{"id":88653,"date":"2011-03-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011"},"modified":"2018-08-20T12:11:16","modified_gmt":"2018-08-20T06:41:16","slug":"rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Harsha Devani,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/800020\/2008\t 5\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 8000 of 2008\n \n\nwith\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC. APPLIATION NO.8361 OF 2008\n \n\n \n \n==========================================\n\n\n \n\nRAJESH\nMOHANBHAI PATEL & 8 - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================\n \nAppearance : \nMR\nAJ SHASTRI for Applicant(s) : 1 - 9. \nMR MR\nMENGDEY, ADD. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, \nMR VM\nPANCHOLI for Respondent(s) : 2, \nMR BHARAT J JOSHI for\nRespondent(s) : 2, \n==========================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 06\/08\/2009 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
Rule.\n<\/p>\n
\t Mr.M.R.Mengdey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service
\n\tof notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1   State of
\n\tGujarat. Mr.V.M.Pancholi, learned advocate waives service of notice
\n\tof rule on behalf of the respondent No.2.\n<\/p>\n
Having
\n\tregard to the facts of the case and by consent of the learned
\n\tadvocates for the parties, the matters are taken up for hearing
\n\ttoday.\n<\/p>\n
Since
\n\tboth these applications arise out of the same complaint, the same
\n\tare taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this
\n\tcommon order.\n<\/p>\n
By
\n\tthis petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
\n\t1973 (the Code), the applicants seek quashment of the complaint
\n\tbeing Inquiry Case No.7 of 2008 pending before the learned Judicial
\n\tMagistrate First Class, at Dakor.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tfacts of the case stated briefly are that the respondent No.2 herein
\n\thad lodged the above referred complaint before the learned Judicial
\n\tMagistrate First Class, at Dakor alleging commission of the offences
\n\tpunishable under Sections 120-B, 167, 192, 196, 463, 464, 467, 468,
\n\t469, 470 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code against the applicants.\n<\/p>\n
It
\n\tappears that during the pendency of the petition, the parties have
\n\tsettled the disputes between them, which has been reduced in writing
\n\tby a compromise deed dated 1st September, 2008.\n<\/p>\n
Mr.Vishal
\n\tMehta, learned advocate for Mr.A.J.Shashtri, learned advocate for
\n\tthe applicants in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.8000 of 2008
\n\tand Mr.Anvesh Vyas, learned advocate for Mr.N.K.Majmudar, learned
\n\tadvocate for the applicants in Criminal Miscellaneous Application
\n\tNo.8361 of 2008, have jointly submitted that in view of the fact
\n\tthat the parties have settled the disputes between them, the
\n\tcomplaint in question is required to be quashed in the interest of
\n\tjustice.\n<\/p>\n
Mr.V.M.Pancholi,
\n\tlearned advocate for the respondent No.2   complainant has
\n\tsubmitted that in view of the settlement arrived at between the
\n\tparties, the respondent No.2 is no longer interested in prosecuting
\n\tthe applicants and as such, he has no objection if the complaint in
\n\tquestion is quashed.\n<\/p>\n
This
\n\tCourt has also heard Mr.M.R.Mengdey, learned Additional Public
\n\tProsecutor for the respondent No.1   State of Gujarat.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tNikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation and
\n\tanother,
\n\t(2008)9 SCC 677, the Apex Court has held that when a compromise has
\n\tbeen arrived at between the parties, by which the parties have
\n\twithdrawn all claims and allegations against each other,
\n\ttechnicality should not be allowed to stand in the way in quashing
\n\tthe criminal proceedings since the same would be a futile exercise.\n<\/p>\n
\tIn
\n\tMadan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab,<\/a> (2008)4 SCC 582,
\n\tthe Apex Court has made the following observations :\n<\/p>\n
\t [6]\tWe
\n\tneed to emphasise that it is perhaps advisable that in disputes
\n\twhere the question involved is of a purely personal nature, the
\n\tcourt should ordinarily accept the terms of the compromise even in
\n\tcriminal proceedings as keeping the matter alive with no possibility
\n\tof a result in favour of the prosecution is a luxury which the
\n\tcourts, grossly overburdened as they are, cannot afford and that the
\n\ttime so saved can be utilized in deciding more effective and
\n\tmeaningful litigation.  This is a common sense approach to the
\n\tmatter based on ground of realities and bereft of the technicalities
\n\tof the law.\n<\/p>\n
\tHaving
\n\tregard to the allegations made in the first information report, it
\n\tis evident that the same are purely personal in nature.   Subsequent
\n\tto the lodging of the complaint, the parties i.e. the applicants and
\n\tthe respondent No.2   complainant have amicably settled the
\n\tdisputes between them, which has been reduced in writing in the form
\n\tof the compromise deed dated 1st September 2008, wherein
\n\tit is recorded that pursuant to the complaint in question, the
\n\tpolice had started investigation in connection with the said
\n\toffence;  that due to intervention of leaders of the community and
\n\tthe village, the parties have settled the matter between them and
\n\tboth the sides  have, without any force, willingly settled the
\n\tmatter between them. Under the compromise recorded between the
\n\tparties, the respondent No.2   complainant has agreed that in the
\n\tproceedings under Section 482 of the Code filed before this Court,
\n\tthe present compromise deed would be produced and that the parties
\n\twould agree that the complaint be quashed in the interest of
\n\tjustice.\n<\/p>\n
\tConsidering
\n\tthe facts of the case, in the light of the decisions cited
\n\thereinabove, this Court is of the view that as the parties have
\n\tamicably settled the disputes between them, which even otherwise are
\n\tpersonal in nature, no useful purpose would be served by permitting
\n\tthe prosecution to continue.  Besides, in view of the amicable
\n\tsettlement arrived at between the parties, chances of an ultimate
\n\tconviction are also bleak.  In the circumstances, this is a fit case
\n\tfor exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Code to secure the
\n\tends of justice.\n<\/p>\n
\tFor
\n\tthe foregoing reasons, the petition succeeds and is, accordingly,
\n\tallowed.  Inquiry Case No.7 of 2008 pending before the learned
\n\tJudicial Magistrate First Class, at Dakor, is hereby quashed. Rule
\n\tis made absolute accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
\tRegistry
\n\tis directed to place a copy of this order in both the applications.\n<\/p>\n
\tDirect
\n\tservice is permitted.\n<\/p>\n
[HARSHA
\nDEVANI, J.]<\/p>\n
parmar*<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 Author: Harsha Devani,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/800020\/2008 5\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 8000 of 2008 with CRIMINAL MISC. APPLIATION NO.8361 OF 2008 ========================================== RAJESH MOHANBHAI PATEL & 8 – Applicant(s) Versus STATE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-20T06:41:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T06:41:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":868,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T06:41:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-20T06:41:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T06:41:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011"},"wordCount":868,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011","name":"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T06:41:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-state-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajesh vs State on 31 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}