{"id":88017,"date":"2009-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-02T03:22:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-01T21:52:30","slug":"ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n
WP N0.65488 of 2009\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 23rd DAY or OCTOBER \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE DR.JUS'I'ICE K_,B,HAKTHA\"ViAfT'SALA  ' 'V R\n\nWRIT PETITION No.654S8\/2%?) (A\/Pits\/IQ   at\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nM \/ s Mrutyunjay Traders,\nCommission Agents V I '~ *\nBy its Proprietor\n\nChandrashekhar Karabas'a:P\u00a5+'5iVa:t    9 '\n\nDevanagavi, Age: .55 years', - \n\nOcc: Business,'f?e;\/oz I\\\/funavalli\";  \n\nTq: Savadatti;*Dist:';7Be1ga}L1m.   '\n\n(By Srr....AB.-.V.SVorn ap:t1re,'4Ac1V0Cate)\nA N D: V 2 d \"t d\n\n1. Tire VDirector,\"  .  _____ M .\n\n A Agricillttire Marketing,\n\n' _V'Raj  Road,\n\n  'V  001.\n\n2. A'I\"he Sfecretary,\n\n AgIicu3_ture Produce Marketing\n  .. Corrxrnittee, Savadatti,\n\" Vg\ufb02ist: Belgaum.\n\n. . PETITIONER\n\n. . RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
‘   Smt. K.Vidyavathi, Addl. Govt. Advocate for R1<\/p>\n
Shri. Mall\ufb02-;arjun.C.Basareddy, Advocate for R2)<\/p>\n
WP No.65488 of 2009<\/p>\n
This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 81, 227
\nof the Constitution of India praying to quash the
\nimpugned order dated 15.09.2008 so far as it reiatesp to
\nPlot No.6 in Munavaili sub market yard vide Anrieiiut-reg
\nA passed by the 2nd respondent; and di~re_ct__’e-tjhe
\nrespondents to provide infrastructure in the_.ASub 1
\nyard Munavalli to enable to the petitionerto’=.co-nstruct”
\nshop and godown.   ‘ ii ” * <\/p>\n
This writ petition corninzg 03:1 “fo\u00a3’=
\nhearing this day, the Court made thevfo11owi1’1’g;.   ”
\nThe petitioner Viis._z’:ybefore;Vi_Vthig-..iiC’ourt praying for<\/p>\n
quashing the impugned.iordersdated”.[.”1’5.09.2008 at<\/p>\n
AnneXj;irei\u00a5iA*  theiwirespondents to provide
\ninfrastructure  yard, Munavaili to<\/p>\n
enable. the p”et_iition’er to oonstruct shop-cum–godown.<\/p>\n
V  counsel for respondent No.2 submits<\/p>\n
  the general direction given in Writ Appeal<\/p>\n
ii”=-‘~___”-\u00bb.No.161Q}2007 (Am\/1c) (N.V.Somashekar Vs. The APMC<\/p>\n
  rq21dfp.iOthers) disposed off on 19.12.1007 , a resolution<\/p>\n
ix ..\n<\/p>\n
Vi    to be passed and the impugned order was issued<\/p>\n
WP No.65488 of 2009<\/p>\n
to the petitioner stating that the plot allotted to the
\npetitioner for construction of shop–cum–godowng””was
\nforfeited on the ground that in spite of expiry
\nperiod as per the 1ease–cum–sa1e, the   <\/p>\n
yet put up construction. I  _ _ _ _ .\n<\/p>\n
3. Learned counsel forthe petitioner snbmitsii <\/p>\n
respondents have not provide’d3″neces.sary ‘i.n_frastriicture
\nso as to put up shoip’–~e_ums*godoi2\u00a7\/’nii”on theii”pi’ot which<\/p>\n
was allotted in favour    He further<\/p>\n
subrnits i’ii\u00a7:,entic.a1.casesythis court has granted
\none year time toiptttiupdicojnstruction and, therefore, the<\/p>\n
present petition rnayb.e”d’isposed off on identical terrris.<\/p>\n
 t’Learned..mco_iinse1 for respondent No.2 submits<\/p>\n
 thatetherem ‘is\u00b0”vio1ation of terms and conditions of the<\/p>\n
 deed agreement and, therefore, the<\/p>\n
‘.Vimp1ig:{ied “order came to be passed and there is no<\/p>\n
it ii{fi3iegal.ityHor infirmity in the impugned order.<\/p>\n
Ls<\/p>\n
WP No.65488 of 2009<\/p>\n
5. At the Very outset, it must be mentioned that
\nthe petitioner was not a party to the order dated
\n19.12.2007 made in N. V.Somashekar’s
\nView of the general direction given by the  K
\nof this Court, the respondents i
\nidentified the allottees gvho   Plizti
\nconstruction as per the   and V
\nrespondent No.2  order
\nforfeiting the plot <\/p>\n
iere; isi:’:r;;o- In-ateriaI”‘p;aced on record that the<\/p>\n
impugned” order  passed after affording an<\/p>\n
opportunitj\ufb01of  petitioner. However, this<\/p>\n
 dispoisectoif identical writ petitions granting<\/p>\n
 _one_  put up construction, The petitioner is<\/p>\n
also44ientitl.ed}_.for similar relief.
\n” Iri””.&th’e result, the writ petition is disposed of<\/p>\n
   one year time fro\ufb01ay to put up<\/p>\n
WP N0.65488 of 2009
\n: 5 :<\/span>
\nConstruction failing which the impugned order stands<\/p>\n
revived.\n<\/p>\n
Granted three weeks time to file
\nappearance by the Additional Government  _<\/p>\n
respondent No. 1 .\n<\/p>\n
I    <\/p>\n
Kms*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 Author: K.Bhakthavatsala WP N0.65488 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY or OCTOBER BEFORE THE I-ION’BLE DR.JUS’I’ICE K_,B,HAKTHA”ViAfT’SALA ‘ ‘V R WRIT PETITION No.654S8\/2%?) (A\/Pits\/IQ at BETWEEN: M \/ s Mrutyunjay Traders, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-01T21:52:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-01T21:52:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":496,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\",\"name\":\"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-01T21:52:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-01T21:52:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-01T21:52:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009"},"wordCount":496,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009","name":"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-01T21:52:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mrutyunjay-traders-vs-the-director-on-23-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. Mrutyunjay Traders vs The Director on 23 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88017"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88017\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}