{"id":87575,"date":"2011-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2"},"modified":"2019-03-07T19:07:43","modified_gmt":"2019-03-07T13:37:43","slug":"mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                    at\n                                              New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                      File\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001731\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a023,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision:\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a023,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nAppellant\n\n\nShri\u00a0Dev\u00a0Raj\u00a0Kathuria\nH.No.\u00a019,\u00a0Jyoti\u00a0Park\nNear\u00a0Jagdamba\u00a0Hospital\nGurgaon\u00a0\u00ad122001\nHayana\n\nThe\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n\nRespondents\u00a0\n\n\nDepartment\u00a0of\u00a0Food,\u00a0Supplies\u00a0and\u00a0Consumer\u00a0Affairs\nDelhi\n\nRepresented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0H.P.\u00a0Meena,\u00a0AC(ND)\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shakti\u00a0Bangar,\u00a0FSO\n\n\n\n                     Information\u00a0Commissioner    :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                           In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                              at\n                                                      New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001731\n                                                           ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>   1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a008.02.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Food\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Supplies\u00a0Department,\u00a0<br \/>\n        New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0requesting\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0following\u00a0information:\n<\/p>\n<p>        &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;.Kindly\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0that\u00a0which\u00a0inspector\u00a0had\u00a0inspected\u00a0the\u00a0property\u00a0bearing\u00a0no. \u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>        18, \u00a0 Krishna \u00a0 Market, \u00a0 Lajpat \u00a0 Nagar \u00a0and\u00a0 which\u00a0report \u00a0was\u00a0submitted\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0department, \u00a0please \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        provide\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0report.\n<\/p>\n<p>        Please\u00a0also\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0month\u00a0Vandana\u00a0Rani\u00a0used\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0the\u00a0ration \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        from\u00a0Ration\u00a0Shop\u00a0from\u00a01992\u00a0to\u00a01995&#8243;.\n<\/p>\n<p>   2. Since\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0receive\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0despite\u00a0reminders,\u00a0he\u00a0<br \/>\n        filed \u00a0 his \u00a0 first \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 on \u00a0 02.05.11. \u00a0 Acting \u00a0 on \u00a0 this \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Appellant,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0passed\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0on\u00a025.05.11\u00a0recording\u00a0therein\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        has\u00a0already\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0on\u00a026.02.2011.\u00a0From\u00a0this\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0(AA)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        noted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 sought \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 could \u00a0 not \u00a0 be \u00a0 given \u00a0 to \u00a0 him \u00a0 due \u00a0 to \u00a0 non\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>        availability\u00a0of\u00a0records,\u00a0which\u00a0pertained\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a01992\u00adalmost\u00a020\u00a0years\u00a0old.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0explained\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 that \u00a0 during \u00a0 that \u00a0 period\u00a0 this \u00a0 variety \u00a0 of\u00a0 records \u00a0 was \u00a0 created \u00a0 manually\u00a0 and \u00a0 that,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        therefore, \u00a0 it \u00a0 would \u00a0 not \u00a0 be \u00a0 possible \u00a0 for \u00a0 them \u00a0 to \u00a0 retrieve \u00a0 those \u00a0 records \u00a0 now. \u00a0 He \u00a0 accordingly\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        endorsed \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO&#8217;s \u00a0 reply. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 thereafter \u00a0 filed \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 before \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Commission \u00a0 on \u00a0 04.07.2011 \u00a0 calling \u00a0 in \u00a0 question \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents&#8217; \u00a0 statement \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 records\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0are\u00a020\u00a0year\u00a0old\u00a0as,\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0him,\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0only\u00a016\u00a0to\u00a018\u00a0years\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        old.\u00a0He\u00a0accordingly\u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0to\u00a0look\u00a0into\u00a0the\u00a0matter.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>   3.   Heard\u00a0submissions.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4.   Since\u00a0the\u00a0information,\u00a0per\u00adse,\u00a0is\u00a0admittedly\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0its\u00a0disclosure\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>            authorized.\u00a0Moreover,\u00a0the\u00a0cause\u00a0for\u00a0non\u00adavailability\u00a0of\u00a0present\u00a0records\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0reasonable\u00a0given\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>            that\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0almost\u00a016\u00a0to\u00a018\u00a0years\u00a0old.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5.   In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above,\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0appeal\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0allowed.\u00a0Rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>       6.   It\u00a0is,\u00a0however,\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Registry\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0has\u00a0entered\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0as\u00a0&#8216;Dev\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>            Pankaj\u00a0Khaturia&#8217;\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0data\u00a0base\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0incorrect.\u00a0The\u00a0correct\u00a0name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0record\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>            &#8216;Dev\u00a0Raj\u00a0Khaturia&#8217;.\u00a0The\u00a0Registry\u00a0is,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0immediately\u00a0rectify\u00a0its\u00a0mistake.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                         (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>1.          Shri\u00a0Dev\u00a0Raj\u00a0Kathuria<br \/>\n            H.No.\u00a019,\u00a0Jyoti\u00a0Park<br \/>\n            Near\u00a0Jagdamba\u00a0Hospital<br \/>\n            Gurgaon\u00a0\u00ad122001<br \/>\n            Hayana<\/p>\n<p>2.          The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n            Department\u00a0of\u00a0Food,\u00a0Supplies\u00a0and\u00a0Consumer\u00a0Affairs<br \/>\n            &#8216;K&#8217;\u00a0Block,\u00a0Vikas\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0I.P.\u00a0Estate<br \/>\n            New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110002<\/p>\n<p>3.          The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n            &amp;\u00a0Assistant\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0(New\u00a0Delhi)<br \/>\n            Food\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Supplies\u00a0Department<br \/>\n            &#8216;M&#8217;\u00a0Block,\u00a0Vikas\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0I.P.\u00a0Estate<br \/>\n            New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110002<\/p>\n<p>4.          Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<br \/>\n Note:\u00a0In\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0above\u00a0directives\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0complied\u00a0with\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0<br \/>\nfile\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0<br \/>\ncopy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<br \/>\nmay\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001731 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a023,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision:\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a023,\u00a02011 Parties:\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant Shri\u00a0Dev\u00a0Raj\u00a0Kathuria H.No.\u00a019,\u00a0Jyoti\u00a0Park Near\u00a0Jagdamba\u00a0Hospital Gurgaon\u00a0\u00ad122001 Hayana The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present. Respondents\u00a0 Department\u00a0of\u00a0Food,\u00a0Supplies\u00a0and\u00a0Consumer\u00a0Affairs Delhi Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0H.P.\u00a0Meena,\u00a0AC(ND)\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shakti\u00a0Bangar,\u00a0FSO Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001731 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a008.02.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Food\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Supplies\u00a0Department,\u00a0 New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0requesting\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0following\u00a0information: &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;.Kindly\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0that\u00a0which\u00a0inspector\u00a0had\u00a0inspected\u00a0the\u00a0property\u00a0bearing\u00a0no. \u00a0 18, \u00a0 Krishna \u00a0 Market, \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-07T13:37:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-07T13:37:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\"},\"wordCount\":538,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\",\"name\":\"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-07T13:37:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-07T13:37:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-07T13:37:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2"},"wordCount":538,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2","name":"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-07T13:37:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dev-pankaj-kathuria-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-september-2011-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Dev Pankaj Kathuria vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}