4'ti:e1iv\u20ac=;iie<l  l-.()Vl'l'\u20act',t""v_"'~"-llfulgi  "\n\n lthelllulrlsuccessftll petitioner in\nW.P.Nol.l}.O\ufb01$\/ by the order passed by\n\nthe l\u20acf\u00a3:1I'I1\u20acCl.Zl'""Si1'1glV6 j._uo~ge"de1ted 13.1.2010 wherein the writ\n\n petjtilorii dis"I11i.s.s.ed. declining to interfere with the\n\n 's2iii'e.tio11\u00a73ld lpl4\u00e9{r1..wl1icl1 was impugned in the writ petition by\n\nholhciing  disputed question of fact in the title has to\n\nbe   the Competent civil Court.\n\n The'. appellant lierein filed W.P.l.\\lo.1028\/201.0\n\n  cliall_e11ging the Sanetionecl plan dated 1.2.3.200'? issued by\n\n  first respondeni.~Bangalore Iriieriiationzil Airport Area.\n\nPlanning Authority in favour of the second and third\n\nlespondeni. in respe(*t: of petii'.io1ier's land bearing No.56 {Old\n\nmg\n\n\n\n,3s\n\nSy. No.35] measuring 4 acres situated at '1'immeg0uda.n\n\nHosahalli Village. Kasaba Hobli. Devanahalli \n\nBangalore Rural District. as per Am1exure--B8  \n\npetition.\n\n3. It is the case of   that\nNagappa S\/0.ML1r1is\\Arani8i}:)..\u00a7a_ Awgas land bearing\nSy. No.35 [new Sy.N0.5fi}-- situated at\nTimrneg0udan_f:ids:}iii8.lli_Villiige,  called schedule\nproperty}. 6.'  and Subbarayappa\nS\/K  pfoperty under the\nregistei-ed' 's'ale  10.5.1945 Vide Registered\n\nNo.152.3\/44!4"5.V_:'8o\u00a2:1\u00a7'i., Volume 488, Pages 167 to 188\n\n V' "1#egisi.eieaji\u00a2in{he 0fii'CE'5"0i'V the Sub~Registrar Devanahalli. The\n\nii_e\u00e9Qi_'d'  produced as per Annexure B1 to 1312. It\n\nis i'fiifthe1f'"'e:\u00e9;"er1'ed that the name of Subbarayappa.\n\n0.AVea1fcippa appears in Coiumn No.9 and 12 from the year\n\nA  2004 which indicates tliat the said Subbarayappa\n\n'  w\u00e9'?,gs khatedar and possessor of land in Sy.No.56.\n\n 4. It is the f1.u"f.'ner  of the pe1ii.i011er fzhai: after the\n\ndeath ol'Sub1:)a1*ayappa, the name of his legal represemiemves\n\nD.S.Neeiakaz'1i:aia}.1. and I).S.Shiva1'1a181d appeaiwzd in the\n\nK893\/.'\u00a7\n\n\n\n...;;\u00a7,...\n\nrecord of rights and the petitioner has pu1'el1a'sed.:""t\u00a3ha'\n\nschedule property on 2.12.2008 from \n\nrepresentatives of Subbarayappa S...\/o. it.llisl_l_:E..he._V \n\nfurthei' case of the petitioner that  \n\nbeen issued without notice"i_,o"---his \\A"'6I1ClO.I'S: _a.n'e\u00a7"'--w.il:h01it. v '\n\nConsidering the revenue  prodii.ced_:V._Al3\u00a7\ufb02t'-bre t.he\nplanning authority. tlA1e'l.l_in2i_piig'nevd:sanctioned plan is\nliable to be set aside as  it=--  and violative of\nArticle 14   According to the\npetitioner, tlie no  to sanction plan in\n bearihg Sy.No.56 in favour of\nsecond  and the sanctioned plan is\n\nliableto the \n\n V.  The:pe'i,i'i:iQn was resisted by respondent Nos. 2 and 3.<\/pre>\n
 Judge after hearing t.he counsel<\/p>\n
appea1’i11_g’ib.rl”lthe petitioner passed order on 13.1.2010 at the<\/p>\n
:”‘st..age of.-~151’e1irz1i11ary hearing itself and held that having<\/p>\n
 _li–~.ega’rd to the contention of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
 .. _peiitionerwappeliant herein wherein the petitioner requested<\/p>\n
‘this court to issue an order of injunction restraining<\/p>\n
respondent Nos. 2 and 3 from putting up c:onstruct.ioi1 and
\nthat. the title of the petitioner was required to be established<\/p>\n
before a eivii c:ou.1’t., an order of i.nj1i3’1ction Could not be<\/p>\n
‘$.53<\/p>\n
lI5’3?lt1’enei\u00a2’;i I<\/p>\n
,5W<\/p>\n
greinted. That time and again, it. has been held t.hat.__the<\/p>\n
reflection of the name in the revenue records wot_;vlvd_:”-not<\/p>\n
confer title and hence, the disputed question of .<\/p>\n
not be gone into by this court in \\”\u00bb.*-r1’it1′}u~risdli\u00a3Tt.i’e1.1′ of<\/p>\n
court since the petitioner clamietlz to have .pl:l37C1’1\u00abt7iS\ufb01?(:lV the<\/p>\n
property in the year 2009g__and the__setn_etio1ied.  of the
\nyear 2007 and no sale deed:”wasV_  to show that
\nhe has any seniblanee ottitlegf ‘learned singie
\nJudge held  tot:  pronounce as to
\nwhether the\u20acpet’it:iV’:irierll to the property in
\nql1\u20acSlLiO1″lyi11’vE?t’ V226 of the Constitution.
\nof Endia. lA’B.Veing “‘o_;_t,:\/’tlie order of the learned single
\njudge E. dated l”1s:.Vi;2o1o;- this appeal is filed by the writ<\/p>\n
{-\n<\/p>\n
\/”,  No’t.vie”e,Vgwrijsvissued to the respondents and respondent.<\/p>\n
 N0.3″‘\u00ab\u00ab.i1a\\z_e’fiiled their statenient of objections denying the<\/p>\n
 \u00e91’Jeifn1er1t.s”n1ade in the writ petition and contended that<\/p>\n
 _ res’p.oI1=dente No.2 purchased various properties situated at<\/p>\n
it   TiIi1II1\u20acgOL1dEil1 imlosahalli Village under registered sale deeds<\/p>\n
\u00abilbetiween 8″” and 12*” I’e.b1’ua1*y, 1986 for vaitizzible<\/p>\n
consideration. Appliezitions for conversion of land zneastiring
\n4 acres in respect: of the property was filed in the year 1995.<\/p>\n
 i*eq1.zired Lirider Section 95 01’ the Kzuiiatakai Leirid<\/p>\n
there is an exparte order of temporary injunction <\/p>\n
in the said suit against respondent Nos. 2 and.–A”3*–. : ‘<\/p>\n
Counsei also submitted that the qu_esti.oI1 of <\/p>\n
sanctioned plan cannot be granted:”\u00bbby1’_th~e a:ui:_h’crit.yVV<\/p>\n
Section 76 of the Karnataka Tow’1’r.oand C3ot1ntryd’~;Act, * it<\/p>\n
1961 as the bar of legal proceedpi\u00bbn_gs_V_vi.s   State
\nGovernment, the P1annin–g;:A1iti1or%:it\u00a7t  public servant or
\npersons duly appointed-i’~or._  this Act, in
\nrespect of     purporting to be
\ndone under it or the rules made
\n‘thereunder. 1 single judge ought to have
\ngone into’   and considered whether the<\/p>\n
sanctiorxed p4I.a:1.Ais’i1″1 accordance with law and ought to have<\/p>\n
.,,_a1ioWedE\u00bb–the”writ petition as the impugned order sanctioning<\/p>\n
 =p1V3..’i’.(1,’VViI’._Cif~I’\u20acSp()I’1d\u20acI’1t Nos. 2 and 3 is arbitrary and<\/p>\n
perzfersef. . L’  ‘T<\/p>\n
 12.  senior counsel appearing for respondent No.3<\/p>\n
 V.so.bmitted that the enquiry has been held in accordance with<\/p>\n
‘   and the petitioner has purchased the property during<\/p>\n
” “the pendency of the proceedings before the Civil Court” The<\/p>\n
property has been converted in the year 1995 and he has<\/p>\n
made available the original records which contained the<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
proceedings pertaining to the issue of original sanctmned<\/p>\n
plan dated 12.3.2007 and also niodified plan dated _<\/p>\n
and submits that oid Sy.No.35 is now given  .<\/p>\n
1′.hCl’@f()I’E3, modi\ufb01cation has become 1″ie’eesis”ai3′?.<\/p>\n
13. Learned counsel for the  i’es.}3ondeAnt.=
\nthat the second 1’esp0nr:ient  oirtihe ‘property
\nhaving valid title to the  is not the
\nowner of the property:-xvhi\ufb01ni  sanctioned.<\/p>\n
14. In repljini  for the appellant
\nSubmm\u00a2d,(hat.A:i;fi    of Section 42 of the
\nAct since’._&the_re  regard to petitioner and<\/p>\n
second respo-ndent’ -regarding the schedule property. the<\/p>\n
– . \u00a72I1qL1v_’:’f_’:J. oaght to have___be.en heid.<\/p>\n
 “given our careful consideration to the<\/p>\n
contentionsdraipsed by the parties and scrutinized the<\/p>\n
‘ Vrnat.eria1. on record.\n<\/p>\n
”_16.” ‘ii-Theiiiniziteriai on record eleariy shows that there is<\/p>\n
 about titie to the schedule property bearing<\/p>\n
“..VVVSyCNo.35. New No. 56. measuring 4 acres of<\/p>\n
HTimrnegoudanhalli Village. Devanahalli Taluk between the.<\/p>\n
petitioner and the second respondent and his predecessors<\/p>\n
\\;<Za\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n
alt)\u00bb
\nin title. It is not in dispute that the property was coimerted<\/p>\n
For non~ag.riculi.ural purpose in 1995 and tl1ereal7t.ei*–._on<\/p>\n
12.3.1997 sanctioned plan was ordered and   ~<\/p>\n
purchased the property. lt. is also__tnot__ in the <\/p>\n
predecessor title had filed 0.3001 \/08'  sou';gh't..:t'er:}}:)orary <\/p>\n
injunction which was rejected the  suit was
\neventually withdrawn   .tli:"\/'–l.'V[l0l'eiidency of the said
\nsuit, the petit1one_r  property on
\n2.12.2008    petitioner has
\npurchased  ytendor who according to
\nthe  to  schedule property is after
\nthe plan'   12.3.2007 and modified on<\/p>\n
7.7.2007 and et:VheV.aVerme"r:its made in the writ. petition and<\/p>\n
.\u00ab4.\/'."t:h\u20ac':"'6bjiEC1,i0I1 st.ate1'nent filed by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3<\/p>\n
  there is dispute about the title t.o the<\/p>\n
 praperty. It is well settled that disputed questions<\/p>\n
 of fact vizlviixicli pertain to title t.o the property cannot: be gone<\/p>\n
 intoin exercise of writ jurisdiction of this court and though.<\/p>\n
the learned counsel for the appellant subniitted that the<\/p>\n
petitioner is only seeking quashing of the sanctioned plan<\/p>\n
the same cannot be gone into in View of.' Section 76 of the<\/p>\n
Act. The averinents of the counsel is not helpful in the<\/p>\n
present case and even Section 42(3) provides that decision of<\/p>\n
~12~<\/p>\n
The original records shaii be 1"et.urr1ed ta respQ–;'1<J1eI1t<\/p>\n
No.1 after Gbtaining acknoxvledgenlent.<\/p>\n
  sai%\u00a7%Y   <\/p>\n
T  % <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & B.V.Nagarathna A14 1 Al’ [N ‘l’H}E3 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT EAI\\IOA;I,O_RE DATED THIS TIIE 25TH DAY OR OCTOBER, 20I~0j PRESENT ‘mE I~IOI\\I’I3LE MR. JUST\u00a3CE.V,G.SA.B’F\u00a3I’I;H’i:T'”~._ THE HONBLE MRS. BETWEEN: i L S\/() LATE SENIOR Cl’l”I.Z\u00a3\u00a7N5\u00a7H1P NOT.’_cI. ” IIVIED. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport ... on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport ... on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-12T01:19:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-12T01:19:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":969,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\",\"name\":\"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport ... on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-12T01:19:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport ... on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport ... on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-12T01:19:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-12T01:19:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010"},"wordCount":969,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010","name":"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport ... on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-12T01:19:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-varada-raju-vs-bangalore-international-airport-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Varada Raju vs Bangalore International Airport … on 25 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86973\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}