{"id":88590,"date":"2010-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010"},"modified":"2015-09-24T05:27:55","modified_gmt":"2015-09-23T23:57:55","slug":"c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
.1.\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 23R\" DAY or NOVEMBER, 2010\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA\n\nWRIT PETITION NO.33391\/2010 (C-;M~cp_c,)'--TV\"7'Tf3 K\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nC.Narayana @ Babe;\n\nS\/0. late Chikka Byanna,\n\nAged about 38 years, V\n\nR\/0. No.486, 15* Main,  \n\n7\"' 'A' Cross, Vijayanagar II Stage';-T.\n\nBangalore -- 560 040.  '  ii\n...'PETITIONER\n\n(By Sri Shanmukhappatfoara APrci--\\J_s.)\n\n1. Smt. Vijaya,   . \nD\/_o. late\"Ch'i!<Vka.byann~a,\nW;\/0.y.Nagara3f_C.' '\n about 48 rs,\n\n  R;'0."'1\\I0._4'8.6, 15* Main,\n\nT = T'\/'"'_'A['Cr'0ss,*~Vijayanagar 11 Stage,\n\n _"-T\ufb01\ufb01angvamre~}V'\u00bb5'6O 040.\n\nbu'  \n\n2. \u00a7~'3--~rnt;._' 'M aAa::\u00a7"aAm ma,\nW\/0. 'irate Chikkabyanna,\n. Aged'-'about 83 years.\n\n Sharadamma,\n; W\/0. late Chikkabyanna,\nT Aged about 68 years.\n\n\n\n4. Sri Mahesh,\nS\/o. late Shamanna,\nAged about 38 years.\n\n5. Smt. Rathnamma,\nW\/o. Raghu,\nAged about 48 years.\n\n6. Smt. Bhagya, W\/O. Mohan,\nAged about 44 years.\n\n7. Smt. Leeia, W\/o. Devaraj,\nAged about 43 years.\n\n8. Smt. Prabha,\nW\/o. Jayachandra,\nAged about 41 years.\n\nAll are residents of i\\'.o\u00a7,a-186-_,\n15' Main, 7"' 'A' cross,  I  .\nVijayanagar 2*?" Stage.,._ _  '\nBangalore : E3.60~_04C). "  ' \n\n3.  '  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By Sri Su”h:..I,__S.,Ra”o.,  C\/R1)
\n,,._iTHIs wR”IT._,,I>ETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 225<\/p>\n
‘ ‘v.ANE;x_2’2??—AQRTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL
\n FOR THE_REC;QRDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
\n D:ATEO_ ‘2.9″”_SEPTEMBER 2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.25594\/2007
\nE’B.Y’\u00ab.I’THE’v f*L,EARI.I.E’D – CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT,<\/p>\n
BA..NGIALOREIf\u00a7\/IEDE ANNEXURE – A ON THE APPLICATION FILED
\nUNDER  6 RULE 17 WW SECTION 151 OF THE CPC.\n<\/p>\n
 PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING<\/p>\n
 IQIN ‘EQGROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:<\/p>\n
QRDER<\/p>\n
The 13*’ respondent\/plaintiff has filed
\nO.S.No.2S594\/2007 in the City Civil Court, Bangalore,<\/p>\n
against respondents 2 to 8 and the petitioner, whoui’s_:th_e<\/p>\n
8″‘ defendant in the suit, for partition and Otl’iel”_f:”.\u00e9.l’i’\u20ac.?-\u00a35′,-.’.__A:i\u00e9sifi\ufb02 M<\/p>\n
appiication was filed by the plaintiff on  ”  <\/p>\n
permission to amend the plaint. ::__The…a.ppii,cat,i’0’n4″iaayingga8′<\/p>\n
been allowed, the 8″‘ defendant-ihas fi’ie\u00a7i’this ‘.ri’r’\u00a7tV.p:etltio;n;’l<\/p>\n
2. Sri Shanmulg<happa,,_._.lea.r_n'e.d cohunsei appearing<\/p>\n
for the petitioner, firstlylizon-ten,_ded:. tth-e_ trial court has<\/p>\n
failed  notice,t-i:ha__\u00bbt"by"fil_l'i'n_g the application the plaintiff is
\nseeking 'for lithe plaint, which is totally<\/p>\n
inconsistent wit.h"Vthe' averments made in the plaint.<\/p>\n
itLeartned;'""'couns.el submits that, the admission made in the<\/p>\n
A"piai-n_t%.l'h"a'S"~~.b_ee.lnv.-sought to be erased by way of proposed<\/p>\n
amendrn_'er.t.3A He contends that, the tenable objections<\/p>\n
;"fi!.ed_, hassnot been considered and hence, the impugned<\/p>\n
,._'ord'erV\u00e9is irrational and illegal. Secondly, application for<\/p>\n
-amendment fiied earlier was aliowedgo be withdrawn<\/p>\n
\u00bb\/”.\n<\/p>\n
the said Will in favour of one S.T.3ayaram under a sale
\ndeed dated 30.10.1992.\n<\/p>\n
8. The suit was filed for partition claiming 1\/4″”<\/p>\n
share and to direct the defendants to put the plaiVnti._fiVin<\/p>\n
separate possession of her 1\/4″‘ share. The’_pet\u00abiti’o.n:e1’rp’<\/p>\n
who is the 8*” defendant in the suit, ha_s..—-fi.l_ed’wifittenv””  <\/p>\n
statement. The petitioner filed an :appli.i:atio’n> <\/p>\n
7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection’ of the’p!aint_,\u00bb”wVh,Li:;;h was
\nallowed and the plaint was rejVe’t:t’eci_VonV”t’i*le2:groii:nd that,
\nthe plaintiff had no cau’s;e_”of a.j:’tio,njto__fil;e–\u00abthe suit.” Plaintiff<\/p>\n
filed   the said order. The
\naPDeal 3llow_edj.’A’–on”‘-\u00ab.b’8;’C6.2009. Plaintiff filed an<\/p>\n
applioatioAn seeking \u00b0per’mission of the court to amend the<\/p>\n
.\u00ab”plainitV.i.E’e},  incorporate additional pleading as paras<\/p>\n
 for declaratory relief that, the Will<\/p>\n
2  date-d__ 2.S.O93.f1986 executed by late Chikka Byanna is not<\/p>\n
ll””\ufb01floippndino; on the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed memo dated<\/p>\n
:”2.o’.o2:}’2o1o to withdraw the said application and the<\/p>\n
l   .,prayer therein was allowed. \\<\/p>\n
\/”\n<\/p>\n
K .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. The plaintiff filed an application on 20.02.2010
\nunder Order 6 Rule 17 CPC seeking permission to insert in
\nthe plaint the proposed amendment at paras 5(a) to (n)<\/p>\n
and additional prayers (aa) (ab) & (ac). The reasons<\/p>\n
stated in the affidavit in support of the prayer  _<\/p>\n
of the amendment are that, to bring_-~homje:”eei<tain:" <\/p>\n
necessary facts which allegedly o.ame.-t_d if<\/p>\n
pursuant to the defendant filing virri.tten stateymrrent  <\/p>\n
that, the proposed amendmenVt"V\u00abirs a measure: to} explain
\ncertain facts.\n<\/p>\n
130. _fndrisyputedIy,”‘\u00ab.a_ctin_g on the registered Will
\ndated 2S.,_0’9,,198_t3 by Chikka Byanna, the<\/p>\n
respondent Nor-,1\/plaintiffrrrand the defendants 4 to 7 have<\/p>\n
   property bequeathed under the said Will, in<\/p>\n
cfavour ~of\u00abv..g”rie.i’-S;T.3ayaram under a registered sale deed<\/p>\n
dated 3,__0.’1.0.}’i992. The covenants in the said sale deed<\/p>\n
u”””–..r:”wit,h regard to the said testament is to the following effect:<\/p>\n
”  2′  .i5″Whereas, one Sri Chikka Byarma, S\/o.<\/p>\n
 Mitmishamappa. (the father of the vendors herein) was<\/p>\n
 enjoying the property bearing Municipal No.19, situated at<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
rt<\/p>\n
3″‘ Main, Hosahalli extension, Vijayanagar, Bangalore, a-sits<\/p>\n
sole and absolute beneficial owner together with<\/p>\n
properties. which he acquired by virtue of a family”partitijoln.:_it <\/p>\n
which is duly registered in the office of the  S<\/p>\n
Bangalore North Taluk, on 13.7. ]..96oO._and_’  <\/p>\n
document No.3].25 of Book–I, Volume:1$)’l5} ir1..pa.ges”i}5~2__ to it<\/p>\n
16].\n<\/p>\n
And whereas, the said Srilbhiizka  during his
\nlife time while enjoying theu_aboVe”‘sai:Clg operty together with
\nall rights, lawful titles etc’.;t testament
\nWill, on 25.9.1986, which jduhpeeg’iet:efe’:t— in the office of
\nthe Sub–Regist:rar”:;;.e:$ri_rampura1’n; :Ba’nga_lore on 25.9.1986,
\nas  Volurne:2], in pages
\n49 to    bequeathed all the
\nproperties  unto his wives and children.\n<\/p>\n
And the em E3-yanna, through the above
\ntestanientllexplained this  and allotted a port.ion of site<\/p>\n
meagsuriiig East VWest. 30′ feet and North to South 120′<\/p>\n
Sl”fectl;t.,\ufb01jmjlltlcie’ East  out of property bearing Municipal<\/p>\n
  daughter Smt. Bhagyamma [the vendor<\/p>\n
 andlallotted a portion of site measuring East to
\nWest. 40Vf_”\u00a7”eet’*”and North to South 30′ feet, on the south side<\/p>\n
Kin Easteifn side out of the same property bearing No.19, unto<\/p>\n
A daughter Snot. Vijayarnma {the vendor No.2, herein] and<\/p>\n
  allotted other portion of site measuring East to West 40′ feet
\n stand North to South 30′ feet on right–half middle side on<\/p>\n
 Eastern portion out of the property bearing No.19, unto his<\/p>\n
\/”\n<\/p>\n
‘{<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
daughter Smt. Prabhavathi (the vendor No.3, herein], and
\nallotted a portion of site measuring East to West 40′ feet and
\nNorth to South 30′ feet, on left–half middle side on Eastern
\nportion, out of property bearing No.19, unto his daughter<\/p>\n
Smt. Leelamma (the vendor No.4 herein) and also allotted<\/p>\n
another portion of site, measuring East to West ” <\/p>\n
North to South 30′ feet, on the North Side in Eastielrn  if<\/p>\n
out of the same property bearing  unto”his:’_da’ughte1’a.V
\nSmt. Rathnamma {the vendor No.5, l:1A_ere:ir1,]\u00ab,fj.’t_he fsaidp f<\/p>\n
Chikka Byanna, died intestate on 21,3.  leaving behindf”<\/p>\n
the above said Will for his succe-ssoijs.\n<\/p>\n
And whereas sub.s’equent”to”theulfdeath fof’SriV4Chikka
\nByanna, the Will bearing”i*egistere.d,v N’o.:62g\/A8687, has come<\/p>\n
into effect and aCC0rdingly.,.th,e’\\Zend’o1’sV’l”lo.’l to 5, herein<\/p>\n
above named werg..,pec0ti1e’V”s.ole and absolute owners to their
\nrespective portior1S’o.ir’~lA11d whereas, even the vendors<\/p>\n
herein beingoindividual owners of their respective shares.<\/p>\n
 up wereenjoying thesaid five portions of sites in joint making it<\/p>\n
Vasgavsinzg\ufb01le unit and are in peaceful possession of the same<\/p>\n
 tgiricgs’ from ‘the date of their acquisition.<\/p>\n
  vendors herein Smt. Bhagyamma, Smt.\n<\/p>\n
Vila\u00a7a,mi.na,’v'”;Sn1t. Prabhavathi, Smt. Leelamma and<\/p>\n
if'”.__V”‘Smt.Ratv1i1riamma, are the sole and absolute beneficial<\/p>\n
“t’0wnfei=s of the site measuring in all East to West 82’~–0’ feet<\/p>\n
 —  [inclusive of 12′ feet wide passage at the middle of 181
\nif  ..vendor’s share and between the 2″,  4″‘ and 51″ vendor’s<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
share which now treated as part and parcel of joint enjoying<\/p>\n
site] and North to South 120′ — 0′ feet, being East pvor_t’ioiri.,_<\/p>\n
out of property bearing Municipal No.19, (old No.<S:']"'siti;atet1:._A' <\/p>\n
at 3"' main, Hosahalli extension, Vijayanagar,"i\ufb01iarijgaiore; <\/p>\n
which is rnorefully and specifically \u00bb..des=i:'ribeCic–finV'  if<\/p>\n
'SCHEDULE' hereunder and hereinafter"~rCt7erred-..to 'as;-ethej<\/p>\n
'SCHEDULE SITE' and the; _\\rendo'rs'V–are peacemit'<\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment of the-v._s:a~;;1e wit1'1 .an_1ewtuji"i%:gi1ts,
\ntitles and interest and are at lib.ert3r__acnd 1ega11y_ent?it1ed to
\ndeal with the schedule Sit\u00a7"in any .tna.nn_e'r,as they like and<\/p>\n
deems fit."\n<\/p>\n
11. rayon} the said item of
\nproperty__wyas”‘*so’i’d1}.;:j_s_ not   the suit. After about
\n18 years of thVei’sa’iVe:V’of”property in favour of S.T.Jayaram,<\/p>\n
based on ‘the ii’egiVstere’d\u00bb- Chikka Byanna, by seeking<\/p>\n
 ame,,n_drne.nt of”rt..hVe plaint, a declaration has now been<\/p>\n
  Will dated 25.09.1986 is a concocted<\/p>\n
idocijrne”nt”a.ndidoes not bind the interest and share of the<\/p>\n
V . plaintiff and’ to declare the sale transaction effected by the<\/p>\n
Vi\u20ac1f&fe’n’dant on 05.07.1989 in favour of Mr.Brahma Deo<\/p>\n
.’  Prasa’d as a avyavaharika transaction, not binding on the<\/p>\n
T  “interest and share of the plaintiff. It is apparent that, the<\/p>\n
4′<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
being ex–facie barred by limitation and since it alters the
\ncharacter of the action and would cause prejudice to the
\ncontesting defendant, the triai court is not justified in
\npassing the impugned order. The impugned <\/p>\n
irrationai.\n<\/p>\n
In the resuit, the writ petition is al.!~ovveci~..a”i’i:d   <\/p>\n
impugned order is quashed. No costs. 3 <\/p>\n
However, it is made c|eaVr”~-t,hat,A’the .t_ria.!V Ac’o__’u’rt…s:ha|I
\ndecide the suit on its rjnerit a,n.ci:’i~n_ ‘a.ccordan.ce with law,<\/p>\n
un–infIuenced by any of*the’–c_oias}erKi–ati.o’ns_ made above,<\/p>\n
which 1′-i__are_–  _fovr_:”‘consideration of prayer for
\na men d m ent of th  \u00a73.’I’8\u00a2\u00a7’Ii.f:,.’  4′ V.\n<\/p>\n
Edi”:\n<\/p>\n
jadqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda .1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23R” DAY or NOVEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.33391\/2010 (C-;M~cp_c,)’–TV”7’Tf3 K BETWEEN: C.Narayana @ Babe; S\/0. late Chikka Byanna, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nC Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-23T23:57:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-23T23:57:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1553,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\",\"name\":\"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-23T23:57:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-23T23:57:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-23T23:57:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010"},"wordCount":1553,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010","name":"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-23T23:57:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-narayana-babu-vs-smt-vijaya-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C Narayana @ Babu vs Smt Vijaya on 23 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}