{"id":87678,"date":"2009-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009"},"modified":"2019-03-27T09:15:24","modified_gmt":"2019-03-27T03:45:24","slug":"mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                        Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                      Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                             Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                            Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002325\/5462Penalty\n                                                          Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002325\n\nSHOWCAUSE HEARING:\n\nAppellant                           :       Mr. Ajay Kumar,\n                                            S\/o Shri Jai Narain,\n                                            A-167,-A, Shiv Vihar,\n                                            (Near Kamlesh Public School), Vikas Nagar,\n                                            Uttam Nagar, New Delhi- 110059.\n\nRespondent    1)                    :       Mr. P.Bose (Licensing Inspector),\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi.\n                                            O\/o Deputy Commissioner,\n                                            West Zone, Rajouri Garden,\n                                            New Delhi- 110027.\n\nRespondent    2)                    :       Mr. Ashok Kumar (Rent Collector)\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi.\n                                            O\/o Deputy Commissioner,\n                                            West Zone, Rajouri Garden,\n                                            New Delhi- 110027.\n\nRTI application filed on            :       20\/03\/2009\nPIO replied                         :       13\/08\/2009\nFirst appeal filed on               :       08\/07\/2009\nFirst Appellate Authority order     :       24\/08\/2009\nSecond Appeal received on           :       15\/09\/2009\nDate of Notice of Hearing           :       12\/10\/2009\nHearing Held on                     :       11\/11\/2009\n\nBACKGROUND<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>Information Sought<br \/>\nThe Appellant has sought copies of original Tehbazari allotment letters dated 27\/01\/2009, letter<br \/>\nNo AC-WZ\/2009\/D-908 dated 27\/01\/2009 and the name of the allotted Tehbazari site boundary<br \/>\nDushera Park, opposite F Block, Vikaspuri, Delhi. The Appellant also wanted to know whether<br \/>\nany license fee of Tehbazari was due against him and if he was issued allotment letter,<br \/>\npossession slip and identity card in respect of the newly allotted Tehbazari site.\n<\/p>\n<p>Reply of PIO (after 1st Appeal)<br \/>\nThe PIO mentioned that till date no Tehbazari has been allotted to the Appellant and the<br \/>\nAppellant&#8217;s name was erroneously added in the letter sent to SHO &#8216;wherein it was requested to<br \/>\nallow him to squad at F Block boundary wall&#8217;. The Appellant was not provided any possession<br \/>\nslip or Tehbazari identity card.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                 Page no. 1 of 4<br \/>\n First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>No information provided by the PIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order of the FAA:\n<\/p>\n<p>The FAA observed that the PIO (AC\/WZ) had mentioned that the complete reply to the queries<br \/>\nof the Appellant had been sent vide No AC\/WZ\/2009\/512 dated 13\/08\/2009 and therefore the<br \/>\nFAA disposed off the case.\n<\/p>\n<p>Ground of the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Unfair disposal of the appeal by FAA.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts that emerged during Hearing on 11 November 2009 :<br \/>\n&#8220;The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumar;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. Dalip Singh, Public Information Officer &amp; AC;\n<\/p>\n<p>        The PIO claims that he had sent a letter on 23\/03\/2009 stating &#8220;applicant may be requsted<br \/>\nto submit the photocopy of the document indicated vide point number 1,2,3,4 in his RTI<br \/>\napplication so the same could be verified in this office and reply could be given accordingly. He<br \/>\nalso claims that after the order of the FAA on 13\/08\/2009 he has sent a reply to the Appellant in<br \/>\nwhich he has stated as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;a)     As per document submitted by applicant, no tehbazari has been allotted to him by this<br \/>\n        office, only he was called to submit the documents.\n<\/p>\n<p>b)      NO<br \/>\nc,d,e) His name was erroneously added in the letter sent to SHO wherein it was requested to<br \/>\n        allow him to squad at F-Block Boundary wall.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      Information provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      No.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      Documents shows that he is not allottee of any tehbazari site.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>    The information now brought by the PIO and given to the appellant before the Commission<br \/>\nstates, &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>    1.     The applicant paid license fee upto 31.3.2008, the balance tehbazari fee is due for the<br \/>\n           period w.e.f. 1.4.2008 to 31.3.2010 i.e. Rs.3960\/- for two years.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    2.     No allotment letter has been issued. Since the tebazari measuring 6&#8217;x4&#8242; sanctioned in<br \/>\n           his favour, therefore, he has been allowed to squat in F-Block Vikas Puri.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    3.     As above.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    4.     No.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>    It is apparent that just because the matter came before the Commission the truth has been<br \/>\nacknowledged that the Appellant is eligible for the tehbazari. The Respondent states that the<br \/>\nfalse information was provided by the deemed PIOs Mr. P.Bose (Licensing Inspector) and Mr.<br \/>\nAshok Kumar (Rent Collector). There are four other tehbazari holders who have come with the<br \/>\nAppellant whose names are Mr. Jawahar Chaudhary, Mr. Jagmohan and Mr. Changulal who<br \/>\nclaim they are eligible for the tehbazari but others who are squatting without any legal<br \/>\nrecognition at the place where they are permitted to squat are in collusion with MCD and Police<br \/>\nofficials harassing them. This is indeed a very distressing state of affairs and the Respondent<br \/>\nadmits that this is indeed the case. This Commission has no jurisdiction in these matters but<br \/>\nhopes that those who have jurisdiction in such matters will take a note of this. The commission<br \/>\nwould like to know that a majority of the tehbazari files are claimed to be stolen\/lost in various<br \/>\nzones and it appears that systematically those eligible are denied their rights.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                  Page no. 2 of 4<br \/>\n Commission&#8217;s Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>The information has been provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>Facts leading to Showcause:\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission was of not supplying the correct information by the PIO and<br \/>\ndeemed PIOs. From the facts before the Commission it was apparent that the then PIO Mr.<br \/>\nMadan Mohan and deemed PIOs Mr. P.Bose (Licensing Inspector), Mr. Ashok Kumar (Rent<br \/>\nCollector) are guilty of not furnishing correct information. Hence a showcause notice was issued<br \/>\nto them, and they were directed give their reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty<br \/>\nshould not be levied on them on 24 November 2009 at 10.30am.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Showcause Hearing on 24 November 2009:<br \/>\nThe following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent : Mr. Madan Mohan, the then Assistant Commissioner &amp; PIO;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             Mr. P.Bose (Licensing Inspector), West Zone;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             Mr. Ashok Kumar (Rent Collector), West Zone;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       The then PIO Mr. Madan Mohan states that the responsibility of locating the files and<br \/>\nproviding the answers was with Mr. P.Bose and Mr. Ashok Kumar the holders of information.<br \/>\nThe First reply on 13\/08\/2009 stated that no tehbazari has been allotted to the Appellant and his<br \/>\nname was erroneously in the letter sent to the SHO. It was also stated that, &#8220;documents show that<br \/>\nhe is not allottee of any tehbazari site&#8221;. Even after the order of FAA no effort was made to<br \/>\nprovide the correct information. Mr. P.Bose and Mr. Ashok Kumar claim that since Information<br \/>\nCommission called for a hearing, they made efforts to trace the file which they miraculously<br \/>\nfound and therefore gave the correct information on 06\/11\/2009 that the Appellant had indeed<br \/>\nbeen allotted a tehbazari site and had paid the tehbazari fee upto 31\/03\/2008. It appears that there<br \/>\nmay have been malafide in giving false information initially. The Respondent states that in their<br \/>\nzone out of 1200 tehbazaries about 500 files are claimed to be &#8220;not traceable&#8221;. In the entire MCD<br \/>\nsystem thousands of Tehbazari files are claimed to be &#8220;not traceable&#8221;. There appears to be some<br \/>\nfundamental systemic corruption by which the allottees of tehbazaris are bled by corrupt officers<br \/>\nby claiming that their files are missing, and it is necessary that some authority should take<br \/>\ncognizance of this if the capital of this Country is to live by any set of rules and laws.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Commission sees clear evidence that the holder of information Mr. P.Bose and Mr. Ashok<br \/>\nKumar have collaborated to deny the Appellant his tehbazari rights by not giving the correct<br \/>\ninformation and claiming that the file was &#8220;not traceable&#8221;. No reasonable cause has been brought<br \/>\nbefore the Commission for providing the false information initially that the Appellant was not<br \/>\nallottee of any tehbazari site. The Commission finds this as a fit case for levy of Penalty under<br \/>\nSection 20(1) of the RTI Act on both the officers. The first information provided to the Appellant<br \/>\non 13\/08\/2009 was false and the correct information was only provided on 06\/11\/2009. Since the<br \/>\nRTI application was filed on 20\/03\/2009 and the correct reply was given only on 06\/11\/2009 the<br \/>\ndelay was clearly more than 100 days and initially false information was supplied to the<br \/>\nAppellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                    Page no. 3 of 4<br \/>\n Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>            As per the provisions of Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act 2005, the Commission finds<br \/>\nthis a fit case for levying penalty on Mr. P. Bose (Licensing Inspector) and Mr. Ashok Kumar<br \/>\n(Rent Collector), MCD, West Zone, New Delhi. Since the delay in providing the correct<br \/>\ninformation has been over 100 days, the Commission is passing an order penalizing Mr. P.Bose<br \/>\nand Mr. Ashok Kumar for Rs. 25000\/ each which is the maximum penalty under the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>        The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to recover the amount of<br \/>\nRs.25000\/- each from the salary of Mr. P.Bose and Mr. Ashok Kumar and remit the same by a<br \/>\ndemand draft or a Banker&#8217;s Cheque in the name of the Pay &amp; Accounts Officer, CAT, payable at<br \/>\nNew Delhi and send the same to Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, Joint Registrar and Deputy<br \/>\nSecretary of the Central Information Commission, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, New Delhi\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 110066. The amount may be deducted at the rate of Rs.5000\/ per month every month from the<br \/>\nsalaries of Mr. P. Bose and Mr. Ashok Kumar and remitted by the 10th of every month starting<br \/>\nfrom December 2009. The total amount of Rs.25000 \/- levied on each will be remitted by 10th of<br \/>\nApril, 2010.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n                                                                                    Shailesh Gandhi\n                                                                          Information Commissioner\n                                                                                 24 November 2009\n\n1-     Commissioner\n       Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n       Town Hall, Delhi- 110006\n\n2.     Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar,\n       Joint Registrar and Deputy Secretary\n       Central Information Commission,\n       2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan,\n       New Delhi - 110066\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>             (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                          Page no. 4 of 4\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002325\/5462Penalty Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002325 SHOWCAUSE HEARING: Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar, S\/o Shri Jai Narain, A-167,-A, Shiv Vihar, (Near Kamlesh Public [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-27T03:45:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-27T03:45:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1382,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-27T03:45:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-27T03:45:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-27T03:45:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009"},"wordCount":1382,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009","name":"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-27T03:45:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajay-kumar-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Ajay Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 24 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87678"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87678\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}