{"id":89029,"date":"2009-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2"},"modified":"2014-12-11T23:04:54","modified_gmt":"2014-12-11T17:34:54","slug":"narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
7' PETER PRAKASH\nAGED '.20 YEARS\n53\/ C) RAYAPPA\n\nRESPONDENT N031 TO 7  '<\/pre>\n
R\/AT GANJAM, SRIRANGAPATNA TOWN __ ~ _ <\/p>\n
8 TOWN MUNICEPAL COUNCIL
\nSRIRANGAPATNA
\nBY1TSCHIEE’Oi3’F’ICER I    ” ”  ”\n<\/p>\n
SRERANGAPATNA   RE:fSP(>I\u00a7II\u00a7}.E,}I>\u00a7T{fS <\/p>\n
(BY SR1 RAJENDRA s ANKALKOTI  :22 ‘1?-ot R1’:=:I  ‘ ”<\/p>\n
THIS RSA IS F1IE;_D”‘\u00bb~..U\/:5; V3.\u00a7)c:},0E*’~–cP<: AGAINST "rm;
\nJUDGEMENT 85 macaw. =I;)*I':.25II-I..f.;\u00bb.::\u00a70-5_ PASSED IN<\/p>\n
R.A.NO.68\/95?' Q_r~1"*rH.s I"IIjI:.I\u00a7:"'=~r:;sI'\u00ab'g 'I'HE. ADDL. CIVIL JUBGE
\n(SR.{}N), SRiRA'i\u00a5\u00a5fT?APA'3'Z\\fA,"=131SEi'1ISS'\u00a7NG THE APPEAL AND
\nCONF'IRMING_ '*z,'HE'::::,IIL;L*Ic:.I<zI.E;I~:*1*'-~-IwI:s DEGREE D'I'.2.8. I997
\nFASSEEI IN o'.'-s;No,2?55,*.$9'~w..oNT-III; FILE 01? THE PRL. CIVIL
\nJUEKEE E-JR.'-Di\u00e9}, SP\u20aciE?ANGAPA'FNA(<\/p>\n
'I'HIs=-;I9PEA'L eii\u00e9\u00a71\u00bbIII\u00a7i';:\u00a7k:V9:'~: FOR ADMISSION 'FHiS my,
\nTHE COURT D\u00abF2LiVEF3ED'._TH*E FOLLOWING:
\n:"u V_ QEDGMENT<\/p>\n
   \u00e9ijgigg\ufb02ant herein is the second defendant in<\/p>\n
 ()._ The respondent Nos.1 to 3?' herein were<\/p>\n
the   the said suit and were seeking for the<\/p>\n
'j1;ciVgx3aefz:I;1;; and decree of declara\ufb01ctm and permanent<\/p>\n
 _ izf1\u00a721n_I\u00a7ti0n, in respect of the suit schtt\u00e9ule property. The Trial<\/p>\n
VA    a\ufb01xsr noticing tbs rival contentious and on analysing<\/p>\n
VV the evirience has dacxeed the suit by its judgment dated<\/p>\n
IL<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
02.08.1993′. The defendants were therefore before th.evVLe{ver<\/p>\n
Appellate Conn: in R.A.No.68\/1997. The <\/p>\n
Court on re–appIec:iati011 of the evidence has–\u00bb  ” <\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings of the Trial Court and diisizglisse\u00e9zi. fj%:1ie \u00a3;Lp”pe\u00e91\u00bb   T<\/p>\n
judgment eiated 25.1}..2005.,*    <\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings relldered by the Courtsx\ufb01elxoiv,   defendant
\naione is before this  .evi’1*e refe1’1’ed to in the
\nsame rank as assigned    Court for the<\/p>\n
gurposse of conraeiiieiice  ck-iI1’tj,r. ‘  u <\/p>\n
2:V;f1’he’ -for “the appellant While assaiiing
\nthe judgmezjts paisseiii’  Ceurte below wouid contend<\/p>\n
that  \u20acou1*\u00a3e”E3eiew xxfere not gustified in their conclusion.<\/p>\n
 Vft*i’:\u00ab;7V}”ca;’3;A1:e:11s:i:ei;iVii1at when the plaintiffs had placed reliance<\/p>\n
Len’:a$’1_1V.uI;.t9egis\u00a3eV:’eii sale deed, the burden was heavier on the<\/p>\n
p1aiii1;if1’s’;:_”tk:3-.;:j”z*o\\se the case. It 13 contended that the Courts<\/p>\n
  izeiejnz leave wrongly Jfelied on the said \u00e9oeument ten heid that<\/p>\n
  had pmved title 1:0 the property. 011 the other<\/p>\n
%   ..i1::e1d, according to the Iearneci counsel, the deiexzdanis has?<\/p>\n
Vprodueed su\ufb01ieieni: documents to indica\u00e9e that the<\/p>\n
45<\/span><\/p>\n
defendants are the (3″\u00a7\u00a5I}\u20acf.E{‘:”-i cf the property age! are in<\/p>\n
possession of ihe same and thexefme, the Trial Ceu:f:’eeeu_1d<\/p>\n
not have disear\u00e9ed the said evicienee only on z_1;t\ufb01’.ie.i11g_: ihe <\/p>\n
fact that the Tewn Municieai Council haci not..;)_fcyiueed._a\ufb01}?”  <\/p>\n
records before the Court. In that <\/p>\n
since the maxmer of appxeciafien of tfhe evidence ‘bye: tile  *’<\/p>\n
Courts below is not sustaineB’1e:,”‘\u00bb the jiizigineilt for<\/p>\n
interference by this \u00ab_<\/p>\n
39  *  respondents however
\nsought  passed by the Ceurts below.\n<\/p>\n
1: is eo;1tez1\u00a3iedVV’o33.V\u00bbL:e1ia_Jf’ 25% the plaintijfs that the plairltiifs<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.1;ho’:i:g5i1   umegistereczi sale deed, the same<\/p>\n
  <Jf\u00b0eV1"f~}.04 and the value of the preperty was beiow<\/p>\n
Re; 1 — \u00e9eti_fE1eIefore, a saie made under such a document<\/p>\n
'euwas "val;1adt_ end the Ceurts below have noticed that the<\/p>\n
V' '\ufb02jdeetiment was more than 30 yeam old and had accepted the<\/p>\n
'  Same'; In ad\ufb02ition te the same, the Courts below have also<\/p>\n
" .'if1e:ti<:e:;i the other documents which were produced by the<\/p>\n
plam\ufb01\ufb02s in\ufb01ieating that the property stood in the name of<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
"4<\/p>\n
5. 011 the other hand, the defendants on appearigug<\/p>\n
before the Trial Court had \ufb02ied their wlitten statemen’te_”e12;fd<\/p>\n
had contended that the fifth. Ciefexzdant-‘I’ow::1_ ;Ve’r\u00bb::::ii\u00a2_;%\u00a7a\u00a7’ <\/p>\n
Council hati auctioned the property and ”<\/p>\n
dated 26.05.1973 was issued in  <\/p>\n
Pursuant to the same, the defe:1.dantS’~–‘_n\u00e9i\\’<\/p>\n
respect of the property and  the  cVe11not
\nclaim any right with    written<\/p>\n
statement, details were else   regard to the<\/p>\n
measm:emeef   aceerciingly, sought for
\ndismissaiof the  :  V ., ”\n<\/p>\n
4563″.’ 1:1 v;Viewu V_Vv;}f”  five} contentions urged, the ‘i’1::ia1<\/p>\n
Vcoufi; f1’2:f11eE1’~.g2s mazxy as \ufb01ve issues for its consideration.<\/p>\n
   VV examined herself as PW-=1 anti three<\/p>\n
Wit11x3_f\u00a7S\u20acS’$E?\u00a2\u00a7?\u20ac examined as PWs.2 tea 4 and the documents<\/p>\n
   its ?28 were marker}. On behalf of the defen\ufb01axzts,<\/p>\n
   defendant had examined himself as \ufb02W~1 and<\/p>\n
  hezse\u00e9mined witnesses at DWS.2 and 3 and the documents at<\/p>\n
 E}:{s.\u00a731 is D}? were marked. In the background of the<\/p>\n
evidence tendered by the parties, the Couris below have<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
‘u<\/p>\n
Municipality who was the \ufb01\ufb01h defendant before <\/p>\n
Court has not supported the case of the seconci.  .<\/p>\n
who Ck\ufb01nmd \ufb01ghtto ux:;nnpeny, Ike men &e\u00e9ussmus’*<\/p>\n
made by the Courts below woulei-1′ :%n:;i[ie..rite\u00ab<\/p>\n
Ciourts have referred to the evi\u00a7_:ie.1}ce \u00e9\ufb01rajiahle   *<\/p>\n
the manner cf appreciation of tirie-;e:vi-;};e13.ee”iz: 33′::y \ufb02ew dees
\nnot indicate perversity.’  _ <\/p>\n
the evidence  tyeve  at a \ufb01nding of fact and when
\nthere is  St1_l\u00ab)Vs4fan;’\u00e9iz’a_1′:L””qJuestion of Law arising for<\/p>\n
eonsi\ufb01era\ufb01o\ufb01 in the present appeal, I do not see any reason<\/p>\n
.   theiii\ufb01lgments passe\u00e9 by the Courts below.<\/p>\n
    appeei being devoid of merit stands<\/p>\n
diSppsed~0ff_3\u00a36 order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
Sdf\u00e9
\n}u&g\u00e9<\/p>\n
VV J’I’\/ {Isms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna 7′ PETER PRAKASH AGED ‘.20 YEARS 53\/ C) RAYAPPA RESPONDENT N031 TO 7 ‘ R\/AT GANJAM, SRIRANGAPATNA TOWN __ ~ _ 8 TOWN MUNICEPAL COUNCIL SRIRANGAPATNA BY1TSCHIEE’Oi3’F’ICER I ” ” ” SRERANGAPATNA RE:fSP(>I\u00a7II\u00a7}.E,}I>\u00a7T{fS (BY SR1 RAJENDRA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNarasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-11T17:34:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Narasoji Rao S\\\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\\\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-11T17:34:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":945,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Narasoji Rao S\\\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\\\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-11T17:34:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Narasoji Rao S\\\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\\\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-11T17:34:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-11T17:34:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2"},"wordCount":945,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2","name":"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-11T17:34:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasoji-rao-so-nagoji-rao-vs-joseph-mary-wo-rayappa-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Narasoji Rao S\/O Nagoji Rao vs Joseph Mary W\/O Rayappa on 29 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89029"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89029\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}