{"id":87709,"date":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2"},"modified":"2014-04-10T05:36:36","modified_gmt":"2014-04-10T00:06:36","slug":"mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n
1\n\nin THE HIGH coum' OF KARNATAKA AT BANG!sL()Ri\u00a7 _\n\nDATED THIS THE 197% DAY OF MARCH;    A-\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.Jusri\u00a7:E ,Ki;iA\u00a3;1a\u00a7N:\u00a7A    7\n\nMISCELLANEOUS mesa\" :=;r1PEAL\"No;949;_;gV: V%\n\n ;\n\nLMAVAJI,\n\n3\/ CLDEVASI PATEL,\n\nAGE 45 ms, -. V \nR\/(ZLHARUGERI,   \n\nASHAPUR sAW.M;L1--.,. 1; _.   j'\ni)1sT.BELGp;.Um'...__  .    .\n\n2.JlVARAJ;    \" __\ns\/0.1:>12:v;~_,sI' PATEL,  = \"  \"\nAGEAO YRS,' ' _ _  \" . \nR\/o.HARuGE:2;, \nASI;hji_\\PUR saw MELL,\n\n  ..... \n<\/pre>\n
‘ DIf.3’?.BEL{l$UM. .. APPELLANTS<\/p>\n
‘V   ‘($’Y~\u00abs3Ei\u00a73.,:3.sHAsrRY, ADV.)
\n5.13%     <\/p>\n
  ‘ MONAPPE ANNAPPA BADIGER,<\/p>\n
e  m.goR,”‘
\n R\/OHANATHA PLOT,
\n. ‘AHARUGER! VILLAGE,<\/p>\n
  ‘f\u00a7Q.RA}BAG,
\n  BELGAUM. .. RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
(BY SR1 M.H.PRAKASH, ADV.)<\/p>\n
..-h
\n‘:_’!,\u00a2 3\/,’<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U\/330(1) OF
\nTHE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED Q6\/8\/2005 FA,S4?\u00bbED “$N<\/p>\n
KAAPAAKA:SR-5222004 on THE FILE OF THE LABC\u00a7{3R-OF”-E-‘1CE_R\u00e9_
\nAND COMPENSATION. SUB-DIVISKEN-1, BELGAUM,’ Awwnirze v 4_
\nCOMPENSATION ow Rs.I,22,079\/— AND _D\u00a7REQTiN\u00a73._ -2’m:., <\/p>\n
APPELLANS HEREIN TO DEPOSIT  I<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL COMING cm F612 H:\u00a7:m\u00e9iN\u20acs._’mtS I\u00a7AY–,.,f1’isg<\/p>\n
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:’:__ “<\/p>\n
\n\nJUD  V\n\nThis appellants    have mum up\n<\/pre>\n
with this appca1_<_:hal]ensm1 _,'   V  awaxd passed<\/p>\n
by   ':  's Compensation,' Sub-\n<\/p>\n
  dated 26-8-2005<\/p>\n
mainly’   the respondent is not an<\/p>\n
 ‘_    and there was no tnzlatianship of<\/p>\n
‘  between them. There is inoxtlinatc<\/p>\n
   chain: petition. The evidence of other<\/p>\n
  :\u00abV.ci1\u00a3wit11csses does not oormboratiz with each other.<\/p>\n
 “i’he_reepondent has not produced any single paper to show<\/p>\n
she was an employee under the appellants. The pnva’ tn<\/p>\n
   ‘\u00e9emplamt \ufb01led by the respondent came to be <\/p>\n
 V<\/p>\n
2. Admittedly, the appellants are the  -‘\ufb021_V\u00a3:<\/p>\n
saw mill. The records indicate that = <\/p>\n
obtained licence to run the say’ <\/p>\n
_ workers to cut wood logs.   not<\/p>\n
disputed. Aooonifmg to} the I’e \u00a7pe’nzient,   as
\ncarpenter. On Wood,  eustainod a
\ncrush injury to the 1:11    his four \ufb01ngers
\nwent: out andfixf 5″‘ memrpal
\nbase. He   Home, Gokak
\non     to the counsel for
\nmsponemg  by one .19 Patil to the<\/p>\n
Nursing  T9]_pfL~_vS*e nature of injuries sustained by<\/p>\n
   the wound certi\ufb01cate. The<\/p>\n
 ‘   produced before this Court clearly<\/p>\n
 g V-a’ tv: :.-39 was \ufb01acture of 1,2,3 as 4 metacarpal<\/p>\n
  .. le\ufb01handandcxushinjuuywhik workingin the<\/p>\n
u x V’   of the appellants. The appclhnts have not seriously<\/p>\n
 about the discharge summary pmduoed by the<\/p>\n
 ” 1*espondent~1 be\ufb01m-: this Court. Initially the appellant<\/p>\n
disputed the relationship of employer and ‘_<\/p>\n
the Commissioner. Howcvcr, in View of the   <\/p>\n
P.Ws.1,2 & 3 coupled with    5337 b<\/p>\n
the respondent, it is clear that    ‘a,<\/p>\n
skilled’ iaboumr under the:\n<\/p>\n
contention of the appcilgants   maiioxidezit has not
\nproduced any salary  -of appointment.<\/p>\n
Usually, in thcffirxns  1\u00a7o’}\u00a7f;point:ncnt OI’d\u20ac:I’S<\/p>\n
_ will 13:: issgaa\ufb01v   in 3: Saw Mill but<\/p>\n
the  _tl_;;: discharge summaxy itself
\ncicarly  in the-said Saw Mill as
\na 95394   .  s<\/p>\n
–  3′;:Of  rcspondcnt has mkcn the oontcnticm<\/p>\n
      a\ufb01eld” cut, owner of the Saw Mill has<\/p>\n
 V. mm. Q ‘ : payment of czompcnsation but has &11cd–‘<\/p>\n
 to pa’3.r th\u00a2 same. Therefore, has got issued the notice mld<\/p>\n
A “ii tt\ufb01\u00e9fc-aiicr, ahr rcccipt of the reply, he \ufb01led a pzivatc<\/p>\n
fgompiaint before JMFC and hcnoc them is a dclay in \ufb01ling<\/p>\n
 the claim petition bcfom the Commissioner. Thcrcfom, the<\/p>\n
‘I.\n<\/p>\n
J,
\n‘J: :_\/’1’ &.\n<\/p>\n
Oom  ‘ has rightly accepted the  <\/p>\n
by the rcspomcnt-claimant in     ” . 2 <\/p>\n
appmaching the Commissions:   1’<\/p>\n
No.48]’2003 \ufb01led bcfom JMFC;V%’b${t11;; mgpegjgq\u00e9nt  to be
\ndismissed as the    su\ufb01cicnt
\nmatcxials and  to  witnesses
\nbcfom the Jngpgrrgaut inc: wand to deny the<\/p>\n
   icamcd oqunscl for the
\napPc1l\u00e9ints _is is tvariation in the evidence of<\/p>\n
p.ws.2 aga} V T115  himaclf has stated before the<\/p>\n
 ‘~   f35}2\ufb01v-.3;-,,-gswas working as a skilled labourer and<\/p>\n
 ‘   during the cows: of employment. Of<\/p>\n
 of the Saw Mill has not been cxam1n’ ed by<\/p>\n
  I  When then: are two workers in the Saw<\/p>\n
 V’ .. Mil;  of which had sustained injuries in the acciicn-t and<\/p>\n
 workcr had not been in a position to dcposc again’ at<\/p>\n
  the employer. Thercfom, the evidence of P.W.1 coupled with<\/p>\n
C ,.:\n<\/p>\n
the evidence of other witnesses shows that ‘\ufb01es<\/p>\n
working as skilled labourer in the Saw Min.  ‘<\/p>\n
respondent has not produced the  B3!’ <\/p>\n
his employer. At the tune’ of issui\ufb01g   <\/p>\n
has instructed his counsel  was   to” V L’<\/p>\n
R3200\/— per day. (b1;siie\ufb01ng…\u00a3\u00a31e_t%z(;t  he gig skilled
\nlabouier, in the % ;   oerti\ufb01catle, the
\nComml.-33′ inner has   ” respondent as<\/p>\n
per the     at Rs.2,203\/–\n<\/p>\n
per  ‘ ~   oonsidefmg the age
\nmen\ufb01ozoed’   has taken the age of<\/p>\n
the res_ponxienf’asV32  and has taken the loss of earning<\/p>\n
  atn   by applying the relevant factor,<\/p>\n
  at Rs.80,847\/–. The learned<\/p>\n
  appellants contended that respondent su\ufb02me<\/p>\n
 only”   ofearning capacity. The Doctor — P.W.4 has<\/p>\n
V’ ~  fehat respondent su\ufb01em only 40% disability ho the<\/p>\n
 limb but has not stated the func\ufb01ona} disability.<\/p>\n
V’ W’f’hc Commissioner has taken the loss of eanling capacity at<\/p>\n
 ;=;.i~’–‘”””\/<\/p>\n
_,.,.\u00ab<\/p>\n
30%. Considering the injuries susmined by  <\/p>\n
and the treatment undergone by him..a:od   u<\/p>\n
respondent is a skilled labourer   <\/p>\n
Mil], the functional disabiV1:\u00a7’t3t..Vat’A”3f:};-.3  <\/p>\n
Commissioner is excessive.  mojjeogieofil su\ufb02isrs
\nonly 23% of \ufb01mc\ufb01on\u00a7’I’\u00ab–\u00a2;i\u00a73;;Iji1it3_*’  ” as per the
\ncalculations,  is V   of<\/p>\n
Rs.67,362\/–H   ks,\u00e9r;,g4i’f:’e awarded by the<\/p>\n
   _ injvtjeresteawazded by the Commissioner
\non the  at the rate of 12% pa, after 30<\/p>\n
days. fmm  ._\u00a7iai:e.v’of ?aoei.ient is incorrect. The respondent\u00bb<\/p>\n
 i}’.=_{{enAt&tled.Ato mores: at 12% p.a. on the compensation<\/p>\n
 days from the date of passing of the award<\/p>\n
i;e.,, ‘\ufb01om_  an the date of deposit made by the<\/p>\n
 5. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed in part. The<\/p>\n
  judgment mud award passed by the Commissioner is hemby<\/p>\n
‘modi\ufb01ed. The respond t-claimant is czuti\ufb02ed to<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs.67,362\/- with interest    <\/p>\n
2&9-2005 till the date of dcpositgngndc fay”   <\/p>\n
\n\nThe amount in deposit bcforc \n\nto the concerned    *\n\nCompensation for payment.    to\nrcfund of the excess   by them.\n\n*sp _  \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 Author: K.Ramanna 1 in THE HIGH coum’ OF KARNATAKA AT BANG!sL()Ri\u00a7 _ DATED THIS THE 197% DAY OF MARCH; A- THE HONBLE MR.Jusri\u00a7:E ,Ki;iA\u00a3;1a\u00a7N:\u00a7A 7 MISCELLANEOUS mesa” :=;r1PEAL”No;949;_;gV: V% ; LMAVAJI, 3\/ CLDEVASI PATEL, AGE 45 ms, -. V R\/(ZLHARUGERI, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-10T00:06:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mavaji S\\\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-10T00:06:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":921,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\",\"name\":\"Mavaji S\\\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-10T00:06:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mavaji S\\\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-10T00:06:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-10T00:06:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2"},"wordCount":921,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2","name":"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-10T00:06:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mavaji-so-devasi-patel-vs-monappa-annappa-badiger-on-19-march-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mavaji S\/O Devasi Patel vs Monappa Annappa Badiger on 19 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}