{"id":88768,"date":"2009-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-27T19:56:40","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T14:26:40","slug":"m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 18\"!\" DAY OF NOVEMBER :&gt;;Ij3\"o--O\"'~._: \n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE I-IONBLE MR. RD. DINAKARAN. CI+IIEE;iI_IS'IIcvE.V \n\nAND \n\nTHE HONBLE MRIIIISTICE'--V.O\u00ab.SABIIAIIIIf'_'  .\n\nWRIT APPEAL No.8'-.4I\u00a7j2O07 {I;I_~3;BI.-;?3. \nBETWEEN:   A ' V\n\nI MNPOONACHA '\nS\/O M.K.NANJAPPA _ .\nAGED ABO.U'I'41   .  I\nR \/AT NO,  IIAOCAUVERI ..I:III,'AYA -- I _\nBABUSIQPAISFA ,   . \n\n   \n\nBANCIAIXQREJ 43* \u00bb   Q APPELLANTIS)\n\n{By Sr:\/.\"SrIIt :\" SSE SIEAI',  _\nAND: \" ' V _ \nI BRUHA:['B1KNG.AI;k9RE..\n. MAHANAOARA PALIKE\n\n,.  BY I'IS\"--cOMI\\:IISSIONER\n N IARE BANGALORE\n\n   T \"'1'?I?I'x:', f5I'4\"Vf&lt;&quot;J&lt;;f:jII&#039;\u00a2$g.\u00a5. COMMISSIONER\n\n  %BRUIIAfI&quot;I3ANOAI.ORE\nI &#039;MAHAIIAOARA PALEKE\n N RSQUARE BANGALORE\n\n  *I&#039;I~IE&#039;:DEPU&#039;IY COMMISSIONER\n\n* =_(MARI&lt;E&#039;Ij\n BRUHAT BANGALORE\n&#039; &#039;MAHANAGARA PALEKE\nDASAPPA HOSPITAL COMPOUND\nII FLOOR BANGALORE)\n\n 4 THE A.SSfS&#039;FANT REVENUE\n\nOFFECIER {EAST}\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\nRASOOL MARKET OFFICE\nBANGALORE\n\n5 SANJEEVA GHOEL\nAGARWAL\nMAJOR\nS\/O LATE MAHENDRA\nSWARi\\iA GHOEL\nNO.306. 2ND MAIN\nDOMLUR LAYOUT   &#039;  -_ \u00ab. \nBANGALORE , _  iV2EsPc).N--L&#039;:EvNi&#039;{s);\n\n(By Sri\/Srnt : M\/S VISWANATH As&#039;sQciAi*Es,&#039; ADV. FDR R-1 &#039;DO\nR-4, M\/s.\\\/AGDEVI AssD(;iATE.s;&quot;&#039;Eo_R R451 &quot; &quot;\n\n* **4$$$*&#039;\n\nTHIS w}?I9.ApPEAL LS --EiLED&quot;&#039;U}:s..4...TDE THE KARNATAKA\nHIGH comm Ae&#039;1*i&#039;1i9.aAYm;s_*iD S&#039;f\u00a53&#039;I&#039;*AS1_DE THE ORDER PASSED\nIN THE wRir_PE&#039;fI=&#039;}&#039;ioN No;i6v575.4&#039;\/200?? DATED 18\/04\/2007.\n\nTHIS  ON FOR PRELIMINARY\nHEARING ON &#039;ri~iisfjjDA\u00a5,_lA&quot;&#039;\u00bbsABHAH1T J.. DELIVERED THE\nF&#039;OLLOWli\\lC--.;_&#039;--ll . &#039; 7  \n\n \n\n&quot;\u00bbJUDGMENT\n\n ;&#039;w:r:ilt..appeal is filed by the petitioner in\n\n-  being aggrieved by the order dated\n\n&#039;V._?18\/4\/2V(5(}7 wherein, the learned Single Judge of this\n\n&quot;:ifCDi:,ii&#039;i:_l has- declined to interfere with the impugned\n\n preceeding leading up to the passing of the order dated\n\n&#039;T7\/4\/200? in the matter of shop premises bearing\n\n \n\nx\ufb01\n\n \n\n\n\ndirection to the respondent not to interfere with the<\/pre>\n<p>possession over the Ashop premises, <\/p>\n<p>possession of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Learned Single Judge :k\ufb01:i:&#8217;t\u20acI?.\ufb02:&#8217; the<\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing for the petitilonelr <\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing for the   No.1 by<br \/>\nan order dated 18  petitioner has<br \/>\nput forth a false&#8217; ciairrr. the context of<br \/>\npartnership     into between<br \/>\nthe    fit case for not giving<br \/>\neffect  licence in favour of the<br \/>\npetitionerqm   was not the original<\/p>\n<p>iicenicee\/1esse.e&#8221; =at______al.1. If the authorities decline to<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;A\u00ab.a:\u00ab.:licence of this nature in favour of the<br \/>\n  be said that the right of the<br \/>\n  affected nor determined by the authorities<br \/>\n lll..:i&#8217;.gr:}\u00a2{..,,.r;-fvvlllthe petitioner has any such right against<br \/>\n&#8216;  respondent No.5 or against his predecessors, it is open<\/p>\n<p>if to the petitioner to make good that claim or right before<\/p>\n<p>any forum permitted in law and seek for consequential<\/p>\n<p>A-K<\/p>\n<p>relief thereupon. Accordingly, held that theregwas no<\/p>\n<p>scope for interference in the matter of this <\/p>\n<p>dismissed the writ petition. Being aggrieved  <\/p>\n<p>order dated 18\/-4\u00bb\/2007 dismissing thg_e&#8221;.wr,it  the &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has preferred this app\u00e9eallgfi<\/p>\n<p>4. We have heard theiuiearnged counselgvappearing<br \/>\nfor the appellant; &#8220;&#8216;&#8211;.lxcarrAi_edl.g&#8217; :Vcoi:inse1._ appearing for<br \/>\nrespondents into 4 arid-tlg1e&#8221;lefari1.e&#8217;d {coliinsel appearing<\/p>\n<p>for respondent    <\/p>\n<p>  appearing for the appellant<br \/>\nsubmivttelq.  already been transferred<\/p>\n<p>in  narne  the petitioner and by the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>the-fsariie was cancelled and the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n<p>   the writ petition instead of giving<\/p>\n<p>liberty petitioner to work out his remedy in<\/p>\n<p> V&#8221;aCc0rda.nce with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n<p> for respondents submitted that petitioner was not the<\/p>\n<p>original licensee and the entry was made wrongly.<\/p>\n<p>7. We have given careful consideration.-=t_o the<br \/>\ncontentions of the learned counsel app\u20acEiTiIi\u00a7i&#8221;fdI7,.&#8217;V.th\u20ac<\/p>\n<p>parties and scrutinized the material on record..   &#8216;M<\/p>\n<p>8. The material on record,wouId7 clea1*i3}&#8221;shotw.&#8217;that<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has not produced \u00abany &#8216;material&#8217;v:to{.s\u00abh.Qwi thatf&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>he was entitled to get the  name<br \/>\nas even according  of the 5:11<br \/>\nrespondent M . S iGhQe&#8217;i ~     partnership<br \/>\ndeed on     There is no<br \/>\nI&#8217;1&#8217;1a'[\u20acl&#8217;1&#8217;VvaI__VvlIf;&#8217;J5fi1*i}\u00a75\/H   was the original<br \/>\nIicencee  cancellation, an entry was<br \/>\ngot done by suppressing the fact and<\/p>\n<p>cont\u00a7end&#8217;ing thatw.h&#8217;e&#8217;_&#8217;vJas the original Iicencee has been<\/p>\n<p> \u00bbrigh_tly.,  It is well settled that mere entry in the<\/p>\n<p>Katina  confer any title over the property and<\/p>\n<p> the \u00e9\u00e9sarne  always subject to declaration that may be<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;..\ufb02grari\u00abted before the Civil Court and there is serious<\/p>\n<p> dispute about the succession to the property and<\/p>\n<p> therefore, it is for the parties to approach the Civil<\/p>\n<p>Court and-obtain necessary declaration and thereafter,<\/p>\n<p>make an application for change of entry in the=.__Katha<\/p>\n<p>and therefore. an order passed by the learhed-._S.ii1gle<\/p>\n<p>Judge is justified and does not suffer from: <\/p>\n<p>illegality as to Call for interfer.enceAin&#8217;_;<\/p>\n<p>appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Accordingly, thelltappeaih   with<br \/>\nliberty to the   out his<br \/>\nremedy in aceordancewwvith ffivil Court shall<br \/>\ndispose of    Without being<\/p>\n<p>influenced   Katha as the same is<\/p>\n<p>disputed ._andl1&#8217;\u00e9.s-:.\u00a7bg;\u00a7cit.:fo&#8211;.ti1e decision in the suit.<\/p>\n<p> _____   Itgs\ufb01cg<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n<p> p   lrifdexz Yes\/No<br \/>\n&#8216;V V  A\u00bb  Web Host: Yes\/No<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;mvs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18&#8243;!&#8221; DAY OF NOVEMBER :&gt;;Ij3&#8243;o&#8211;O&#8221;&#8216;~._: PRESENT THE I-IONBLE MR. RD. DINAKARAN. CI+IIEE;iI_IS&#8217;IIcvE.V AND THE HONBLE MRIIIISTICE&#8217;&#8211;V.O\u00ab.SABIIAIIIIf&#8217;_&#8217; . WRIT APPEAL No.8&#8242;-.4I\u00a7j2O07 {I;I_~3;BI.-;?3. BETWEEN: A &#8216; V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-27T14:26:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-27T14:26:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":556,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\",\"name\":\"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-27T14:26:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-27T14:26:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-27T14:26:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009"},"wordCount":556,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009","name":"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-27T14:26:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-n-poonacha-vs-bruhat-bangalore-mahanagara-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M N Poonacha vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara &#8230; on 18 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88768","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88768\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}